Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T07:34:36.356Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Corruption in the Context of Moral Trade-offs

from Part II - Moral Cognition and Bribery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

By
James Dungan ,
Adam Waytz  and
Liane Young
Edited by
Philip M. Nichols  and
Diana C. Robertson
Philip M. Nichols
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Diana C. Robertson
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Thinking about Bribery
Neuroscience, Moral Cognition and the Psychology of Bribery
 , pp. 83 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

André, J. B., & Baumard, N. (2011). The evolution of fairness in a biological market. Evolution, 65(5), 1447–1456.Google Scholar
Anik, L., Aknin, L. B., Norton, M. I., Dunn, E. W., & Quoidbach, J. (2013). Prosocial Bonuses Increase Employee Satisfaction and Team Performance. Harvard Business School Working Paper 13-095.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. II (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ariely, D. (2013). The Honest Truth about Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone – Especially Ourselves. New York, NY: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity, I: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Anand, V. (2003). The normalization of corruption in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 1–52.Google Scholar
Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M. H., & Chugh, D. (2003). How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 56–64.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 364–374.Google Scholar
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Pastorelli, C., & Regalia, C. (2001). Sociocognitive self-regulatory mechanisms governing transgressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 125–135.Google Scholar
Barclay, P., & Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 274(1610), 749–753.Google Scholar
Barnett, T., & Vaicys, C. (2000). The moderating effect of individuals’ perceptions of ethical work climate on ethical judgments and behavioral intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 351–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, B., & Oliver, R. (1996). Affect in dyadic negotiation: A model and propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, 127–143.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2011). What’s wrong with morality? Emotion Review, 3(3), 230–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batson, C. D., Kobrynowicz, D., Dinnerstein, J. L., Kampf, H. C., & Wilson, A. D. (1997). In a very different voice: Unmasking moral hypocrisy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(6), 1335–1348.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Thompson, E. R., Seuferling, G., Whitney, H., & Strongman, J. A. (1999). Moral hypocrisy: Appearing moral to oneself without being so. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(3), 525–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumard, N., André, J. B., & Sperber, D. (2013). A mutualistic approach to morality: The evolution of fairness by partner choice. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(1), 59–122.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benson, M. L. (1985). Denying the guilty mind: Accounting for involvement in a white-collar crime. Criminology, 23(4), 583–607.Google Scholar
Bhattacharjee, A., Berman, J. Z., & Reed, A. II (2012). Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(6), 1167–1184.Google Scholar
Bishop, J. W., & Scott, K. (2000). An examination of organizational and team commitment in a self-directed team environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 439–450.Google Scholar
Bloom, P. (2011). Family, community, trolley problems, and the crisis in moral psychology. The Yale Review, 99(2), 26–43.Google Scholar
Brosig, J. (2002). Identifying cooperative behavior: Some experimental results in a prisoner’s dilemma game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 47(3), 275–290.Google Scholar
Brosnan, S. F., Schiff, H. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 272, 253–258.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., & Patrick, W. (2008). Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, D., Goth, W., & Ploner, M. (2011). Being of two minds: Ultimatum offers under cognitive constraints. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 940–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiaburu, D., & Harrison, D. (2008). Do peers make the place? Conceptual synthesis and meta-analysis of coworker effects on perceptions, attitudes, OCBs, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 1082–1103.Google Scholar
Chiang, Y. (2010). Self-interested partner selection can lead to the emergence of fairness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(4), 265–270.Google Scholar
Cikara, M., Bruneau, E. G., & Saxe, R. R. (2011). Us and them intergroup failures of empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(3), 149–153.Google Scholar
Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotypes and schadenfreude affective and physiological markers of pleasure at outgroup misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 63–71.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23, 239–290.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. R., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A. (2006). Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(11), 1559–1572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., & Turan, N. (2012). Guilt proneness and moral character. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(5), 355–359.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., & Warlop, L. (2011). Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1080–1090.Google Scholar
Cushman, F. A. (2008). Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition, 108(2), 353–380.Google Scholar
Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2009). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35, 219–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M. T., & Maner, J. K. (2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(12), 1653–1662.Google Scholar
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological Science, 13(1), 81–84.Google Scholar
Ditto, P. H., & Mastronarde, A. J. (2009). The paradox of the political maverick. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 295–298.Google Scholar
Dyck, A., Adair, M., & Zingales, L. (2010). Who blows the whistle on corporate fraud? Journal of Finance, 65, 2213–2254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, A. P. (2000). The Search for Integrity: A Leadership Impact Study. Doctoral dissertation. ProQuest Information & Learning.Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18(2), 255–297.Google Scholar
Friman, P. C., Woods, D. W., Freeman, K. A., et al. (2004). Relationships between tattling, likeability, and social classification: A preliminary investigation of adolescents in residential care. Behavior Modification, 28, 331–348.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gino, F., & Pierce, L. (2009a). Dishonesty in the name of equity. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1153–1160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gino, F., (2009b). The abundance effect: Unethical behavior in the presence of wealth. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(2), 142–155.Google Scholar
Gino, F., (2010). Lying to level the playing field: Why people may dishonestly help or hurt others to create equity. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(1), 89–103.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.Google Scholar
Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.Google Scholar
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review, 32, 393–417.Google Scholar
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998–1002.Google Scholar
Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.Google Scholar
Hamman, J., Rick, S., & Weber, R. A. (2007). Solving coordination failure with “all-or-none” group-level incentives. Experimental Economics, 10(3), 285–303.Google Scholar
Hamann, K., Warneken, F., Greenberg, J. R., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Collaboration encourages equal sharing in children but not in chimpanzees. Nature, 476(7360), 328–331.Google Scholar
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., Bloom, P., & Mahajan, N. (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 19931–19936.Google Scholar
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2005). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In Patrick, C. J., ed., Handbook of Psychopathy (58–88). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Hegtvedt, K. A., & Killian, C. (1999). Fairness and emotions: Reactions to the process and outcomes of negotiations. Social Forces, 78(1), 269–302.Google Scholar
Ingram, G. P. D., & Bering, J. M. (2010). Children’s tattling: The reporting of everyday norm violations in preschool settings. Child Development, 81, 945–957.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to Socialization. In Goslin, D. A., ed., Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research (151–235). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on Moral Development, Volume 1: The Philosophy of Moral Development. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51.Google Scholar
Luguri, J. B., Napier, J. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (2012). Reconstruing intolerance abstract thinking reduces conservatives’ prejudice against nonnormative groups. Psychological Science, 23(7), 756–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mahajan, N., Martinez, M. A., Gutierrez, N. L., Diesendruck, G., Banaji, M. R., & Santos, L. (2011). The evolution of intergroup bias: Perceptions and attitudes in rhesus macaques. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 387–405.Google Scholar
Mazar, N., & Aggarwal, P. (2011). Greasing the palm: Can collectivism promote bribery? Psychological Science, 22(7), 843–848.Google Scholar
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(6), 633–644.Google Scholar
Meier, B. P., & Hinsz, V. B. (2004). A comparison of human aggression committed by groups and individuals: An interindividual–intergroup discontinuity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 551–559.Google Scholar
Messick, D. M., & Bazerman, M. H. (1996). Ethical leadership and the psychology of decision making. Sloan Management Review, 37, 9–22.Google Scholar
Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152.Google Scholar
Minson, J. A., & Monin, B. (2012). Do-gooder derogation: Putting down morally-motivated others to defuse implicit moral reproach. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 200–207.Google Scholar
Monin, B., & Merritt, A. (2012). Moral hypocrisy, moral inconsistency, and the struggle for moral integrity. In Merritt, A., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R., eds., The Social Psychology of Morality: Exploring the Causes of Good and Evil (167–184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Monin, B., Sawyer, P. J., & Marquez, M. J. (2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 76–93.Google Scholar
Moore, D. A., Tetlock, P. E., Tanlu, L., & Bazerman, M. H. (2006). Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 10–29.Google Scholar
Morrison, R. (2004). Information relationships in the workplace: Association with job satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intentions. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 33, 114–128.Google Scholar
Napier, J. L., & Luguri, J. B. (2013). Moral mind-sets abstract thinking increases a preference for “individualizing” over “binding” moral foundations. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 754–759.Google Scholar
