Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T02:30:07.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Is the WTO dispute settlement mechanism important to business?

from PART III - Asian Perspectives on WTO Dispute Settlement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2012

Soichiro Sakuma
Affiliation:
Tokyo University
Yasuhei Taniguchi
Affiliation:
Keizai University, Tokyo and Member, WTO Appellate Body
Alan Yanovich
Affiliation:
WTO Appellate Body Secretariat
Jan Bohanes
Affiliation:
Sidley Austin LLP
Get access

Summary

I have been working at a Japanese steel company for over 20 years on various investment and trade matters, including a number of trade disputes that have been brought before the dispute settlement system of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In the following chapter, I offer a personal perspective on the subject: ‘Business and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism’.

My discussion addresses some basic questions.

Is the WTO dispute settlement mechanism important to business?

The first question is whether or not the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is important to business. Unquestionably, the answer is ‘Yes’. The dispute settlement mechanism is very important to business. Every decision of the WTO dispute settlement system affects business.

Japanese taxes on alcoholic beverages

To demonstrate the importance of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, consider a WTO case: Japan – Alcoholic Beverages II. The Japanese government lost this case. The rulings in this case had a tremendous impact on the Japanese alcoholic beverage business. The dispute concerned the Japanese Liquor Tax Law and shochu. Shochu is a traditional colourless distilled liquor (‘white liquor’). The European Communities, together with the United States and Canada, claimed that: (i) shochu was directly competitive with whisky, brandy, and other ‘brown’ spirits; and (ii) shochu and these ‘brown’ spirits were substitutable products, but (iii) that higher tax rates were applied to ‘brown’ spirits, in violation of Article III (National Treatment) of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994.

Type
Chapter
Information
The WTO in the Twenty-first Century
Dispute Settlement, Negotiations, and Regionalism in Asia
, pp. 294 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×