Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2013
  • Online publication date: May 2013

1 - Technological Revolutions and the Evolution of Industrial Structures


Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69, 567–75.
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1989). Small-firm entry in U.S. manufacturing. Economica, 56, 255–65.
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Acs, Z. J., & D. B. Audretsch, D. B. (1991). R&D firm size and innovative activity. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Innovation and technological change. An international comparison. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Armington, C. (1986). Entry and exit of firms: An international comparison. Economic Council ofCanada.
Arora, A., Fosfuri, A., & Gambardella, A. (2004). Markets for technology: The economics of innovation and corporate strategy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (Eds.). (2005). From underdogs to tigers: The rise and growth of the software industry in some emergent regions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Athreye, S., & Cantwell, J. (2007). Creating competition? : Globalisation and the emergence of new technology producers. Research Policy, 36(2), 209–26.
Axtell, R. L. (2001). Zipf distribution of US firm sizes. Science, 293, 1818–20.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2000): Design rules: The power of modularity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baldwin, C. Y., & Clark, K. B. (2001). Modularity after the crash (Working Paper No. 01–075). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.
Baldwin, J. R. (1998). The dynamics of industrial competition: A North American perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baldwin, W. L., & Scott, J. T. (1987). Market structure and technological change. London: Harwood Academic.
Bartelsman, E. J., & Doms, M. (2000). Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 569–94.
Bartelsman, E. J., Haltiwanger, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2004). Microeconomic evidence of creative destruction in industrial and developing countries (Working Paper No. 04–114/3). Tinbergen Institute.
Bartelsman, E. J., Scarpetta, S., & and Schivardi, F. (2005). Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: Micro-level evidence for the OECD countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 365–91.
Beesley, M. E., & Hamilton, R. T. (1984). Small firms’ seedbed role and the concept of turbulence. Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 217–32.
Bhidé, A. V. (2000). The origin and evolution of new businesses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Boeri, T., & Cramer, U. (1992). Employment growth, incumbents and entrants: Evidence from Germany. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10(4), 545–65.
Bond, R. S. (1975). Mergers and mobility among largest corporations, 1948–68. Antitrust Bulletin, 20, 505–20.
Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., & Dosi, G. (2002). Corporate growth and industrial structure. Some evidence from the Italian manufacturing industry. Industrial and Corporate Change,11, 705–23.
Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G., & Secchi, A. (2007). Invariances and diversities in the evolution of Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 137–59.
Bottazzi, G., Coad, A., Jacoby, N., & Secchi, A. (2005). Corporate growth and industrial dynamics: Evidence from French manufacturing (LEM Working Paper No. 21). S. Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2003a). Properties and sectoral specificities in the dynamics of U.S. manufacturing companies. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 217–32.
Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2003b). Why are distributions of firm growth rates tent-shaped? Economics Letters,80, 415–20.
Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2006). Explaining the distribution of firms growth rates. RANDJournal of Economics, 37, 235–56.
Bound, J., Cummins, C., Griliches, Z., & Jaffe, A. (1984). Who does R&D and who patents? In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Economic Journal, 110(463), 388–410.
Bresnahan, T., & Gambardella, A. (Eds.). (2004). Building high-tech clusters: Silicon Valley and beyond. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Unpacking the black box of modularity: Technologies, products and organizations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 179–205.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialisation, organizational coupling and the boundaries of the firm: Why firms know more than they make?. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597–621.
Cantwell, J., & Iammarino, S. (2001). EU regions and multinational corporations: Change, stability and strengthening of technological comparative advantages. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 1007–37.
Chamberlin, E. H. (1962). The theory of monopolistic competition (8th ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chandler, A. D. J.(1990). Scale and scope: The dynamics of industrial capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
Christensen, C. M., & Rosenbloom, R. S. (1995). Explaining the attacker's advantage: Technological paradigms, organizational dynamics, and the value network. Research Policy, 24(2), 233–57.
Cohen, W. M. (1995). Empirical studies of innovative activity. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change (Chap. 6, pp. 182–264). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Cohen, W. M., & Levin, R. C. (1989). Empirical studies of innovation and market structure. In R. Schmalensee & R. D. Willig (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial Organization (Vol. 2, pp. 1059–107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Collins, N. R., & Preston, L. E. (1961). The size structure of the largest industrial firms, 1909–58. American Economic Review, 51, 986–1011.
Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. C., & Schuh, S. (1996). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dosi, G. (1982). Technological paradigms and technological trajectories: A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, 11, 147–62.
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26, 1120–71.
Dosi, G. (1991). Perspectives on evolutionary theory. Science and Public Policy.
Dosi, G. (2006). Statistical regularities in the evolution of industries. A guide through some evidence and challenges for the theory. In S. Brusoni & F. Malerba (Eds.), Perspectives on innovation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dosi, G., & Coriat, B. (1998). Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems. On the co-evolution of competences, conflicts and organizational routines. In A. D. Chandler & O. S. P. Hagström (Eds.), The dynamic firm: The role of technology, strategy, organization, and regions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dosi, G., & Grazzi, M. (2006). Technologies as problem-solving procedures and technologies as input–output relations: Some perspectives on the theory of production. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 173–202.
Dosi, G., Malerba, F., Marsili, O., & Orsenigo, L. (1997). Industrial structures and dynamics: Evidence, interpretations and puzzles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 3–24.
Dosi, G., & Marengo, L. (1994). Some elements of an evolutionary theory of organizational competence. In R. W. England (Ed.), Evolutionary concepts in contemporary economics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Dosi, G., Marsili, O., Orsenigo, L., &Salvatore, R. (1995). Learning, market selection and evolution of industrial structures. Small Business Economics, 7, 411–36.
Dosi, G., Orsenigo, L., & Sylos-Labini, M. (2005). Technology and the economy. In J. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The handbook of economic sociology (2nd ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dosi, G., & Salvatore, R. (1992). The structure of industrial production and the boundaries between firms and markets. In M. Storper & A. J. Scott(Eds.), Pathways to industrialization and regional development. London: Routeledge.
EUROSTAT. (2006). Industry, trade and services database. Luxembourg: Author.
Evans, D. S. (1987a). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: Estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 567–81.
Evans, D. S. (1987b). Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 657–74.
Freeman, C. (1982). The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Freeman, C., & Perez, C. (1988). Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In G. Dosi et al. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter.
Galambos, L., & Sturchio, J. L. (1998). Pharmaceutical firms and the transition to biotechnology: A study in strategic innovation. Business History Review, 72, 250–78.
Geroski, P. A., & Mazzucato, M. (2002). Learning and the sources of corporate growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 623–44.
Geroski, P. A., & Toker, S. (1996). The turnover of market leaders in UK manufacturing industry, 1979–86. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 141–58.
Ghemawat, P., & Ghadar, F. (2006). Global integration, global concentration. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15, 595–623.
Hall, B. H. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 583–606.
Henderson, R., & Cockburn, I. (1994). Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 63–84.
Henderson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Pisano, G. (1999). The pharmaceutical industry and the revolution in molecular biology: Interactions among scientific, institutional, and organizational change. In D. Mowery & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), Sources of industrial leadership: Studies of seven industries (Chap. 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in competition. Economic Journal, 39(153), 41–57.
Ijiri, Y., & Simon, H. A. (1977). Skew distributions and the sizes of business firms. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
ISTAT. (1997). Rapporto annuale 2004. Rome: Istituto Nazionele di Statistica.
ISTAT. (2001). Rapporto annuale 2004. Rome: Istituto Nazionele di Statistica.
Japan, S. B. (2006). Establishment and enterprise census.
Kamien, M. I., &Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Kaplan, A. D. (1954). Big enterprise in a competitive system. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86, 562–83.
Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145–82.
Klepper, S. (2002). Firm survival and the evolution of oligopoly. Rand Journal of Economics, 33(1), 37–61.
Klepper, S. & Thompson, P. (2007). Submarkets and the evolution of market structure. Rand Journal of Economics, 37(4).
Kumar, M. S. (1985). Growth, acquisition activity and firm size: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 327–38.
Lamoreaux, N. R., & Sokoloff, K. L. (Eds.). (2007). Financing innovation in the United States, 1870 to present. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Lancaster, K. J. (1979). Variety, equity and efficiency. New York: Columbia University Press.
Langlois, R. N. (2002). Modularity in technology and organization. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 49(1), 19–37.
