Book contents
- Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Section 1 Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, and Causes of Transient Ischemic Attacks and Stroke
- Section 2 Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Investigation
- Chapter 8 Clinical Features and Differential Diagnosis of a Transient Ischemic Attack
- Chapter 9 The Clinical Features and Differential Diagnosis of Acute Stroke
- Chapter 10 Brain Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke
- Chapter 11 Brain Imaging in Major Acute Stroke
- Chapter 12 Vascular Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Chapter 13 Non-Radiological Investigations for Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Section 3 Prognosis of Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Section 4 Treatment of Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Section 5 Secondary Prevention
- Section 6 Miscellaneous Disorders
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Vascular Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
from Section 2 - Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Investigation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2018
Book contents
- Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface to the Second Edition
- Section 1 Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Pathophysiology, and Causes of Transient Ischemic Attacks and Stroke
- Section 2 Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Investigation
- Chapter 8 Clinical Features and Differential Diagnosis of a Transient Ischemic Attack
- Chapter 9 The Clinical Features and Differential Diagnosis of Acute Stroke
- Chapter 10 Brain Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke
- Chapter 11 Brain Imaging in Major Acute Stroke
- Chapter 12 Vascular Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Chapter 13 Non-Radiological Investigations for Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Section 3 Prognosis of Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Section 4 Treatment of Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke
- Section 5 Secondary Prevention
- Section 6 Miscellaneous Disorders
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Transient Ischemic Attack and StrokeDiagnosis, Investigation and Treatment, pp. 191 - 206Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alexandrov, AV, Molina, CA, Grotta, JC et al. (2004). Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. New England Journal of Medicine 351:2170–2178Google Scholar
Arnold, JA, Modaresi, KB, Thomas, N et al. (1999). Carotid plaque characterization by duplex scanning: Observer error may undermine current clinical trials. Stroke 30:61–65Google Scholar
Babikian, VL, Wijman, CAC, Hyde, C et al. (1997). Cerebral microembolism and early recurrent cerebral or retinal ischemic events. Stroke 28:1314–1318CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartlett, ES, Symons, SP, Fox, AJ (2006). Correlation of carotid stenosis diameter and cross-sectional areas with CT angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:638–642Google ScholarPubMed
Barth, A, Arnold, M, Mattle, HPC et al. (2006). Contrast-enhanced 3-D MRA in decision making for carotid endarterectomy: A 6-year experience. Cerebrovascular Diseases 21:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, RW (1999). Transcranial color-coded duplex sonography. Journal of Neurology 246:637–647Google Scholar
Baumgartner, RW, Mattle, HP, Aaslid, RC et al. (1997). Transcranial colour-coded duplex sonography in arterial cerebrovascular disease. Cerebrovascular Diseases 7:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, CCR, Powell, S, Insall, MC et al. (1986). Effect of internal carotid artery occlusion on middle cerebral artery blood flow at rest and in response to hypercapnia. Lancet i:710–712Google Scholar
Blakeley, DD, Oddone, EZ, Hasselblad, VC et al. (1995). Non-invasive carotid artery testing: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Internal Medicine 122:360–367Google Scholar
Bornstein, NM, Norris, JW (1986). Subclavian steal: A harmless haemodynamic phenomenon? Lancet ii:303–305Google Scholar
Brink, JA, McFarland, EG, Heiken, JP (1997). Helical/spiral computed body tomography. Clinical Radiology 52:489–503Google Scholar
Camargo, EC, Furie, KL, Singhal, AB et al. (2007). Acute brain infarct: Detection and delineation with CT angiographic source images versus nonenhanced CT scans. Radiology 244:541–548Google Scholar
