Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: June 2012

13 - Multi-ethnicity and Federalism: Constitutional Provisions in the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia

from IV - Non-Commonwealth Parliamentary Federations in Afro-Asia



Comparing Ethiopia with other countries on the African continent, one can observe similarities and distinctiveness. Unlike any other sub-Saharan country, Ethiopia has never been colonized by any European country and unlike most other African countries, Ethiopia opted for a federal political system in the 1990s after the end of the military rule. While most African countries are also characterized by significant ethnic and religious diversity, most of these countries discarded the idea of federalism as a principle of state organization. The question why Ethiopia opted for a federal system and how the distinct features of the Ethiopian federal system can be explained and understood is the focus of this chapter.

Comparing Ethiopia with other federal systems, one will come across a number of features which are rarely found elsewhere. The founding on ethnic groups and the constitutional interpretation through the Upper House of Parliament can be mentioned as examples. It can be argued that the institutional set-up of the federal system can be explained to a large part by Ethiopia's history. Using assumptions of institutionalism this chapter will try to explain the specific characteristics of the Ethiopian case. Since institutionalism as theoretical framework has been discussed at length, it will not be discussed again in this chapter. The following section will briefly outline historical events which are assumed to be of explanatory value for the development into federalism. Thereafter the specific characteristics of the Ethiopian federal Constitution will be explained and discussed.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO