Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T23:14:04.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Forensic Linguistics

Forensic Linguistics in China

Origins, Progress, and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2024

Yuan Chuanyou ,
Xu Youping  and
Lu Nan
Yuan Chuanyou
Affiliation:
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
Xu Youping
Affiliation:
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
Lu Nan
Affiliation:
Guangdong University of Foreign Studies

Summary

This Element offers a comprehensive examination of forensic linguistics in China. It traces the origins of the field in the 1980s and 1990s, and highlights the progress made in the 2000s, with a focus on the work of influential scholars such as Pan Qingyun, Wang Jie, Du Jinbang, Liao Meizhen, Yuan Chuanyou, and Wang Zhenhua. It discusses the development of Discourse Information Theory, the Principle of Goal, Functional Forensic Discourse Analysis, and Legal Discourse as a Social Process. It also analyses studies on language evidence and explores legal translation. It discusses emerging research areas, including cyberbullying language research, internet court discourse analysis, authorship analysis, expert assistance systems, and speaker identification and evidence of forensic phonetics. This Element provides valuable insights into the growth and potential of forensic linguistics in China, serving as a comprehensive resource for scholars, researchers, and practitioners interested in the intersection of language and law.
Get access

Keywords

Forensic linguistics in Chinalegal linguisticsoriginsprogressprospects
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Forensic Linguistics
Online ISBN: 9781009162548
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 02 May 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ainsworth, J. (2020). The uses of theory in forensic linguistics: A plea for methodological cross-fertilization. Keynote presentation at the 11th national conference of China’s Association of Forensic Linguistics (CAFL11), Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. & Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings. London:Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, L. (2017). Transitivity, No Stone Left Unturned: Introducing Flexibility and Granularity into the Framework for the Analysis of Courtroom Discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Granada.Google Scholar
Bartley, L. (2018). Justice demands that you find this man not guilty: A transitivity analysis of the closing arguments of a rape case that resulted in a wrongful conviction. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 28: 480–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, L. (2020). Please make your verdict speak the truth: Insights from an appraisal analysis of the closing arguments from a rape trial. Text & Talk, 40(4): 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, L. (2022). A transitivity-based exploration of a wrongful conviction for arson and murder: The case of Kristine Bunch. Language, Context and Text, 4(2): 304–334.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. L. & Feldman, M. S. (1981). Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Berk-Seligson, S. (1990). Bilingual court proceedings: The role of the court interpreter. In Levi, J. N. and Walker, A. G.‚ (eds.), Language in the Judicial Process (pp. 155–202). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boulle, L. (2005). Mediation: Principles, Process, Practice (2nd ed). Chatswood: LexisNexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
Braddock, R. (1958). An extension of the Lasswell Formula. Journal of Communication, 8(2): 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Büring, D. (1999). Focus and topic in a complex model of discourse. In Krifka, G. & van der Sandt, (eds.), Focus and Presupposition in a Multi-speaker Discourse. ESSLI-99 Workshop Reader. Utrecht: Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Cao, H. & Lei, Y. (2017). Fundamental frequency statistics for young male speakers of Mandarin. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine, 3(4): 217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, H. & Ding, T. (2018). An empirical study on the application of evidence of forensic phonetics in courts of Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Tianjin and Chongqing in China. Evidence Science, 26(5): 622–638.Google Scholar
Cao, H. & Zhang, X. (2020). An empirical study on the present status of the application of evidence of forensic phonetics in courts of China. Chinese Journal of Phonetics, 8(1): 90–104.Google Scholar
Chan, C. (2020). Legal Translation and Bilingual Law Drafting in Hong Kong: Challenges and Interactions in Chinese Regions. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charrow, R. P. & Charrow, V. (1979). Making legal language understandable: A psycholinguistic study of jury instructions. Columbia Law Review. 79: 1306–1374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, J. (1985a). Legal linguistics should be established. Modern Jurisprudence (formerly Law Quarterly), 7(1): 77.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (1985b). Explorations in legal linguistics. Journal of Anhui University, 26(1): 49–52.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (1998). Introduction to Legal Linguistics. Xi’an: Shaanxi Education Press.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (2004). A review of legal language research in China over the past twenty years. Journal of Bijie Normal College, 22(1): 1–4.Google Scholar
