Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:37:00.197Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Just Debate Denied: Socialist and Post-socialist Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2010

Denise M. Walsh
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

“There are equal, and more equal.”

Polish proverb

INTRODUCTION

Democratic transitions in Central and Eastern Europe have been associated with limited advances in gender justice. Although scholars do not deny women's valuable gains in civil and political rights in this region, most agree that the price women paid for those rights was high (e.g., Fodor 2009; Heinen and Portet 2002; Titkow 1998). This high price has been evident even in countries where the democratic transition was the smoothest and most successful: Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Poland. Analysts agree that women's rights eroded precipitously with the transition to democracy in Poland, pointing to an immediate decline in the number of women in politics, dramatically high unemployment rates, decreases in women's family benefits, and an end to legalized abortion (Hardy, Kozek, and Stenning 2008; Heinen and Portet 2002; Simienska 1998). Democratization in Poland appears to have been accompanied by a backlash against women's rights.

As discussed in Chapter 3, scholars have offered several persuasive explanations for this retrenchment, including a lack of women's organizing and an alliance between Solidarity and the conservative Polish Roman Catholic Church. That means an analysis of just debate in Poland cannot prove the causal salience of my hypothesis, as it must compete on an equal footing with these alternative arguments. However, an analysis of debate conditions in Poland can reveal whether the just debate approach is plausible when democratization and such poor outcomes on women's rights occur in tandem.

Type
Chapter
Information
Women’s Rights in Democratizing States
Just Debate and Gender Justice in the Public Sphere
, pp. 79 - 117
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×