Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • This chapter is unavailable for purchase
  • Print publication year: 2010
  • Online publication date: February 2013

14 - Tangible space

Summary

Manifestations of curvature

Now that we have a reasonable grasp of the distinction between flat and curved spaces we can turn to our main business, and consider the significance of the distinction for the reality of space. That the distinction does impact on the debate between substantivalists and relationists has been forcefully argued by Nerlich, on various occasions (1979, 1991, 1994b: §1.7). I will start by looking at some of the ways that spatial curvature can manifest itself in discernible ways, and them move on to consider the use that Nerlich makes of these manifestations.

Leibniz's various anti-substantivalist arguments all rely on the innocuous ness of space: there would be no discernible or significant difference if the physical universe as a whole were shifted with respect to space, either by having a different velocity, or by being located elsewhere. A further variant along these general lines that Leibniz could have employed is nocturnal doubling. If everything were to double in size overnight, would we be able to tell? You would wake up in the morning twice your previous size, but since your bed would also have doubled, this would not be immediately apparent. Similarly, your room would also have doubled in size, as would your house, your town and everyone in it. Distances between houses and towns are now twice what they were, but since all measuring implements have also doubled in size, there is no way that this can be detected.