Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
  • Home
Element
Global Climate Governance
Series: Elements in Public and Nonprofit Administration

Global Climate Governance

Climate change is one of the most daunting global policy challenges facing the international community in the 21st century. This Element takes stock of the current state of the global climate change regime, illuminating scope for policymaking and mobilizing collective action through networked governance at all scales, from the sub-national to the highest global level of political assembly. It provides an unusually comprehensive snapshot of policymaking within the regime created by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), bolstered by the 2015 Paris Agreement, as well as novel insight into how other formal and informal intergovernmental organizations relate to this regime, including a sophisticated EU policymaking and delivery apparatus, already dedicated to tackling climate change at the regional level. It further locates a highly diverse and numerous non-state actor constituency, from market actors to NGOs to city governors, all of whom have a crucial role to play.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the Element

  • Copyright

  • COPYRIGHT: © David Coen, Julia Kreienkamp and Tom Pegram 2020

References

Hide all
Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4),571–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Acuto, M. (2013). Global Cities, Governance and Diplomacy. The Urban Link. London: Routledge. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Acuto, M., and Rayner, S. (2016). City networks: breaking gridlocks or forging (new) lock-ins? International Affairs, 92(5),1147–66. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Adaptation Fund (n.d.). Website of the Adaptation Fund [online]. www.adaptation-fund.org/. Google Scholar
Aengenheyster, M., Feng, Q. Y., van der Ploeg, F., and Dijkstra, H. A. (2018). The point of no return for climate action: effects of climate uncertainty and risk tolerance. Earth System Dynamics, 9, 1085–95. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Agrawala, S. (1998). Structural and process history of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climatic Change, 39(4),621–42. Google Scholar
Aklin, M., and Mildenberger, M. (2018). ‘Prisoners of the wrong dilemma: why distributive conflict, not collective action, characterizes the politics of climate change.’ SSRN Working Paper [online]. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3281045. Google Scholar
Allan, J., et al. (2020). A net-zero emissions economic recovery from COVID-19. SSEE Working Paper, No. 20–01. Oxford Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment [online]. 4 May 2020. www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/publications/wpapers/workingpaper20-01.pdf. Google Scholar
Alter, K. J, . and Raustiala, K. (2018). The rise of international regime complexity. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 14, 329–49. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Andonova, L. B. (2017). Governance Entrepreneurs: International Organizations and the Rise of Global Public-Private Partnerships. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Andonova, L. B., and Levy, M. A. (2003). Franchising global governance: Making sense of the Johannesburg type II partnerships. In Stokke, O. S. and Thommessen, O., eds., Yearbook of International Co-operation on Environment and Development 2003/2004. London: Earthscan, 19–31. Google Scholar
Antonich, B. (2019). Number of climate adaptation projects increases, so must their quality. SDG Knowledge Hub [online]. 21 March 2019. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). https://sdg.iisd.org/news/adaptation-finance-update-number-of-climate-adaptation-projects-increases-so-must-their-quality/. Google Scholar
Appleby, K. (2019). What the 1.5°C-degree report means for city climate action. CDP Blog [online]. 18 September 2019. www.cdp.net/en/articles/cities/what-the-15 c-degree-report-means-for-city-climate-action. Google Scholar
Arroyo, V. (2018). The global climate action summit: increasing ambition during turbulent times. Climate Policy, 18(9),1087–93. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Averchenkova, A. (2019). Legislating for a low carbon and climate resilient transition: learning from international experiences. Elcano Policy Paper [online]. January 2019. Madrid: Real Instituto Elcano. www.realinstitutoelcano.org/wps/wcm/connect/130a3d55-dd9f-4ce1-ac04-a3caf5910edf/Policy-Paper-2019-Legislating-low-carbon-climate-resilient-transition.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CACHEID=130a3d55-dd9 f-4ce1-ac04-a3caf5910edf. Google Scholar
Averchenkova, A., Fankhauser, S., and Finnegan, J. (2018). The role of independent bodies in climate governance: the UK’s Committee on Climate Change [online]. October 2018. London: The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science. www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/The-role-of-independent-bodies-in-climate-governance-the-UKs-Committee-on-Climate-Change_Averchenkova-et-al.pdf. Google Scholar
Ayers, J. (2011). Resolving the adaptation paradox: exploring the potential for deliberative adaptation policy-making in Bangladesh. Global Environmental Politics, 11(1),62–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: the rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3),74–102. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., and Elgström, O. (2013). The EU’s role in climate change negotiations: from leader to ‘leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10),1369–86. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., and Kuyper, J. W. (2017). The democratic legitimacy of orchestration: the UNFCCC, non-state actors, and transnational climate governance. Environmental Politics, 26(4),764–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., and Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: from Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4),561–79. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., and Lövbrand, E. (2016). The road to Paris: contending climate governance discourses in the post-Copenhagen era. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18, 1–19. Google Scholar
Barnard, A. (2019). A ‘Climate Emergency’ was declared in New York City. Will that change anything? The New York Times [online]. 5 July 2019. www.nytimes.com/2019/07/05/nyregion/climate-emergency-nyc.html. Google Scholar
Barrett, S. (2007). Why Cooperate? The Incentive to Supply Global Public Goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Basu, J. (2019). Climate Emergency CoP 25: loss and damage ‘fighting out’ in Madrid. DownToEarth [online]. 13 December 2019. www.downtoearth.org.in/news/climate-change/climate-emergency-cop-25-loss-and-damage-fighting-out-in-madrid-68416. Google Scholar
Baur, D., and Schmitz, H. P. (2012). Corporations and NGOs: when accountability leads to co-optation. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1),9–21. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Beck, S. (2012). Between tribalism and trust: the IPCC under the ‘public microscope’. Nature and Culture, 7(2),151–73. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Beck, S., and Mahony, M. (2018). The IPCC and the new map of science and politics. WIREs Climate Change, 9(6),e547, 1–16. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Benvenisti, E., and Downs, G.W. (2007). The empire’s new clothes: political economy and the fragmentation of international law. Stanford Law Review, 60(2),595–631. Google Scholar
Benson, D., and Lorenzoni, I. (2014). Examining the scope for national lesson‐drawing on climate governance. Political Quarterly, 85(2),202–11. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Benzie, M., et al. (2018). Meeting the global challenge of adaptation by addressing transboundary climate risk. Discussion Brief. Stockholm Environment Institute [online]. www.sei.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/meetingtheglobalchallengeofadaptation.pdf. Google Scholar
Berg, M., and Lidskog, R. (2018). Pathways to deliberative capacity: the role of the IPCC. Climatic Change, 148(1–2), 11–24. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Berglund, N. (2018). Solheim resigns as UN climate chief. News in English Norway [online]. 20 November 2018. www.newsinenglish.no/2018/11/20/solheim-resigns-as-un-climate-chief/. Google Scholar
Berliner, D., and Prakash, A. (2015). ‘Bluewashing’ the firm? voluntary regulations, program design, and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact. Policy Studies Journal, 43(1),115–38. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bernstein, S., and Hoffman, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Science, 51, 189–211. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Bernstein, S., and Hoffmann, M. (2019). Climate politics, metaphors and the fractal carbon trap. Nature Climate Change, 9, 919–25. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Berny, N., and Rootes, C. (2018). Environmental NGOs at a crossroads? Environmental Politics, 27(6), 947–72. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Berwyn, B. (2020). Coronavirus already hindering climate science, but the worst disruptions are likely yet to come. Inside Climate News [online]. 27 March 2020. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/26032020/coronavirus-climate-science-research-impact. Google Scholar
