Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:54:56.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part IV - Transnational Legal Ordering and Human Rights Standards in Criminal Justice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2020

Edited by
Gregory Shaffer  and
Ely Aaronson
Gregory Shaffer
Affiliation:
University of California, Irvine
Ely Aaronson
Affiliation:
University of Haifa, Israel
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Legal Ordering of Criminal Justice , pp. 259 - 366
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abels, Denis. 2012. Prisoners of the International Community. The Hague: TMC Asser Press.Google Scholar
African Correctional Services Association. 2017. Home Page. http://acsa-ps.org/index.php.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2018. Punished for Being Poor: Unjustified, Excessive and Prolonged Pre-trial Detention in Madagascar. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Sarah. 2018. “Securing Prison through Human Rights: Unanticipated Implications of Rights‐Based Penal Governance.” The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 57(3): 401–421.Google Scholar
Association for the Prevention of Torture. 2016. Putting Prevention into Practice 10 Years On: The Optional Protocol to the UN Convention against Torture. Geneva: APT.Google Scholar
Association for the Prevention of Torture. 2017. Annual Report 2017: 40 Years of Torture Prevention. Geneva: APT.Google Scholar
Association for the Prevention of Torture. 2018. OPCAT Database. https://apt.ch/en/opcat-database/.Google Scholar
Boister, Neil. 2018. An Introduction to Transnational Criminal Law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
British High Commission Abuja. 2014. UK–Nigeria Sign Compulsory Prisoner Transfer Agreement. www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-nigeria-sign-compulsory-prisoner-transfer-agreement.Google Scholar
Cassese, Antonio. 1996. Inhuman States: Imprisonment, Detention and Torture in Europe Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cernko, Daniela. 2014. Die Umsetzung der CPT-Empfehlungen im deutschen Strafvollzug. Berlin: Duncker und Humblot.Google Scholar
Clark, Roger. 1994. The United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Program. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, William. 1972. “The Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners.” American Society of International Law Proceedings 66: 232–236.Google Scholar
Cliquennois, Gaëtan, and de Suremain, Hugues, eds. 2017. Monitoring Penal Policy in Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corporate Watch. 2018. Carceral Colonialism: Britain Plans to Build a Prison Wing in Nigeria. https://corporatewatch.org/carceral-colonialism-britains-plan-to-build-a-prison-wing-in-nigeria/.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2011. Report Presented to the Sixteenth Conference of Directors of Prison Administration: Summary of the Replies Given to the Questionnaire Regarding the Implementation of the Most Recent Council of Europe Standards Related to the Treatment of Offenders While in Custody as Well as in the Community. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Das Neves, Pedro. 2018. The “Low Cost” Prison: Minimum Design for Minimum Results. Presentation to the 18th Conference of Directors of Prison Administration, Brussels, November 27, 2018. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806f4fc2.Google Scholar
de Lange, Jan. 2008. Detentie genormeerd: Een onderzoek naar de betekenis van het CPT voor de inrichting van vrijheidsbeneming in Nederlandse penitentiaire inrichtingen. Oisterwijk: Wolf.Google Scholar
Deruiter, Rebecca. 2018. Detention Conditions in a Cosmopolitan Europe. PhD thesis, Ghent University, Belgium.Google Scholar
Dyer, Andrew. 2016. “Irreducible Life Sentences: What Difference Have the European Convention on Human Rights and the United Kingdom Human Rights Act Made?” Human Rights Law Review 16: 541–584.Google Scholar
Eeckhaut, Mark, and Temmerman, Jan. 2013. “Nizar Trabelsi uitgeleverd aan de VS.” De Standaard (Belgium), October 3, 2013.Google Scholar
European Union. 2002. Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of June 13, 2002, on the European Arrest Warrant and the Surrender Procedures between Member States.Google Scholar
European Union. 2008. Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA, of November 27, 2008, on the Application of the Principle of Mutual Recognition to Judgments in Criminal Matters Imposing Custodial Sentences or Measures Involving Deprivation of Liberty for the Purpose of Their Enforcement in the European Union.Google Scholar