Campbell, BC, Christensen, S, Tress, BM et al. (2013). Failure of collateral blood flow is associated with infarct growth in ischemic stroke. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 33:1168–1172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, BC, Mitchell, MJ, Kleinig, TJ et al. (2015). Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection. New England Journal of Medicine 372:1009–1018Google Scholar
Chappell, ET, Moure, FC, Good, MC (2003). Comparison of computed tomographic angiography with digital subtraction angiography in the diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms: A meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 52:624–631Google Scholar
Chappell, F, Wardlaw, J, Best, JKK et al. (2006). Non-invasive imaging compared with intra-arterial angiography in the diagnosis of symptomatic carotid stenosis: A meta-analysis. Lancet 376:1503–1512Google Scholar
Coutts, SB, Lev, MH, Eliasziw, M et al. (2004). ASPECTS on CTA source images versus unenhanced CT: Added value in predicting final infarct extent and clinical outcome. Stroke 35:2472–2476Google Scholar
Cuffe, R, Rothwell, PM (2006). Effect of non-optimal imaging on the relationship between the measured degree of symptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of ischemic stroke. Stroke 37:1785–1791Google Scholar
Dahl, A, Russell, D, Rootwelt, KC et al. (1995). Cerebral vasoreactivity assessed with transcranial Doppler and regional cerebral blood flow measurements: Dose serum concentration and time course of the response to acetazolamide. Stroke 26:2302–2306CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeMarco, JK, Huston, J III, Nash, AK (2006). Extracranial carotid MR imaging at 3T. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America 14:109–1021Google Scholar
Derdeyn, CP, Grubb, RL, Powers, WJ (1999). Cerebral haemodynamic impairment: Methods of measurements and association with stroke risk. Neurology 53:251–259Google Scholar
Derdeyn, CP, Grubb, RL Jr., Powers, WJ (2005). Indications for cerebral revascularization for patients with atherosclerotic carotid occlusion. Skull Base 15:7–14Google Scholar
Dittrich, R, Ritter, MA, Kaps, MC et al. (2006). The use of embolic signal detection in multicenter trials to evaluate antiplatelet efficacy: Signal analysis and quality control mechanisms in the CARESS (Clopidogrel and Aspirin for Reduction of Emboli in Symptomatic carotid Stenosis) trial. Stroke 37:1065–1069Google Scholar
Droste, DW, Jurgens, R, Nabavi, DGC et al. (1999). Echocontrast-enhanced ultrasound of extracranial internal carotid artery high-grade stenosis and occlusion. Stroke 30:2302–2306CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eliasziw, M, Streifler, JY, Fox, AJC for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (1994). Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. Stroke 25:304–308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fanou, EM, Knight, J, Aviv, RI et al. (2015). Effect of collaterals on clinical presentation, baseline imaging, complications, and outcome in acute stroke. American Journal of Neuroradiology 36:2285–2291Google Scholar
Flossmann, E, Rothwell, PM (2003). Prognosis of verterobrobasilar transient ischemic attack and minor ischemic stroke. Brain 126:1940–1954Google Scholar
Flossmann, E, Redgrave, JN, Schulz, UGC et al. (2006). Reliability of clinical diagnosis of the symptomatic vascular territory in patients with recent TIA or minor stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 21(Suppl 4):18Google Scholar
Fox, AJ, Eliasziw, M, Rothwell, PMC et al. (2005). Identification prognosis and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:2086–2094Google Scholar
Friedman, SG (1990). Transient ischemic attacks resulting from carotid duplex imaging. Surgery 107:153–155Google Scholar
Gaitini, D, Soudack, M (2005). Diagnosing carotid stenosis by Doppler sonography: State of the art. Journal of Ultrasound Medicine 24:1127–1136Google Scholar
Gerraty, RP, Bowser, DN, Infeld, BC et al. (1996). Microemboli during carotid angiography: Association with stroke risk factors or subsequent magnetic resonance imaging changes? Stroke 27:1543–1547Google Scholar
Gerriets, T, Seidel, G, Fiss, IC et al. (1999). Contrast-enhanced transcranial colour-coded duplex sonography: Efficiency and validity. Neurology 52:1133–1137Google Scholar
Graves, MJ (1997). Magnetic resonance angiography. British Journal of Radiology 70:6–28Google Scholar