    Betsill, M. M. (2007). Regional governance of global climate change: the North American Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Global Environmental Politics, 7(2),11–27. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Betsill, M. M., and Bulkeley, H. (2006). Cities and the multilevel governance of global climate change. Global Governance, 12(2),141–59. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Bexell, M., and Mörth, U. (2010). Introduction: Partnerships, democracy and governance. In Bexell, M. and Mörth, U., eds., Democracy and Public-Private Partnerships in Global Governance. Baskingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 3–23. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Biermann, F. and Boas, I. (2010). Global adaptation governance: setting the stage. In Biermann, F., Pattberg, P. and Zelli, F., eds., Global Climate Governance beyond 2012: Architecture, Agency and Adaptation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 223–34. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H., and Zelli, F. (2009). The fragmentation of global governance architectures: a framework for analysis. Global Environmental Politics, 9(4),14–40. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Blackstock, J. J., et al. (2009). Climate Engineering Responses to Climate Emergencies. Santa Barbara, CA: Novim [online]. 29 July 2009. https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0907/0907.5140.pdf. Google Scholar
    Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Agreement: a new hope? The American Journal of International Law, 110(2),288–319. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., and Rajamani, L. (2017). International Climate Change Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Bodansky, D. (2015). Reflections on the Paris conference. Opinio Juris [online]. 15 December 2015. http://opiniojuris.org/2015/12/15/reflections-on-the-paris-conference/. Google Scholar
    Bocse, A.-M. (2019). The UK’s decision to leave the European Union (Brexit) and its impact on the EU as a climate change actor. Climate Policy, 1–11. Google Scholar
    Borger, J. (2020). Caught in a superpower struggle: the inside story of the WHO’s response to coronavirus. The Guardian [online]. 18 April 2020. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/caught-in-a-superpower-struggle-the-inside-story-of-the-whos-response-to-coronavirus. Google Scholar
    Bouteligier, S. (2012). Inequality in new global governance arrangements: the North–South divide in transnational municipal networks. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(3),251–67. Google Scholar
    Broberg, M. (2020). Interpreting the UNFCCC’s provisions on ‘mitigation’ and ‘adaptation’ in light of the Paris Agreement’s provision on ‘loss and damage’. Climate Policy, 20(5),527–33. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Brown, L. D., Ebrahim, A., and Batliwala, S. (2012). Governing international advocacy NGOs. World Development, 40(6),1098–108. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Brown, K., Adger, W. N., and Cinner, J. E. (2019). Moving climate change beyond the tragedy of the commons. Global Environmental Change, 54, 61–3. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Brunnée, J., Doelle, M., and Rajamani, L. (2011). Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Bulkeley, H., et al. (2014). Transnational Climate Change Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Busby, J., and Hadden, J. (2014), Nonstate actors in the climate arena [online]. 19 November 2014. Sponsored by The Stanley Foundation, National Defense University, and World Future Society. www.stanleyfoundation.org/publications/working_papers/StanleyNonState_BusbyHadden.pdf. Google Scholar
    Busch, P.-O. (2009). The Climate Secretariat: making a living in a straitjacket. In Biermann, F. and Siebenhüner, B., eds., Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 245–64. Google Scholar
    Calliari, E., Surminski, S. and Mysiak, J. (2019). The politics of (and behind) the UNFCCC’s Loss and Damage Mechanism. In Mechler, R. et al., eds., Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options. Cham: Springer, 155–78. Google Scholar
    Carbon Brief (2018). COP-24: Key outcomes agreed at the UN climate talks in Katowice [online]. 16 December 2018. www.carbonbrief.org/COP-24-key-outcomes-agreed-at-the-un-climate-talks-in-katowice. Google Scholar
    Carrington, D. (2011). Q&A: ‘Climategate’. The Guardian [online]. 22 November 2011. www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/jul/07/climate-emails-question-answer. Google Scholar
    Cashore, B., and Bernstein, S. (2020). Bringing the environment back in: overcoming the tragedy of the diffusion of the commons metaphor. Substantially revised version of papers presented to the Ostrom Workshop at Indiana University, 23 April 23 2018, Bloomington, Indiana and the International Studies Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 3–7 April 2018. Google Scholar
    CCAC (n.d.). Terms of membership. Irish Climate Change Advisory Council (CCAC) [online]. www.climatecouncil.ie/aboutus/councilmembers/termsofcouncilmembership/. Google Scholar
    CCC (2019). Summary Report. 2019 Progress Report to Parliament [online]. July 2019. UK Committee on Climate Change. www.theccc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019-Progress-Report-Summary.pdf. Google Scholar
    CDP (n.d.) CDP website [online]. www.cdp.net/en. Google Scholar
    CEO (2019). Big Oil and Gas spent over 250 million euros lobbying the EU. Brussels: Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) [online]. 23 October 2019. https://corporateeurope.org/en/2019/10/big-oil-and-gas-spent-over-250-million-euros-lobbying-eu. Google Scholar
    Challies, E. and Newig, J. (2019). What is ‘environmental governance’? A working definition. Sustainability Governance [online]. https://sustainability-governance.net/2019/06/14/what-is-environmental-governance-a-working-definition/. Google Scholar
    Chan, S., and Amling, W. (2019). Does orchestration in the Global Climate Action Agenda effectively prioritize and mobilize transnational climate adaptation action? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19(4–5), 429–46. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Chan, S., et al. (2015). Reinvigorating international climate policy: a comprehensive framework for effective nonstate action. Global Policy, 6(4),466–73. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Chan, S., et al. (2018). Cooperative Climate Action: Global Performance & Delivery in the Global South. Research report published by the African Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS), the Blavatnik School of Government and Global Economic Governance Programme at the University of Oxford, the German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) and TERI University [online]. www.geg.ox.ac.uk/sites/geg.bsg.ox.ac.uk/files/2018–11/ClimateSouth%20-%20GCAS%20Brief.pdf. Google Scholar
    Chan, S., Brandi, C., and Bauer, S. (2016). Aligning transnational climate action with international climate governance: the road from Paris. RECIEL, 25(2),238–47. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Christoff, P. (2016). The promissory note: COP 21 and the Paris Climate Agreement. Environmental Politics, 25(5),765–87. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    CIEL (2019). It’s a crisis; act like it: COP-25 outcome inconsistent with urgency and ambition demanded to confront the climate crisis. Center for International Environmental Law [online]. www.ciel.org/news/its-a-crisis-act-like-it-COP-25-outcome-inconsistent-with-urgency-and-ambition-demanded-to-confront-the-climate-crisis/. Google Scholar
    Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., and Khan, M. (2013). The politics of international climate adaptation funding: justice and divisions in the greenhouse. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1),49–68. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Climate Action Tracker (2019). Warming projections. Global Update [online]. September 2019. https://climateactiontracker.org/documents/644/CAT_2019–09-19_BriefingUNSG_WarmingProjectionsGlobalUpdate_Sept2019.pdf. Google Scholar
    Climate Action Tracker (n.d.). EU Profile [online]. https://climateactiontracker.org/countries/eu/. Google Scholar
    Coen, D., and Pegram, T. (2018). Towards a third generation of global governance scholarship. Global Policy, 9(1),107–13. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Cogswell, N., and Dagnet, Y. (2019). Why does the Paris Climate Agreement need a rulebook? 7 questions and answers. World Resources Institute (WRI) [online]. www.wri.org/blog/2019/06/why-does-paris-climate-agreement-need-rulebook-7-questions-and-answers. Google Scholar
    Cole, D. H. (2015). Shared irresponsibilities in international climate law. In Nollkaemper, A. and Jacobs, D., eds., Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 290–320. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Conca, K. (2018). Is there a role for the UN Security Council on Climate Change? Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61(1),4–15. Google Scholar
    Corbera, E., Calvet-Mir, L., Hughes, H., and Paterson, M. (2016). Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. Nature Climate Change, 6, 94–99. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Council of the European Union (n.d.). Environment Council configuration (ENVI) [online]. www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/configurations/env/. Google Scholar
