Skip to main content Accessibility help
Designing for Policy Effectiveness
  • Cited by 32

Designing for Policy Effectiveness

The field of policy studies has always been interested in analyzing and improving the sets of policy tools adopted by governments to correct policy problems, and better understanding and improving processes of policy analysis and policy formulation in order to do so. Past studies have helped clarify the role of historical processes, policy capacities and design intentions in affecting policy formulation processes, and more recently in understanding how the bundling of multiple policy elements together to meet policy goals can be better understood and done. While this work has progressed, however, the discussion of what goals policy designs should serve remains disjointed. Here it is argued that a central goal, in fact, 'the' central goal, of policy design is effectiveness. Effectiveness serves as the basic goal of any design, upon which is built other goals such as efficiency or equity.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the Element
  • Copyright

  • COPYRIGHT: © Giliberto Capano, Ishani Mukherjee, Meng-Hsuan Chou, Michael Howlett, B. Guy Peters, and Pauline Ravinet 2018


Hide all
Braathen, N. A. (2007). Instrument mixes for environmental policy: how many stones should be used to kill a bird? International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 1(2), 185–235. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Dudley, G. & Richardson, J. (1999). Competing advocacy coalitions and the process of “frame reflection”: a longitudinal analysis of EU steel policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(2), 225–48. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–8. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Gilabert, P. & Lawford-Smith, H. (2012). Political feasibility: a conceptual exploration. Political Studies, 60(4), 809–25. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Mazey, S. & Richardson, J. (1997). Policy framing: interest groups and the lead up to 1996 Intergovernmental Conference. West European Politics, 20(3), 111–33. CrossRef | Google Scholar
O’Toole, L. J. (2014). Globalization, global governance and public administration. In S. Kim , S. Ashley , & W. H. Lambright , eds., Public Administration in the Context of Global Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 3–8. Google Scholar
Pestoff, V. A. , Brandsen, T. , & Verschuere, B. (2012). New Public Governance, the Third Sector and Co-Production. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
Redström, J. (2006). Persuasive design: fringes and foundations. In A. Wijnand , I. Jsselsteijn , Y. A. W. de Kort , C. Midden , B. Eggen , & E. van den Hoven , eds., Persuasive Technology (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3962). Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 112–22. Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–69. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Rogge, K. S. & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: an extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620–35. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Room, G. (2011). Complexity, Institutions and Public Policy: Agile Decision-Making in a Turbulent World. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Skodvin, T. , Gullberg, A. T. , & Aakre, S. (2010). Target-group influence and political feasibility: the case of climate policy design in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 854–73. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Sterner, T. (2003). Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management. Washington, DC: Resource for the Future Press. Google Scholar
Whiteman, D. (1985b). Reaffirming the importance of strategic use: a two-dimensional perspective on policy analysis in congress. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization 6(3), 203–24. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Woodside, K. (1986). Policy instruments and the study of public policy. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 19(4), 775–93. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bullock, H. , Mountford, J. & Stanley, R. (2001). Better Policy-Making. London: Centre for Management and Policy Studies, Cabinet Office, United Kingdom. Google Scholar
Hayes, M. T. (2006). Incrementalism and Public Policy. Lanham, MD: University Press of America. Google Scholar
Hjern, B. & Porter, D. O. (1981). Implementation structures: a new unit of administrative analysis. Organization Studies, 2(3), 211–27. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hood, C. (1983). Using bureaucracy sparingly. Public Administration, 61(2), 197–208. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Linder, S. H. & Peters, B. G. (1987). A design perspective on policy implementation: the fallacy of misplaced precision. Review of Policy Research, 6(3), 459–75. CrossRef | Google Scholar
May, P. J. (2003). Policy design and implementation. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre , eds., Handbook of Public Administration. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, pp.223–33. Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1981). Rethinking public management: third party government and the changing forms of government action. Public Policy, 29(3), 255–75. Google Scholar