EuroPris. n.d. www.europris.org/about/.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. A. Sheridan. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Frøysnes, Torbjørn. 2013. Head of the Council of Europe Office to the EU, Opening Speech at the Eighteenth Conference of Directors of Prison Administration, Brussels, November 27–29, 2013. https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=09000016806f5088.Google Scholar
Goda, Norman. 2007. Tales from Spandau: Nazi Criminals and the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Government of Australia. Response of Australia to the Views of the Human Rights Committee in Communication No. 1968/2010 (Blessington and Elliot v. Australia) www.ag.gov.au/RightsandProtections/HumanRights/Documents/Blessington&ElliotVAustralia-AustralianGovernmentResponse.pdf.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology 110(5): 1373–1411.Google Scholar
Howard, John. 1792. The State of the Prisons in England and Wales, with Preliminary Observations, and an Account of Some Foreign Prisons and Hospitals. London: Johnson, Dilly, and Cadell.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2016a. We Are in Tombs: Abuses in Egypt’s Scorpion Prison. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2016b. Double Punishment: Inadequate Conditions for Prisoners with Psychosocial Disabilities in France. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2018a. I Needed Help, Instead I Was Punished: Abuse and Neglect of Prisoners with Disabilities in Australia. Washington, DC: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2018b. We Are Like The Dead: Torture and Other Human Rights Abuses in Jail Ogaden, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Washington, DC.: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
ICPA. Mission, Vision and Values. https://icpa.ca/about-us/mission-vision-and-values/.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, Michael. 1981. “State, Civil Society, and Total Institutions: A Critique of Recent Social Histories of Punishment.” Crime and Justice 3: 153–191.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. 2012. Water, Sanitation, Hygiene and Habitat in Prisons. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. 2016. Protecting People Deprived of Their Liberty. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. 2017. Health Care in Detention. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
International Committee of the Red Cross. 2018. Toward Humane Prisons: A Principled and Participatory Approach to Prison Planning and Design. Geneva: ICRC.Google Scholar
Prisons, Irish. 2017. Director General Michael Donnellan Awarded Head of Service Award. www.irishprisons.ie/director-general-michael-donnellan-awarded-head-service-award-icpa-conference-london-25th-october–2017/.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Andrew. 2013. The Situated Production of Legitimacy: Perspectives from the Global South. Pp. 267–292 in Legitimacy and Criminal Justice, edited by Justice Tankebe and Alison Liebling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Andrew. 2014. “Conceptualizing Confinement: Prisons and Poverty in Sierra Leone.” Punishment and Society 14: 41–60.Google Scholar
Johnson, Boris MP. 2018. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs. Provision of Prison Accommodation to Nigeria: Written Statement – HCWS518. March 7. www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-statement/Commons/2018–03-07/HCWS518/.Google Scholar
Kelk, Constantijn. 1978. Recht Voor Gedetineerden: Een Onderzoek Naar De Beginselen Van Het Detentierecht. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samsom.Google Scholar
Kleijssen, Jan. 2018. Opening Speech at the Twenty-Third Council of Europe Conference of Directors of Prison and Probation Services, Working Together Effectively: Management and Co-operation Models between Prison and Probation Services. June 19, 2018. Jõhvi, Estonia. https://rm.coe.int/jan-kleijssen-opening-speech-23rd-cdpps-estonia-2018-doc/16808b7dfe.Google Scholar
Lappi-Seppälä, Tapio, and Koskenniemi, Lauri. 2018. “National and Regional Instruments in Securing the Rule of Law and Human Rights in the Nordic Prisons.” Crime, Law and Social Change 70: 135–159.Google Scholar
Leonards, Chris. 2015. “Visitors to the International Penitentiary Congress: A Transnational Platform Dealing with Penitentiary Care.” Österreichische Zeitschrift für Geschichtswissenschaften 26: 80–101.Google Scholar
Leonards, Chris, and Randeraad, Nico. 2010. “Transnational Experts in Social Reform, 1840–1880.” International Review of Social History 55: 215–239.Google Scholar
McGregor, Judy. 2017. “The Challenges and Limitations of OPCAT National Preventive Mechanisms: Lessons from New Zealand.” Australian Journal of Human Rights 23: 351–367.Google Scholar