    Curtis, S. (2014). The Power of Cities in International Relations. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar
    Das, K., van Asselt, H., Droege, S., and Mehling, M. (2018). Making the international trade system work for climate change: assessing the options. Climate Strategies [online]. https://climatestrategies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/CS-Report-_Trade-WP4.pdf. Google Scholar
    Delbeke, J., and Vis, P. (2016). EU climate policy explained. European Union [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/eu_climate_policy_explained_en.pdf. Google Scholar
    Doelle, M. (2016). The Paris Agreement: historic breakthrough or high stakes experiment? Climate Law, 6(1–2),1–20. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Drexhage, J. (2008). Climate change and global governance: which way ahead? Global Environmental Governance (GEG) Briefing Paper, No. 2. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) [online]. April 2008. www.iisd.org/pdf/2008/geg_climate_gov.pdf. Google Scholar
    Drezner, D. W. (2009). The power and peril of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1),65–70. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Duggan, J. (2019). The role of sub-state and non-state actors in international climate processes: subnational governments [online]. Background Paper, January 2019. London: Chatham House. www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/publications/2019–01-23-Duggan.pdf. Google Scholar
    Dunne, D. (2018). Explainer: Ssx ideas to limit global warming with solar geoengineering. CarbonBrief [online]. 9 May 2018. www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-six-ideas-to-limit-global-warming-with-solar-geoengineering. Google Scholar
    Duwe, M. et al. (2017). ‘Paris compatible’ governance: long-term policy frameworks to drive transformational change. Ecologic Institute [online]. www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/2018/2138-governance-to-fight-climate-change-112018_0.pdf. Google Scholar
    Dyck, S. (2017). The Paris climate agreement and the protection of human rights in a changing climate. Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 26, 3–45. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    E360 (2015). Five questions for Bill McKibben on the Paris Climate Agreement. Yale Environment 360 [online]. 16 December 2015. https://e360.yale.edu/digest/five_questions_for_bill_mckibben_on_the_paris_climate_agreement. Google Scholar
    ETC Group (2009). The Emperor’s new climate: geoengineering as 21st century fairytale. ETC Group Special Report [online]. 28 August 2009. www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgroup.org/files/publication/pdf_file/etcspecialreport_rsgeoeng28aug09.pdf. Google Scholar
    Esty, D. C. (2009). Revitalizing global environmental governance for climate change. Global Governance, 15(4),427–434. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    European Commission (2018). EU-China leaders’ statement on climate change and clean energy [online]. Beijing, 16 July 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/news/20180713_statement_en.pdf. Google Scholar
    European Commission (2019). Ready, Steady, Green! LIFE helps farming and forestry adapt to climate change [online]. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/8119493 f-db52-11e9-9c4e-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-106529364. Google Scholar
    European Commission (n.d.a). 2050 long-term strategy [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/2050_en. Google Scholar
    European Commission (n.d.b). A European Green Deal [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019–2024/european-green-deal_en Google Scholar
    European Commission (n.d.c). Directorate-General for Climate Action (DG CLIMA) – What we do [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/about-us/mission_en. Google Scholar
    European Commission (n.d.d). National energy and climate plans (NECPs) [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/energy-climate-change-environment/overall-targets/national-energy-and-climate-plans-necps_en. Google Scholar
    European Commission (n.d.e.). Emissions monitoring & reporting [online]. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/strategies/progress/monitoring_en. Google Scholar
    European Environment Agency (2019). Annual European Union greenhouse gas inventory 1990–2017 and the inventory report 2019. Submission under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol. 27 May 2019. EEA/PUBL/2019/051. Google Scholar
    Fahys, J. (2020). In the face of a pandemic, climate activists reevaluate their tactics. Inside Climate News [online]. 20 March 2020. https://insideclimatenews.org/news/19032020/climate-change-activism-coronavirus. Google Scholar
    Falkner, R. (2016a). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5),1107–1125. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Falkner, R. (2016b). A minilateral solution for global climate change? on bargaining efficiency, club benefits, and international legitimacy. Perspectives on Politics, 14(1),87–101. Google Scholar
    Falkner, R. (2010). Business and global climate governance: a neo-pluralist perspective. In Ougaard, M. and Leander, A., eds., Business and Global Governance. London: Routledge, 99–117. Google Scholar
    Falkner, R., Stephan, H. and Vogler, J. (2010). International climate policy after Copenhagen: towards a ‘building blocks’ approach. Global Policy, 1(3),252–62. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Fankhauser, S., Averchenkova, A. and Finnegan, J. (2018). 10 years of the UK Climate Change Act. London: The Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy. London School of Economics and Political Science [online]. www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/10-Years-of-the-UK-Climate-Change-Act_Fankhauser-et-al.pdf. Google Scholar
    Farand, C. (2019). The UN asked for climate plans. Major economies failed to answer. Climate Home News [online]. 24 September 2019. www.climatechangenews.com/2019/09/24/un-asked-climate-plans-major-economies-failed-answer/. Google Scholar
    Farand, C. (2020). Guterres confronts China over coal boom, urging a green recovery. Climate Home News [online]. 23 July 2020. www.climatechangenews.com/2020/07/23/guterres-confronts-china-coal-boom-urging-green-recovery/. Google Scholar
    Fehl, C., and Thimm, J. (2019). Dispensing with the indispensable nation? multilateralism minus one in the Trump era. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 25(1),23–46. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Finck, M. (2014). Above and below the surface: the status of sub-national authorities in EU climate change regulation. Journal of Environmental Law, 26(3),443–72. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Forster, P. M., et al. (2020). Current and future global climate impacts resulting from COVID-19. Nature Climate Change, 1–15. Google Scholar
    G7 Information Centre (n.d.). Declaration of the 1979 G7 Summit [online]. Tokyo, 29 June 1979. www.g7.utoronto.ca/summit/1979tokyo/communique.html. Google Scholar
    G20 (2019). Safeguarding the planet [online]. https://g20.org/en/Documents/Safeguarding%20the%20Planet.pdf Google Scholar
    Garrelts, H., and Dietz, M. (2013). Introduction. In Dietz, M. and Garrelts, H., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Climate Change Movement. New York: Routledge, 1–15. Google Scholar
    Gehring, T., and Faude, B. (2013). The dynamics of regime complexes: microfoundations and systemic effects. Global Governance, 19(1),119–30. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gereke, M., and Brühl, T. (2019). Unpacking the unequal representation of Northern and Southern NGOs in international climate change politics. Third World Quarterly, 40(5),870–89. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    GGI (2018). Towards a third generation of global governance scholarship. The Global Governance Institute [online]. 21 May 2018. London: University College London. www.ucl.ac.uk/global-governance/news/2018/may/towards-third-generation-global-governance-scholarship. Google Scholar
    Gill, S. (2012). Organic crisis, global leadership and progressive alternatives. In Gill, S., ed., Global Crises and the Crisis of Global Leadership. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 233–54. Google Scholar
    Gollier, C., and Tirole, J. (2015). Negotiating effective institutions against climate change. Economics of Energy & Environmental Policy, 4(2),5–28. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Graham, E. R., and Thompson, A. (2015). Efficient orchestration? the global environment facility in the governance of climate adaptation. In Abott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D. and Zangl, B., eds., International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 114–38. Google Scholar
    Grasso, M., and Roberts, J. T. (2014). A compromise to break the climate impasse. Nature Climate Change, 4, 543–9. Google Scholar
    Grasso, M., and Vladimirova, K. (2020). A moral analysis of carbon majors’ role in climate change. Environmental Values, 29(2),175–95. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gray, B., and Purdy, J. (2018). Collaborating for Our Future: Multistakeholder Partnerships for Solving Complex Problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Green Climate Fund (n.d.). Website of the Green Climate Fund [online]. www.greenclimate.fund/home. Google Scholar
