Skip to main content Accessibility help
Kant's Power of Imagination
  • Cited by 5

Kant's Power of Imagination

This Element is a study of how the power of imagination is, according to Kant, supposed to contribute to cognition. It is meant to be an immanent and a reconstructive endeavor, relying solely on Kant's own resources when he tries to determine what material, faculties, and operations are necessary for cognition of objects. The main discourse is divided into two sections. The first deals with Kant's views concerning the power of imagination as outlined in the A- and B- edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. The second focuses on the power of imagination in the first part of the Critique of Judgment.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the Element
  • Copyright

  • COPYRIGHT: © Rolf-Peter Horstmann 2018


Hide all
Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1902 Google Scholar
Kant’s text in The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992) Google Scholar
Paul Guyer , The Deduction of the Categories . In P. Guyer , ed., The Cambridge Companion to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, 118–150 CrossRef | Google Scholar
Peter Strawson , The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. London: Methuen, 1966, 40 Google Scholar
Paul Guyer , “Is There a Transcendental Imagination?” In Günter Abel , ed., Kreativität: XX. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie, Kolloquienbeiträge. Hamburg: Felix Meiner, 2006, 462 Google Scholar
Dieter Henrich demonstrated more than sixty years ago (in his “Über die Einheit der Subjektivität,” Philosophische Rundschau 5, 3, 1955, 28–69 Google Scholar
Michael L. Thompson , ed., Imagination in Kant’s Critical Philosophy. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2013 CrossRef | Google Scholar
Paul Guyer , “The Project of the Transcendental Deduction.” In Ralph Schumacher , ed., Idealismus als Theorie der Repräsentation? Paderborn: Mentis, 2001, 318 Google Scholar
Rolf-Peter Horstmann , “The Metaphysical Deduction in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason.” Philosophical Forum 13, 1981, 32–47 Google Scholar
H. Vaihinger in his Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, vol. 2, Stuttgart: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft, 1892, 30 Google Scholar
Béatrice Longuenesse also hints at this ambiguity in her Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000, 24 Google Scholar
H. Allison in a footnote in Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. Rev. and enl. edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004, 484 CrossRef | Google Scholar
S. Gibbons , Kant’s Theory of Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994, 18 Google Scholar
Martin Heidegger’s attempt (Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, Bonn: Friedrich Cohen, 1929, 153 Google Scholar
H. Ginsborg , in The Normativity of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015, 55 Google Scholar
S. Grüne , Blinde Anschauung. Die Rolle von Begriffen in Kants Theorie sinnlicher Synthesis. Frankfurt: Klostermann, 2009 Google Scholar
K. Vorderobermeier , Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Zur transzendentallogischen Entfaltung des Gegenstandsbezugs bei Kant. Berlin: de Gruyter, 2012 CrossRef | Google Scholar
P. Kitcher , Kant’s Transcendental Psychology, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990 Google Scholar
J. McDowell , Having the World in View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009 Google Scholar
Kant’s Anatomy of the Intelligent Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 5 Google Scholar
F. Hughes (Kant’s Aesthetic Epistemology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2007 Google Scholar
K. Ameriks puts it in the preface to the second edition of his Kant’s Theory of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000 CrossRef | Google Scholar
D. Henrich in his Werke im Werden. Über die Genesis philosophischer Einsichten. München: C. H. Beck, 2011 Google Scholar
T. Burge , Origins of Objectivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 CrossRef | Google Scholar
Paul Guyer , Harmony of the Faculties Revisited, in Values of Beauty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 CrossRef | Google Scholar
H. Allison , Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 CrossRef | Google Scholar
P. Guyer , Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979 Google Scholar
J. Kulenkampff , Kants Logik des ästhetischen Urteils. 2. erw. Aufl., Frankfurt a.M.: Klostermann, 1994 CrossRef | Google Scholar
J. Kneller in her Kant and the Power of Imagination (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 CrossRef | Google Scholar
P. Guyer (Harmony of the Faculties Revisited. In Values of Beauty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005 CrossRef | Google Scholar
J. Haag (Erfahrung und Gegenstand. Klostermann Verlag: Frankfurt 2007, 279 Google Scholar
H. Johnstone , ed., Categories: A Colloquium. Philadelphia, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1978, 231 Google Scholar
R. Butts ( Kant’s Schemata as Semantical Rules . In L. W. Beck , ed., Kant Studies Today. LaSalle, IL: Open Court Press, 1969, 290–300 Google Scholar
E. R. Curtius , (“ Das Schematismuskapitel in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft.” Kant Studien 19, 1914, 338–366 CrossRef | Google Scholar
R. Pippin , “The Schematism and Empirical Concepts.” Kant Studien 67, 1976, 156–171 CrossRef | Google Scholar


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.