Mitsilegas, Valsamis. 2015. “The Symbiotic Relationship between Mutual Trust and Fundamental Rights in Europe’s Area of Criminal Justice.” New Journal of European Criminal Law 4: 457–480.Google Scholar
Mulgrew, Róisín. 2011. “The International Movement of Prisoners.” Criminal Law Forum 22: 103–143.Google Scholar
Mulgrew, Róisín. 2013. Toward the Development of the International Penal System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, Patricia. 1995. The Prison on the Continent Europe 1865–1965. Pp. 178–201 in The Oxford History of the Prison, edited by Morris, Norval and Rothman, David. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, Tim, and MacDonald, Alison, eds. 2015. Livingstone, Owen and MacDonald on Prison Law, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penal Reform International. 2017. Implementation of the Nelson Mandela Rules in Africa: Challenges and Opportunities. Presentation at the Fourth ACSA Biennial Conference, May 16, 2017; conference program available at http://acsa-ps.org/4th%20conference%20program%20Day2.php.Google Scholar
Radzinowicz, Leon. 1999. Adventures in Criminology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel. 1987. The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rodley, Nigel, and Pollard, Matt. 2009. The Treatment of Prisoners under International Law, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rope, Olivia, and Sheahan, Frances. 2018. Global Prison Trends 2018. London: Penal Reform International and Thailand Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Seeh, Manfred. 2018. Häftlinge in Heimatländer bringen. June 25, 2018. Die Presse.Google Scholar
Simon, Jonathan. 2018. “Penal Monitoring in the United States: Lessons from the American Experience and Prospects for Change.” Crime, Law and Social Change 70: 161–173.Google Scholar
Snacken, Sonia, and Kiefer, Nik. 2016. Oversight of International Imprisonment: The Committee for the Prevention of Torture. Pp. 322–344 in Research Handbook on the International Penal System, edited by Mulgrew, Róisín and Abels, Denis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Steinerte, Elina. 2014. “The Jewel in the Crown and Its Three Guardians: Independence of National Preventive Mechanisms under the Optional Protocol to the UN Torture Convention.” Human Rights Law Review 14: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swedish International Development Agency. 2014. Promoting Human-Rights Based Approach Toward Vulnerable Groups in Detention in the Middle East and North Africa Region: Impact Evaluation. London: Penal Reform International.Google Scholar
Tiefenbrun, Susan. 2012. Women’s International and Comparative Human Rights. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk. 2003. The Impact of United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Standards on Domestic Legislation and Criminal Justice Operations. In The Application of United Nations Standards and Norms in Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice, edited by United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk. 2005. “International Imprisonment.” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 54: 357–386.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk. 2013a. Legitimacy and the Development of International Standards for Punishment. Pp. 267–292 in Legitimacy and Criminal Justice, edited by Tankebe, Justice and Liebling, Alison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk. 2013b. Punishment and Human Rights. Pp. 395–414 in The Sage Handbook of Punishment and Society, edited by Simon, Jonathan and Sparks, Richard. London: Sage.Google Scholar
van Zyl Smit, Dirk, and Snacken, Sonja. 2009. Principles of European Prison Law and Policy: Penology and Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, David. 2014. Pain and Retribution: A Short History of British Prisons, 1066 to the Present. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Xenakis, Sappho, and Chelioliotis, Leonidas. 2017. International Pressure and Carceral Moderation: Greece and the European Convention on Human Rights. In Monitoring Penal Policy in Europe, 1st ed., edited by Cliquennois, Gaëtan and de Suremain, Hugues. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Amnesty International. 2018. Death Sentences and Executions 2017. London: Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Beccaria, Cesare. 2008. On Crimes and Punishments and Other Writings. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Colin J., Meyer, John W., et al. 2017. “Constitutions in World Society: A New Measure of Human Rights.” Unpublished manuscript. January 27, 2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2906946 (accessed April 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Boli, John. 1987. “Human Rights or State Expansion? Cross-National Definitions of Constitutional Rights, 1870–1970.” Pp. 71–91 in Institutional Structure, edited by Thomas, George, Meyer, John, Ramirez, Francisco, and Boli, John. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Boli-Bennett, John, and Meyer, John. 1978. “The Ideology of Childhood and the State: Rules Distinguishing Children in National Constitutions, 1870–1970.” American Sociological Review 43(6): 797–812.Google Scholar