Chen, J. (2011). The reconstruction of Prosecution-Defense-Judge relationship in China: A frame analysis of judges’ discourse information processing. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 18(2): 309–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L., Sin, K., & Cheng, W. (2014). Legal translation: A sociosemiotic approach. Semiotica, 2014(201): 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L. & Wang, J. (2008). A tudy on linguistic evidence. Forensic Linguistics Study, 2(2): 71–75.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. & Wang, X. (2017). Linguistic evidence and expert testimony: A study of admissibility in the field of judicial practice in the United States and its implications. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 47(6): 181–196.Google Scholar
China News Network (2022, 4 November). Cyberspace Administration of China: Strengthen the governance of cyberbullying! China News Network. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/7FMqsI-RZmnjYw96StUQhQ.Google Scholar
China Internet Network Information Center (2022, 31 August). 2022/6 50th Statistical Report Basic Data. www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0916/c132-10593.html.Google Scholar
Cole, S. R. & Blankley, K. M. (2006). Online mediation: Where we have been, where we are now, and where we should be. University of Toledo Law Review, 39(38): 193–205.Google Scholar
Conley, J. M. & O’ Barr, W. M. (1998). Just Words. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. (1994). On the use of corpora in the analysis of forensic texts. Forensic Linguistics, 1(1): 27–43.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. (2004). Author identification, idiolect, and linguistic uniqueness. Applied Linguistics, 25: 432–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, M. (2021). In my opinion. In Coulthard, M., May, A. & Silva, R. Sousa- (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 523–538). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coulthard, M. & Johnson, A. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A. & Wright, D. (2017). An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cui, S. (2013). DIA Based Chinese Fraudulent Mobile Short Message (SMS) Detection. MA thesis. Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Du, B. (2016). Staging justice: Courtroom semiotics and the judicial ideology in China. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 29(3): 595–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du, J. (2000). The macrostructure of forensic linguistics: An overview based on current research. Modern Foreign Languages, 23(1): 99–107.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2004). Forensic Linguistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2005). Principles of legal exchange and legal translation. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 16(4): 11–14.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2007). A study of the tree information structure of legal discourse. Modern Foreign Languages, 30(1): 40–49, 109.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2009). A study on discourse information features of written exercise by English major students. Foreign Language Teaching, 30(2): 42–46,56.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2010). The application of discourse information element analysis in the teaching of advanced legal translation. In Yu, S. (ed.), Legal Language and Translation (pp. 1–10). Shanghai: Shanghai Translation.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2011). Discourse information analysis: A new approach to forensic linguistics. Journal of Social Science in China, 15 (190).Google Scholar
Du, J. (2012, May 31-June 2). A study on assessment of legal translation quality: From the perspective of discourse information. 2nd International Conference on Law, Translation and Culture, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2013). Tutorial on Discourse Analysis. Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2014). Legal Discourse Information Analysis. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2022). Information Mining of Legal Discourse. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Du, J. (2022). On Discourse Information Mining. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Du, J & Yu, S., eds. (2007). New Progress in Legal Language Research. Beijing: University of International Business and Economics Press.Google Scholar
Du, J., Chen, J. & Yu, S., eds. (2010). Prospects of Forensic Linguistics in China. Beijing: University of International Business and Economics Press.Google Scholar
Du, J. & Ge, Y. (2016). On Methodology of Forensic Linguistics. Beijing: People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Eades, D. (1994). A case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system. In Gibbons, J. (ed.), Language and Law (pp. 234–264). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Eades, D. (1995). Language in Evidence: Issues Confronting Aboriginal and Multicultural Australia. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
Eades, D. (1998). The Fields of Law and Language. Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 5(2): 215.Google Scholar
Eagleson, R. (1994). Forensic analysis of personal written texts: A case study. In Gibbons, J. (ed.), Language and Law (pp. 363–373). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Felton-Rosulek, L. (2009). The Sociolinguistic Construction of Reality in the Closing Arguments of Criminal Trials. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Felton-Rosulek, L. (2015). Dueling Discourses: The Construction of Reality in Closing Arguments. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, P., Cao, H. & Lei, Y. (2019). A developmental history of forensic speaker comparison in the UK. Evidence Science, 27, (6): 730–740.Google Scholar
