Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2018
  • Online publication date: February 2018

11 - The Impact of Market Orders



To measure is to know.

(Lord Kelvin)

In this chapter, we address the seemingly obvious notion of price impact (which we first discussed in Section 1.3.2): buy trades tend to push the price up and sell trades tend to push the price down. Expressed in the notation and language that we have subsequently developed, we might also express this notion by saying that price impact refers to the positive correlation between the sign (+1 for a buy order and –1 for a sell order) of an incoming market order and the subsequent price change that occurs upon or after its arrival. As we discuss in Section 11.3, these seemingly obvious statements are indeed verified by empirical data.

Price impact is an all-too-familiar reality for traders who need to buy or sell large quantities of an asset. To these traders, price impact is tantamount to a cost, because the impact of their earlier trades makes the price of their subsequent trades worse on average. Therefore, monitoring and controlling impact costs is one of the most active and rapidly expanding domains of research in both academic circles and trading firms.

Understanding and assessing price impact entails considering two different but related topics. The first is how volume creates impact: how much more impact does a larger trade cause? The second is the temporal behaviour of impact: how much of a trade's impact is permanent, how much decays over time, and how does this transient behaviour unfold? We will consider both of these topics in detail throughout this chapter. As we will discuss, both of these aspects of price impact are far from trivial. Is a transaction not a fair deal between a buyer and a seller? If so, which of the two is really impacting the price?

What Is Price Impact?

In much of the existing literature, there are two strands of interpretation for price impact, which reflect the great divide between efficient-market enthusiasts (who believe that the price is always close to its fundamental value) and sceptics (who believe that the dynamics of financial markets is primarily governed by order flow).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Weber, P., & Rosenow, B. (2005). Order book approach to price impact. Quantitative Finance, 5(4), 357–364.
Gerig, A. (2007). A theory for market impact: How order flow affects stock price. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, available at: arXiv:0804.3818.
Farmer, J. D., & Zamani, N. (2007). Mechanical vs. informational components of price impact. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 55(2), 189–200.
Hasbrouck, J. (2007). Empirical market microstructure: The institutions, economics, and econometrics of securities trading. Oxford University Press.
Bouchaud, J. P., Farmer, J. D., & Lillo, F. (2009). How markets slowly digest changes in supply and demand. In Hens, T. & Schenk-Hoppe, K. R. (Eds.), Handbook of financial markets: Dynamics and evolution. North-Holland, Elsevier.
Bouchaud, J. P. (2010). Price impact. In Cont, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quantitative finance. Wiley.
Eisler, Z., Bouchaud, J. P., & Kockelkoren, J. (2012). The price impact of order book events: Market orders, limit orders and cancellations. Quantitative Finance, 12(9), 1395–1419.
Hautsch, N., & Huang, R. (2012). The market impact of a limit order. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(4), 501–522.
Cont, R., Kukanov, A., & Stoikov, S. (2014). The price impact of order book events. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 12(1), 47–88.
Donier, J., & Bonart, J. (2015). A million metaorder analysis of market impact on the Bitcoin. Market Microstructure and Liquidity, 1(02), 1550008.
Gomes, C., & Waelbroeck, H. (2015). Is market impact a measure of the information value of trades? Market response to liquidity vs. informed metaorders. Quantitative Finance, 15(5), 773–793.
Tóth, B., Eisler, Z. & Bouchaud, J.-P. (2017). The short-term price impact of trades is universal.
Hasbrouck, J. (1991).Measuring the information content of stock trades. The Journal of Finance, 46(1), 179–207.
Jones, C. M., Kaul, G., & Lipson, M. L. (1994). Transactions, volume, and volatility. Review of Financial Studies, 7(4), 631–651.
Chen, Z., Stanzl, W., & Watanabe, M. (2002). Price impact costs and the limit of arbitrage. Yale ICF Working Paper No. 00–66.
Lillo, F., Farmer, J. D., & Mantegna, R. N. (2003). Econophysics: Master curve for price-impact function. Nature, 421(6919), 129–130.
Potters, M., & Bouchaud, J. P. (2003). More statistical properties of order books and price impact. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 324(1), 133–140.
Zhou, W. X. (2012). Universal price impact functions of individual trades in an order-driven market. Quantitative Finance, 12(8), 1253–1263.
Taranto, D. E., Bormetti, G., & Lillo, F. (2014). The adaptive nature of liquiditytaking in limit order books. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2014(6), P06002.
Gomber, P., Schweickert, U., & Theissen, E. (2015). Liquidity dynamics in an electronic open limit order book: An event study approach. European Financial Management, 21(1), 52–78.
Bouchaud, J. P., Gefen, Y., Potters, M., & Wyart, M. (2004). Fluctuations and response in financial markets: The subtle nature of random price changes. Quantitative Finance, 4(2), 176–190.
Bouchaud, J. P., Kockelkoren, J., & Potters, M. (2006). Random walks, liquidity molasses and critical response in financial markets. Quantitative Finance, 6(02), 115–123.
Farmer, J. D., Gerig, A., Lillo, F., & Mike, S. (2006). Market efficiency and the long-memory of supply and demand: Is price impact variable and permanent or fixed and temporary? Quantitative Finance, 6(02), 107–112.
Taranto, D. E., Bormetti, G., Bouchaud, J. P., Lillo, F., & Tóth, B. (2016). Linear models for the impact of order flow on prices I. Propagators: Transient vs. history dependent impact. Available at SSRN:
Kempf, A., & Korn, O. (1999). Market depth and order size. Journal of Financial Markets, 2(1), 29–48.
Plerou, V., Gopikrishnan, P., Gabaix, X., & Stanley, H. E. (2002). Quantifying stock-price response to demand fluctuations. Physical Review E, 66(2), 027104.
Chordia, T., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2004). Order imbalance and individual stock returns: Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 72(3), 485–518.
Evans, M. D., & Lyons, R. K. (2002). Order flow and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 170–180.
Gabaix, X., Gopikrishnan, P., Plerou, V., & Stanley, H. E. (2006). Institutional investors and stock market volatility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 461–504.
Lillo, F., Farmer, J. D., & Gerig, A. (2008). A theory for aggregate market impact. Technical report, Santa Fe Institute, unpublished research.
Hopman, C. (2007). Do supply and demand drive stock prices? Quantitative Finance, 7, 37–53.