Bosse, Giselle, and Vieira, Alena. 2018. “Human Rights in Belarus: The EU’s Role since 2016.” European Parliament Think Tank. www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EXPO_STU%282018%29603870.Google Scholar
Bouckaert, Peter Norbert. 1996. “Shutting Down the Death Factory: The Abolition of Capital Punishment in South Africa.” Stanford Journal of International Law 32(2): 287–325.Google Scholar
Cole, Wade M. 2009. “Hard and Soft Commitments to Human Rights Treaties, 1966–20001.” Sociological Forum 24(3): 563–588.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, et al. 2013. “Getting to Rights: Treaty Ratification, Constitutional Convergence, and Human Rights Practice.” Harvard International Law Journal 54(1): 61–95.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, Ginsburg, Tom, et al. 2014. “Characteristics of National Constitutions, Version 2.0.” www.comparativeconstitutionsproject.org. (accessed December 28, 2016).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1997a. Agenda 2000: Commission Opinion on Estonia’s Application for Membership of the European Union. July 15, 1997. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/dwn/opinions/estonia/es-op_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1997b. Commission Opinion on Bulgaria’s Application for Membership of the European Union. July 15, 1997. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/dwn/opinions/bulgaria/bu-op_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1998. 1998 Regular Report from the Commission on Poland’s Progress towards Accession. November 4. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1998/poland_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 1999. Composite Paper: Reports on Progress towards Accession by Each of the Candidate Countries: Annex 3. October 13, 1999. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/1999/annex3_en.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2001. Making a Success of Enlargement: Strategy Paper and Report of the European Commission on the Progress towards Accession by Each of the Candidate Countries. November 13, 2001. http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/archives/pdf/key_documents/2001/annexes_en.pdf (accessed July 9, 2007).Google Scholar
European Council. 1993. European Council in Copenhagen 21–22 June 1993: Conclusions of the Presidency. http://ue.eu.int/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/72921.pdf (accessed May 24, 2007).Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. 1996. Rituals of Retribution: Capital Punishment in Germany 1600–1987. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frankowski, Stanislaw. 1996. “Post-Communist Europe.” Pp. 215–241 in Capital Punishment: Global Issues and Prospects, edited by Hodgkinson, Peter and Rutherford, Andrew. Winchester, UK: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
Garland, David. 2010. Peculiar Institution : America’s Death Penalty in an Age of Abolition. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gottschalk, Marie, Blumstein, Alfred, et al. 2006. The Prison and the Gallows: The Politics of Mass Incarceration in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015. “Transnational Legal Orders.” Pp. 3–74 in Transnational Legal Orders, edited by Halliday, Terence C. and Shaffer, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Peter. 2000. “Europe – A Death Penalty Free Zone: Commentary and Critique of Abolitionist Strategies.” Ohio Northern University Law Review 26: 625–663.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, Peter, and Rutherford, Andrew. 1996. Capital Punishment: Global Issues and Prospects. Winchester: Waterside Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger. 2002. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger G., and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2008. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger, and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2009. “Abolishing the Death Penalty Worldwide: The Impact of a ‘New Dynamic.’” Crime and Justice 38(1): 1–63.Google Scholar