    Green, J. (2010). Private standards in the climate regime: the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. Business and Politics, 12(3),1–37. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Green, J. (2014). Rethinking Private Authority: Agents and Entrepreneurs in Global Environmental Governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
    Green, J. (2017). Don’t link carbon markets. Nature, 543, 484–6. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Green, J., Hale, T., and Colgan, J. D. (2019). The existential politics of climate change. Global Policy Blog [online]. 21 February 2019. www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/21/02/2019/existential-politics-climate-change. Google Scholar
    Grubb, M. (2016). Why it’s wrong to label the Kyoto Protocol a disaster. Climate Home News [online]. 10 June 2016. www.climatechangenews.com/2016/06/10/why-its-wrong-to-label-the-kyoto-protocol-a-disaster/. Google Scholar
    Gupta, A., and Mason, M. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? the politics of transparency in climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 82–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Haas, P. M., and Stevens, C. (2011). Organized science, usable knowledge, and multilateral environmental governance. In Lidskog, R. and Sundqvist, G., eds., Governing the Air: The Dynamics of Science, Policy, and Citizen Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 125–62. Google Scholar
    Haass, R. (2020). The pandemic will accelerate history rather than reshape it. Foreign Affairs [online]. 7 April 2020. www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020–04-07/pandemic-will-accelerate-history-rather-reshape-it. Google Scholar
    Hale, T. (2016). ‘All hands on deck’: The Paris Agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3),12–22. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hale, T. (2017). Climate change: from gridlock to catalyst. In Hale, T. and Held, D., eds., Beyond Gridlock. Cambridge: Polity Press, 184–204. Google Scholar
    Hale, T. (2019). UN climate talks must include cities, businesses or risk irrelevance. Climate Home News [online]. 9 October 2019. www.climatechangenews.com/2019/10/09/un-climate-talks-must-include-cities-businesses-risk-irrelevance/. Google Scholar
    Hall, N., and Persson, Å. (2018). Global climate adaptation governance: why is it not legally binding? European Journal of International Relations, 24(3),540–66. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Harari, Y. N. (2017). Nationalism vs. globalism: the new political divide. TED Dialogues [online video]. February 2017. www.ted.com/talks/yuval_noah_harari_nationalism_vs_globalism_the_new_political_divide. Google Scholar
    Harrison, N. E., and Geyer, R. (2019). The complexity of the governance of climate change. In A. Orsini et al., Forum: Complex Systems and International Governance. International Studies Review, 0, 21–4. Google Scholar
    Haufler, V. (2018). Producing global governance in the global factory: markets, politics, and regulation. Global Policy, 9(1),114–20. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Held, D., and Roger, C. (2018). Three models of global climate governance: From Kyoto to Paris and beyond. Global Policy, 9(4),527–37. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Helmore, E. (2019). Wall Street investment giants voting against key climate resolutions. The Guardian [online]. 17 September 2019. www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/sep/17/wall-street-asset-management-climate-change-blackrock-vanguard. Google Scholar
    Hermwille, L. (2018). Making initiatives resonate: how can non-state initiatives advance national contributions under the UNFCCC? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(3),447–66. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W., Ott, H. E., and Beuermann, C. (2017). UNFCCC before and after Paris: what’s necessary for an effective climate regime? Climate Policy, 17(2),150–70. Google Scholar
    Hickmann, T. (2017). The reconfiguration of authority in global climate governance. International Studies Review, 19(3),430–51. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hickmann, T., Widerberg, O., Lederer, M., and Pattberg, P. (2019). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 0(0),1–18. Google Scholar
    Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response After Kyoto. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Höhne, N. et al. (2017). The Paris Agreement: resolving the inconsistency between global goals and national contributions. Climate Policy, 17(1),16–32. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Holden, E. (2019). Climate crisis will not be discussed at G7 next year, says Trump official. The Guardian [online]. 17 October 2019. www.theguardian.com/world/2019/oct/17/g7-summit-2020-trump-climate-crisis. Google Scholar
    Ho-Lem, C., Zerriffi, H., and Kandlikar, M. (2011). Who participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and why: a quantitative assessment of the national representation of authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Global Environmental Change, 21(4),1308–17. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Homer-Dixon, T. (2007). The upside of down: catastrophe, creativity, and the renewal of civilization. Toronto: Vintage Canada. Google Scholar
    Hoppe, R., Wesselink, A., and Cairns, R. (2013). Lost in the problem: the role of boundary organisations in the governance of climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 4(4),283–300. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    HSBC (2019). COP 25: Intransigence: renegotiating a ‘pre-nup’ after the wedding’. HSBC Global Research [online]. 16 December 2019. www.research.hsbc.com/C/1/1/339/S2Bzwn7. Google Scholar
    Hsu, A., Moffat, A. S., Weinfurter, A. J., and Schwartz, J. D. (2015). Towards a new climate diplomacy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 501–3. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hulme, M. (2009). Why We Disagree About Climate Change. Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hunt, G. (Minister for the Environment) (2013). Streamlining government processes by dissolving the climate commission. Media release [online]. 19 September 2013. https://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22media%2Fpressrel%2F2736602%22;src1=sm1. Google Scholar
    IEA (2020). World energy balances: overview. Paris: International Energy Agency. www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-balances-overview. Google Scholar
    IPCC (1990). IPCC First Assessment Report. Policymaker Summary of Working Group I (Scientific Assessment of Climate Change) [online]. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/05/ipcc_90_92_assessments_far_wg_I_spm.pdf. Google Scholar
    IPCC (2018a). Summary for policymakers. In Masson-Delmotte, V. et al., eds., Global warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Google Scholar
    IPCC (2018b). Summary for Policymakers of IPCC Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5°C approved by governments [online]. 8 October 2018. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/2018/10/08/summary-for-policymakers-of-ipcc-special-report-on-global-warming-of-1-5 c-approved-by-governments/. Google Scholar
    IPCC (n.d.). The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change – Homepage [online]. www.ipcc.ch/. Google Scholar
    IPCC-TFI (n.d.). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [online]. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) – Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (TFI). www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html. Google Scholar
    Isailovic, M., Widerberg, O., and Pattberg, P. (2013). Fragmentation of global environmental governance architectures: a literature review. IVM Institute for Environmental Studies, Report W-13/09 [online]. 1 July 2013. https://research.vu.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/804246/R13-09.pdf. Google Scholar
    Ivanova, M. (2005). Can the anchor hold? Rethinking the United Nations Environment Programme for the 21st Century. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies Publication Series, Report No. 7 [online]. September 2005. https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/fes-pubs/27/. Google Scholar
    Ivanova, M. (2008). UNEP as anchor organization for the global environment. In Biermann, F., Siebenhüner, B. and Schreyögg, A. (eds.), International Organizations in Global Environmental Governance. Abington: Routledge, 151–73. Google Scholar
    IVM (2015). Non-state actors in a Paris Agreement: are cities and companies bridging the ambition gap? [online]. Policy Brief. Amsterdam: Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM) and FORES. https://fores.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/NSA_Policy_brief_Bonn2.pdf. Google Scholar