Near, J. P., & Miceli, M. P. (1985). Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle- blowing. Journal of Business Ethics, 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Neumann, C. S., & Hare, R. D. (2008). Psychopathic traits in a large community sample: Links to violence, alcohol use, and intelligence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 893–899.Google Scholar
Niemi, L., & Young, L. (2013). Caring across boundaries versus keeping boundaries intact: Links between moral values and interpersonal orientations. PloS One, 8(12), e81605.Google Scholar
Olson, K. R., & Spelke, E. S. (2008). Foundations of cooperation in young children. Cognition, 108, 222–231.Google Scholar
Ordonez, L., Connolly, T., & Coughlan, R. (2000). Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 329–344.Google Scholar
Parks, C. D., & Stone, A. B. (2010). The desire to expel unselfish members from the group. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 303–310.Google Scholar
Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741–763.Google Scholar
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., & Nowak, M. A. (2012). Spontaneous giving and calculated greed. Nature, 489(7416), 427–430.Google Scholar
Reed, A. II, & Aquino, K. F. (2003). Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1270–1286.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1997). Justice as a larger loyalty. In Bonketoe, R. & Stepaniants, M., eds., Justice and Democracy: Cross-cultural Perspectives (9–22). Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, A., DeScioli, P., & Olson, K. R. (2012). Fairness versus favoritism in children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 736–745.Google Scholar
Shaw, A., Montinari, N., Piovesan, M., Olson, K. R., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2013). Children develop a veil of fairness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 363–375.Google Scholar
Shweder, R. A., Much, N. C., Mahapatra, M., & Park, L. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In Brandt, A. & Rozin, P., eds., Morality and Health (119–169). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Skeem, J. L., Polaschek, D. L., Patrick, C. J., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2011). Psychopathic personality bridging the gap between scientific evidence and public policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(3), 95–162.Google Scholar
Sloane, S., Baillargeon, R., & Premack, D. (2012). Do infants have a sense of fairness? Psychological Science, 23, 196–204.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Killen, M., & Turiel, E. (1991). Children’s reasoning about interpersonal and moral conflicts. Child Development, 62, 629–644.Google Scholar
Sylwester, K., & Roberts, G. (2010). Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games. Biology Letters, 6(5), 659–662.Google Scholar
Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2003). Shame and Guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (2004). Ethical fading: The role of self-deception in unethical behavior. Social Justice Research, 17(2), 223–236.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. D., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8(3), 447–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32(6), 951–990.Google Scholar
Treviño, L. K., & Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision-making behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(4), 378–385.Google Scholar
Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57.Google Scholar
Tsang, J. A. (2002). Moral rationalization and the integration of situational factors and psychological processes in immoral behavior. Review of General Psychology, 6(1), 25–50.Google Scholar
Valdesolo, P., & DeSteno, D. (2007). Moral hypocrisy: Social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychological Science, 18(8), 689–690.Google Scholar
Verplaetse, J., Vanneste, S., & Braeckman, J. (2007). You can judge a book by its cover: The sequel. A kernel of truth in predictive cheating detection. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28(4), 260–271.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., & Goode, M. R. (2006). The psychological consequences of money. Science, 314(5802), 1154–1156.Google Scholar
Vohs, K. D., Mead, N. L., (2008). Merely activating the concept of money changes personal and interpersonal behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(3), 208–212.Google Scholar
Walker, L. J., & Hennig, K. H. (2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(4), 629–647.Google Scholar
Waytz, A., Dungan, J., & Young, L. (2013). The whistleblower’s dilemma and the fairness–loyalty tradeoff. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(6), 1027–1033.Google Scholar
Waytz, A., & Epley, N. (2012). Social connection enables dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 70–76.Google Scholar
Weber, J., & Wasieleski, D. (2001). Investigating influences on managers’ moral reasoning: The impact of context and personal and organizational factors. Business & Society, 40(1), 79–110.Google Scholar
Wildschut, T., Pinter, B., Vevea, J. L., Insko, C. A., & Schopler, J. (2003). Beyond the group mind: A quantitative review of the interindividual–intergroup discontinuity effect. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 698–722.Google Scholar
Wiltermuth, S. S. (2011). Cheating more when the spoils are split. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 157–168.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C., & Baril, G. (2011). The role of cognitive resources in determining our moral intuitions: Are we all liberals at heart? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(5), 1007–1012.Google Scholar
Zaki, J., & Mitchell, J. P. (2011). Equitable decision making is associated with neural markers of intrinsic value. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(49), 19761–19766.Google Scholar
Zaki, J., (2013). Intuitive prosociality. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 466–470.Google Scholar
Zhong, C. B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×