Hood, Roger, and Hoyle, Carolyn. 2015. The Death Penalty: A Worldwide Perspective, 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shanhe, Lambert, Eric G., et al. 2010. “Death Penalty Views in China, Japan and the U.S.: An Empirical Comparison.” Journal of Criminal Justice 38(5): 862–869.Google Scholar
Johnson, David T. 2014. “Progress and Problems in Japanese Capital Punishment.” Pp. 168–184 in Confronting Capital Punishment in Asia: Human Rights, Politics, and Public Opinion, edited by Hood, Roger and Deva, Surya. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Dongwook. 2016. “International Non-governmental Organizations and the Abolition of the Death Penalty.” European Journal of International Relations 22(3): 596–621.Google Scholar
Law, David S., and Versteeg, Mila. 2011. “The Evolution and Ideology of Global Constitutionalism.” California Law Review 99: 1163–1257.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, et al. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.Google Scholar
Neary, Ian. 2002. Human Rights in Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric. 2008. “Death Penalty: The Political Foundations of the Global Trend towards Abolition.” Human Rights Review 9(2): 241–268.Google Scholar
Obara-Minnitt, Mika. 2016. Japanese Moratorium on the Death Penalty. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Organization of American States. 2018. Signatures and Ratifications: Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights to Abolish the Death Penalty. Department of International Law. www.oas.org/juridico/english/sigs/a-53.html (accessed May 20, 2018).Google Scholar
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights. 2003. The Death Penalty in the OSCE Area. October 2003. www.osce.org/documents/odihr/2003/10/771_en.pdf (accessed May 23, 2007).Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 1994. Resolution 1044 (1994) on the Abolition of Capital Punishment. http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/AdoptedText/ta96/ERES1097.HTM.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 1996. Resolution 1097 (1996) on the Abolition of the Death Penalty in Europe. http://assembly.coe.int/Documents/AdoptedText/ta96/ERES1097.HTM.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2000. Opinion No. 221 (2000): Armenia’s Application for Membership of the Council of Europe. June 28. http://assembly.coe.int/main.asp?Link=/documents/adoptedtext/ta00/eopi221.htm (accessed May 23, 2007).Google Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne, and Neumeier, Stefanie. 2019. “The Transnational Legal Ordering of the Death Penalty.” UCI Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 4.Google Scholar
Sarat, Austin, and Martschukat, Jürgen, eds. 2011. Is the Death Penalty Dying? European and American Perspectives. New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sato, Mai. 2014. The Death Penalty in Japan: Will the Public Tolerate Abolition? Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
Schabas, William A. 1997. The Abolition of the Death Penalty in International Law, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sergeyeva, Viktoria, and Pokras, Alla. 2012. The Abolition of the Death Penalty and Its Alternative Sanction in Eastern Europe: Belarus, Russia and Ukraine. London: Penal Reform International.Google Scholar
Shelton, Dinah. 2010. Regional Protection of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sloss, David, and Sandholtz, Wayne. 2018. “Universal Human Rights and Constitutional Change.” Manuscript. May 18, 2018. 52 pages.Google Scholar
Stack, Steven. 2004. “Public Opinion and the Death Penalty.” International Criminal Justice Review 14(1): 69–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiker, Carol S. 2002. “Capital Punishment and American Exceptionalism.” Oregon Law Review 81(1): 97–130.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, and Wotipka, Christine Min. 2004. “Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement: Citizen Participation in Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations.” Social Forces 83(2): 587–620.Google Scholar
General Assembly, UN. 1948. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Resolution 217 A (III). December 10. www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm (accessed April 29, 2018).Google Scholar
Unnever, James. 2010. “Global Support for the Death Penalty.” Punishment & Society 12(4): 463–484.Google Scholar
Versteeg, Mila. 2015. “Law versus Norms: The Impact of Human Rights Treaties on National Bills of Rights.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 171(1): 87–111.Google Scholar
Wotipka, Christine Min, and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2008. “Global Human Rights and State Sovereignty: State Ratification of International Human Rights Treaties, 1965–2001.” Sociological Forum 23(4): 724–754.Google Scholar
