Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2006
  • Online publication date: June 2012

1 - The Universal Preschool Movement


The term “school age” carries significant meaning in American society. The day a child walks through the schoolhouse doors marks an unforgettable benchmark for the young student and his or her family. Of course, the first day of kindergarten is not the first “teachable moment” the child has experienced. A vast amount of learning has preceded that eventful day. Knowledge, skills, and abilities have been acquired and practiced at home, in the playground, and – for the majority of children born in the 21st century – in child care settings. The difference between “preschool” and “school age”, then, is not really about teaching and learning but about where and how these activities take place, and who assumes responsibility for them.

In the United States today, formal schooling is largely the responsibility of state and local governments. In most communities, children are eligible to enroll in the public education system when they are about five years old. Historically, it was not unusual for children to be admitted at younger ages. The first kindergartens in America commonly served children younger than five – for example, New York City schools admitted four-year-olds, and Boston's public schools enrolled toddlers as young as 22 months (Mitchell, Seligson, & Marx, 1989). Wisconsin's state constitution has contained “a commitment to free education for four-year-olds” since the middle of the 19th century (Barnett, Hustedt, Robin, & Schulman, 2004, p. 170).

Administration for Children and Families. (1999, December 13). Head Start bests Mercedes and BMW in customer satisfaction. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed March 2005.
Barnett, W. S., Hustedt, J. T., Robin, K. B., & Schulman, K. L. (2004). The state of preschool: 2004 state preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
Barnett, W. S., Robin, K., Hustedt, J., & Schulman, K. (2003). The state of preschool: 2003 state preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.
Beatty, B. (2004, November). Past, present, and future: What we can learn from the history of preschool education. American Prospect, pp. A3–A5.
Berrueta-Clement, J. R., Schweinhart, L. J., Barnett, W. S., Epstein, A. S., & Weikart, D. P. (1984). Changed lives: The effects of the Perry Preschool program on youths through age 19. Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation (No. 8). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Blood, M. (2000). Our youngest children: Massachusetts voters and opinion leaders speak out on their care and education. Boston: Stride Rite Foundation.
Bogard, K. (2004). Mapping a P–3 continuum (MAP): P–3 as the foundation of education reform. New York: Foundation for Child Development. Accessed June 2005.
Business Roundtable & Corporate Voices for Working Families. (2003, May). Early childhood education: A call to action from the business community. Accessed April 2005.
Caputo, M. (2004, April 21). Factions airing ads on preschool plans. Miami Sun Herald.
Committee for Economic Development. (2002). Preschool for all: Investing in a productive and just society. Washington, DC: Author.
Consortium for Longitudinal Studies. (1983). As the twig is bent: Lasting effects of preschool programs. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fight Crime: Invest in Kids. (2000). America's child care crisis: A crime prevention tragedy. Washington, DC: Author.
Gormley, W. T., Gayer, T., Phillips, D., & Dawson, B. (2005). The effects of universal pre-K on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology, 41, 872–884.
Heckman, J. (2000). Policies to foster human capital. Research in Economics, 54, 3–56.
Karoly, L. A., & Bigelow, J. H. (2005). The economics of investing in universal preschool education in California. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Kjos, L. (2004, February 19). Study: Preschool woefully lacking. United Press International.–06.htm.
Krueger, C. (2002). The case for P–16: Designing an integrated learning system, preschool through postsecondary education. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States. (No. P16-02-01).
Lynch, R. G. (2004). Exceptional returns: Economic, fiscal, and social benefits of investment in early childhood development. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
Maeroff, G. (2003). Universal preschool: State of play. In First things first: Pre-kindergarten as the starting point for education reform (pp. 4–12). New York: Foundation for Child Development.
Merrow, J. (2002, September 25). The “failure” of Head Start. Education Week, p. 52.
Mitchell, A., Seligson, M., & Marx, F. (1989). Early childhood programs and the public schools. Dover, MA: Auburn House.
Mooney, J. (2004, November 19). A model in early learning. New Jersey Star Ledger.
National Head Start Association. (2005). Position paper: Our vision for universal pre-kindergarten and Head Start programs, investments in America's future. Discussion draft. Alexandria, VA: Author.
Olsen, D. A. (1999). Universal preschool is no golden ticket: Why government should not enter the preschool business. Cato Policy Analysis No. 333. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.
Oppenheim, J., & MacGregor, T. (Undated). The economics of education: Public benefits of high-quality preschool education for low-income children. Entergy, New Orleans.
Pax World/NHSA Survey. (2003, September 4). More than 9 out of 10 Americans support existing Head Start program. Washington, DC: Pax World Funds. Accessed March 2005.
Pre-K Now. (2005). Leadership matters: Governors' pre-k proposals Fiscal Year 2006. Washington, DC: Author. Accessed April 2005.
Rolnick, A., & Grunewald, R. (2003, October). Early childhood development: Economic development with a high public return. The Region (supplement). Minneapolis, MN: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.
Salisbury, D. (2002, January 10). Preschool is no answer. USA Today.
Sawhill, I. V. (1999). Early education: A national priority. Brookings Children's Roundtable Report. Policy Brief # 1. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 27. Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation (No. 10). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Schweinhart, L. J., Montie, J., Xiang, Z., Barnett, W. S., Belfield, C. R., & Nores, M. (2005). Lifetime effects: The High/Scope Perry Preschool study through age 40. Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation (No. 14). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Urahn, S. K. (2001). Promoting universal access to high quality early education for three and four year olds: The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Starting Early, Starting Strong Initiative. Philadelphia: Pew Charitable Trusts.
U.S. Department of Labor. (2000). Employment and earnings. January 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Washington, V. (2004, November). Where do we go from here? Building a movement on behalf of young children. American Prospect, pp. A22–A23.
White, S. H. (1965). Evidence for a hierarchical arrangement of learning processes. In Lipsitt, L. P. & Spiker, C. C. (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press.
Zigler, E., & Muenchow, S. (1992). Head Start: The inside story of America's most successful educational experiment. New York: Basic Books.
Zigler, E., & Styfco, S. J. (1996). Head Start and early childhood intervention: The changing course of social science and social policy. In Zigler, E., Kagan, S. L., & Hall, N. (Eds.), Children, families, and government: Preparing for the twenty-first century (pp. 132–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.