Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: January 2010

7 - Landsat mapping of local landscape change: the satellite-era context

from Part III



To set the stage for a vulnerability analysis, investigators must describe and understand the geographic context, including physical characteristics of the landscape and the political and socioeconomic milieu of the population (Jianchu et al. 2005). Vulnerability studies focus on a particular place, at a specific time through its three dimensions, exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity; therefore, understanding place is essential to analyzing vulnerability.

Land-use studies are essential to understanding place because they generalize human activities on the physical landscape. Essentially, land use indicates past human decisions and actions, environmental constraints, and, in some cases, gives insight into subsequent change. Like vulnerability, land use is particular to a place at a certain time, and the analysis of that land use can be used as a baseline for future change and its implications. Vulnerability and land use are linked by the concept of place and are fundamental to contemporary research on human–environment interactions.

Although the literature on land use, land-use change, and climate change is extensive, the land-use component of vulnerability is usually conceptualized as a feedback mechanism to climate change: forest cutting releases carbon dioxide, which increases atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, which increases radiative forcing, which changes climate, and which ultimately changes land cover and subsequent land use (e.g. DeFries and Bounoua 2004; Jianchu et al. 2005; Salinger et al. 2005; Watson 2005). Moreover, land use is rarely specifically identified as a component of vulnerability.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., and Roach, J. T., 1972. A Land-Use Classification System for Use with Remote-Sensor Data, United States Geological Survey Circular No. 671. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Anderson, J. R., Hardy, E. E., Roach, J. T., and Witmer, R. E., 1976. A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data, United States Geological Survey Professional Paper No. 964. Washington, D.C.: US Government Printing Office.
Bankoff, G., 2003. Constructing vulnerability: the historical, natural, and social generation of flooding in metropolitan Manila. Disasters 27(3): 224–238.
Burton, I., and Lim, B., 2005. Achieving adequate adaptation in agriculture. Climatic Change 70: 191–200.
Civco, D. L., Hurd, J. D., Wilson, E. H., Arnold, C. L., and Prisloe, M., 2002. Quantifying and describing urbanizing landscapes in the Northeast United States. Photogrammetry Engineering and Remote Sensing 68(10): 1083–1090.
DeFries, R., and Bounoua, L., 2004. Consequences of land use change for ecosystem services: a future unlike the past. GeoJournal 61: 345–351.
Edmonds, J. A., and Rosenberg, N. J., 2005. Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: an integrated assessment summary. Climatic Change 69: 151–162.
Foster, D. R. 1993. Land-use history and forest transformations in Central New England. In Humans as Components of Ecosystems, eds. McDonnell, M. J. and Pickett, S. T. A., pp. 91–110. New York: Springer.
Goodin, D. G., Harrington, Jr J. A.., and Rundquist, B. C., 2002. Land cover change and associated trends in surface reflectivity and vegetation index in Southwest Kansas: 1972–1992. Geocarto International 17(1): 43–50.
Jianchu, X., Fox, J., Volger, J. B., Peifang, Z., Yongshou, F., Lixin, Y., Jie, Q., and Leisz, S., 2005. Land-use and land-cover change and farmer vulnerability in Xishuangbanna Prefecture in southwestern China. Environmental Management 36(3): 404–413.
Kakembo, V. and Rowntree, K. M., 2003. The relationship between land use and soil erosion in the communal lands near Peddie Town, Eastern Cape, South Africa. Land Degradation and Development 14: 39–49.
Kromm, D. E. and White, S. E. (eds.), 1992. Groundwater Exploitation in the High Plains. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
Lioubimtseva, E., Cole, R., Adams, J. M., and Kapustin, G., 2005. Impacts of climate and land-cover changes in arid lands of Central Asia. Journal of Arid Environments 62: 285–308.
Liverman, D. M., 1990. Drought impacts in Mexico: climate, agriculture, technology, and land tenure in Sonora and Puebla. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80(1): 49–72.
MacIver, D. C., and Wheaton, E., 2005. Tomorrow's forests: adapting to a changing climate. Climatic Change 70: 273–282.
Motha, R. P., and Baier, W., 2005. Impacts of present and future climate change and climate variability on agriculture in the temperate regions: North America. Climatic Change 70: 137–164.
Mustafa, D., 1998. Structural causes of vulnerability to flood hazard in Pakistan. Economic Geography 74(3): 289–305.
Nearing, M. A., Jetten, V., Baffaut, C., Cerdan, O., Couturier, A., Hernandez, M., Bissonnais, Y., Nichols, M. H., Nunes, J. P., Renschler, C. S., Souchère, V., and Oost, K., 2005. Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena 61: 131–154.
Neke, K. S., and Du Plessis, M. A., 2004. The threat of transformation: quantifying the vulnerability of grasslands in South Africa. Conservation Biology 18(2): 466–477.
Pearson, S. M., Turner, M. G., and Drake, J. B., 1999. Landscape change and habitat availability in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and the Olympic Peninsula. Ecological Applications 9: 1288–1304.
Polsky, C. and Easterling, W. E., 2001. Adaptation to climate variability and change in the US Great Plains: a multi-scale analysis of Ricardian climate sensitivities. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 85: 133–144.
Pontius, R. G., and Malizia, N., 2004. Effect of category aggregation on map comparison. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3234, eds. Egenhofer, M. J., Freksa, C., and Miller, H. J., pp. 251–268. Berlin: Springer.
Pontius, R. G., Shusas, E., and McEachern, M., 2004. Detecting important categorical land changes while accounting for persistence. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 101(2/3): 251–268.
Salinger, M. J., Sivakumar, M. V. K., and Motha, R., 2005. Reducing vulnerability of agriculture and forestry to climate variability and change: workshop summary and recommendations. Climatic Change 70: 341–362.
Schloss, J. A., Buddemeier, R. A., and Wilson, B. B., 2000. An Atlas of the Kansas High Plains Aquifer, Kansas Geological Survey Educational Series 14. Accessed at
Sivakumar, M. V. K., Das, H. P., and Brunini, O., 2005. Impacts of present and future climate variability and change on agriculture and forestry in the arid and semi-arid tropics. Climatic Change 70: 31–72.
Soini, E., 2005. Land use change patterns and livelihood dynamics on the slopes of Mt Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Agricultural Systems 85: 306–323.
Thomson, A. M., Brown, R. A., Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., and Benson, V., 2005a. Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: an integrated assessment. 3: Dryland production of grain and forage crops. Climatic Change 69: 43–65.
Thomson, A. M., Rosenberg, N. J., Izaurralde, R. C., and Brown, R. A., 2005b. Climate change impacts for the conterminous USA: an integrated assessment. 5: Irrigated agriculture and national grain crop production. Climatic Change 69: 89–105.
Vasconcelos, M. J. P., Musa Biai, J. C., Araujo, A., and Diniz, M. A., 2002. Land cover change in two protected areas of Guinea-Bissau (1956–1998), Applied Geography 22 139–156.
Walker, S., 2005. Role of education and training in agricultural meteorology to reduce vulnerability to climate variability. Climatic Change 70: 311–318.
Warrick, R. A., 1980. Drought in the Great Plains: a case study of research on climate and society in the USA. In Climatic Constraints and Human Activities, eds. Ausubel, J. and Biswas, A. K., pp. 93–123. New York: Pergamon Press.
Watson, R. T., 2005. Turning science into policy: challenges and experiences from the science–policy interface. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 360: 471–477.