Zimring, Franklin E. 2003. The Contradictions of American Capital Punishment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

References

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performative Revolution in Egypt: An Essay in Cultural Power. London, New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C., and Mast, Jason L.. 2006. “Introduction: Symbolic Action in Theory and Practice: The Cultural Pragmatics of Symbolic Action.” Pp. 1–28 in Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., and Mast, J. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Amnesty International. 2010. Case Closed: Rape and Human Rights in the Nordic Countries: Summary Report. ACT 77/001/2010. Amnesty International.Google Scholar
Askin, Kelly. 2001. Analysis: Foca’s Monumental Jurisprudence. 226. https://iwpr.net/global-voices/analysis-focas-monumental-jurisprudence.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Kathrine, and Keshk, Omar M. G.. 2009. “‘Trading Data’: Evaluating Our Assumptions and Coding Rules.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 26(5): 471–491.Google Scholar
Barbieri, Kathrine, and Keshk, Omar M. G.. 2017. Correlates of War Project Trade Data Set Codebook, Version 4.0. https://correlatesofwar.org/.Google Scholar
Billaud, Julie. 2015. “The Universal Periodic Review as a Public Audit Ritual: An Anthropological Perspective on Emerging Practices in the Global Governance of Human Rights.” Pp. 63–84 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Błuś, Anna. 2018. “Sex without Consent Is Rape. So Why Do Only Eight European Countries Recognise This?” Amnesty International. www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2018/04/eu-sex-without-consent-is-rape/ (accessed February 25, 2019).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2012. Sur l’État. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2015. On the State: Lectures at the College de France, 1989–1992. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, and Meyer, John W.. 1998. “Modern Law as a Secularized and Global Model: Implications for the Sociology of Law.” Soziale Welt 49(3): 213–232.Google Scholar
Bulto, Takele Soboka. 2015. “Africa’s Engagement with the Universal Periodic Review: Commitment or Capitulation?” Pp. 63–84 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, Hilary, and Larking, Emma. 2015. “Introduction: The Regulatory Power of the Universal Periodic Review.” Pp. 1–22 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chauville, Roland. 2015. “The Universal Periodic Review’s First Cycle: Successes and Failures.” Pp. 87–108 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, Mikkel, and Levi, Ron. 2018. “An Internationalized Criminal Justice: Paths of Law and Paths of Police.” Pp. 1–14 in International Practices of Criminal Justice: Social and Legal Perspectives, edited by Christensen, M. and Levi, R.. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collister, Heather. 2015. “Rituals and Implementation in the Universal Periodic Review and the Human Rights Treaty Bodies.” Pp. 235–255 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conti, Joseph. 2016. “Legitimacy Chains: Legitimation of Compliance with International Courts Across Social Fields.” Law and Society Review 50(1):154–188.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane. 2015. “The Universal Periodic Review as a Public Audit Ritual: An Anthropological Perspective on Emerging Practices in the Global Governance of Human Rights.” Pp. 42–62 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De la Vega, Constance, and Yamasaki, Cassandra. 2015. “The Effects of the Universal Periodic Review on Human Rights Practices in the United States.” Pp. 213–234 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Devries, Karen M., Mak, Joelle Y., Bacchus, Loraine J., Child, Jennifer C., Falder, Gail, Petzold, Max, Astbury, Jill, and Watts, Charlotte H.. 2013. “Intimate Partner Violence and Incident Depressive Symptoms and Suicide Attempts: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal Studies.” PLOS Medicine 10(5): e1001439.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G.. 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Elizalde, Pilar. 2019. “A Horizontal Pathway to Impact? An Assessment of the Universal Periodic Review at 10.” Pp. 83–106 in Contesting Human Rights: Norms, Institutions, and Practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Ermakoff, Ivan. 2008. Ruling Oneself Out: A Theory of Collective Abdications. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Eyerman, Ron. 2006. “Performing Opposition, or How Social Movements Move.” Pp. 193–217 in Social Performance: Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual, edited by Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., and Mast., J. L. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freedom House. 2018. Freedom in the World 2017. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, 1st ed. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1982. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, 1st ed. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Goodale, Mark. 2002. “Legal Ethnography in an Era of Globalization: The Arrival of Western Human Rights Discourse to Rural Bolivia.” Pp. 50–72 in Practicing Ethnography in Law: New Dialogues, Enduring Methods, edited by Starr, J. and Goodale, M.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek. 2004. “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law.” Duke Law Journal 54(3): 621–703.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie. 2012. “International Regimes for Human Rights.” Annual Review of Political Science 15: 265–286.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Helfer, Laurence R., and Fariss, Christopher J.. 2011. “Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogations from Human Rights Treaties.” International Organization 65(4): 673–707.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2005. “Human Rights in a Globalizing World: The Paradox of Empty Promises.” American Journal of Sociology 110: 1373–1411.Google Scholar
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., and Tsutsui, Kiyoteru. 2007. “Justice Lost! The Failure of International Human Rights Law To Matter Where Needed Most.” Journal of Peace Research 44(4): 407–425.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron. 2005. “Crimes of War and the Force of Law.” Social Forces 83(4): 1499–1534.Google Scholar
Hagan, John, Levi, Ron, and Ferrales, Gabrielle. 2006. “Swaying the Hand of Justice: The Internal and External Dynamics of Regime Change at the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia.” Law and Social Inquiry 31(3): 585–616.Google Scholar
Halliday, Terence C., and Shaffer, Gregory. 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Houge, Anette Bringedal, and Lohne, Kjersti. 2017. “End Impunity! Reducing Conflict-Related Sexual Violence to a Problem of Law.” Law and Society Review 51(4): 755–789.Google Scholar
Joseph, Sarah. 2015. “Global Media Coverage of the Universal Periodic Review Process.” Pp. 147–166 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E., and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, 1st ed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levi, Ron, and Sendroiu, Ioana. 2019. “Moral Claims and Redress after Atrocity: Economies of Worth across Political Cultures in the Holocaust Swiss Banks Litigation.” Poetics 73:45–60.Google Scholar
Mackie, Gerry. 1996. “Ending Footbinding and Infibulation: A Convention Account.” American Sociological Review 61(6): 999–1017.Google Scholar
Massoud, Mark Fathi. 2011. “Do Victims of War Need International Law? Human Rights Education Programs in Authoritarian Sudan.” Law and Society Review 45(1): 1–32.Google Scholar
McMahon, Edward R., Busia, Kojo, and Ascherio, Marta. 2013. “Comparing Peer Reviews: The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council and the African Peer Review Mechanism.” African and Asian Studies 12(3): 266–289.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006a. Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2006b. “Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle.” American Anthropologist 108(1): 38–51.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle. 2012. “Measuring the World: Indicators, Human Rights, and Global Governance.” Current Anthropology 52(S3): S83–S95.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation‐State.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.Google Scholar
Michaels, Ralf. 2016. “State Law as a Transnational Legal Order.” UC Irvine Journal of International, Transnational, and Comparative Law 1: 141.Google Scholar
Milewicz, Karolina M., and Goodin, Robert E.. 2018. “Deliberative Capacity Building through International Organizations: The Case of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights.” British Journal of Political Science 48(2): 513–533.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.” International Organization 54(2): 217–252.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices.” Comparative Political Studies 35(1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Newman, Matthew L., Groom, Carla J., Handelman, Lori D., and Pennebaker, James W.. 2008. “Gender Differences in Language Use: An Analysis of 14,000 Text Samples.” Discourse Processes 45(3): 211–236.Google Scholar