Gronholdt, MLM (1999). Ultrasound and lipoproteins as predictors of lipid-rich rupture-prone plaques in the carotid artery. Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology 19:2–13Google Scholar
Grosveld, WJ, Lawson, JA, Eikelboom, BCC et al. (1988). Clinical and haemodynamic significance of innominate artery lesions evaluated by ultrasonography and digital angiography. Stroke 19:958–962Google Scholar
Gur, AY, Bova, I, Bornstein, NM (1996). Is impaired cerebral vasomotor reactivity a predictive factor of stroke in asymptomatic patients? Stroke 27:2188–2190Google Scholar
Halliday, A, Mansfield, A, Marro, JC for the MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group (2004). Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 363:1491–1502Google Scholar
Hand, PJ, Wardlaw, JM, Rivers, CS et al. (2006). MR diffusion-weighted imaging and outcome prediction after ischemic stroke. Neurology 66:1159–1163Google Scholar
Hankey, GJ, Warlow, CP (1990). Symptomatic carotid ischemic events: Safest and most cost effective way of selecting patients for angiography before carotid endarterectomy. British Medical Journal 300:1485–1491Google Scholar
Hankey, GJ, Warlow, CP (1991). Lacunar transient ischemic attacks: A clinically useful concept? Lancet 337:335–338Google Scholar
Hankey, GJ, Slattery, JM, Warlow, CP (1991). The prognosis of hospital-referred transient ischemic attacks. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 54:793–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heiken, JP, Brink, JA, Vannier, MW (1993). Spiral (helical) CT. Radiology 189:647–656CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hennerici, M, Klemm, C, Rautenberg, W (1988). The subclavian steal phenomenon: A common vascular disorder with rare neurologic deficits. Neurology 38:669–673Google Scholar
Hopyan, JJ, Gladstone, DJ, Mallia, G et al. (2008). Renal safety of CT angiography and perfusion imaging in the emergency evaluation of acute stroke. American Journal of Neuroradiology 29:1826–1830Google Scholar
Jeans, WD, Mackenzie, S, Baird, RN (1986). Angiography in transient cerebral ischemia using three views of the carotid bifurcation. British Journal of Radiology 59:135–142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, DC, Goldstein, LB (2001). Clinical carotid endarterectomy decision making: Noninvasive vascular imaging versus angiography. Neurology 56:1009–1015Google Scholar
Johnston, DC, Chapman, KM, Goldstein, LB (2001). Low rate of complications of cerebral angiography in routine clinical practice. Neurology 57:2012–2014Google Scholar
Johnston, DC, Eastwood, JD, Nguyen, TC et al. (2002). Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: Utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke 33:2834–2838Google Scholar
Josephson, SA, Bryant, SO, Mak, HK et al. (2004). Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology 63:457–460Google Scholar
Kempczinski, R, Hermann, G (1979). The innominate steal syndrome. Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery 20:481–486Google Scholar
Khan, S, Cloud, GC, Kerry, S et al. (2007). Imaging of vertebral artery stenosis: A systematic review. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 78:1218–1225Google Scholar
Kim, YS, Garami, Z, Mikulik, RC for the CLOTBUST Collaborators (2005). Early recanalization rates and clinical outcomes in patients with tandem internal carotid artery/middle cerebral artery occlusion and isolated middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 36:869–871Google Scholar
Kleiser, B, Widder, B (1992). Course of carotid artery occlusions with impaired cerebrovascular reactivity. Stroke 23:171–174Google Scholar
Krol, AL, Dzialowski, I, Roy, J et al. (2008). Incidence of radiocontrast nephropathy in patients undergoing acute stroke computed tomography angiography. Stroke 38:2364–2366Google Scholar
Leclerc, X, Godefroy, O, Pruvo, JPC et al. (1995). Computed tomographic angiography for the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 26:1577–1581Google Scholar
Levi, CR, Mitchell, A, Fitt, GC et al. (1996). The accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery occlusive disease. Cerebrovascular Diseases 6:231–236Google Scholar
Lovett, JK, Gallagher, PJ, Hands, LJC et al. (2004). Histological correlates of carotid plaque surface morphology on lumen contrast imaging. Circulation 110:2190–2197Google Scholar