    Jaeger, C. C., and Jaeger, J. (2011). Three views on two degrees. Regional Environmental Change, 11(1),15–26. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Jagers, S. C, . and Stripple, J. (2003). Climate governance beyond the state. Global Governance, 9(3),385–99. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    James, R., Jones, R, . and Boyd, E. (2017). What is loss and damage from climate change? First academic study reveals different perspectives, challenging questions. New Security Beat [online]. 25 September 2017. www.newsecuritybeat.org/2017/09/loss-damage-climate-change-academic-study-reveals-perspectives-challenging-questions/. Google Scholar
    Jamieson, D. (2014). Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle Against Climate Change Failed – and What It means for Our Future. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Johnson, D., and Levin, S. (2009). The tragedy of cognition: psychological biases and environmental inaction. Current Science, 97(11),1593–603. Google Scholar
    Johnson, L., and Rampini, C. (2017). Are climate models global public goods? In Tyfield, D., Lave, R., Randalls, S. and Thorpe, C., eds., The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science. London: Routledge, 263–74. Google Scholar
    Johnson, P. M. (2001). Creating sustainable global governance. In Kirton, J. J., Daniels, J. P. and Freytag, A., eds., Guiding Global Order: G8 Governance in the Twenty-First Century. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 245–82. Google Scholar
    Jordan, A. J., et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change, 5, 977–82. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Kapstein, E. B. (1999). Distributive justice as an international public good. a historical perspective. In Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M., eds., Global Public Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 88–115. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S., et al. (2017). Entry into force and then? The Paris agreement and state accountability. Climate Policy, 18(5),593–599. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Kaul, I. (2008). Providing (contested) global public goods. In Rittberger, V., Nettesheim, M. and Huckel, C., eds., Authority in the Global Political Economy. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 89–115. Google Scholar
    Kaul, I., and Blondin, D. (2016). Global oublic goods and the United Nations. In Ocampo, J. A., ed., Global Governance and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 32–65. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Kaul, I., Conceição, P., Le Goulven, K., and Mendoza, R. U. (2003). Why do global public goods matter today? In Kaul, I., ed., Providing Global Public Goods: Managing Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2–20. Google Scholar
    Keck, M. E., and Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar
    Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1),7–23. Google Scholar
    Keohane, R. O., and Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6, 570–5. Google Scholar
    Kirton, J. J., and Guebert, J. (2009). Climate change accountability: the G8’s compliance record from 1975 to 2009. G8 Research Group [online]. 28 November 2009. www.g8.utoronto.ca/scholar/kirton-guebert-climate-091128.pdf. Google Scholar
    Kirton, J. J., and Kikotsis, E. (2015). The Global Governance of Climate Change: G7, G20, and UN Leadership. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar
    Kokotsis, E. (2017). The Gx contribution to global climate governance. StudiaDiplomatica, 68(3),79–96. Google Scholar
    Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2),185–205 CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Kuo, L. (2020). China withheld data on coronavirus from WHO, recordings reveal. The Guardian [online]. 2 June 2020. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/02/china-withheld-data-coronavirus-world-health-organization-recordings-reveal. Google Scholar
    Kuramochi, T. et al. (2019). Global climate action from cities, regions and businesses: Impact of individual actors and cooperative initiatives on global and national emissions [online]. Second edition. NewClimate Institute, Data-Driven Lab, PBL, German Development Institute/Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) and Blavatnik School of Government, University of Oxford. https://newclimate.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Report-Global-Climate-Action-from-Cities-Regions-and-Businesses_2019.pdf. Google Scholar
    Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B.-O., and Schroeder, H. (2018). Non‐state actors in hybrid global climate governance: justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post‐Paris era. WIREs Climate Change, 9(e497), 1–18. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Labatt, S., and White, R. R. (2007). Carbon Finance: The Financial Implications of Climate Change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
    Larionova, M., and Kirton, J. J. (2015). The G8-G20 relationship in global governance. Farnham: Ashgate. Google Scholar
    Lebada, A. M. (2019). UN Secretary-General presents 2020 Programme Budget, Reform Updates. SDG Knowledge Hub [online]. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). 10 October 2019. https://sdg.iisd.org/news/un-secretary-general-presents-2020-programme-budget-reform-updates/. Google Scholar
    Lebaron, G., and Lister, J. (2015). Benchmarking global supply chains: the power of the ‘ethical audit’ regime. Review of International Studies, 41(5),905–24. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lefeber, R., and Oberthür, S. (2012). Key features of the Kyoto Protocol’s compliance system. In Brunnée, J., Doelle, M. and Rajamani, L., eds., Promoting Compliance in an Evolving Climate Regime. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–101. Google Scholar
    Lenton, T. M., et al. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. PNAS, 105(6),1786–93. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Lesnikowski, A., et al. (2017). What does the Paris Agreement mean for adaptation? Climate Policy, 17(7),825–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., and Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems. Policy Sciences, 45(2),123–52. Google Scholar
    Lin, J. (2018). Governing Climate Change: Global Cities and Transnational Lawmaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Livingstone, D. (2016). The G7 climate mandate and tragedy of horizons. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace [online]. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/CP_263_Livingston_G7_Final.pdf/. Google Scholar
    Magnan, A. K., and Ribera, T. (2016). Global adaptation after Paris. Science, 352(6291),1280–2. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Manguiat, M. S., and Raine, A. (2018). Strengthening national legal frameworks to implement the Paris Agreement. Carbon & Climate Law Review, 12(1),15–22. Google Scholar
    Marx, A., and Wouters, J. (2015). Competition and cooperation in the market of voluntary sustainability standards. In Delimatsis, P., ed., The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 215–41. Google Scholar
    Mayrhofer, J. P., and Gupta, J. (2016). The science and politics of co-benefits in climate policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 57, 22–30. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    McLeod, M. (2010). Private governance and climate change: institutional investors and emerging investor-driven governance mechanisms. St Antony’s International Review, 5(2),46–65. Google Scholar
    Mechler, R., et al. (2019). Science for loss and damage: findings and propositions. In Mechler, R. et al., eds., Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options. Cham: Springer, 3–37. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Merrill, L., and Funke, F. (2019). All change and no change: G20 commitment on fossil fuel subsidy reform, ten years on. SDG Knowledge Hub [online]. 3 October 2019. https://sdg.iisd.org/commentary/guest-articles/all-change-and-no-change-g20-commitment-on-fossil-fuel-subsidy-reform-ten-years-on/. Google Scholar
    Mert, A. (2015). Public–private partnerships. In Pattberg, P. H. and Zelli, F., eds., Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Governance and Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 289–294. Google Scholar
    Michaelowa, K., and Michaelowa, A. (2017). Transnational climate governance initiatives: designed for effective climate change mitigation? International Interactions: Empirical and Theoretical Research in International Relations, 43(1),129–55. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Minx, J. C., et al. (2017). Learning about climate change solutions in the IPCC and beyond. Environmental Science & Policy, 77, 252–9. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Najam, A., Papa, M., and Taiyab, N. (2006). Global Environmental Governance: A Reform Agenda. Winnipeg, Manitoba: International Institute for Sustainable Development [online]. www.iisd.org/pdf/2006/geg.pdf. Google Scholar
    NAZCA (n.d.). Global Climate Action portal [online]. https://climateaction.unfccc.int/. Google Scholar
    Norton, A. (2020). Coronavirus and climate change are two crises that need humanity to unite. Climate Home News [online]. 12 March 2020. www.climatechangenews.com/2020/03/12/coronavirus-climate-change-two-crises-need-humanity-unite/. Google Scholar
    Nyman, J., and Stainforth, T. (2018). Talanoa Dialogue: a new approach to global decision making or a rebranding of business as usual? [online]. Institute for European Environmental Policy. 4 July 2018. https://ieep.eu/news/talanoa-dialogue-a-new-approach-to-global-decision-making-or-a-rebranding-of-business-as-usual. Google Scholar