Newman, Matthew L., Pennebaker, James W., Berry, Diane S., and Richards, Jane M.. 2003. “Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(5): 665–675.Google Scholar
Nyamu-Musembi, Celestine. 2002. “Are Local Norms and Practices Fences or Pathways? The Example of Women’s Property Rights.” Pp. 126–150 in Cultural Transformation and Human Rights in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Pennebaker, James W., and Stone, Lori D.. 2003. “Words of Wisdom: Language Use over the Life Span.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(2): 291–301.Google Scholar
Pierotti, Rachael S. 2013. “Increasing Rejection of Intimate Partner Violence: Evidence of Global Cultural Diffusion.” American Sociological Review 78(2): 240–265.Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent. 2016. International Pecking Orders: The Politics and Practice of Multilateral Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, S. Garnett, Lerch, Julia C., and Wotipka, Christine Min. 2018. “The Making of a Human Rights Issue: A Cross-National Analysis of Gender-Based Violence in Textbooks, 1950-2011.” Gender and Society 32(5): 713–738.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Averell, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2019. “Breaking the Ban? The Heterogeneous Impact of US Contestation of the Torture Norm.” Journal of Global Security Studies 4(1): 105–122.Google Scholar
Schokman, Ben, and Lynch, Phil. 2015. “Effective NGO Engagement with the Universal Periodic Review.” Pp. 126–146 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Semin, Gün R., and Fiedler, Klaus. 1988. “The Cognitive Functions of Linguistic Categories in Describing Persons: Social Cognition and Language.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54(4): 558–568.Google Scholar
Sendroiu, Ioana. 2019. “Human Rights as Uncertain Performance During the Arab Spring.” Poetics 73: 32–44.Google Scholar
Sexton, J. B., Thomas, E. J., and Helmreich, R. L.. 2000. “Error, Stress, and Teamwork in Medicine and Aviation: Cross Sectional Surveys.” BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.) 320(7237): 745–749.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2012. “Transnational Legal Process and State Change.” Law and Social Inquiry 37(2): 229–264.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory. 2016. “Theorizing Transnational Legal Ordering.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12(1): 231–253.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, ed. 2012. Transnational Legal Ordering and State Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, Gregory, and Halliday, Terence. 2016. With, Within, and Beyond the State: The Promise and Limits of Transnational Legal Ordering. SSRN Scholarly Paper. ID 2882851. Rochester: Social Science Research Network.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics, 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simmons, Rachel A., Chambless, Dianne L., and Gordon, Peter C.. 2008. “How Do Hostile and Emotionally Overinvolved Relatives View Relationships?: What Relatives’ Pronoun Use Tells Us.” Family Process 47(3): 405–419.Google Scholar
Skotnicki, Tad. 2019. “Unseen Suffering: Slow Violence and the Phenomenological Structure of Social Problems.” Theory and Society 48: 299–323.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Yla R., and Pennebaker, James W.. 2010. “The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(1): 24–54.Google Scholar
Tsutsui, Kiyoteru, and Wotipka, Christine Min. 2004. “Global Civil Society and the International Human Rights Movement: Citizen Participation in Human Rights International Nongovernmental Organizations.” Social Forces 83(2):587–620.Google Scholar
Union of International Associations. 2018. “Yearbook of International Organizations” (accessed March 23, 2018).Google Scholar
Van Schaack, Beth. 2008. “Engendering Genocide: The Akayesu Case Before the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda.” Santa Clara Law Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/facpubs/629.Google Scholar
Vega, Constance, and Yamasaki, Cassandra. 2015. “The Effects of the Universal Periodic Review on Human Rights Practices in the United States.” Pp. 213–234 in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Charlesworth, H. and Larking, E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, Elisabeth Jean. 2014. “Conflict-Related Sexual Violence and the Policy Implications of Recent Research.” International Review of the Red Cross 96(894): 457–478.Google Scholar
World Bank. 2018. “GDP (Current US$).”Google Scholar
Zhou, Min. 2012. “Participation in International Human Rights NGOs: The Effect of Democracy and State Capacity.” Social Science Research 41(5):1254–1274.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×