Lu, L, Zhang, LJ, Poon, CS et al. (2012). Digital subtraction CT angiography for detection of intracranial aneurysms: Comparison with three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 262:605–612Google Scholar
Markus, HS (1999). Transcranial Doppler ultrasound. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 67:135–137Google Scholar
Markus, HS (2006). Can microemboli on transcranial Doppler identify patients at increased stroke risk? Nature Clinical Practice in Cardiovascular Medicine 3:246–247Google Scholar
Markus, HS, Harrison, MJG (1992). Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity using transcranial Doppler, including the use of breath-holding as the vasodilatory stimulus. Stroke 23:668–673Google Scholar
Markus, HS, Droste, DW, Brown, MM (1994). Detection of asymptomatic cerebral embolic signals with Doppler ultrasound. Lancet 343:1011–1012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, R, Bogousslavsky, J, Miklossy, J et al. (1992). Floating thrombus in the innominate artery as a cause of cerebral infarction in young adults. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2:177–181Google Scholar
Mead, GE, Wardlaw, JM, Lewis, SCC et al. (1999). Can simple clinical features be used to identify patients with severe carotid stenosis on Doppler ultrasound? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 66:16–19Google Scholar
Menon, BK, Smith, EE, Modi, J et al. (2011). Regional leptomeningeal score on CT angiography predicts clinical and imaging outcomes in patients with acute anterior circulation occlusions. American Journal of Neuroradiology 32:1640–1645Google Scholar
Menon, BK, d’Esterre, CD, Qazi, EM et al. (2015). Multiphase CT angiography: A new tool for the imaging triage of patients with acute ischemic stroke. Radiology 275:510–520Google Scholar
Meuli, RA (2004). Imaging viable brain tissue with CT scan during acute stroke. Cerebrovascular Diseases 17:28–34Google Scholar
Mitra, D, Connolly, D, Jenkins, SC et al. (2006). Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography, in evaluation of carotid stenosis. British Journal of Radiology 79:201–207Google Scholar
Molloy, J, Markus, HS (1999). Asymptomatic embolization predicts stroke and TIA risk in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 30:1440–1443Google Scholar
Nabavi, DG, Kloska, SP, Nam, EM et al. (2002). MOSAIC: Multimodal stroke assessment using computed tomography: Novel diagnostic approach for the prediction of infarction size and clinical outcome. Stroke 33:2819–2826Google Scholar
Nandalur, KR, Baskurt, E, Hagspiel, KDC et al. (2006). Carotid artery calcification on CT may independently predict stroke risk. American Journal of Radiology 186:547–552Google Scholar
Nguyen-Huynh, MN, Wintermark, M, English, J et al. (2008). How accurate is CT angiography in evaluating intracranial atherosclerotic disease? Stroke 39:1184–1188CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norris, JW, Halliday, A (2004). Is ultrasound sufficient for vascular imaging prior to carotid endarterectomy? Stroke 35:370–371Google Scholar
Norris, JW, Morriello, F, Rowed, DW et al. (2003). Vascular imaging before carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 34:e16Google Scholar
Parsons, MW, Pepper, EM, Chan, V et al. (2005). Perfusion computed tomography: Prediction of final infarct extent and stroke outcome. Annals of Neurology 58:672–679Google Scholar
Pelz, DM, Fox, AJ, Vinuela, F (1985). Digital subtraction angiography: Current clinical applications. Stroke 16:528–536Google Scholar
Polak, JF, Shemanski, L, O’Leary, DH for the Cardiovascular Health Study (1998). Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: An independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Radiology 208:649–654Google Scholar
Puetz, V, Dzialowski, I, Hill, MD et al. (2008). Intracranial thrombus extent predicts clinical outcome, final infarct size and hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke: The clot burden score. International Journal of Stroke 3:230–236Google Scholar
Puetz, V, Khomenko, A, Hill, MD et al. (2011). Extent of hypoattenuation on CT angiography source images in basilar artery occlusion: Prognostic value in the Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study. Stroke 42:3454–3459Google Scholar