Timmermans, A. , Rothmayr, C. , Serduelt, U. , & Varone, F. (1998). “The Design of Policy Instruments: Perspectives and Concepts.” Paper presented to the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois. Google Scholar
Turnbull, N. (2017). Policy design: its enduring appeal in a complex world and how to think it differently. Public Policy and Administration. Published online 31 May 2017. Available at (last accessed 12 December 2017). CrossRef | Google Scholar
70 Weaver, K. (2009b). Target Compliance: The Final Frontier of Policy Implementation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar
Whiteman, D. (1985a). The fate of policy analysis in congressional decision making: three types of use in committees.” Western Political Quarterly, 38(2), 294–311. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Wu, X. , Ramesh, M. , Howlett, M. , & Fritzen, S. (2010). The Public Policy Primer: Managing Public Policy. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Anderson, J. E. (1975). Public Policymaking, New York, NY: Praeger. Google Scholar
Barnett, C. K. & Shore, B. (2009). Reinventing program design: challenges in leading sustainable institutional change. Leadership & Organization, 30(1), 16–35. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Barzelay, M. (2001). The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
Considine, M. (2012). Thinking outside the box? Applying design theory to public policy. Politics & Policy, 40(4), 704–24. CrossRef | Google Scholar
60 Doremus, H. (2003). A policy portfolio approach to biodiversity protection on private lands. Environmental Science & Policy, 6, 217–32. CrossRef | Google Scholar
64 Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. (2012). Governance network theory: past, present and future. Policy & Politics, 40(4), 587–606. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-Based Policy: A Realist Perspective. London: Sage. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Raadschelders, J. , Vigoda-Gadot, E. , & Kirsner, M. , eds. (2014). Global Dimensions of Public Administration and Governance: A Comparative Voyage. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
Rayner, J. , McNutt, K. , & Wellstead, A. (2013). Dispersed capacity and weak coordination: the challenge of climate change adaptation in Canada’s forest policy sector. Review of Policy Research, 30(1), 66–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Seymour-Ure, C. (1987). Institutionalization and informality in advisory systems. In W. Plowden , ed., Advising the Rulers. London: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 175–84. Google Scholar
Baumgartner, F. & Jones, B. (1991). Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. Journal of Politics, 53(4), 1044–74. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Bobrow, D. B. & Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Policy Analysis by Design, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
Bovens, M. , ’t Hart, P. & Kuipers, S. (2008). The politics of policy evaluation. In R. E. Goodin , M. Moran , & M. Rein , eds., The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 319–35. Google Scholar
Colebatch, H. K. (2017). The idea of policy design: intention, process, outcome, meaning and validity. Public Policy and Administration, publishing online: May 18, 2017. (last accessed 11 December 11 2017). CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hay, C. & Smith, N. J.-A. (2010). How policy-makers (really) understand globalization: the internal architecture of Anglophone globalization discourse in Europe. Public Administration, 88(4), 903–27. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2011). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar
Howlett, M. , Vince, J. & del Río, P. (2017). Policy integration and multi-level governance: dealing with the vertical dimension of policy mix designs. Politics and Governance, 5(2), 69–78. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Jarvis, D. S. L. (2011). Infrastructure Regulation: What Works, Why and How Do We Know? Lessons from Asia and Beyond. Singapore: World Scientific. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Mintrom, M. & Luetjens, J. (2017). Creating public value: tightening connections between policy design and public management. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 170–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–53. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Schneider, A. L. & Ingram, H. (1997). Policy Design for Democracy. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. Google Scholar
Schneider, A. & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Studies Journal, 37(1): 103–19. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Weimer, D. L. & Vining, A. (2011). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice, 5th edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
