Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2011
  • Online publication date: October 2011

Chapter 13 - Care of the patient with a tracheotomy

Summary

Defective or incomplete separation by the tracheoesophageal septum is one of the most frequent congenital anomalies producing tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF). Anatomic variations that can influence the planning and success of a tracheotomy may be broadly grouped into extrinsic and intrinsic causes. The etiology of the nasal obstruction may include an anterior congenital nasal pyriform aperture stenosis (which is rare), a tumor, or choanal atresia. The most common congenital malformation of the esophagus is esophageal atresia, with or without TEF. Congenital tracheal stenosis may be associated with congenital heart disease, TEF, and skeletal abnormalities. Treatments include tracheoplasty, resection with reanastomosis and stenting. Direct trauma can result in cartilaginous damage and occlusion of the airway lumen by hemorrhage, edema, granulation tissue, scarring, or structural collapse. Congenital tracheal webs are rare presenting with stridor, wheezing, and recurrent respiratory infections. The most common pediatric tracheobronchial tumors include hemangioma, bronchial carcinoid, and papillomatosis.

References

1. RogersDF. Physiology of airway mucus secretion and pathophysiology of hypersecretion.Respir Care 2007; 52(9): 1134–46; discussion 1146–9.
2. VoynowJA, RubinBK. Mucins, mucus, and sputum. Chest 2009; 135(2): 505–12.
3. RogersDF. Mucoactive agents for airway mucus hypersecretory diseases. Respir Care 2007; 52(9): 1176–93; discussion 1193–7.
4. KingM. Experimental models for studying mucociliary clearance. Eur Respir J 1998; 11: 222–8.
5. Walker, WellsRE Jr., MerrillEW. Heat and water exchange in the respiratory tract. Am J Med 1961; 30: 259–67.
6. ShellyMP, LloydGM, ParkGR. A review of the mechanisms and methods of humidification of inspired gases. Intensive Care Med 1988; 14: 1–9.
7. ChalonJ, LoewDA, MalebrancheJ. Effects of dry anesthetic gases on tracheobronchial ciliated epithelium. Anesthesiology 1972; 37(3): 338–43.
8. AARC Clinical Practice Guideline. Endotracheal suctioning of mechanically ventilated adults and children with artificial airways. American Association for Respiratory Care. Respir Care 1993; 38(5): 500–4.
9. LienerK, DurrJ, LeiackerR, RozsasiA, KeckT. Measurement of tracheal humidity and temperature. Respiration 2006; 73(3): 324–8.
10. FinkJ. Humidity and bland aerosol therapy. In: R Kacmarek, RL Wilkins, JK Stoller, editors. Egan’s Fundamentals of Respiratory Care, 9th edn. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elselvier, 2009; 775–90.
11. LemmensHJ, Brock-UtneJG. Heat and moisture exchange devices: are they doing what they are supposed to do? Anesth Analg 2004; 98(2): 382–5, table of contents.
12. UnalN, KanhaiJK, BuijkSL, et al. A novel method of evaluation of three heat-moisture exchangers in six different ventilator settings. Intensive Care Med 1998; 24(2): 138–46.
13. GiraultC, BretonL, RichardJC, et al. Mechanical effects of airway humidification devices in difficult to wean patients. Crit Care Med 2003; 31(5): 1306–11.
14. Le BourdellesG, MierL, FiquetB, et al. Comparison of the effects of heat and moisture exchangers and heated humidifiers on ventilation and gas exchange during weaning trials from mechanical ventilation. Chest 1996; 110(5): 1294–8.
15. De LeynP, BedertL, DelcroixM, et al. Tracheotomy: clinical review and guidelines. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007; 32(3): 412–21.
16. LewarskiJS. Long-term care of the patient with a tracheostomy. Respir Care 2005; 50(4): 534–7.
17. WrightSE, VanDahmK. Long-term care of the tracheostomy patient. Clin Chest Med 2003; 24(3): 473–87.
18. SacknerMA, LandaJF, GreeneltchN, RobinsonMJ. Pathogenesis and prevention of tracheobronchial damage with suction procedures. Chest 1973; 64(3): 284–90.
19. ShermanJM, DavisS, Albamonte-PetrickS, et al. Care of the child with a chronic tracheostomy. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000; 161: 297–308.
20. LandaJF, KwokaMA, ChapmanGA, BritoM, SacknerMA. Effects of suctioning on mucociliary transport. Chest 1980; 77(2): 202–7.
21. Arroyo-NovoaCM, Figueroa-RamosMI, PuntilloKA, et al. Pain related to tracheal suctioning in awake acutely and critically ill adults: a descriptive study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2008; 24: 20–7.
22. JohnsonKL, KearneyPA, JohnsonSB, et al. Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning: costs and physiologic consequences. Crit Care Med 1994; 22(4): 658–66.
23. AckermanMH, EcklundMM, Abu-JumahM. A review of normal saline instillation: implications for practice. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 1996; 15: 31–8.
24. HarrisRB, HymanRB. Clean vs. sterile tracheotomy care and level of pulmonary infection. Nurs Res 1984; 33(2): 80–5.
25. TabaeeA, LandoT, RickertS, StewartMG, KuhelWI. Practice patterns, safety, and rationale for tracheostomy tube changes: a survey of otolaryngology training programs. Laryngoscope 2007; 117(4): 573–6.
26. YaremchukK. Regular tracheostomy tube changes to prevent formation of granulation tissue. Laryngoscope 2003; 113: 1–10.
27. MottaGJ, TrigiliaD. The effect of an antimicrobial drain sponge dressing on specific bacterial isolates at tracheostomy sites. Ostomy Wound Manage 2005; 51: 60–2, 64–6.