Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:25:03.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Negation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2013

Peter Siemund
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg
Get access

Summary

For every descriptive statement that we make, we have to decide whether the truth-value of the proposition we wish to express is true or false, or, whether we wish to express that its truth-value is not fully known to us. We express – in our view – true propositions by affirmative sentences and false propositions by negative sentences, where ‘negative’ means that the sentence contains some overt negative element (e.g. not). Uncertain truth-values can be expressed by adverbials like probably, likely, certainly, etc., but in this chapter we will not be concerned with these. In English, as in the vast majority of other languages, affirmative sentences receive no special marking, while negative sentences are typically marked by one or more negative expressions. Apparently, we consider the making of positive statements the norm, and verbally express the absence of a positive truth-value.

Strictly speaking, the assignment of clear truth-values is only possible for what is known in the relevant literature as ‘constative utterances’ (Austin 1962; Searle 1969). These are, by and large, descriptive statements that contrast with performative utterances of the type ‘I hereby christen this child “John”.’, i.e. utterances used for effectuating a change in the state in which the world is. Such utterances cannot be assigned a truth-value, as they require certain felicity conditions for their successful application. Some performative utterances, like the one just mentioned, are clearly odd when negated, but this should not be taken to mean that such utterances cannot in general be negated (Don't move!, I do not apologise., etc.).

Type
Chapter
Information
Varieties of English
A Typological Approach
, pp. 174 - 194
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2002. Negation in Non-Standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetries. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1985. Imbabura Quechua. (Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars.) London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17. 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2011. Negative morphemes. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 112. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan M. and Selinker, Larry. 2008. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2011. Negative indefinite pronouns and predicate negation. Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 115. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard. 2000. *I amn't. Language 76(2). 297–323.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: Høst.Google Scholar
Krug, Manfred. 1998. British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit? A study in lexicalisation based on social, regional and stylistic variation. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23(2). 145–97.Google Scholar
Martin, Stefan and Wolfram, Walt. 1998. The sentence in African-American Vernacular English. In Mufwene, Salikoko S., Rickford, John R., Bailey, Guy, and Baugh, John (eds.), African-American English, 11–36. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maslova, Elena. 2003. A Grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, Ingeborg, Meier, Paul, and Bendor-Samuel, John. 1975. A Grammar of Izi: An Igbo Language. Norman, OK: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2000. Towards a typology of standard negation. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 23(1). 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2007. Negation – an overview of typological research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1(5). 552–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2010. Negatives without negators. In Wohlgemuth, Jan and Cysouw, Michael (eds.), Rethinking Universals: How Rarities Affect Linguistic Theory (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 45), 169–94. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Miestamo, Matti. 2011. Subtypes of asymmetric standard negation. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 114. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.Google Scholar
Millar, Martin and Brown, Keith. 1979. Tag questions in Edinburgh speech. Linguistische Berichte 60. 24–45.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Negative concord as an English ‘Vernacular Universal’: Social history and linguistic typology. English Language and Linguistics 34(3). 257–78.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemund, Peter, Davydova, Julia, and Maier, Georg. 2012. The Amazing World of Englishes: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulkala, Helena and Karjalainen, Merja. 1992. Finnish. London. Routledge.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali and Smith, Jennifer. 2002. NEG/AUX contraction in British dialects. English World-Wide 23(2). 251–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tucker, Archibald N. and Bryan, Margret A.. 1966. Linguistic Analyses: The Non-Bantu Languages of North-Eastern Africa. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van der Auwera, Johan. 2010. On the diachrony of negation. In Horn, Laurence R. (ed.), The Expression of Negation, 73–101. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2003. Non-standard English and typological principles: The case of negation. In Rohdenburg, Günter and Mondorf, Britta (eds.), Determinants of Linguistic Variation (Topics in English Linguistics 43), 507–29. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2001. A Natural History of Negation. (The David Hume Series: Philosophy and Cognitive Science Reissues.) Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Howe, Darin M. 1997. Negation and the history of African American English. Language Variation and Change 9(2). 267–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48(4). 773–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1991. The boundaries of a grammar: Inter-dialectal reactions to positive anymore. In Trudgill, Peter and Chambers, Jack K. (eds.), Dialects of English: Studies in Grammatical Variation, 273–88. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Nolan, David W. 1991. A diachronic survey of English negative concord. American Speech 66(2). 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, John R. 1985. Negation. In Shopen, Timothy (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, volume I: Clause Structure, 197–242. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shields, Kenneth. 1997. Positive anymore in Southeastern Pennsylvania. American Speech 72(2). 217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Negation
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Negation
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Negation
  • Peter Siemund, Universität Hamburg
  • Book: Varieties of English
  • Online publication: 05 May 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139028240.010
Available formats
×