Capano, G. , & Woo, J. J. (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: a critical appraisal. Policy Sciences, 50(3), 399–426. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2009). Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: a multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Policy Sciences, 42(1), 73–89. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Kern, F. & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Science, 42(4), 391–408. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Koch, P. (2013). Overestimating the shift from government to governance: evidence from Swiss metropolitan areas. Governance, 26(3), 397–423 CrossRef | Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1951). The policy orientation. In D. Lerner & H. D. Lasswell , eds., The Policy Sciences: Recent Developments in Scope and Method. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 3–15. Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artificial Intelligence, 4, 181–201. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Tunzelmann, N. von (2010). Technology and technology policy in the postwar UK: market failure or “network failure?” Revue d’économie industrielle, 129–130, 237–58. Google Scholar
Weimer, D. L. (1993). The current state of design craft: borrowing, tinkering, and problem solving. Public Administration Review, 53(2), 110–20. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Boswell, C. (2012). The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Braathen, N. A. & Croci, E. (2005). Environmental agreements used in combination with other policy instruments. In E. Croci , ed., The Handbook of Environmental Voluntary Agreements: Design, Implementation and Evaluation Issues. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 335–64. Google Scholar
Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654–66. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Harcourt, A. J. (1998). EU media ownership regulation: conflict over the definition of alternatives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(3), 369–89. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2014a). From the “old” to the “new” policy design: design thinking beyond markets and collaborative agreements. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Howlett, M. & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs. packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–82. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Levin, K. , Cashore, B. , Bernstein, S. & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 121–52. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Linder, S. H. & Peters, B. G. (1984). From social theory to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 4(3), 237–59. CrossRef | Google Scholar
May, P. J. (2005). Regulation and compliance motivations: examining different approaches. Public Administration Review, 65(1), 31–44. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Rein, M. & Schön, D. A. (1991). Frame-reflective policy discourse. In P. Wagner , C.H. Weiss , B. Wittrock , & H. Wollman , eds., Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–89. Google Scholar
Rotberg, R. I. (2014) Good Governance Means Performance and Results. Governance 27, 511–18. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Thompson, J. D. & Tuden, A. (1959). Strategy, Structure and Process in Organizational Design (Comparative Studies in Administration). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Administrative Studies Center. Google Scholar
Walker, W. E. , Marchau, V. A. W. J. , & Swanson, D. (2010). Addressing deep uncertainty using adaptive policies: introduction to Section 2. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), 917–23. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Botterill, L. C. & Hindmoor, A. (2012). Turtles all the way down: bounded rationality in an evidence-based age. Policy Studies, 33, 367–79. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Buckman, G. & Diesendorf, M. (2010). Design limitations in Australian renewable electricity policies. Energy Policy, 38(7), 3365–76. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Estlund, D. (2003). Why not epistocracy? In N. Reshotko , ed., Desire, Identity and Existence: Essays in Honor of T. M. Penner. Kelowna, BC: Academic Printing and Publishing, pp.53–69. Google Scholar
Goldsmith, S. & Eggers, W. D. (2004). Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2014b). Policy design: what, who, how and why? In C. Halpern , P. Lascoumes & P. Le Gales , eds., L’instrumentation de l’action publique. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, pp. 281–316. Google Scholar
65 Linder, S. H. & Peters, B. G. (1991). The logic of public policy design: linking policy actors and plausible instruments. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 4(1), 125–51. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Mesequer, C. (2006). Policy learning, policy diffusion, and the making of a new order. Annals of the American Academy, 598, 67–82. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Page, E. C. (2012). Policy without Politicians: Bureaucratic Influence in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Sidney, M. S. (2007). Policy formulation: design and tools. In F. Fischer , G. J. Miller , & M. S. Sidney , eds., Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. New Brunswick, NJ: CRC Taylor & Francis, pp. 79–87. Google Scholar
Tollefson, C. , Zito, A. R. , & Gale, F. (2012). Symposium overview: conceptualizing new governance arrangements. Public Administration, 90(1), 3–18. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Trebilcock, M. J. , Tuohy, C. J. , & Wolfson, A. D. (1979). “Professional regulation: a staff study of accountancy, architecture, engineering, and law in Ontario prepared for the Professional Organizations Committee.” Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General. Google Scholar