Fillmore, C. J. (1968). The case for case. In Bach, E. & Harms, R. (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory (pp. 1–88). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Gales, T. (2010). Ideologies of violence: A corpus and discourse analytic approach to stance in threatening communications. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 17(2): 299–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gales, T. (2011). Identifying interpersonal stance in threatening discourse: An appraisal analysis. Discourse Studies, 13(1): 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gales, T. (2015). Threatening Stances: A corpus analysis of realized vs. non-realized threats. Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, 2(2): 1–25.Google Scholar
Gales, T. & Solan, L. (2017). Witness cross-examinations in non-stranger assault crimes: An appraisal analysis. Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, 4(2): 108–139.Google Scholar
Ge, Y. (2013). Solicitation of Desired Information in Courtroom Questioning: A Discourse Information Processing Perspective. Jinan: Shandong University Press.Google Scholar
Ge, Y. (2018). Resolution of Conflict of Interest in Chinese Civil Court Hearings: A Perspective of Discourse Information Theory. New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, J. (2003). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Britain: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gluzman, H. (2018). Back to the future: Reviving the use of video link evidence in Canadian criminal courts. Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, 16(1): 183–193.Google Scholar
Grant, T. (2021). Txt 4n6: Idiolect free authorship analysis? In Coulthard, M., May, A. & Sousa-Silva, R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 558–575). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Grant, T. (2022). The Idea of Progress in Forensic Authorship Analysis: Elements in Forensic Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, J. (2023). Awakening Justifiable Defence: The Study of Evaluation in Media Reports on Self-defence Cases. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Guo, W. (2022). Information Processing in the Summing Up of Issues in Chinese Civil Court Hearings: A Discourse Information Perspective. MA thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985/1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
He, X. (2021). The nature of persons with expertise and their effectiveness in the law of evidence. Minutes of the 31st Judges’ Meeting of 2019. The Second Circuit Court of the Supreme Court.Google Scholar
Heffer, C. (2007). Judgement in court: Evaluating participants in courtroom discourse. In Kredens, K. & Gozdz-Roszkowski, S. (eds.), Language and the Law: International Outlooks (pp. 145–179). Frankfurt am Mein: Perter Lang GmbH.Google Scholar
Hibbitts, B. J. (1994). Making sense of metaphors: Visuality, aurality, and the reconfiguration of American legal discourse. Cardozo Law Review, 16: 229–356.Google Scholar
Hinduja, S. & Patchin, J. W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2): 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, Z. (1994). Cohesion and Coherence in Discourse. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Huai, Y. (2021). Multimodal Discourse Information Processing in English Classroom Instruction for Legal Purposes. Ohio: American Academic Press.Google Scholar
Huang, H. (2021). Information Processing in the Compilation of Chinese Guiding Cases: From the Perspective of Discourse Information. MA thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Huang, P. & Wang, T. (2013). Interpretation and application of the pragmatic goal principle. Heilongjiang Social Sciences, 139(4): 128–130.Google Scholar
Hunter, M. & Grant, T. (2022). Killer stance: An investigation of the relationship between attitudinal resources and psychological traits in the writings of four serial murderers. Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito, 9(1): 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurt, M. (2020). Pledging to Harm: A Linguistic Analysis of Violent Intent in Threatening Language. Unpublished PhD thesis, Aston University.Google Scholar
Hurt, M. & Grant, T. (2019). Pledging to harm: A linguistics appraisal analysis of judgement comparing realized and non-realized violent fantasies. Discourse & Society, 30(2): 154–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ira-Katharina, P. & Petermann, F. (2018). Cyberbullying: A concept analysis of defining attributes and additional influencing factors. Computers in Human Behavior, 86: 350–366.Google Scholar
Jacobs, T. A. (2020). Cyberbullying law. Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
Jessen, M., Cao, H. & Wang, Y. (2010). Forensic Phonetics. Evidence Science, 17(5): 712–738.Google Scholar
Jiang, J. (1990). On the expressive coloration of legal language. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (The Rule of Law Forum), 5(3): 42–45,49.Google Scholar
Jiang, J. (1994). Contextual composition of legal speech. Journal of Shanghai University of Political Science and Law (The Rule of Law Forum), 9(5): 60–62.Google Scholar
Jiang, J. (1995). Legal Language and Speech Research. Beijing: Mass Publishing House.Google Scholar
Jing, H. (2022). Innovation and contributions of China’s internet courts. China Legal Science, 39(4): 49–73.Google Scholar
Jones, A. (1994). The limitations of voice identification. In Gibbons, J. (ed.), Language and Law (pp. 346–362). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Klomek, A. B., Sourander, A. & Gould, M. (2010). The association of suicide and bullying in childhood to young adulthood: A review of cross-sectional and longitudinal research findings. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(5): 282–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körner, H. (2000). Negotiating Authority: The Logogenesis of Dialogue in Common Law Judgments. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Sydney, NSW.Google Scholar
Labov, W. & Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy As Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. In Bryson, L. (ed.), The Communication of Ideas (pp. 37–51). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Levi, J. N. & Walker, A. G. (1990). Language in the Judicial Process. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, K. (2010). On static equivalence in translating legal texts. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 42(1)1: 59–65,81.Google Scholar
Li, K. & Zhang, X. (2005). Legal Texts and Legal Ttranslation. Beijing: China Translation Corporation.Google Scholar
Li, W. & Wang, Z. (2019). A multimodal study of forensic linguistics: Current research and prospects. Journal of SJTU (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 27(5): 110–119.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2002). The status quo of Chinese courtroom trials from linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 11(4): 25–36.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2003). Courtroom Questions, Responses and their Interaction. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2004a). A review of study of forensic linguistics abroad. Contemporary Rhetoric, 43(1): 66–76,94.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2004b). A study on the principle of goal and cooperation in the courtroom interactive discourse. Foreign Language Research, 43(5): 43–52.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2005a). The ‘principle of goal’ and goal analysis (I): Exploring new approaches to pragmatic research. Contemporary Rhetoric, 44(3): 1–10.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2005b). The ‘principle of Goal’ and goal analysis (II): A new approach to pragmatic discourse analysis. Contemporary Rhetoric, 44(4): 5–11.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2005c). The principle of goal and analysis of discourse coherence: A new approach to the study of discourse coherence. Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 49(5): 351–357.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2004, 2005, 2009). Trial Communication Strategies. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2006). A study on ‘formulation’ in Chinese courtroom interaction. Foreign Languages Research, 23(2): 1–8,13,80.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2007). Pragmatics and jurisprudence: Application of the principle of cooperation in legislative communication. Journal of Comparative Law, 21(5): 45–63.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2009a). The principle of goal direction and goal analysis. Foreign Language Research, 32(4): 62–64.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2009b). The principle of goal direction and goal analysis (Continued). Foreign Language Research, 32(6): 101–109.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2009c). A study of interruption in Chinese criminal courtroom discourse. Text & Talk, 29(2): 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, M. (2010). The principle of goal and dynamics of context. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages, 33(4): 1–5,127.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2012a). The principle of goal direction and interaction of speech acts. Foreign Language Research, 35(5): 23–30.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2012b). Courtroom discourse in China. In Tiersma, P. & Solan, L. M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (pp. 395–407). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, M. (2013a). The principle of goal and contextual studies: On human beings as the key factor of the context. Foreign Language Education & Research, 1(1): 17–21.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2013b). Power in interruption. In Christopher, W. & Tessuto, G. (eds.), Language in the Negotiation of Justice: Contexts, Issues and Applications (pp. 33–48). Surrey, UK: Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Liao, M. (2015). Speech or silence: Within & beyond language and law. In Solan, M. L., Ainsworth, J. & Shuy, R. (eds.), Speaking of Language and Law: Conversation on the Work of Peter Tiersma (pp. 164-185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Liao, M. & Gong, J. (2015). Interruption in courtroom discourse and gender differences. Contemporary Rhetoric, 34(1):43–55.Google Scholar
Lin, K. & Ji, M. (2002). Discussion on the translation of the ‘ de’ structure in legal texts. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 3: 20–22.Google Scholar
Liu, M. & Han, H. (2016). Litigation status, evidentiary effect and scope of cross-examination of ‘persons with expertise’ in criminal proceedings. Journal of CUPL (China University of Political Science and Law), 52(2): 100–106.Google Scholar
Liu, M. (2019). Improvement of the system of participation of ‘persons with expertise’ in criminal proceedings. Law-Based Society, 4(4): 102–109.Google Scholar
Liu, W. (2009). Forensic linguistics research in evidence. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 20(1): 68–72.Google Scholar
Liu, X. & Wang, Y. (2014). Study on the expert assistant qualification review. Evidence Science, 21(6): 698–715.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. (2019a). Multimodal Construction of ‘Rule of Law’ in Chinese Anti-corruption Public Service Advertisements: A Social Semiotic Approach. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. (2019b). Multimodal construction of ‘rule of law’ in Chinese anti-corruption public service advertisements: A social semiotic approach (PhD abstract). The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 26(2): 287–290.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. & Yuan, C. (2022). Multimodal construction of the ‘Rule of Law’: A genre analysis of anticorruption public service advertisements. Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 44(2): 51–65.Google Scholar
Lou, K. (2007). On role of linguistics and communication in analysis and attestation of verbal evidence: Taking Yang’s prosecution against Hu on infringement of right of reputation as an example. Evidence Science, 15(1,2): 78–83.Google Scholar