Langlois, R. N. (2003). The vanishing hand: The changing dynamics of industrial capitalism. Industrial and Corporate Change, 12, 351–85.
Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2003). Does Gibrat's Law hold among young, small firms?Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 213–35.
Louçã, F., & Mendonça, S. (2002). Steady change: The 200 largest US manufacturing firms throughout the 20th century. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 817–45.
Malerba, F., Nelson, R., Orsenigo, L., & Winter, S. (2006). Vertical integration and dis-integration of computer firms: A history friendly model of the co-evolution of the computer and semiconductor industries (Papers on Economics and Evolution 2006–19). Munich: Evolutionary Economics Group, Max-Planck-Institute of Economics.
Malerba, F., Nelson, R. R., Winter, S. G., & Orsenigo, L. (1999). “History-friendly” models of industry evolution: The computer industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 8(1), 3–40.
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1995). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. CambridgeJournal of Economics, 19(1), 47–65.
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1997) Technological regimes and sectoral pattern of innovative activities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 83–117.
Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2002). Innovation and market structure in the dynamics of the pharmaceutical industry and biotechnology: Towards a history-friendly model. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 667–703.
Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat's Law, innovation, and the growth of firms. American Economic Review, 52, 1023–51.
Marengo, L., & Dosi, G. (2005). Division of labor, organizational coordination and market mechanisms in collective problem-solving. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58, 303–26.
Marsili, O. (2005). Technology and the size distribution of firms: Evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Review of Industrial Organization, 27, 303–28.
Mermelstein, D. (1969). Large industrial corporations and asset shares. American Economic Review, 59, 531–41.
Metcalfe, S. J. (2001). Restless capitalism: Increasing returns and growth in enterprise economies. In Industrial Structure and Innovation Dynamics. London: Elgar.
Mueller, W. F. (1962). The origins of the basic inventions underlying DuPont's major product and process innovations, 1920 to 1950. In R. R. Nelson & K. J. Arrow (Eds.), The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323–51.
OECD. (1994). Employment outlook. Paris: Author.
OECD. (1995). Industrial structure statistics. Paris: Author.
OECD. (2006). Structural demographic and business statistics 19962003. Paris: Author.
Orsenigo, L., Pammolli, F., & Riccaboni, M. (2001). Technological change and network dynamics: Lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy, 30, 485–508.
Osiris (2005). Bureau Van Dijk Electronic Publishing.
Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral pattern of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–73.
Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7, 433–52.
Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987). The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945–83. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(3), 297–316.
Perez, C. (2007). Finance and technical change: A long-term view. In H. Hanusch & A. Pyka (Eds.), The Elgar companion to neo-Schumpeterian economics. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
Pisano, G. P. (2006). Science business: The promise, the reality, and the future of biotech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Robertson, P. L., & Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation, networks, and vertical integration. Research Policy, 24, 543–62.
Robinson, J. V. (1933). Economic of imperfect competition. London: Macmillan.
Sanchez, R., &Mahoney, J. T. (1996). Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal (Special Issue: Knowledge and the firm), 17, 63–76.
Scherer, F. M. (1965). Market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. American Economic Review, 55, 1097–125.
Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1978). Product differentiation and industrial structure. Journal of Industrial Economics, 36(2), 131–46.
Simon, H. A. (1991). Organizations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(2), 25–44.
Soete, L. L. G. (1979). Firm size and inventive activity : The evidence reconsidered. European Economic Review, 12(4), 319–40.
Steindl, J. (1945). Small and big business: Economic problems of the size of firms. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routeledge.
Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat's legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(1), 40–59.
Sutton, J. (1998). Technology and market structure: Theory and evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Symeonidis, G. (1996). Innovation, firm size and market structure: Schumpeterian hypotheses and some new themes (OECD Economics Department Working Papers 161). Paris: Economics Department, OECD.
Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implication for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285–305.
Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1), 1–30.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Business employment dynamics. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1972). Enterprise statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1977). Enterprise statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1982). Enterprise statistics. Washington, DC: Author.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2006). Statistics of U.S. business. Washington, DC: Author.
Winter, S. G. (1984). Schumpeterian competition under alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5, 287–320.
Winter, S. G., Kaniovski, Y. M., & Dosi, G. (2000). Modeling industrial dynamics with innovative entrants. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 11, 255–93.