59 Chou, M.-H. & Ravinet, P. (forthcoming). Designing global public policies in the 21st century. In K. Moloney & D. Stone , eds., Handbook on Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Considine, M. , Alexander, D. & Lewis, J. M. (2014). Policy design as craft: design expertise using a semi-experimental approach. Policy Sciences, 47, 209–25. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Grabosky, P. N. (1994). Green markets: environmental regulation by the private sector. Law and Policy, 16(4), 419–48. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2016). Achilles’ heels of governance: critical capacity deficits and their role in governance failures. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 301–13. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Klijn, E. H. , Koppenjan, J. & Termeer, K. (1995). Managing networks in the public sector: a theoretical study of management strategies in policy networks. Public Administration, 73, 437–54. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Stone, D. (2013). Knowledge Actors and Transnational Governance: The Private-Public Policy Nexus in the Global Agora. Houndsmill: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Tiernan, A. & Wanna, J. (2006). “Competence, Capacity, Capability: Towards Conceptual Clarity in the Discourse of Declining Policy Skills.” Paper presented at the Govnet International Conference, Australian National University, Canberra. Google Scholar
Weiss, C. H. (1976). Policy research in the university: practical aid or academic exercise? Policy Studies Journal, 4(3): 224–8. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Cerna, L. & Chou, M.-H. (2014). The regional dimension in the global competition for talent: lessons from framing the European Scientific Visa and Blue Card. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 76–95. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Christensen, T. , Laegreid, P. & L. R. Wise . (2002). Transforming administrative policy. Public Administration, 80(1), 153–79. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Funke, J. (1991). Solving complex problems: exploration and control of complex systems. In R. Sternberg & P. Frensch , eds., Complex Problem Solving – Principles and Methods. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Association. Google Scholar
Head, B. W. (2016). Toward more “evidence-informed” policy making? Public Administration Review, 76(3), 472–84. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hisschemöller, M. & Hoppe, R. (1995). Coping with intractable controversies: the case of problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowledge and Policy, 8, 40–60. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hood, C. (2007). Intellectual obsolescence and intellectual makeovers: reflections on the tools of government after two decades. Governance, 20(1), 127–44. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Howlett, M. & Lejano, R. P. (2012). Tales from the crypt: the rise and fall (and rebirth?) of policy design. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–81. Google Scholar
del Río, P. (2010). Analysing the interactions between renewable energy promotion and energy efficiency support schemes: the impact of different instruments and design elements. Energy Policy, 38(9), 4978–89. CrossRef | Google Scholar
del Río, P. & Howlett, M. (2013). “Beyond the ‘Tinbergen Rule’ in Policy Design: Matching Tools and Goals in Policy Portfolios.” SSRN Scholarly Paper. Available at (last accessed 30 September 2017). Google Scholar
del Río, P. , Silvosa, A. C. & Gómez, G. I. (2011). Policies and design elements for the repowering of wind farms: a qualitative analysis of different options. Energy Policy, 39(4), 1897–1908. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. (1983). Don’t toss coins into garbage cans: a prologue to policy design. Journal of Public Policy, 3, 345–67. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2003). Survey article: recipes for public spheres: eight institutional design choices and their consequences. Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 338–67. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. J. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response for Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
62 Hood, C. (2002). The risk game and the blame game. Government and Opposition, 37(1), 15–54. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Moloney, K. & Stone, D. , eds. (2018). Handbook on Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Sackett, D. , Rosenberg, W. M. C. , Gray, J. A. M. , Haynes, R. B. , & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–2. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • 63 Howlett, M. & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in “new governance arrangements.” Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18. Google Scholar
    Jordan, A. , Benson, D. , Wurzel, R. & Zito, A. (2011). Policy instruments in practice. In J. S. Dryzek , R. B. Norgaard & D. Schlosberg , eds., Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 537–49. Google Scholar
    Jordan, A. & Turnpenny, J. R. (2016). The Tools of Policy Formulation: Actors, Capacities, Venues and Effects. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