Lu, J. (2000). A distinctive monograph on legal language research – reading Wang Jie’s Legal Language Research. Applied Linguistics, 9(3): 110–112.Google Scholar
Lu, N. (2021). The Discursive Construction of Legal Reasoning: A Genre Study of the United States Supreme Court. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Lu, N. & Yuan, C. (2021). Legal reasoning: A textual perspective on common law judicial opinions and Chinese judgments. Text & Talk, 41(1): 71–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, N. & Yuan, C. (2022). Judicial opinions as a genre simplex with an embedding structure. Journal of Foreign Languages, 23(3): 34–47.Google Scholar
Luchjenbroers, J. (1997). In your own words: Questions and answers in a Supreme Court trial. Journal of Pragmatics 27 (4): 477–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, H. (2012). A Preliminary study on author identification: Combined with DIA theory analysis. Journal of Language and Literature Studies 32(10): 16–18,20.Google Scholar
Luo, X. (2023). Tenor Negotiation in Community Correction Discourse: A Judicial Practice Navigating between Retributive Justice and Restorative Justice. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Luo, X. & Yuan, C. (2019). An analysis of preliminary assessment discourse of community correction: From the perspective of genre structure and exchange structure. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 30(3): 39–47.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. (2017). The status quo of MTI education and countermeasures at Universities of Political Science & Law in China. Chinese Translators Journal, 14(4): 21–27.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Zappavigna, M. (2016). Exploring restorative justice: Dialectics of theory and practice. International Journal of Speech Language and the Law, 23(2): 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R. & Zappavigna, M. (2019). Embodied meaning: A systemic functional perspective on paralanguage. Functional Linguistics, 6(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. R., Zappavigna, M. & Dwyer, P. (2012). Beyond redemption: Choice and consequence in youth justice conferencing. In Martin, J. R. & Wang, Z. (eds.), Forensic Linguistics (pp. 227–258). Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R., Zappavigna, M., Dwyer, P. & Cléirigh, C. (2013). Users in uses of language: Embodied identity in youth justice conferencing. Text & Talk, 33(4–5): 467–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathesius, V. (1929). Zur Satzperspektive im modernen English. Archiv flir das Studium der modern Sprachen und Literaruren, 155: 200–210.Google Scholar
Matoesian, G. M. (1993). Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McMenamin, G. (2021). The theory and practice of forensic stylistics. In Coulthard, M., May, A. & Sousa-Silva, R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Forensic Linguistics (pp. 539–557). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mellinkoff, D. (1963). The Language of the Law. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Miller, & Kimberly, (2017). Cyberbullying and its consequences: How cyberbullying is contorting the minds of victims and bullies alike, and the law’s limited available redress. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal, 26(2): 379–404.Google Scholar
Nini, A. & Grant, T. (2013). Bridging the gap between stylistic and cognitive approaches to authorship analysis using systemic functional linguistics and multidimensional analysis. International Journal of Speech, Language & the Law, 20(2): 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OʾBarr, W. (1982). Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power and Strategy in the Courtroom. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (1983). Several Issues on Legal Style. Weekly Newspaper of East China College of Political Science and Law. July 7.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (1987). Objects, scope and methodology of legal stylistics. Zhongzhou Journal, 9(1): 95–96.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (1989). The Art of Legal Language. Shanghai: Xue Lin Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (1991). Exploration of Legal Language Styles. Kunming: Yunnan People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (1997). Chinese Legal Language in the Cross-Century. Wuhan: East China University of Science and Technology Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (2004). Chinese Legal Language Assessment. Anhui: Chinese Dictionary.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (2015). Language Rights Comprehensive Protection of Juvenile Criminal Defendants in the Context of Rule-by-Law. Conference paper at the 12th Biennial Conference of the International Association for Forensic Linguists (IAFL 12), Guangzhou, China in 2015, www.flrchina.com/001/108.html.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (2017). Forensic Linguistics. Beijing: China University of Political Science & Law Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (2019a). A comparative examination of the past and present Chinese and English legal languages and their reform and optimization. Language Weekly, 2019–11–2, 2019–1–9.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (2019b). The language dilemma of the ‘valley people’ facing the Law. Language Weekly, 2019–11–6, 2019–11–13.Google Scholar
Pan, Q. (2019c). The legal embarrassment and language problems faced by vulnerable groups: Taking the poor educated or people of low social and economic status as examples. Language and Law Studies, 1(1): 24–39.Google Scholar
Pan, X. & Du, J. (2011). Information flow of process control in courtroom question and response. Journal of Foreign Languages, 34(2): 56–63.Google Scholar