    Obergassel, W. et al., (2019). Paris Agreement: Ship Moves out of the Drydock. An Assessment of COP-24 in Katowice. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute [online]. wupperinst.org/fa/redaktion/downloads/publications/COP-24-Report.pdf. Google Scholar
    Oberthür, S. (2011). The European Union’s performance in the international climate change regime. Journal of European Integration, 33(6),667–82. Google Scholar
    Odionu, G. (2019). Striking the right balance: climate finance for developing countries. Oxford Business Law Blog [online]. Oxford: University of Oxford, Faculty of Law. 27 March 2019. www.law.ox.ac.uk/business-law-blog/blog/2019/03/striking-right-balance-climate-finance-developing-countries. Google Scholar
    OECD (2019). Climate finance for developing countries reached USD 71 billion in 2017. 13 September 2019. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [online]. www.oecd.org/environment/climate-finance-for-developing-countries-reached-usd-71-billion-in-2017.htm. Google Scholar
    Orr, S. K. (2016). Institutional control and climate change activism at COP 21 in Paris. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3),23–30. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., and Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284 (5412), 278–82. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Paavola, J. (2012). Climate change: the ultimate tragedy of the Commons? In Cole, D. H. and Ostrom, E., eds., Property in Land and Other Resources. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 417–33. Google Scholar
    Paavola, J. (2019). Climate as a commons. In Hudson, B., Rosenbloom, J. and Cole, D., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons. London: Routledge, 188–97. Google Scholar
    Pattberg, P. (2010). Public–private partnerships in global climate governance. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1(2),279–87. Google Scholar
    Pattberg, P. (2017). The emergence of carbon disclosure: exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(8),1437–55. Google Scholar
    Pattberg, P., and Stripple, J. (2008). Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 8(4),367–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Pattberg, P., and Widerberg, O. (2016). Transnational multistakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Conditions for success. Ambio, 45(1),42–51. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Pattberg, P., and Widerberg, O. (2017). The climate change regime. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia: Climate Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Pegram, T. (2020). Coronavirus is a failure of global governance – now the world needs a radical transformation. The Conversation [online]. 5 May 2020. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-is-a-failure-of-global-governance-now-the-world-needs-a-radical-transformation-136535. Google Scholar
    Persson, Å. (2019). Global adaptation governance: an emerging but contested domain. WIREs Climate Change, 10(4),1–18. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Persson, Å. , and Dzebo, A. (2019). Special issue: exploring global and transnational governance of climate change adaptation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 19, 357–67. Google Scholar
    Peters, G. B. (2005). The problem of policy problems. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 7(4),349–70. Google Scholar
    Pickering, J., and Rübbelke, D. (2014). International cooperation on adaptation to climate change. In Markandya, A., Galarraga, I. and Sainz de Murieta, E., eds., Routledge Handbook of the Economics of Climate Change Adaptation. London: Routledge, 56–75 Google Scholar
    Pielke, R. Jr., Prins, G., Rayner, S., and Sarewitz, D. (2007). Lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature, 445, 597–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Rademaekers, K., et al. (2019). Study on Energy Prices, Costs and Subsidies and their Impact on Industry and Households. Trinomics/European Union. Google Scholar
    Rajamani, L. (2016a). The 2015 Paris Agreement: interplay between hard, soft and non-obligations. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(2),337–58. Google Scholar
    Rajamani, L. (2016b). Ambition and differentiation in the 2015 Paris Agreement: interpretative possibilities and underlying politics. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 65(2),493–514. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Rajamani, L., and Werksman, J. (2018). The legal character and operational relevance of the Paris Agreement’s temperature goal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, A 376: 20160458. Google Scholar
    Rajamani, L., and Brunnée, J. (2017). The legality of downgrading nationally determined contributions under the Paris Agreement: lessons from the US disengagement. Journal of Environmental Law, 29(3),537–51. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Raustiala, K., and Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2),277–309. Google Scholar
    Rayner, T., and Jordan, A. (2016). Climate change policy in the European Union. In Rayner, T. and Jordan, A. (eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1–31. Google Scholar
    Reynolds, J., and Wagner, G. (2018). Governance of highly decentralized nonstate actors: the case of solar geoengineering. Discussion Paper, Harvard Kennedy School Belfer Center [online]. www.belfercenter.org/publication/governance-highly-decentralized-nonstate-actors-case-solar-geoengineering. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Roberts, J. T., Natson, S., Hoffmeister, V., et al. (2017). How will we pay for loss and damage? Ethics, Policy, and Environment, 20(2),208–26. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Roger, C. B. (2020). The Origins of Informality: Why the Legal Foundations of Global Governance are Shifting, and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Savage, K., and Hope, M. (2019). Global climate coalition: documents show how a fossil fuel lobby group manipulated UN climate negotiations. Climate Liability News [online]. 25 April 2019. www.climateliabilitynews.org/2019/04/25/global-climate-coalition-gcc-un-climate-change-ipcc/. Google Scholar
    Schinko, T., Mechler, R.ç and Hochrainer-Stigler, S. (2019). The risk and policy space for loss and damage: integrating notions of distributive and compensatory justice with comprehensive climate risk management. In Mechler, R. et al., eds., Loss and Damage from Climate Change: Concepts, Methods and Policy Options. Cham: Springer, 83–110. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schipper, E. L. F. (2006). Conceptual history of adaptation in the UNFCCC process. RECIEL, 15(1),82–92. Google Scholar
    SDG Knowledge Platform (n.d.). Sustainable development Goal 17. Division for Sustainable Development Goals (DSDG) in the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) [online]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg17. Google Scholar
    Setzer, J.ç and Byrnes, R. (2019). Global trends in climate change litigation: 2019 snapshot. London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and the Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy [online]. July 2019. www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/GRI_Global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2019-snapshot-2.pdf. Google Scholar
    Sharma, A. (2017). Precaution and post‐caution in the Paris Agreement: adaptation, loss and damage and finance. Climate Policy, 17(1),33–47. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Shaw, C. (2017). The two degrees celsius limit. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate. Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Shell, (n.d.). Our response to climate change [online]. www.shell.co.uk/a-cleaner-energy-future/our-response-to-climate-change.html. Google Scholar
    Singh, N., Finnegan, J., and Levin, K. (2016). MRV 101: Understanding measurement, reporting, and verification of climate change mitigation. WRI Working Paper. Washington DC: World Resources Institute [online]. wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/MRV_101_0.pdf. Google Scholar
    Skjærseth, J. B. (2017). The Commission’s shifting climate leadership: from emissions trading to energy union. In Wurzel, R. K. W., Connelly, J. and Liefferink, D., eds., The European Union in International Climate Politics: Still Taking a Lead? Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 37–51. Google Scholar
    Skovgaard, J. (2014). EU climate policy after the crisis. Environmental Politics, 23(1),1–17. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Slaughter, A.-M. (2015). The Paris Approach to global governance. Project Syndicate. [online]. 28 December 2015. www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/paris-agreement-model-for-global-governance-by-anne-marie-slaughter-2015–12. Google Scholar
    Smeds, E., and Acuto, M. (2018). Networking cities after Paris: weighing the ambition of urban climate change experimentation. Global Policy, 9(4),549–59. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Smith, J. J., and Tanveer, A. M. (2018). Globalization’s vehicle: the evolution and future of emission regulation in the ICAO and IMO in comparative assessment. Climate Law, 8(1–2),70–103. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Snowden, D. J., and Boone, M. E. (2007). A leader’s framework for decision making. Harvard Business Review, 1–9. Google Scholar
