Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2017
  • Online publication date: June 2017

Chapter 6 - Practical Aspects of the Well-Woman Visit

from Section 1 - General Principles
1.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Well-woman visit. Committee Opinion Number 534. Obstet Gynecol. 2012, 120:420–4.
2.Meddler, J.D., Kahn, N.B. Jr., and Susman, J.L. Risk factors and recommendations for 230 primary care adult patients, based on US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 1992, 8:150–3.
3.Holman, G.T., Beasley, J.W., Karsh, B.T. et al. The myth of standardized workflow in primary care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015, September 2. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv107.
4.Wetterneck, T.B., Lapin, J.A., Krueger, D.J. et al. Development of a primary care physician task list to evaluate clinic visit workflow. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012, 21:4753.
5.Yarnall, K.S.H., Pollak, K.I., Østbye, T., Krause, K.M., and Michener, J.L. Primary care: Is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003, 93:635–41.
6.Carey, M., Noble, N., Mansfield, E. et al. The role of ehealth in optimizing preventive care in the primary care setting. J Med Internet Res. 2015, 17:e126.
7.McGlynn, E.A., Asch, S.M., Adams, J. et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348:2635–45.
8.Anderson, L.M. and May, D.S. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the Unites States? Am J Public Health. 1995, 85:840–2.
9.Paul, C.L., Carey, M., Yoong, S.L. et al. Access to chronic disease care in general practice: The acceptability of implementing systematic waiting-room screening using computer-based patient-reported risk status. Br J Gen Pract. 2013, 63:e620–6.
10.Ruffin, M.T., Gorenflo, D.W., and Woodman, B. Predictors of screening for breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostatic cancer among community-based primary care practices. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000, 13:110.
11.Pollak, K.I., Krause, K.M., Yarnall, K.S.H. et al. Estimated time spent on preventive services by primary care physicians. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008, 8:245.
12.Sonntag, U., Henkel, J., Renneberg, B. et al. Counseling overweight patients: Analysis of preventive encounters in primary care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2010, 22:486–92.
13.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
14.Cancer Council Australia. National Cancer Prevention Policy, 2007–2009. Cancer Council Australia, 2011. Available at:
15.Burack, R.C. Barriers to clinical preventive medicine. Prim Care. 1989, 16:245–50.
16.Kottke, T.E., Brekke, M.L., and Solberg, L.I. Making “time” for preventive services. Mayo Clin Proc. 1993, 68:785–91.
17.McPhee, S.J., Richard, S.J., and Solkowitz, S.N. Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: Comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines. J Gen Intern Med. 1986, 1:275–81.
18.Spitz, M.R., Chamberlain, R.M., Sider, J.G., and Fueger, J.J. Cancer prevention practices among Texas primary care physicians. J Cancer Educ. 1992, 7:5560.
19.Wender, R.C. Cancer screening and prevention in primary care. Obstacles for physicians. Cancer. 1993, 72(Suppl 3):1093–9.
20.Passey, M., Fanaian, M., Lyle, D., and Harris, M.F. Assessment and management of lifestyle risk factors in rural and urban general practices in Australia. Aust J Prim Health. 2010, 16:81–6.
21.Ayres, C.G. and Griffith, H.M. Perceived barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of priority clinical preventive service guidelines. Am J Manag Care. 2007, 13:150–5.
22.Campion, E.W. A symptom of discontent. N Engl J Med. 2001, 344:223–5.
23.Collins, K.S., Schoen, C., and Sandman, D.R. The Commonwealth Fund Survey of Physician Experiences with Managed Care. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund, 1997.
24.Hadley, J., Mitchell, J.M., Sulmasy, D.P., and Bloche, M.G. Perceived financial incentives, HMO market penetration, and physicians’ practice styles and satisfaction. Health Surv Res. 1999, 34:307–21.
25.Dennis, S., Williams, A., Taggart, J. et al. Which providers can bridge the health literacy gap in lifestyle risk factor modification education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Fam Pract, 2012, 13:44.
26.Zyzanski, S.J., Stange, K.C., Langa, D., and Flocke, S.A. Trade-offs in high-volume primary care practice. J Fam Pract. 1998, 46:397402.