Posner, R. (2013). Reflections on Judging. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E. F. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P. (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Vol. 14. Radical Pragmatics (pp. 223–255). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Qiu, D. (1980). The application of linguistic analysis in detecting and solving crimes. Forensic Science and Technology, 5(5): 27–32.Google Scholar
Qiu, D. (1981). How to analyse speech in cases. Forensic Science and Technology, 6(2):31–38.Google Scholar
Qiu, D. (1985). Speech Recognition. Beijing: Mass Publishing House.Google Scholar
Qiu, D. (1991). The origin and development of investigative linguistics in China. Language Planning, 36(6): 37–38.Google Scholar
Qiu, D. (1995). Investigative Linguistics. Beijing: China People’s Public Security University Press.Google Scholar
Qu, T. & Wang, Z. (2022). Modelling multimodal design in conflict negotiation discourse. Modern Foreign Languages, 45(6): 780–793.Google Scholar
Qu, W. (2012). Reflections on the problems and their causes of the translation of Chinese legal terms. Chinese Translators Journal, 33(6) 68–75.Google Scholar
Qu, W. (2022). The system of principles of foreign translation of Chinese legislative texts: Based on the English translation practice of Chinese Civil Laws. Foreign Languages in China, 19(1): 1, 10–20.Google Scholar
Ramos, P. (2021). Translating legal terminology and phraseology: between inter-systemic incongruity and multilingual harmonization. Perspectives, 29(2): 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, 49: 91–136.Google Scholar
Sampasa-Kanyinga, H., Roumeliotis, P. & Xu, H. (2014). Associations between cyberbullying and school bullying victimization and suicidal ideation, plans and attempts among Canadian schoolchildren. PloS One, 9(7): e102145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarcevic, S. (1997). New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. (1993). Language Crimes: The Use and Abuse of Language Evidence in the Courtroom. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W. (1987). The Language of Confession, Interrogation and Deception.Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., et al. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 49(4): 376–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, D. & Wan, Y. (2021). The role of ‘persons with expertise’ in criminal proceedings. Journal of Sichuan Police College, 33(6):14–23.Google Scholar
Stygall, G. (1994). Trial Language: Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, B. (2022). Construction of criminal expert assistant (legal) aid assistance system. Evidence Science, 29(5): 587–599.Google Scholar
Su, L. (2023). Thinking about things, not words – a fragment of thought on ‘legal language’. Oriental Jurisprudence, 16(1): 91–101.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. & Zhou, G. (1997). Legal Linguistics. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press.Google Scholar
Sung, H.-C. (2020). Can online courts promote access to justice? A case study of the internet courts in China. The Computer Law and Security Report, 39: 105461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, J. (2018). From Guilt to Innocence: Discursive Construction of the Presumption of Innocence in Legal News Discourse. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. (1999). Legal Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. (2005). Some myths about legal language. Legal Studies Paper No. 2005–26, Loyola Law School. http://ssrn.com/abstract=845928.Google Scholar
Tian, H. & Wang, Z. (2016). Distributional features of attitudinal resources in statements of defense in Chinese criminal trials: Legal discourse as social process. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 37(2): 13–21.Google Scholar
Tian, J. (2008). Courtroom Interpreters’ Decision Making in Information Processing. MA thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and Context: A Socio-cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, M. (1994). Interactional Styles in the courtroom. In Gibbons, J. (ed.),Language and Law (pp. 217–233). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (1996). The intersection of linguistics and jurisprudence—an introduction to the Legal Linguistics Coursebook. Applied Linguistics, 5(4): 90–94.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (1997). Legal Linguistics Coursebook. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (1999). Legal Language Research. Guangzhou: Guangdong Education Press.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2004). Exploring the interactive language in prosecution and defense court trials. Applied Linguistics, 13(3): 76–82.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2010). Research on legal language in mainland China from the ‘legislative era’ to the ‘law revision era’. Applied Linguistics, 19(4): 2–9.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (2011). Analysis and authentication of linguistic evidence and its judicial application. Contemporary Rhetoric, 30(2): 27–31.Google Scholar
Wang, J., Su, J. Z., & Toury, Joseph G., eds. (2006). Law-Language-Linguistic Diversity: Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Law and Language. Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
Wang, P. & Wang, Z. (2016). A study on the legal discourse and ideational meaning of social processes – Taking the marriage law of the people’s republic of China as an example. Contemporary Rhetoric, 35(4): 56–67.Google Scholar