    Sørensen, E., and Torfing, J. (2009). Managing governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2),234–58. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    SRU (n.d.). Mission. German Advisory Council on the Environment (SRU). Online: www.umweltrat.de/EN/council/council_node.html. Google Scholar
    Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Streck, C., von Unger, M., and Krämer, N. (2019). From Paris to Katowice: COP-24 tackles the Paris Rulebook. Journal for European Environmental Planning Law, 16, 165–190. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Tamma, P., Schaart, E., and Gurzu, A. (2019). Europe’s Green Deal plan unveiled. Politico [online]. 12 December 2019. www.politico.eu/article/the-commissions-green-deal-plan-unveiled/. Google Scholar
    Taylor, M., and Watts, J. (2019). Revealed: the 20 firms behind a third of all carbon emissions. The Guardian [online]. 9 October 2019. www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions. Google Scholar
    Terman, R., and Voeten, E. (2018). The relational politics of shame: evidence from the universal periodic review. Review of International Organizations, 13(1),1–23. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Thatcher, M., and Coen, D. (2008). Reshaping European regulatory space: an evolutionary analysis. West European Politics, 31(4),806–36. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Climate Group (2018). Leading states and regions decarbonizing at double the rate of G20 governments [online]. www.theclimategroup.org/news/leading-states-and-regions-decarbonizing-double-rate-g20-governments. Google Scholar
    The Economist (2015). The Cost of Inaction: Recognising the Value at Risk from Climate Change. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit [online]. https://eiuperspectives.economist.com/sites/default/files/The%20cost%20of%20inaction_0.pdf. Google Scholar
    The White House (2014). U.S.–China Joint Announcement on Climate Change [online]. 11 November 2014. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/11/us-china-joint-announcement-climate-change. Google Scholar
    Thornton, T. F., and Comberti, C. (2017). Synergies and trade-offs between adaptation, mitigation and development. Climatic Change, 140(1),5–18. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Timmons, R. J. (2011). Multipolarity and the new world (dis)order: US hegemonic decline and the fragmentation of the global climate regime. Global Environmental Change, 21(3),776–84. Google Scholar
    Timperley, J. (2019). COP-25: What was achieved and where to next? Climate Home News [online]. 16 December 2019. www.climatechangenews.com/2019/12/16/cop25-achieved-next/. Google Scholar
    Torny, D. (2017). If at first you don’t succeed: the development of climate change legislation in Ireland. Irish Political Studies, 32(2),247–67. Google Scholar
    UK Government (2008). Climate Change Act 2008 [online]. www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2008/27/contents. Google Scholar
    Umbers, L. M., and Moss, J. (2019). The climate duties of sub-national political communities. Political Studies, 1–17. Google Scholar
    United Nations (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/INFORMAL/84 [online]. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf. Google Scholar
    United Nations (2012). The future we want. Outcome document of the United Nations conference on sustainable development. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20–22 June 2012 [online]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/733FutureWeWant.pdf. Google Scholar
    United Nations (2015). COP21: UN chief hails new climate change agreement as ‘monumental triumph’. UN News [online]. 12 December 2015. https://news.un.org/en/story/2015/12/517982-cop21-un-chief-hails-new-climate-change-agreement-monumental-triumph. Google Scholar
    United Nations (2020). UN tackles ‘infodemic’ of misinformation and cybercrime in COVID-19 crisis. United Nations Department of Global Communications [online]. 31 March 2020. www.un.org/en/un-coronavirus-communications-team/un-tackling-%E2%80%98infodemic%E2%80%99-misinformation-and-cybercrime-covid-19. Google Scholar
    UN DESA (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division [online]. https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf. Google Scholar
    UN News (2014). Climate Summit: ‘All hands on deck’ declares Ban, calling for leadership, concrete action [online]. 23 September 2014. https://news.un.org/en/story/2014/09/478172-climate-summit-all-hands-deck-declares-ban-calling-leadership-concrete-action. Google Scholar
    UNEP (2012). United Nations Environment Programme upgraded to universal membership following Rio+20 Summit. Press Release. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme [online]. 21 December 2012. www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/press-release/united-nations-environment-programme-upgraded-universal-membership. Google Scholar
    UNEP (2018). Emissions Gap Report 2018. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme [online]. wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/27114/AGR_2018.pdf/. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (1998). Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/kpeng.pdf. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2008). Report of the Conference of the Parties on its thirteenth session, held in Bali from 3 to 15 December 2007. Addendum. FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2007/cop13/eng/06a01.pdf. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2015). The Paris Agreement. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2016). Decision 1/CP.21. Adoption of the Paris Agreement. FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add. 29 January 2016. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf#page=2. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2018). Talanoa Call for Action. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Talanoa%20Call%20for%20Action.pdf. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2019a). Statement by the UN Secretary-General António Guterres on the outcome of COP25 [online]. 15 December 2019. https://unfccc.int/news/statement-by-the-un-secretary-general-antonio-guterres-on-the-outcome-of-cop25. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2019b). Fact Sheet. The UNFCCC Programme Budget 2020–21. United Nations Climate Change Secretariat. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/Budget-2020–2021-fact-sheet.pdf. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2019c). Report of the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Paris Agreement on the third part of its first session, held in Katowice from 2 to 15 December 2018. 19 March 2019. FCCC/PA/CMA/2018/3/Add.2. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/cma2018_3_add2_new_advance.pdf#page=18. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (2020). Open Letter by the Executive Secretary on COVID-19. United Nations Climate Change [online]. 23 April 2020. https://unfccc.int/news/open-letter-by-the-executive-secretary-on-covid-19. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (n.d.a). Regional Centres and Networks. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/bodies/constituted-bodies/adaptation-committee-ac/areas-of-work/regional-centres-and-networks#eq-5. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (n.d.b).What is transparency and reporting? United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/transparency-and-reporting/the-big-picture/what-is-transparency-and-reporting. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (n.d.c). Marrakech Partnership for Global Climate Action. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/climate-action/marrakech-partnership-for-global-climate-action. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC (n.d.d). Marrakech Partnership at COP-23. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. https://unfccc.int/climate-action/marrakech-partnership/events/marrakech-partnership-at-cop23. Google Scholar
    UNFCCC Clearinghouse (n.d.). Fiji Clearing House for Risk Transfer. Homepage. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [online]. http://unfccc-clearinghouse.org/. Google Scholar
    UNGA (1988). Resolution 43/53: Protection of global climate for present and future generations of mankind. A/RES/43/53, 6 December 1988. United Nations General Assembly [online]. www.un.org/documents/ga/res/43/a43r053.htm. Google Scholar
    UN Secretary General (2020). Secretary-General’s Nelson Mandela lecture: ‘tackling the inequality pandemic: a new social contract for a new Era’ [as delivered]. 18 July 2020 [online]. www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2020–07-18/secretary-generals-nelson-mandela-lecture-%E2%80%9Ctackling-the-inequality-pandemic-new-social-contract-for-new-era%E2%80%9D-delivered. Google Scholar
    US Department of State (2019). On the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Michael R. Pompeo, Secretary of State. 4 November 2019 [online]. www.state.gov/on-the-u-s-withdrawal-from-the-paris-agreement/. Google Scholar
    Vabulas, F. (2019). The importance of informal intergovernmental organizations: a typology of transnational administration without independent secretariats. In Stone, D. and Moloney, K., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 401–18. Google Scholar
    Vabulas, F., and Snidal, D. (2013). Organization without delegation: informal intergovernmental organizations (IIGOs) and the spectrum of intergovernmental arrangements. The Review of International Organizations, 8(2),193–220. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Van Asselt, H. (2007). Dealing with the Fragmentation of Global Climate Governance. Legal and Political Approaches in Interplay Management Management. Global Governance Working Paper, No. 30, May 2007. The Global Governance Project [online]. www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/C08-0093-Asselt-Dealing.pdf. Google Scholar
    Van Asselt, H. (2011). Legal and political approaches in interplay management: dealing with the fragmentation of global climate governance. In Oberthür, S. and Stokke, O. S., eds., Managing Institutional Complexity: Regime Interplay and Global Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 59–86. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Van Asselt, H. (2014). Alongside the UNFCCC: Complementary Venues for Climate Action. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) [online]. www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2014/05/alongside-unfccc-complementary-venues-climate-action.pdf. Google Scholar
    Van der Heijden, J., Patterson, J., Juhola, S., and Wolfram, M. (2018). Special section: advancing the role of cities in climate governance – promise, limits, politics. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(3),365–73. Google Scholar
    Van der Lugt, C., and Dingwerth, K. (2015). Governing where focality is low: UNEP and the Principles for Responsible Investment. In Abbott, K., Genschel, P., Snidal, D. and Zangl, B., eds., International Organizations as Orchestrators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 237–61. Google Scholar
    Vandenbergh, M. P., and Gilligan, J. M. (2017). Beyond Politics: The Private Governance Response to Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Vanhala, L., and Hestbaek, C. (2016). Framing climate change loss and damage in UNFCCC negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 16(4),111–29. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Van Schaik, L., and Schunz, S. (2012). Explaining EU activism and impact in global climate politics: is the union a norm- or interest-driven actor? Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(1),169–86. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Verkuijl, C., and van Asselt, H. (2019). Paris rules? Environmental Policy and Law, 49(1),11–19. Google Scholar
    Victor, D. (2009). Plan B for Copenhagen. Nature, 461(7262),342–4. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
    • Victor, D. G., Geels, F. W., and Sharpe, S. (2019). Accelerating the low carbon transition: The case for stronger, more targeted and coordinated international action. Brookings [online]. www.energy-transitions.org/sites/default/files/Accelerating-The-Transitions_Report.pdf. Google Scholar
    Vidal, J. (2010). Copenhagen climate failure blamed on ‘Danish text’. The Guardian [online]. 31 May 2010. www.theguardian.com/environment/2010/may/31/climate-change-copenhagen-danish-text. Google Scholar
    Vogler, J. (2018). Energy, climate change, and global governance: the 2015 Paris Agreement in perspective. In Davidson, D. J. and Gross, M., eds., Oxford Handbook of Energy and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Voigt, C., and Ferreira, F. (2016). Differentiation in the Paris Agreement. Climate Law, 6(1–2),58–74. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Von Bassewitz, N. (2013). International climate change policy: where do we Stand? In Ruppel, O. C., Roschmann, C. and Ruppel-Schlichting, K., eds., Climate Change: International Law and Global Governance: Volume II: Policy, Diplomacy and Governance in a Changing Environment. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, 101–70. Google Scholar
    Voosen, P. (2009). Creative accounting will help E.U. meet Kyoto targets. New York Times [online]. 13 November 2009. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/11/13/13greenwire-creative-accounting-will-help-eu-meet-kyoto-cl-27564.html?pagewanted=all. Google Scholar
    Waldman, S. (2019). Climate preparation report released by panel previously disbanded by Trump. Climate Wire [online]. 4 April 2019. www.scientificamerican.com/article/climate-preparation-report-released-by-panel-previously-disbanded-by-trump/. Google Scholar
    Watts, J., and Doherty, B. (2018). US and Russia ally with Saudi Arabia to water down climate pledge. The Guardian [online]. 9 December 2018. www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/09/us-russia-ally-saudi-arabia-water-down-climate-pledges-un. Google Scholar
    Watts, J. (2019). US and Saudi Arabia blocking regulation of geoengineering, sources say. The Guardian [online]. 18 March 2019. www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/mar/18/us-and-saudi-arabia-blocking-regulation-of-geoengineering-sources-say. Google Scholar
    Weart, S. R. (2008). The Discovery of Global Warming. Revised and Expanded Edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Weaver, S., Lötjönen, S., and Ollikainen, M. (2019). Overview of National Climate Change Advisory Councils. The Finnish Climate Change Panel, Report 3/2019 [online]. www.ilmastopaneeli.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/Overview-of-national-CCCs.pdf. Google Scholar
    Wei, D. (2016). Linking non-state action with the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change. Arlington, VA: Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2ES) [online]. www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2016/10/linking-nonstate-action-unfccc.pdf. Google Scholar
    Widerberg, O. (2016). Mapping institutional complexity in the Anthropocene: a network approach. In Pattberg, P. and Zelli, F., eds., Environmental Politics and Governance in the Anthropocene: Institutions and Legitimacy in a Complex World. London, UK: Routledge, 81–102. Google Scholar
    Widerberg, O. E., Pattberg, P. H., and Kristensen, K. E. G. (2016). Mapping the Institutional Architecture of Global Climate Change Governance V.2. Institute for Environmental Studies/IVM. Google Scholar
    Willsher, K., Borger, J., and Holmes, O. (2020). US accused of ‘modern piracy’ after diversion of masks meant for Europe. The Guardian [online]. 4 April 2020. www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/03/mask-wars-coronavirus-outbidding-demand. Google Scholar
    Wirth, D. A. (2015). The Eenvironment. In Cogan, J., Hurd, I. and Johnstone, I., eds., Oxford Handbook of International Organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 425–46. Google Scholar
    Wurzel, R. K. W., Liefferink, D., and Di Lullo, M. (2019). The European Council, the Council and the Member States: changing environmental leadership dynamics in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 28(2),248–270. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Yamin, F., and Depledge, J. (2004). The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Yeo, S. (2013). Australia Climate Commission starts fightback against Abbott cuts. Climate Home News [online]. 24 September 2013. www.climatechangenews.com/2013/09/24/climate-commission-fights-back-as-abbotts-onslaught-gets-underway/. Google Scholar
    Young, O. R. (2008). The architecture of global environmental governance: bringing science to bear on policy. Global Environmental Politics, 8(1),14–32. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Zhang, Y.-X., Chao, Q.-C., Zheng, Q.-H., and Huang, L. (2017). The withdrawal of the U.S. from the Paris Agreement and its impact on global climate change governance. Advances in Climate Change Research, 8(4),213–19. Google Scholar
    Zito, A. R., Burns, C., and Lenschow, A. (2019). Is the trajectory of European Union environmental policy less certain? Environmental Politics, 28(2),187–207. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Motivating Public Employees Esteve, Marc and Schuster, Christian CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Organizational Obliviousness: Entrenched Resistance to Gender Integration in the Military Doan, Alesha and Portillo, Shannon CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Partnerships that Last: Identifying the Keys to Resilient Collaboration Getha-Taylor, Heather CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Behavioral Public Performance: How People Make Sense of Government Metrics James, Oliver, Moynihan, Donald P., Olsen, Asmus Leth and Van Ryzin, Gregg G. Google Scholar
    Redefining Development: Resolving Complex Challenges in Developing Countries Kritz, Jessica CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gender, Risk and Leadership: The Glass Cliff in Public Service Careers DeHart-Davis, Leisha, Hatmaker, Deneen, Nelson, Kim, Pandey, Sanjay K., Pandey, Sheela and Smith, Amy Google Scholar
    Institutional Memory as Storytelling: How Networked Government Remembers Corbett, Jack, Grube, Dennis Christian, Lovell, Heather Caroline and Scott, Rodney James Google Scholar
    How Local Governments Govern Culture War Conflicts Chou, Mark and Busbridge, Rachel Google Scholar
    Global Climate Governance Coen, David, Kreienkamp, Julia and Pegram, Tom Google Scholar

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Total abstract views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.