Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: January 2010

1 - Infrastructure for observing local human–environment interactions

from Part I

Summary

The vision: sustainable communities on a sustainable planet

Imagine a world where nature and society coexist in a healthy symbiosis, where human impacts on the environment are minimal, and where communities are safe from natural and technological hazards. Imagine a time when scientists can monitor such sustainable human–environment interactions, when they can interactively share and compare data, analyses, and ideas about those interactions from their homes and offices, and when they can collaborate with local, regional, and international colleagues and stakeholders in a global network devoted to the environmental sustainability of their communities and of the planet.

We contend that to build the sustainable world portrayed above, it is necessary to develop an infrastructure that will support such an edifice. Consequently, this chapter introduces our ideas about the infrastructure needed to realize this vision and how the Human–Environment Regional Observatory project (HERO) attempted to take the initial steps to develop that infrastructure. The chapter also demonstrates that HERO addressed several major growth areas of twenty-first-century science – complex systems, interdisciplinary research, usable knowledge/usable science, and transdisciplinarity – as integral parts of its infrastructure development. The chapter ends by laying out the rationale behind and structure of this book.

Achieving the vision: infrastructure development and HERO

Infrastructure for monitoring global change in local places

To paraphrase the American politician Tip O'Neill, “all global change is local.” On the one hand, anthropogenic global environmental change is the accumulated result of billions of individual actions occurring at billions of specific locations.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
References
Dilling, L., 2007. Towards science in support of decision making: characterizing the supply of carbon cycle science. Environmental Science and Policy 10(1): 48–61.
European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2007. Accessed at www.cenorm.be.
Farrell, A., and Hart, M., 1998. What does sustainability really mean? The search for useful indicators. Environment 40(9): 4–9, 26–31.
Gahegan, M., and Pike, W., 2006. A situated knowledge representation of geographical information. Transactions in GIS 10(5): 727–749.
,IPCC, 2007a. Global climate projections. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis, eds. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
,IPCC, 2007b. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, eds. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., Linden, P. J., and Hanson, C. E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
,IPCC, 2007c. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation, eds. Metz, B., Davidson, O. R., Bosch, P. R., Dave, R., and Meyer, L. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jianchu, X., Fox, J., Volger, J. B., Peifang, Z., Yongshou, F., Lixin, Y., Jie, Q., and Leisz, S., 2005. Land-use and land-cover change and farmer vulnerability in Xishuangbanna Prefecture in southwestern China. Environmental Management 36(3): 404–413.
Kates, R. W., and Torrie, R., 1998. Global change in local places. Environment 40(2): 5, 39–41.
Klein, J. T., 2004. Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Futures 36(4): 515–526.
Lemos, M. C., and Morehouse, B. J., 2005. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environmental Change Part A 15(1): 57–68.
MacEachren, A. M., 2000. Cartography and GIS: facilitating collaboration. Progress in Human Geography 24: 445–456.
MacEachren, A. M., 2001. Cartography and GIS: extending collaborative tools to support virtual teams. Progress in Human Geography 25: 431–444.
Metz, B., Davidson, O., Swart, R., and Pan, J. (eds.), 2001. Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Miller, P., 2000. Interoperability: what is it and why should I want it?Ariadne 24. Accessed at www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue24/interoperability.
,National Academy of Sciences, 2004. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research. Washington, D. C.: National Academies Press.
,National Science Foundation (NSF), 2003. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering through Cyberinfrastructure, Report of the NSF Blue-Ribbon Advisory Panel on Cyberinfrastructure. Accessed at www.communitytechnology.org/nsf
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., and Gibbons, M., 2003. Mode 2′ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41(3): 179–194.
,Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC), 2007. Open GIS Consortium. Accessed at http://www.opengis.org.
Tran, L. and Wu, S.-Y., 2001. HERO project's methodology for protocol development: HERO–MEPRODE. Draft report available at http://hero.geog.psu.edu/products/metainfopaperrevised2.pdf.
,United States Federal Geographic Data Committee, 2007. Standards. Accessed at www.fgdc.gov/standards/st.andards.html.
Wilbanks, T. J., and Kates, R. W., 1999. Global change in local places: how scale matters. Climatic Change 43: 601–628.
Yarnal, B., and Neff, R., 2007. Teaching global change in local places: the HERO Research Experiences for Undergraduates program. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 31(3): 413–426.