Element contents
Series: Elements in the Problems of God
God and the Problem of Evidential Ambiguity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 December 2023
Summary
When it comes to what many of us think of as the deepest questions of existence, the answers can seem difficult to make out. This difficulty, or ambiguity, is the topic of this Element. The Element begins by offering a general account of what evidential ambiguity consists in and uses it to try to make sense of the idea that our world is religiously ambiguous in some sense. It goes on to consider the questions of how we ought to investigate the nature of ultimate reality and whether evidential ambiguity is itself a significant piece of evidence in the quest.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in the Problems of GodOnline ISBN: 9781009269841Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 May 2024
References
Abraham, W. J. (1987). Cumulative Case Arguments for Christian Theism. In Abraham, W. J. & Holtzer, S. W., eds., The Rationality of Religious Belief: Essays in Honour of Basil Mitchell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 17–37.Google Scholar
Allison, D. C. (2022). Encountering Mystery: Religious Experience in a Secular Age. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (2017). Divine Hiddenness: Defeated Evidence. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 81, 119–32.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (2021). Divine Hiddenness: An Evidential Argument. Philosophical Perspectives, 35, 5–22.Google Scholar
Baker-Hytch, M. (2016). Mutual Epistemic Dependence and the Demographic Divine Hiddenness Problem. Religious Studies, 52(3), 375–94.Google Scholar
Baker-Hytch, M. (2023). Natural Theology and Religious Belief. In Fuqua, J., Greco, J., & McNab, T., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Religious Epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–28.Google Scholar
Baker-Hytch, M., & Benton, M. A. (2015). Defeatism Defeated. Philosophical Perspectives, 29(1), 40–66.Google Scholar
Benton, M. A. (2017). Epistemology Personalized. The Philosophical Quarterly, 67(269), 813–34.Google Scholar
Benton, M. A., Hawthorne, J., & Isaacs, Y. (2016). Evil and Evidence. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, 7, 1–31.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (1997). Internalism, Externalism and the No-Defeater Condition. Synthese, 110(3), 399–417.Google Scholar
Bergmann, M. (2021). Radical Skepticism and Epistemic Intuition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boghossian, P. (2001). Inference and Insight. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(3), 633–40.Google Scholar
Braddock, M. (2023). Natural Nonbelief in God: Prehistoric Humans, Divine Hiddenness, and Debunking. In Machuca, D. E., ed., Evolutionary Debunking Arguments: Ethics, Philosophy of Religion, Philosophy of Mathematics, Metaphysics, and Epistemology. New York, NY: Routledge, 160–84.Google Scholar
Carr, B. (2008). Cosmology and Religion. In Clayton, P., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 139–55.Google Scholar
Clark, K. J., & Barrett, J. L. (2011). Reidian Religious Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 79(2), 1–37.Google Scholar
Cottingham, J. (2005). The Spiritual Dimension: Religion, Philosophy, and Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L., & Moreland, J. P. (2009). Introduction. In Craig, W. L. & Moreland, J. P., eds., The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Oxford: Blackwell, ix–xiii.Google Scholar
Dalal, N. (2021). Advaita Vedānta. In Goetz, S. & Taliaferro, C., eds., The Encylopedia of Philosophy of Religion. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. (2007). You Have to Give up Your Intuitions about Consciousness. In Blackmore, S., ed., Conversations on Consciousness: What the Best Minds Think about the Brain, Free Will, and What It Means to Be Human. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 79–91.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. (1988 [1641]). Meditations on First Philosophy. In Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R., & Murdoch, D., eds., The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Draper, P. (2002). Seeing but Not Believing: Confessions of a Practicing Agnostic. In Howard-Snyder, D. & Moser, P. K., eds., Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 197–214.Google Scholar
Draper, P. (2010). Cumulative Cases. In Taliaferro, C., Draper, P., & Quinn, P. L., eds., A Companion to Philosophy of Religion. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 414–24.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2001). A Bayesian Account of Independent Evidence with Applications. Philosophy of Science, 68(3), S123–S140.Google Scholar
Fitelson, B. (2007). Likelihoodism, Bayesianism, and Relational Confirmation. Synthese, 156(3), 473–89.Google Scholar
Goldberg, S. (2014). Does Externalist Epistemology Rationalize Religious Commitment? In Callahan, L. F. & O’Connor, T., eds., Religious Faith and Intellectual Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–98.Google Scholar
Goldie, P. (2000). The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, J. 2013. Theism, Atheism, and Bayesianism: Part 1. Philosophy of Cosmology Conference ‘Is “God” Explanatory?’. St Anne’s College, Oxford. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItV-gPtxtL0.Google Scholar
Hick, J. (1989). An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsch, S. R. (1960 [1836]). The Nineteen Letters about Judaism. New York, NY: Philip Feldheim.Google Scholar
Howard-Snyder, D., & Moser, P. K., eds. (2002). Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. (1979 [1896]). The Will to Believe and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. (2014). Evidence. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/evidence.Google Scholar