Rosario, JA, Hachinski, VA, Lee, DH et al. (1987). Adverse reactions to duplex scanning. Lancet ii:1023Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gibson, RJ, Villagra, RC et al. (1998). The effect of angiographic technique and image quality on the reproducibility of measurement of carotid stenosis and assessment of plaque surface morphology. Clinical Radiology 53:439–443Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Pendlebury, ST, Wardlaw, J et al. (2000a). Critical appraisal of the design and reporting of studies of the imaging and measurement of carotid stenosis. Stroke 31:1444–1450Google Scholar
Rothwell, PM, Gibson, R, Warlow, CP on behalf of the European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2000b). Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke 31:615–621Google Scholar
Ryu, CW, Kwak, HS, Jahng, GH et al. (2014). High-resolution MRI of intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Neurointervention 9:9–20Google Scholar
Schramm, P, Schellinger, PD, Klotz, E et al. (2004). Comparison of perfusion computed tomography and computed tomography angiography source images with perfusion-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in patients with acute stroke of less than 6 hours’ duration. Stroke 35:1652–1658Google Scholar
Siewert, B, Patel, MR, Warach, S (1995). Magnetic resonance angiography. Neurologist 1:167–184Google Scholar
Sliwka, U, Lingnau, A, Stohlmann, WD et al. (1997). Prevalence and time course of microembolic signals in patients with acute stroke: A prospective study. Stroke 28:358–363Google Scholar
Streifler, JY, Eliaziw, M, Fox, AJ, for the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (1994). Angiographic detection of carotid plaque ulceration: Comparison with surgical observations in a multicentre study. Stroke 25:1130–1132Google Scholar
Tan, IY, Demchuk, AM, Hopyan, J et al. (2009). CT angiography clot burden score and collateral score: Correlation with clinical and radiologic outcomes in acute middle cerebral artery infarct. American Journal of Neuroradiology 30:525–531Google Scholar
U-King-Im, JM, Hollingworth, W, Trivedi, RAC et al. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy. Annals of Neurology 58:506–515Google Scholar
Vernieri, F, Pasqualetti, P, Passarelli, FC et al. (1999). Outcome of carotid artery occlusion is predicted by cerebrovascular reactivity. Stroke 30:593–598Google Scholar
Vernieri, F, Pasqualetti, P, Matteis, MC et al. (2001). Effect of collateral blood flow and cerebral vasomotor reactivity on the outcome of carotid artery occlusion. Stroke 32:1552–1558Google Scholar
Villablanca, JP, Hooshi, P, Martin, N et al. (2002). Three-dimensional helical computerized tomography angiography in the diagnosis characterization and management of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: Comparison with conventional angiography and intraoperative findings. Journal of Neurosurgery 97:1322–1332Google Scholar
Wardlaw, JM, Lewis, S (2005). Carotid stenosis measurement on colour Doppler ultrasound: Agreement of ECST NASCET and CCA methods applied to ultrasound with intra-arterial angiographic stenosis measurement. European Journal of Radiology 56:205–211Google Scholar
Warnock, NG, Gandhi, MR, Bergvall, UC et al. (1993). Complications of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in patients investigated for cerebral vascular disease. British Journal of Radiology 66:855–858Google Scholar
Watanabe, Y, Nagayama, M (2010). MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery. Neuroradiology 52:253–274Google Scholar
Widder, B, Kleiser, B, Krapf, H (1994). Course of cerebrovascular reactivity in patients with carotid artery occlusions. Stroke 25:1963–1967Google Scholar
Wilson, D, Adams, ME, Robertson, F et al. (2015). Investigating intracerebral hemorrhage. British Medical Journal 350:h2484Google Scholar
Wintermark, M, Uske, A, Chalaron, M et al. (2003). Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: A comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Journal of Neurosurgery 98:828–836Google Scholar
Wintermark, M, Bogousslavsky, J (2003). Imaging of acute ischemic brain injury: The return of computed tomography. Current Opinions in Neurology 16:59–63Google Scholar
Wintermark, M, Meuli, R, Browaeys, P et al. (2007). Comparison of CT perfusion and angiography and MRI in selecting stroke patients for acute treatment. Neurology 68:694–697Google Scholar
Zhu, XL, Chan, MSY, Poon, WS (1997). Spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage: Which patients need diagnostic cerebral angiography? A prospective study of 206 cases and review of the literature. Stroke 28:1406–1409Google Scholar