    Klijn, E.-H. & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2006). Institutional design: changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review, 8(1), 141–60. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Mayntz, R. (1983). The conditions of effective public policy: a new challenge for policy analysis. Policy and Politics, 11(2), 123–43. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Menahem, G. & Stein, R. (2013). High-capacity and low-capacity governance networks in welfare services delivery: a typology and empirical examination of the case of Israeli municipalities. Public Administration, 91(1), 211–31. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Mörth, U. (2000). Competing frames in the European Commission: the case of the defence of EU industry and equipment issue. Journal of European Public Policy, 7(2), 173–89. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peters, B. G. (2014). Implementation structures as institutions. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 131–44. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peters, B. G. , Eliadis, P. , Hill, M. M. & Howlett, M. (2005). Conclusion: the future of instruments research. In P. Eliadis , M. M. Hill , & M. J. Howlett , eds., Designing Government: From Instruments to Governance. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 353–63. Google Scholar
    Pressman, J. L. & Wildavsky, A. B. (1973). Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington Are Dashed in Oakland. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
    Tribe, L. H. (1972). Policy science: analysis or ideology? Philosophy and Public Affairs, 2(1), 66–110. Google Scholar
    Warfield, J. N. & Perino Jr., G.H. (1999). The problematique: evolution of an idea. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(3), 221–6. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    58 Boonekamp, P. G. M. (2006). Actual interaction effects between policy measures for energy efficiency: a qualitative matrix method and quantitative simulation results for households. Energy, 31(14), 2848–73. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Capano, G. , Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (forthcoming). Designing for robustness: surprise, agility and improvisation in policy design. Policy & Society. Google Scholar
    Gibson, R. B. , ed. (1999). Voluntary Initiatives: The New Politics of Corporate Greening. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press. Google Scholar
    Jordan, A. , Benson, D. , Wurzel, R. & Zito, A. (2012). Environmental policy: governing by multiple policy instruments? In J. J. Richardson , ed., Constructing a Policy State? Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105–24. Google Scholar
    Kiss, B. , Manchón, C. G. & Neij, L. (2013). The role of policy instruments in supporting the development of mineral wool insulation in Germany, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 187–99. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Latour, B. (2008). “A Cautious Prometheus? A Few Steps Toward a Philosophy of Design,” Keynote Address, Networks of Design Conference , Falmouth, Cornwall, United Kingdom. Google Scholar
    Meuleman, L. (2009b). “Metagoverning Governance Styles: Increasing the Public Manager’s Toolbox.” Paper presented at the ECPR general conference, Potsdam. Google Scholar
    66 Nair, S. & Howlett, M. (2017). Policy myopia as a source of policy failure: adaptation and policy learning under deep uncertainty. Policy & Politics, 45(1), 103–18. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Newman, J. & Head, B. W. (2017). Wicked tendencies in policy problems: rethinking the distinction between social and technical problems. Policy and Society, 36(3), 414–29. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peters, B. G. (2017). What is so wicked about wicked problems? A conceptual analysis and a research program. Policy and Society, 36(3), 385–96. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Roch, C. , Pitts, D. , & Navarro, I. (2010). Representative bureaucracy and policy tools: ethnicity, student discipline, and representation in public schools. Administration & Society, 42(1), 38–65. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Shore, C. , Wright, S. , & Pero, D. , eds. (2011). Policy Worlds: Anthropology and Analysis of Contemporary Power. New York, NY: Berghahn Books. Google Scholar
    Weimer, D. L. (1992). The craft of policy design: can it be more than art? Policy Studies Review, 11(3/4), 370–88. Google Scholar
    Alexander, E. (1982). Design in the decision-making process. Policy Sciences, 14, 279–92. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Barker, A. & Peter, B. G. eds. (1993). The Politics of Expert Advice: Creating, Using and Manipulating Scientific Knowledge for Public Policy. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
