Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Access
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: July 2010

2 - European Communities – Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India (AB-2000-13, WT/DS141/AB/R:DSR 2003: III, 965): Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by India

    • Send chapter to Kindle

      To send this chapter to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Available formats
      ×

      Send chapter to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Available formats
      ×

Summary

Introduction

This chapter addresses the dispute brought to the World Trade Organization (WTO) by India concerning anti-dumping duties imposed by the European Communities (EC) on cotton-type bed linen. An earlier complaint brought by India challenged the anti-dumping duties on a number of points, including the EC practice of “zeroing” for the computation of dumping margins (which had the effect of assigning a negative dumping margin a weight of zero when computing a weighted average dumping margin). India prevailed in that dispute, and the EC responded with Council Regulation (EC) No. 1644/2001, amending the original anti-dumping measure on bed linen from India. India was of the view that the amended measure did not comply with EC obligations under the WTO Anti-dumping Agreement, and brought the proceeding under Art. 21.5 of the DSU that is the subject of this chapter.

Several issues were raised before the Art. 21.5 Panel, but only three issues reached the Appellate Body. First, India argued that although the EC had corrected the “zeroing” problem, it had failed to ensure that injury attributable to “other factors” had not wrongly been attributed to dumped imports, in violation of Art. 3 of the Anti-dumping Agreement. Second, India argued that in conducting its revised injury analysis, the EC violated Art. 3 when it presumed that all imports from exporters not individually investigated were “dumped,” even though 53% of the imports from exporters that were individually investigated were found not to have been dumped once the “zeroing” method of calculation was abandoned.

References
Friedenthal, J. H., Kane, M. K. and Miller, A. R. (1999). Civil Procedure 3rd Edn. (Minneapolis: West).
James, F., Hazard, G. C. and Leubsdorf, J. (2001). Civil Procedure 5th Edn. (New York: Foundation).
Janow, M. E. and Staiger, R. W. (2003). European Communities – Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Cotton-Type Bed Linen from India. In Horn, H. and Mavroidis, P. C., eds., The WTO Case Law of 2001, pp. 115–139 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).