Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: May 2013

7 - Aspect marking

Summary

We opened the previous chapter with a description of the grammatical category of tense, which achieves a location of situations in time relative to the time of utterance (moment of speaking), or some other temporal reference point. We will continue this discussion in the present chapter, but will shift the focus to the internal temporal properties of the situation described by a sentence and the grammatical means available for portraying them. The label conventionally used for such grammatical marking is ‘aspect’. Comrie (1976: 3) defines aspects as ‘different ways of viewing the internal temporal constituency of a situation’. The temporal properties that we will be interested in involve central parameters of the situation described, especially such parameters as boundedness, completion, continuity, repetition, inception, and progressiveness, as well as some others. Moreover, these temporal properties are not objective, but, crucially, depend on how a speaker construes a real-world situation in their mind, or, put differently, how they view the situation. Aspect, thus, is a highly subjective category insofar as it allows the speaker to highlight different temporal properties of a situation, and to portray a situation in different ways.

Overview

We stated above that the term ‘aspect’ relates to grammatical exponents. As with tense marking, not all languages have aspects, but all languages can express aspectual distinctions by lexical means. For example, the contrast between perfective and imperfective situations in German may be expressed by a prepositional construction, as shown in (1), even though German lacks a corresponding grammatical aspect. We may translate (1a) into English using the simple past and render (1b) with the progressive aspect.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Barnes, William. 1970 [1886]. A Glossary of the Dorset Dialect with a Grammar. Guernsey: The Toucan Press.
Bickerton, Derek. 1980. Creolization, linguistic universals, natural semantax and the brain. In Richard Day (ed.), Issues in English Creoles. Papers from the 1975 Hawai'i Conference, 1–18. Heidelberg: Julius Groos.
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge University Press.
Dahl, Östen and Velupillai, Viveka. 2011. Perfective/imperfective aspect. In Matthew S. Dryer and Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 65. Available online at . Accessed 22 December 2011.
Davydova, Julia. 2011. The Present Progressive in Non-Native Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study of Variation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Felser, Claudia. 1999. Verbal Complement Clauses: A Minimalist Study of Direct Perception Constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Klein, Wolfgang. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.
König, Ekkehard. 1994. English. In Ekkehard König and Johan van der Auwera (eds.), The Germanic Languages, 532–65. London: Routledge.
Kortmann, Bernd. 2004. Do as a tense and aspect marker in varieties of English. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 245–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nichols, Patricia. 1981. Creoles of the USA. In Charles A. Ferguson and Shirley Brice Heath (eds.), Language in the USA, 69–91. Cambridge University Press.
Platt, John, Weber, Heidi, and Ho, Mian Lian. 1984. The New Englishes. London: Routledge.
Rickford, John. 1999. African American Vernacular English. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Schlauch, Margaret. 1973. The English Language in Modern Times (since 1400). London: Oxford University Press.
Shnukal, Anna. 1988. Broken: An Introduction to the Creole Language of Torres. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Linguistics, Australian National University.
Wolfram, Walt. 1976. Toward a description of a-prefixing in Appalachian English. American Speech 51(1/2). 45–56.
Further reading
Bao, Zhiming. 1995. Already in Singapore English. World Englishes 14(2). 181–8.
Bao, Zhiming. 2005. The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics 41(2). 237–67.
Baugh, John. 1984. Steady: Progressive aspect in Black English. American Speech 50(1). 3–12.
Brinton, Laurel. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-Verbal Particles. Cambridge University Press.
Collins, Peter. 2008. The progressive aspect in World Englishes: A corpus-based study. Australian Journal of Linguistics 28(2). 225–49.
Edwards, Walter F. 1991. A comparative description of Guyanese Creole and Black English preverbal aspect marker don. In Walter F. Edwards and Donald Winford (eds.), Verb Phrase Patterns in Black English and Creole, 240–55. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.
Harris, John. 1986. Expanding the superstrate: Habitual aspect markers in Atlantic Englishes. English World-Wide 7(2). 171–99.
Kallen, Jeffrey. 1989. Tense and aspect categories in Irish English. English World-Wide 10(1). 1–39.
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2001. Tense and aspect. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard Konig, Wulf Oesterreicher, and Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language Typology and Language Universals: An International Handbook, volume I, 768–83. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
McCafferty, Kevin. 2004. Innovation in language contact: Be after V-ing as a future gram in Irish English, 1670 to the present. Diachronica 21(1). 113–60.
Miller, Jim. 2004. Perfect and resultative constructions in spoken and non-standard English. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde, and Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and Down the Cline – the Nature of Grammaticalization, 229–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Miller, Jim. 2004. Problems for typology: Perfects and resultatives in spoken and non-standard English and Russian. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 284–311. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pietsch, Lukas. 2008. Prepositional aspect constructions in Hiberno-English. In Peter Siemund and Noemi Kintana (eds.), Language Contact and Contact Languages, 213–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Siemund, Peter. 2004. Substrate, superstrate and universal: Perfect constructions in Irish English. In Bernd Kortmann (ed.), Dialectology Meets Typology: Dialect Grammar from a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, 401–34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Van Rooy, Bertus. 2006. The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 25(1). 37–64.
Winford, Donald. 1993. Variability in the use of the perfect have in Trinidadian English: A problem of categorial and semantic mismatch. Language Variation and Change 5(2). 141–87.