27.Yawn, B., Goodwin, M.A., Zyzanski, S.J., and Stange, K.C. Time use during acute and chronic illness visits to a family physician. Fam Pract. 2003, 20:474–7.
28.Stange, K.C., Flocke, S.A., and Goodwin, M.A. Opportunistic preventive services delivery. Are time limitations and patient satisfaction barriers? J Fam Pract. 1998, 46:419–24.
29.Poissant, L., Pereira, J., Tamblyn, R., and Kawasumi, Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: A systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005, 112:505–16.
30.Mercer, S.W., Smith, S.M., Wyke, S., O’Dowd, T., and Watt, G.C. Multimorbidity in primary care: Developing the research agendas. Fam Pract. 2009, 26:7980.
31.Uijen, A.A. and van de Lisdonk, E.H. Multimorbidity in primary care: Prevalence and trend over the past 20 years. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008, 14(Suppl 1):2832.
32.Bower, P., Macdonald, W., Harkness, E. et al. Multimorbidity, service organization and clinical decision making in primary care: A qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2011, 28:579–87.
33.Tinetti, M.E., Bogardus, S.T. Jr., and Agostini, J.V. Potential pitfalls of disease-specific guidelines for patients with multiple conditions. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351:2870–4.
34.Safford, M.M., Allison, J.J., and Kiefe, C.I. Patient complexity: More than comorbidity, the vector model of complexity. J Gen Intern Med. 2007, 22(Suppl 3):382–90.
35.Adeniji, C., Kenning, C., Coventry, P.A., and Bower, P. What are the core predictors of “hassles” among patients with multimorbidity in primary care? A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015, 15:255.
36.Parchman, M.L., Noël, P.H., and Lee, S. Primary care attributes, health care system hassles, and chronic illness. Med Care. 2005, 43:1123–9.
37.Harrison, M.I., Koppel, R., and Bar-Lev, S. Unintended consequences of information technologies in health care – An interactive sociotechnical analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007, 14:542–9.
38.Avitzur, O. In practice: The worst features of EHRs and how to fix them. Neurol Today. 2012, 12:22–7.
39.Shanafelt, T.D., Boone, S., Tan, L. et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012, 172:1377–85.
40.Dyrbye, L.N. and Shanafelt, T.D. Physician burnout: A potential threat to successful health care reform. JAMA. 2011, 305:2009–10.
41.Okie, S. Innovation in primary care – Staying one step ahead of burnout. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359:2305–9.
42.Sinsky, C.A., Willard-Grace, R., Schutzbank, A.M. et al. In search of joy in practice; a report of 23 high-functioning primary care practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013, 11:272–8.
43.Altschuler, J., Margolius, D., Bodenheimer, T., and Grumbach, K. Estimating a reasonable patient panel size for primary care physicians with team-based task delegation. Ann Fam Med. 2012, 10:396400.
44.Grumbach, K., and Bodenheimer, T. A primary care home for Americans; putting the house in order. JAMA. 2002, 288:889–93.
45.Rayburn, W.F. The Obstetrician-Gynecologists Workforce in the United States. Facts, Figures, and Implications – 2011. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 2011.
46.Weinstein, L. and Wolfe, H.M. The downward spiral of physician satisfaction: An attempt to avert a crisis within the medical profession. Obstet Gynecol. 2007, 109:1181–3.
47.Bettes, B.A., Chalas, E., Coleman, V.H., and Schulkin, J. Heavier workload, less personal control: Impact of delivery on obstetrician/gynecologists’ career satisfaction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004, 190:851–7.
48.Keeton, K., Fenner, D.E., Johnson, T.R., and Hayward, R.A. Predictors of physician career satisfaction, work–life balance, and burnout. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 109:949–55.
49.Conry, J.A. and Brown, H. Executive Summary: Well-Woman Task Force. Components of the well-woman visit. Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:697701.
50.Hagan, J.F., Shaw, J.S., and Duncan, P.M., editors. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 3rd edition. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics, 2008. pp. 203–19.
51.Tomsik, P.E., Witt, A.M., Raddock, M.L. et al. How well do physician and patient visit priorities align? J Fam Pract. 2014, 63:e8e13.
52.Green, M. and Palfrey, J.S., editors. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents, 2nd edition. Arlington, VA: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health, 2002.
53.Saini, S.D., van Hees, F., and Vijan, S. Smarter screening for cancer: Possibilities and challenges of personalization. JAMA. 2014, 312:2211–2.
54.Harris, R.P., Wilt, T.J., and Qaseem, A.; High Value Care Task Force of the American College of Physicians. A value framework for cancer screening: Advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015, 162:712–7.
55.Egnew, T.R; American Academy of Family Physicians. Agenda-Setting Algorithm. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
56.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Electronic Preventive Services Selector (ePSS). Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
57.Maciosek, M.V., Coffield, A.B., McGinnis, J.M. et al. Methods for priority setting among clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2001, 21:10–9.
58.Maciosek, M.V., Coffield, A.B., Edwards, N.M. et al. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: Results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med, 2006, 31:5261.
59.Sawaya, G.F. Re-envisioning the annual well-woman visit (editorial). Obstet Gynecol. 2015, 126:695–6.
60.Stange, K.C. and Woolf, S.H. Policy options in support of high-value preventive care. A prevention policy paper commissioned by the Partnership for Prevention. Partnership for Prevention, 2008. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
61.American Academy of Family Physicians. The patient-centered medical home (PCMH). Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
62.Reid, R.J., Coleman, K., Johnson, E.A. et al. The Group Health medical home at year two: Cost savings, higher patient satisfaction, and less burnout for providers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010, 29:835–43.
63.American Medical Association. Steps Forward: Building an intensive primary care practice (online module). Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
64.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Medical home answers to some questions. Available at:–Answers-to-Some-Questions. Retrieved December 22, 2015.
65.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG medical home toolkit. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
66.Files, J.A., David, P.S., and Frey, K.A. The patient-centered medical home and preconception care: An opportunity for internists. J Gen Intern Med. 2008, 23:1518–20.
67.United States Congress. United States Senate Bill S. 1303 (111th): Women’s Medical Home Demonstration Act. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
68.Moore, G. and Showstack, J. Primary care medicine in crisis: Toward reconstruction and renewal. Ann Intern Med. 2003, 138:244–7.
69.Whitcomb, M.E. and Cohen, J.J. The future of primary care medicine. N Engl J Med. 2004, 351:710–2.
70.Catling, C.J., Medley, N., Foureur, M. et al. Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015, (2):CD007622.
71.Smith, S.M., Soubhi, H., Fortin, M., Hudon, C., and O’Dowd, T. Managing patients with multimorbidity: Systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings. BMJ. 2012, 345:e5205.
72.American Academy of Family Physicians. Family Practice Management: Practice Efficiency. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
73.Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Improving primacy care practice. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
74.Ghorob, A. and Brodenheimer, T. Sharing the care to improve access to primary care. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366:1955–7.
75.Salmoiraghi, A. and Hussain, S. A systematic review of the use of telepsychiatry in acute settings. J Psychiatr Pract. 2015, 21:389–93.
76.Pedone, C. and Lelli, D. Systematic review of telemonitoring in COPD: An update. Pneumonol Alergol Pol. 2015, 83:476–84.
77.Bashshur, R.L., Shannon, G.W., Tejasvi, T., Kvedar, J.C., and Gates, M. The empirical foundations of teledermatology: A review of the research evidence. Telemed J E Health. 2015, 21:953–79.
78.Wilson, L.S. and Maeder, A.J. Recent directions in telemedicine: Review of trends in research and practice. Healthc Inform Res. 2015, 21:213–22.
79.Bossen, A.L., Kim, H., Williams, K.N., Steinhoff, A.E., and Strieker, M. Emerging roles for telemedicine and smart technologies in dementia care. Smart Homecare Technol Telehealth. 2015, 3:4957.
80.Downes, M.J., Mervin, M.C., Byrnes, J.M., and Scuffham, P.A. Telemedicine for general practice: A systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2015, 4:134.
81.Ekeland, A.G., Bowes, A. and Flottorp, S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010, 79:736–71.
82.Coding resources. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Available at: Retrieved December 22, 2015.
83.Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Preventive services. Available at: Retrieved February 5, 2016.