    Cashore, B. & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating what equilibrium? Institutional rigidities and thermostatic properties in Pacific Northwest forest policy dynamics. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–51. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Dryzek, J. S. & Ripley, B. (1988). The ambitions of policy design. Policy Studies Review, 7(4), 705–19. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Geddes, A. & Guiraudon, V. (2004). Britain, France, and EU anti-discrimination policy: the emergence of an EU policy paradigm. West European Politics, 27(2), 334–53. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lascoumes, P. & Le Gales, P. (2007). Introduction: understanding public policy through its instruments – from the nature of instruments to the sociology of public policy instrumentation. Governance, 20(1), 1–21. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Linder, S. H. & Peters, B. G. (1990). Policy formulation and the challenge of conscious design. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13(3), 303–11. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Meuleman, L. (2009a). The cultural dimension of metagovernance: why governance doctrines may fail. Public Organization Review, 10(1), 49–70. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peters, B. G. (1988). Comparing Public Bureaucracies: Problems of Theory and Method. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press. Google Scholar
    68 Salamon, L. M. (2002). The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Schön, D. A. & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Solving Intractable Policy Disputes. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar
    Swanson, D. , Barg, S. , Tyler, S. , Venema, H. , Tomar, S. , Bhadwal, S. , Nair, S. , Roy, D. , & Drexhage, J. (2010). Seven tools for creating adaptive policies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(6), 924–39. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    69 Thelen, K. , Mahoney, J. , & Rueschemeyer, D. (2003). How institutions evolve: insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer , eds., Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208–40. Google Scholar
    Verweij, M. (2011). Clumsy Solutions for a Wicked World: How to Improve Global Governance. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Google Scholar
    Yi, H. & Feiock, R. C. (2012). Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Review of Policy Research, 29(2), 193–206. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Briassoulis, H. (2005). Policy Integration for Complex Environmental Problems. Aldershot: Ashgate. Google Scholar
    Lecuyer, O. & Quirion, P. (2013). Can uncertainty justify overlapping policy instruments to mitigate emissions? Ecological Economics, 93, 177–91. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lee, Y. (2008). Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign: International Journal of CoCreation in Design and the Arts, 4(1), 31–50. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Mahoney, J. (2012). The logic of process tracing tests in the social sciences. Sociological Methods and Research, 41(4), 566–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Salamon, L. M. (1989). The tools approach: basic analytics. In L. M. Salamon & M.S. Lund , eds., Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action. Washington, DC: Urban Institute, pp. 23–50. Google Scholar
    Stone, D. & Ladi, S. (2015). Global public policy and transnational administration. Public Administration, 93(4), 839–55. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Thelen, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Weaver, K. (2009a). “If You Build It, Will They Come? Overcoming Unforeseen Obstacles to Program Effectiveness.” The Tansley Lecture, University of Saskatchewan. Google Scholar
    Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–71. Google Scholar
    Bason, C. (2014). Design for Policy. Burlington, VT: Gower. Google Scholar
    Beland, D. (2007) Ideas and institutional change in social security: conversion, layering and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Bobrow, D. B. (2006). Policy design: ubiquitous, necessary and difficult. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre , eds., Handbook of Public Policy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 75–96. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Considine, M. , Alexander, D. & Lewis, J. M. (2009). Networks, Innovation and Public Policy: Politicians, Bureaucrats and Pathways to Change Inside Government. Basingstoke: Macmillan. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Elmore, R. F. (1985). Forward and backward mapping: reversible logic in the analysis of public policy. In K. Hanf & T. A. J. Toonen , eds., Policy Implementation in Federal and Unitary States, Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 76–98. Google Scholar
    61 Grant, W. (2010). Policy instruments in the Common Agricultural Policy. West European Politics, 33(1), 22–38. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Gunningham, N. , Grabosky, P. N. & Sinclair, D. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Google Scholar
    Halligan, J. (1995). Policy advice and the public sector. In B. G. Peters & D. T. Savoie , eds., Governance in a Changing Environment. Montreal, QC: McGill-Queen’s University Press, pp. 138–72. Google Scholar
    Howlett, M. & Mukherjee, I. (2014). Policy design and non-design: towards a spectrum of policy formulation types. Politics and Governance, 2(2), 57–71. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Howlett, M. & Ramesh, M. (2015). The two orders of governance failure: design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society, 33(4), 317–27. Google Scholar