Wang, S. (2023). A Genre Study of Police Interrogation Discourse: From Investigation Centeredness to Trial Centeredness. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Li, J. & Cao, H. (2012). An overview of voiceprint identification studies. Police Technology, 28(4): 54–56.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. (2001). Appraisal systems and their operation: A new development in the systemic functional linguistics. Journal of Foreign Languages, 24(6): 13–20.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. & Liu, C. (2014). Attitudinal bonding in construing interpersonal harmony. Foreign Languages in China, 11(3): 19–25,33.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. & Tian, H. (2017). Legal discourse as a social process: From the SFL-based discourse semantics perspective. Linguistic Research, 38(1): 199–212.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. & Zhang, Q. (2015). Legal discourse as a social process and its textual semantics. Foreign Language Teaching, 59(1): 1–6.Google Scholar
Wei, Y. (2008). On burden of proof for ambiguous facts in reputation right cases. Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication, 48(2): 5–10.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (1994). Forensic linguistics: Conferences, institutions and journals. Linguistics Abroad, 33(2): 44–50.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (1995). Chinese evidence versus the institutionalized power of English. Forensic Linguistics, 2(2): 154–167.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (2002a). Formation, status and classification of forensic linguistics abroad. New Horizons in the Study of Language and Law–Proceedings of the First Symposium on Language and Law. (pp. 157–173). Beijing: Chinese Society for Ethnolinguistics.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (2002b). Forensic linguistics: Data-based research methods. Contemporary Linguistics, 41(1): 38–45,78.Google Scholar
Wu, W. (2002c). Language and the Law: Linguistic Research in the Legal Field. Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.Google Scholar
Xiong, Y. (2016). Authorship Identification of Anonymous Report Letters: From the Perspective of DIT. MA thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Xu, D. (2017). Dilemma and countermeasures on cultivation of MLTI legal translation talents. Foreign Languages in China, 14(4): 14–20.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2013). Realization of Persuasion in Chinese Court Conciliation: The Discourse Information Approach. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2014). Realisation of persuasion in Chinese court conciliation: A discourse information perspective (doctoral thesis abstract). International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 21(1): 157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. (2016). A new breakthrough in the theoretical construction of legal linguistics: A review of legal discourse information. Journal of Zhongyuan University of Technology, 27(2): 36–40.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2020). The invisible aggressive fist: Features of cyberbullying language in China. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 33(34): 1041–1064.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2021). Every Little Bit Counts: Identifying Implicit Cyberbullying Language on the Chinese Social Media. Conference paper presented at the Fifteenth Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguists, September 13–16. Birmingham: the University of Aston.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. (2024). Semiotic (De)construction of Judges’ Identities in China’s Internet Courts. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. In Press.Google Scholar
Xu, Y. & Trzaskawka, P. (2021). Towards descriptive adequacy of cyberbullying: Interdisciplinary studies on features, cases and legislative concerns of cyberbullying. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(4): 929–943.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, Y. & Yu, W. (2023). Legal translation and interpreting in China: Practices, theoretical studies and future trends. In Wagner, A. & Matulewska, A. (eds.), Research Handbook on Lurilinguistics (pp. 418–435). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C. (2008). Interpersonal meanings in police interrogations: An appraisal-engagement perspective. Modern Foreign Languages, 31(2): 141–149.Google Scholar
Yuan, C. (2010). Avoiding Revictimization: A Study of Police Interrogation Speech. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.Google Scholar
Yuan, C. & Liao, Z. (2010). The covert persuasiveness of rhetoric questions in lawyers’ defense speeches: Attitude perspective. Contemporary Rhetoric, 29(4): 24–30.Google Scholar
Yuan, C. & Hu, J. (2011). An adaptation analysis of engagement resources in lawyer representation. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies, 33(3): 87–94.Google Scholar
Yuan, C. & Hu, J. (2012). Punishing Crimes: An analysis of appraisal resources in public prosecution’s statements. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 23(3): 55–59.Google Scholar
Yuan, C., Zhang, S. & He, Q. (2018). Popularity of Latin and law French in legal English: A corpus-based disciplinary study of the language of the law. Linguistics and Human Sciences. 14(1–2): 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C. & Luo, X. (2021). A negotiation analysis of risk assessment in community correction from the perspective of exchange structure. Language and Dialogue, 11(2): 200–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C., Cao, H. & Zheng, J. (2023). Multimodal attitude analysis of Attorneys’ closing arguments and narrative construction. Modern Foreign Languages, 46(3): 319–331.Google Scholar
Yuan, C., He, Y. & Liu, Y. (2021). Rule by law versus rule of law: A multimodal analysis of persuasion and legal ideologies in anti-corruption discourse in China. Multimodality & Society, 1(4): 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuan, C., Xu, Y. & Zhang, S. (2024). Forensic and Legal Linguistics: New Perspectives and Development. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.Google Scholar
