Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T12:46:27.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

16 - Theories Behind Dystonia Scale Development

from Section I - Basics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2018

Dirk Dressler
Affiliation:
Hannover Medical School
Eckart Altenmüller
Affiliation:
Hochschule für Musik, Theater und Medien, Hannover
Joachim K. Krauss
Affiliation:
Hannover Medical School
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaronson, N, Alonso, J, Burnam, A, Lohr, KN, Patrick, DL, Perrin, E, Stein, RE. 2002. Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11(3):193205.Google ScholarPubMed
Albanese, A, Sorbo, FD, Comella, C, Jinnah, HA, Mink, JW, Post, B, Vidailhet, M, Volkmann, J, Warner, TT, Leentjens, AF, Martinez-Martin, P, Stebbins, GT, Goetz, CG, Schrag, A. 2013. Dystonia rating scales: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord 28(7):874883.Google Scholar
Andrich, D. 1988. Rasch Models for Measurement. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Andrich, D. 2004. Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms? Med Care 42(Suppl. 1):I7–I16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, SJ, Hobart, JC. 2011. The problem with health measurement. Patient Prefer Adherence 5:279290.Google Scholar
Cano, SJ, Hobart, JC, Fitzpatrick, R, Bhatia, K, Thompson, AJ, Warner, TT. 2004a. Patient-based outcomes of cervical dystonia: a review of rating scales. Mov Disord 19(9):10541059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cano, SJ, Warner, TT, Linacre, JM, Bhatia, KP, Thompson, AJ, Fitzpatrick, R, Hobart, JC. 2004b. Capturing the true burden of dystonia on patients: the Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58). Neurology 63(9):16291633.Google Scholar
Cano, SJ, Warner, TT, Thompson, AJ, Bhatia, KP, Fitzpatrick, R, Hobart, JC. 2008. The Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile (CDIP-58): can a Rasch developed patient reported outcome measure satisfy traditional psychometric criteria? Health Qual Life Outcomes 6:58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Food and Drug Administration. 2013. Qualification of Clinical Outcome Assessments (COAs); www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/DrugDevelopmentToolsQualificationProgram/ucm284077.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Organisation. 2009. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims; www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/Guidances/UCM193282.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hobart, J, Cano, S. 2009. Improving the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in multiple sclerosis: the role of new psychometric methods. Health Technol Assess 13(12):iii, ixx, 1177.Google Scholar
Jost, WH, Hefter, H, Stenner, A, Reichel, G. 2013. Rating scales for cervical dystonia: a critical evaluation of tools for outcome assessment of botulinum toxin therapy. J Neural Transm 120(3):487496.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lord, FM, Novick, MR. 1968. Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Lumsden, J. 1977. Person reliability. Appl Psychol Meas 1: 477482.Google Scholar
McDowell, I, Newell, C. 1987. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Novick, MR. 1966. The axioms and principal results of Classical Test Theory. J Math Psychol; 3:118.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. 1960. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Education Research.Google Scholar
Stevens, SS. 1946. On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103(2684):677680.Google Scholar
Waller, M. 1976. Estimating Parameters in the Rasch Model: Removing the Effects of Random Guessing. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×