    Keast, R. , Mandell, M. & Brown, K. (2006). Mixing state, market and network governance modes: the role of government in “crowded” policy domains. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 9(1), 27–50. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Wu, X. , Ramesh, M. , & Howlett, M. (2015). Blending skill and resources across multiple levels of activity: competences, capabilities and the policy capacities of government. Policy & Society, 34(3–4), 165–71. Google Scholar
    Coen, D. & Pegram, T. (2015). Wanted: a third generation of global governance and research. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 28(4), 417–20. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Craft, J. & Howlett, M. (2012). Policy formulation, governance shifts and policy influence: location and content in policy advisory systems. Journal of Public Policy 32(2), 79–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    de Leon, P. (1997). Democracy and the Policy Sciences, Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Google Scholar
    Dunlop, C. A. (2010). The temporal dimension of knowledge and the limits of policy appraisal: biofuels policy in the UK. Policy Sciences, 43(4), 343–63. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Guiraudon, V. (2000). European integration and migration policy: vertical policy-making as venue shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251–71. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Haasnoot, M. , Kwakkel, J. H. , Walker, W. E. (2013). Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 485–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Hallerberg, M. & Wehner, J. (2013). “The Technical Competence of Economic Policy-Makers in Developed Democracies.” SSRN Scholarly Paper, July 29, 2013. Available at (last accessed 15 December 15, 2017). Google Scholar
    Hawkesworth, M. (1992). Epistemology and policy analysis. In W. Dunn & R. M. Kelly , eds., Advances in Policy Studies. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, pp. 291–329. Google Scholar
    Hou, Y. & Brewer, G. (2010). Substitution and supplementation between co-functional policy instruments: evidence from state budget stabilization practices. Public Administration Review, 70(6), 914–24. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Howlett, M. (2004). Beyond good and evil in policy implementation: instrument mixes, implementation styles and second-generation theories of policy instrument choice. Policy and Society, 23(2), 1–17. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Howlett, M. (2013). Policy work, policy advisory systems and politicization. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(1), 4–7. Google Scholar
    Howlett, M. , Mukherjee, I. & Woo, J. J. (2015). The new design orientation in policy formulation research: from tools to toolkits in policy instrument studies. Policy and Politics, 43(2), 291–311. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Jordan, A. & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–58. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lang, A. (2016). “Collaborative Governance in Health and Technology Policy the Use and Effects of Procedural Policy Instruments.” Administration & Society, published online 10 August 2016. Available at (last accessed 12 December, 2017. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lowi, T. J. (1972). Four systems of politics, policy and choice. Public Administration Review, 32(4), 298–310. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    May, P. J. & Jochim, A. E. (2013). Policy regime perspective: policies, politics, and governing. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 426–52. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peters, B. G. & Tarpley, M. M. (2016). “Are Wicked Problems Really So Wicked?: Perceptions of Policy Problems.” Paper presented at conference on the Governance of Wicked Problems, Wageningen, the Netherlands, 27–28 October 2016. Google Scholar
    Banfield, E. C. (1977). Policy science as metaphysical madness. In R. A. Goldwin , ed., Statesmanship and Bureaucracy. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy, pp. 1–35. Google Scholar
    Blonz, J. A. , Vajjhala, S. P. & Safirova, E. (2008). Growing complexities: a cross-sector review of US biofuels policies and their interactions. Resources for the Future (RFF) Discussion Paper No. RFF DP 08–47. Available at–47_final.pdf (last accessed 30 September 2017). CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Caplan, N. , & Weiss, C. H. (1977). A Minimal Set of Conditions Necessary for the Utilization of Social Science Knowledge in Policy Formulation at the National Level. Lexington, KY: Lexington Books. Google Scholar
    Hood, C. & Margetts, H. Z. (2007). The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Majone, G. (1975). On the Notion of Political Feasibility. European Journal of Political Research, 3(2), 259–74. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (1998). Institutions and time: problems of conceptualization and explanation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(4), 565–84. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    67 Pritchett, L. & Woolcock, M. (2004). Solutions when the solution is the problem: arraying the disarray in development. World Development (special issue: Island Studies), 32(2), 191–212. CrossRef | Google Scholar


    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Total abstract views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.