Zappavinga, M. & Martin, J. R. 2018. Discourse and Diversionary Justice: An Analysis of Youth Justice Conferencing. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C. & Zhuo, Y. (2020). Expert Assistant System: Expert Witness in China? – Guide to China’s Civil Evidence Rules (13). China Justice Observer.(www.chinajusticeobserver.com/a/expert-assistant-system-expert-witness-in-china-guide-to-chinas-civil-evidence-rules-13).Google Scholar
Zhang, F. (2018). A study on legal translation teaching and talents cultivation in the context of ‘One Belt, One Road’. Chinese Translators Journal, 40(2): 31–35.Google Scholar
Zhang, F. (2021). On the construction of quality assessment of legal translation: Taking the English translation of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China as a case. Chinese Translators Journal, 43(5): 121–130.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. (2011). Lawyer Evaluation in Chinese Courtroom. Beijing: Knowledge.Google Scholar
Zhang, L. & Wang, Z. (2022). A study of the normalization of expert opinion based on linguistic evidence. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 23(1): 100–104.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q. (2010). An Analysis of the Purpose Relations in the Courtroom Discourse. Journal of Shanxi University (Philosophy and Social Science), 33(6): 130–133.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. (2020). The application of idiolect features to authorship attribution for Chinese short texts. Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences, 21(2): 56–63.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. (2021). From flaming to incited crime: Recognising cyberbullying on Chinese WeChat account. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(4): 1093–1116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, X. (2001). Text type and legal texts. Modern Foreign Languages, 24(2): 192–200.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (2007). Textual interpretation of linguistic evidence. Contemporary Rhetoric (formerly Rhetorical Studies), 26(6): 25–27,40.Google Scholar
Zhang, S. (2016). A study on authorship attribution of Chinese texts based on discourse information analysis. International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 23(1): 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, H. & Wang, Z. (2022). Intermodal construction of lawyer identity: Interaction between linguistic and non-linguistic signs. Modern Foreign Languages, 45(5): 597–610.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. (2011). A Chinese-English Contrastive Discourse Analysis: On the Information Structure and Its Linguistic Realizations in Legal Discourse. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. (2018). On the disciplinary construction of legal translation in MTI education: Notions and pedagogical implications. Foreign Language and Literature Studies, 35(2): 192–202.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. & Xue, J. (2022). Conceptual transplantation and equivalent interpretation in legal translation: Translating key terms of the Civil Code of the People’s Republic of China. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 37(1): 27–33.Google Scholar
Zhao, J. & Xue, J. (2023). Translation strategies for rule-of-law terms with Chinese characteristics in the new era: Standardization and communication. Shanghai Journal of Translators, 38(1): 24–30,96.Google Scholar
Zheng, J. (2019a). A Study of Psycho-correction Discourse in Community Correction Under Restorative Justice from the Perspective of Individuation. Unpublished PhD thesis, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Zheng, J. (2019b). An individuation study of identity construction via multimodal discourse in community corrections. Journal of Xi’an International Studies University, 27(2): 37–42.Google Scholar
Zheng, J. & Yuan, C. (2018). Multimodal discourse construction of the defendant’s identity in community correction pre-trial social investigation and evaluation. Journal of Political Science and Law, 35(4): 62–69.Google Scholar
Zheng, J. & Yuan, C. (2021). Discursive construction of identities of judicial social workers in community correction. Modern Foreign Languages, 44(2): 183–195.Google Scholar
Zheng, X. & Wang, Y. (2021, September 13–15). Changed space and reconstructed meaning a semiotic analysis of the Internet courthouse in China. 15th Biennial Conference of the International Association of Forensic Linguists, Aston University.Google Scholar
Zhou, Q. (2017). Strengthening the construction of Hangzhou Internet Court, exploring new modes of cyber justice and serving the building of a strong internet country. China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence, 1(5): 1–4.Google Scholar
Zou, Y. (2008). Types of linguistic evidence and their semantic examination. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, 2(3): 96–102.Google Scholar
Zou, Y. (2018). Is legal linguistics ‘the language of the law’ or ‘linguistics of the law’ or ‘law and language’: Also on the discipline connotation and orientation of legal linguistics. Journal of Liaoning Normal University (Social Science), 41(1): 8–12.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Forensic Linguistics in China
  • Yuan Chuanyou, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Xu Youping, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Lu Nan, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
  • Online ISBN: 9781009162548
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Forensic Linguistics in China
  • Yuan Chuanyou, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Xu Youping, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Lu Nan, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
  • Online ISBN: 9781009162548
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Forensic Linguistics in China
  • Yuan Chuanyou, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Xu Youping, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, Lu Nan, Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
  • Online ISBN: 9781009162548
Available formats
×