Kopec, M., & Titelbaum, M. G. (2016). The Uniqueness Thesis. Philosophy Compass, 11(4), 189–200.Google Scholar
Kvanvig, J. L. (2002). Divine Hiddenness: What Is the Problem? In Howard-Snyder, D. & Moser, P. K., eds., Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 149–63.Google Scholar
Lasonen-Aarnio, M. (2014). Higher-Order Evidence and the Limits of Defeat. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 88(2), 314–45.Google Scholar
Lebens, S. (2022). Defining Religion. Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion, 10, 145–68.Google Scholar
Leftow, B. (2016). Naturalistic Pantheism. In Buckareff, A. & Nagasawa, Y., eds., Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 64–88.Google Scholar
Leslie, J. (2016). A Way of Picturing God. In Buckareff, A. & Nagasawa, Y., eds., Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 50–63.Google Scholar
Maitzen, S. (2006). Divine Hiddenness and the Demographics of Theism. Religious Studies, 42(2), 177–91.Google Scholar
Marsh, J. (2013). Darwin and the Problem of Natural Nonbelief. The Monist, 96(3), 349–76.Google Scholar
Marsh, J. (2017). On the Socratic Injunction to Follow the Argument Where It Leads. In Draper, P. & Schellenberg, J. L., eds., Renewing Philosophy of Religion: Exploratory Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 187–207.Google Scholar
Mawson, T. J. (2013). The Case against Atheism. In Bullivant, S. & Ruse, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Atheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 22–36.Google Scholar
McCauley, R. (2011). Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McGrew, T. & Depoe, J. M. (2013). Natural Theology and the Uses of Argument. Philosophia Christi, 15(2), 299–309.Google Scholar
McKim, R. (2001). Religious Ambiguity and Religious Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. (2004). Divine Hiddenness Does Not Justify Atheism. In Peterson, M. L. & Van Arragon, R. J., eds., Contemporary Debates in the Philosophy of Religion. Oxford: Blackwell, 42–54.Google Scholar
Moser, P. K. (2010). The Evidence for God: Religious Knowledge Reexamined. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. (1872). Fifteen Sermons Preached before the University of Oxford. London: Longmans, Green and Co.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1989). The Examined Life: Philosophical Meditations. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Oppy, G. (2017). Rationality and Worldview. In Draper, P. & Schellenberg, J. L., eds., Renewing Philosophy of Religion: Exploratory Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 174–86.Google Scholar
Page, B. (2020). Arguing to Theism from Consciousness. Faith and Philosophy, 37(3), 336–62.Google Scholar
Parsons, K. M. (2013). Perspectives on Natural Theology from Analytic Philosophy. In Manning, R. Re, Brooke, J. Hedley, & Watts, F., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 248–61.Google Scholar
Penelhum, T. (1971). Religion and Rationality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
Pittard, J. (2020). Disagreement, Deference, and Religious Commitment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J. L. (1986). Contemporary Theories of Knowledge. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Poston, T. (2018). The Argument from (A) to (Y): The Argument from So Many Arguments. In Walls, J. L. & Dougherty, T., eds., Two Dozen (or So) Arguments for God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 372–88.Google Scholar
Pritchard, D. (2010). Cognitive Ability and the Extended Cognition Thesis. Synthese, 175(1), 133–51.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1953). From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, W. L. (1979). The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(4), 335–41.Google Scholar
Royall, R. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. London: Chapman and Hill.Google Scholar
Salvi, C., Bricolo, E., Kounios, J., Bowden, E., & Beeman, M. (2016). Insight Solutions Are Correct More Often Than Analytic Solutions. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(4), 443–60.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (1993). Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2007). The Wisdom to Doubt: A Justification of Religious Skepticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Schellenberg, J. L. (2016). God for All Time: From Theism to Ultimism. In Buckareff, A. & Nagasawa, Y., eds., Alternative Concepts of God: Essays on the Metaphysics of the Divine. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164–77.Google Scholar
Stump, E. & Green, A., eds. (2015). Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. (1998). Providence and the Problem of Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tucker, C., ed. (2013). Seemings and Justification: New Essays on Dogmatism and Phenomenal Conservatism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vainio, O.-P. (2018). Cosmology in Theological Perspective: Understanding Our Place in the Universe. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
White, R. (2005). Epistemic Permissiveness. Philosophical Perspectives, 19(1), 445–59.Google Scholar
Wynn, M. (1999). God and Goodness: A Natural Theological Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wynn, M. (2005). Emotional Experience and Religious Understanding: Integrating Perception, Conception and Feeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wynn, M. (2009). Faith and Place: An Essay in Embodied Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wynn, M. (2020). Spiritual Traditions and the Virtues: Living between Heaven and Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar