Part I - Phonetic Correlates and Prominence Distinctions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2018
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Study of Word Stress and AccentTheories, Methods and Data, pp. 13 - 144Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Airas, M., Pulakka, H., Bäckström, T. and Alku, P.. (2005). A toolkit for voice inverse filtering and parametrisation. Proceedings of Interspeech 2005, 2145–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, A., Ladd, D. R. and Mennen, I.. (1998). Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics 26: 3–25.Google Scholar
Bergem, D. van (1993). Acoustic vowel reduction as a function of sentence accent, word stress, and word class on the quality of vowels. Speech Communication 12: 1–23.Google Scholar
Berinstein, A. E. (1979). A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress, UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 47: 1–59.Google Scholar
Bloch, B. and Trager, G. L.. (1942). Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Boxwell, H. and Boxwell, M.. (1966). Weri phonemes. In Wurm, S. A. (ed.) Papers in New Guinea Linguistics, Volume 5. Canberra: The Australian National University, 77–93.Google Scholar
Browman, C. P. and Goldstein, L.. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49: 155–80.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T. and Turk, A.. (1999). A cross-linguistic study of accentual lengthening: Dutch versus English. Journal of Phonetics 27: 171–206.Google Scholar
Cambier-Langeveld, T., Nespor, M. and Heuven, V. J. van. (1997). The domain of final lengthening in production and perception in Dutch. Proceedings of Eurospeech ’97, Rhodes, 931–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. N. (1995). Loudness, spectral tilt and perceived prominence in dialogues. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, 676–9.Google Scholar
Campbell, W. N. and Beckman, M. E.. (1995). Stress, loudness, and spectral tilt. Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Japan, Spring Meeting, 3–4–3.Google Scholar
Carlson, R., Elenius, K., Granstrom, B. and Hunnicutt, S. (1985). Phonetic and orthographic properties of the basic vocabulary of five European languages. Speech Transmission Laboratory-Quarterly Progress and Status Report 26: 63–94.Google Scholar
Caspers, J. and Heuven, V. J. van. (1993). Effects of time pressure on the phonetic realisation of the Dutch accent lending pitch rise and fall. Phonetica 50: 161–71.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. and Gussenhoven, C.. (2008). Emphasis and tonal implementation in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Phonetics 36: 724–46.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. A. and Halle, M.. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Comrie, B., Dryer, M. S., Haspelmath, M. and Gil, D.. (eds.) (2005). World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (2005). Lexical stress. In Pisoni, D. B. and Remez, R. E. (eds.) The Handbook of Speech Perception. Oxford: Blackwell, 264–89.Google Scholar
Di Cristo, A. and Hirst, D. J.. (1986). Modelling French micromelody: Analysis and syntheses. Phonetica 43: 11–30.Google Scholar
Dilley, L. C., Ladd, D. R. and Schepman, A.. (2005). Alignment of L and H in bitonal pitch accents: Testing two hypotheses. Journal of Phonetics 33: 115–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dogil, G. and Williams, B.. (1999). The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Lithuanian, Polish, German, and Spanish. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: De Gruyter, 273–334.Google Scholar
Eefting, W. Z. F. (1991). The effect of information value and accentuation on the duration of Dutch words, syllables and segments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89: 412–14.Google Scholar
Erickson, D. and Kawahara, S.. (2016). Articulatory correlates of metrical structure: Studying jaw displacement patterns. Linguistic Vanguard 2: 1–16.Google Scholar
Fant, G. and Kruckenberg, A.. (1995). The voice source in prosody. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, 622–5.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1955). Duration and Intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27: 765–8.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B.(1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1: 126–52.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B.(1965). The dependence of stress judgments on vowel formant structure. Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Basel and New York: Karger, 306–11.Google Scholar
Gauffin, J. and Sundberg, J.. (1989). Spectral correlates of glottal voice source waveform characteristics. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 32: 556–65.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2011). Stress: Phonotactic and phonetic evidence. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, E. and Rice, K. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 924–48.Google Scholar
Halle, M. and Keyser, S. J.. (1971). English Stress: Its Growth, and Its Role in Verse. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Hargus, S. and Beavert, V.. (2005). A note on the phonetic correlates of stress in Yakima Sahaptin. In Jinguji, D. J. and Moran, S. (eds.) University of Washington Working Papers in Linguistics, 24. Seattle: University of Washington, 64–95.Google Scholar
Hart, J. ’t, Collier, R. and Cohen, A.. (1990). A Perceptual Study of Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Heldner, M. (2003). On the reliability of overall intensity and spectral emphasis as acoustic correlates of focal accents in Swedish. Journal of Phonetics 31: 39–62.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van (1993). On the temporal domain of focal accent. In House, D. and Touati, P. (eds.) Proceedings of an ESCA Workshop on Prosody, Working papers 41. Department of Linguistics, Lund University, 132–5.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van(1998). Effects of focus distribution and accentuation on the temporal and melodic organisation of word groups in Dutch. In Barbiers, S., Rooryck, J. and van de Weijer, J. (eds.) Small Words in the Big Picture. Squibs for Hans Bennis. Leiden: Holland Institute of Generative Linguistics, 37–42.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van(2014). Stress and segment duration in Dutch. In Kager, R., Grijzenhout, J. and Sebregts, K. (eds.) Where the Principles Fail. A Festschrift for Wim Zonneveld on the Occasion of His 64th Birthday. Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, 217–28.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Dupuis, M. Ch. (1991). Perception of anticipatory VCV-coarticulation: Effects of vowel context and accent distribution. Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Aix-en-Provence, 78–81.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. and Hagman, P. J. van. (1988). Lexical statistics and spoken word recognition in Dutch. In Coopmans, P. and Hulk, A. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands 1988. Dordrecht: Foris, 59–68.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Jonge, M. de. (2011). Spectral and temporal reduction as stress cues in Dutch. Phonetica 68: 120–32.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Menert, L.. (1996). Why stress position bias? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 2439–51.Google Scholar
Heuven, V. J. van and Sluijter, A. M. C.. (1996). Notes on the phonetics of word prosody. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H. and Visch, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World, Part 1: Background. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 233–69.Google Scholar
Huss, V. (1978). English word stress in the post-nuclear position. Phonetica 35: 86–105.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, L. (ed.) Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: USC Linguistics Department, 37–82.Google Scholar
Isačenko, A. V. and Schädlich, H. J. (1966). Untersuchungen über die deutsche Satzintonation. Studia Grammatica 7: 7–64.Google Scholar
Katwijk, A. van (1974). Accentuation in Dutch: An Experimental Linguistic Study. Amsterdam and Assen: Van Gorcum.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59: 1208–21.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R., Faulkner, D., Faulkner, H. and Schepman, A.. (1999). Constant ‘segmental anchoring’ of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106: 1543–54.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. R., Mennen, I. and Schepman, A.. (2000). Phonological conditioning of peak alignment in rising pitch accents in Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107: 2685–96.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1967). Stress and respiratory activity. In Ladefoged, P. (ed.) Three Areas of Experimental Phonetics. Oxford University Press, 1–49.Google Scholar
Langeweg, S. J. (1988). The stress system of Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Larkey, L. S. (1982). Reiterant speech: An acoustic and perceptual validation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73: 1337–45.Google Scholar
Lea, W. A. (1977). Acoustic correlates of stress and juncture. In Hyman, L. (ed.) Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: USC Linguistics Department, 83–119.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. and Peterson, G. E.. (1959). Vowel amplitude and phoneme stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31: 428–35.Google Scholar
Leyden, K. van and Heuven, V. J. van. (2006). On the prosody of Orkney and Shetland dialects. Phonetica 63: 149–74.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. C. and Streeter, L. A.. (1978). Use of nonsense-syllable mimicry in the study of prosodic phenomena. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63: 231–3.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. E. F. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35: 1773–81.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49: 606–8.Google Scholar
Mol, H. and Uhlenbeck, E. M.. (1956). The linguistic relevance of intensity in stress. Lingua 5: 205–13.Google Scholar
Mol, H. and Uhlenbeck, E. M.(1957). The correlation between interpretation and production of speech sounds. Lingua 6: 333–53.Google Scholar
Morton, J. and Jassem, W.. (1965). Acoustic correlates of stress. Language and Speech 8: 148–58.Google Scholar
Nakatani, L. H. and Shaffer, J. A.. (1978). Hearing ‘words’ without words: Prosodic cues for word perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63: 234–45.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (1978). Phonetic feature systems for vowels. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G. (1972). Production and perception of vowel duration: A study of durational properties of vowels in Dutch. Doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G.(1981). Speech rate and segmental perception or the role of words in phoneme identification. In Myers, T., Anderson, J. and Laver, J. (eds.) The Cognitive Representation of Speech. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 143–50.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, S. G. and Doodeman, G. J. N.. (1980). Production and perception of vowel length in spoken sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67: 276–87.Google Scholar
Öhman, S. E. G. (1967). Coarticulation in VCV utterances: Spectrographic measurements. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 39: 151–68.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M. and Prieto, P.. (2011). Acoustic correlates of stress in Central Catalan and Castillian Spanish. Language and Speech 54: 73–97.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Vanrell, M. M. and Prieto, P.. (2010). Catalan speakers’ perception of word stress in unaccented contexts. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127: 462–71.Google Scholar
Pakerys, A. (1982). Lietuviu Bendrines kalbos prozodija [The prosody of Standard Lithuanian]. Vilnius: Mokslas.Google Scholar
Pakerys, A.(1987). Relative importance of acoustic features for perception of Lithuanian stress. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences, S.S.R., 319–20.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E. and Lehiste, I.. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32: 693–703.Google Scholar
Potisuk, S., Gandour, J. and Harper, M. P.. (1996). Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai. Phonetica 53: 200–20.Google Scholar
Rasier, L. and Hiligsmann, P.. (2007). Prosodic transfer from L1 to L2. Theoretical and methodological issues. Cahiers de Linguistique Française 28: 41–66.Google Scholar
Remijsen, B. (2002). Lexically contrastive stress accent and lexical tone in Ma’ya. In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (eds.) Laboratory Phonology VII. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 585–614.Google Scholar
Remijsen, B. and Heuven, V. J. van. (2005). Stress, tone and discourse prominence in the Curaçao dialect of Papiamentu. Phonology 22: 205–35.Google Scholar
Remijsen, B. and Heuven, V. J. van(eds.) (2006). Between stress and tone. Phonology 23: 121–333.Google Scholar
Rietveld, A. C. M. (1984). Syllaben, klemtoon en de automatische detectie van beklemtoonde lettergrepen in het Nederlands [Syllables, stress and the automatic detection of stressed syllables in Dutch]. Doctoral dissertation, Catholic University of Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Shih, C. (1988). Tone and intonation in Mandarin. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 3, 83–109.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C. (1995). Phonetic Correlates of Stress and Accent. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C. and Heuven, V. J. van. (1995). Effects of focus distribution, pitch accent and lexical stress on the temporal organisation of syllables in Dutch. Phonetica 52: 71–89.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C. and Heuven, V. J. van(1996a). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 2471–85.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C. and Heuven, V. J. van(1996b). Acoustic correlates of linguistic stress and accent in Dutch and American English. Proceedings of ICSLP 96. Philadelphia: Applied Science and Engineering Laboratories, Alfred I. duPont Institute, 630–3.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C., Heuven, V. J. van and Pacilly, J. J. A.. (1997). Spectral balance as a cue in the perception of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101: 503–13.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Stevens, K. N. and Heuven, V. J. van. (1995). Supralaryngeal resonance and glottal pulse shape as correlates of prosodic stress and accent in American English. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Stockholm, 630–3.Google Scholar
Turk, A. E. and Sawush, J. S.. (1997). The domain of accentual lengthening in American English. Journal of Phonetics 25: 25–41.Google Scholar
Vogel, I., Athanasopoulou, A. and Pincus, N.. (2016). Prominence, contrast and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An acoustic investigation. In Goedemans, R., Heinz, J. and van der Hulst, H. (eds.) Accent and Stress. Cambridge University Press, 123–67.Google Scholar
Zanten, E. van and Goedemans, R. W. N.. (2007). A functional typology of Austronesian and Papuan stress systems. In van Heuven, V. J. and van Zanten, E. (eds.) Prosody in Indonesian Languages. Utrecht: LOT, 63–88.Google Scholar
References
Akinlabi, A. and Urua, E. E. (2002). Foot structure in the ibibio verb. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 24: 119–160.Google Scholar
Blanchon, J. (1997). Les formes nominales de citation à préfixe haut en pounoun (bantu B43). Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 18: 129–138.Google Scholar
Botne, R. D. (1998). Prosodically-conditioned vowel shortening in Chindali. Studies in African Linguistics 27: 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, C., Round, E., and Alpher, B. (2014). Yidiny stress, length, and truncation revisited. PowerPoint presentation, ALW 13, March.Google Scholar
Clark, M. (1988). An accentual analysis of Zulu. In van der Hulst, H. and Smith, N. (eds.) Autosegmental Studies on Pitch Accent. Dordrecht: Foris, 51–79.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. (1981). Akan vowel harmony: A non-linear analysis. Harvard Studies in Phonology 2: 108–177.Google Scholar
Cook, T. L. (1969). The Efik consonant system. Unpublished ms., University of Ibadan.(1985). An Integrated Phonology of Efik, Volume I. University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. J. and Olivares, A. T. (2014). Beyond the Iambic-trochaic law: The joint influence of duration and intensity on the perception of rhythmic speech. Phonology 31: 51–94.Google Scholar
de Lacy, P. (2014). Evaluating evidence for stress systems. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 149–193.Google Scholar
Downing, L. J. (2010). Accent in African languages. In van der Hulst, H., Goedemans, R., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 381–427.Google Scholar
Fontaney, L. (1980). Le verbe. In Nsuka-Nkutsi, F. (ed.), Eléments de description du punu. CRLS, Université Lyon II, 51–114Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst, H. (2009). StressTyp: A database for word accentual patterns in the world’s languages. In Everaert, M., Musgrave, S., and Dimitriadis, A. (eds.) The Use of Databases in Cross-linguistic Studies. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 235–282.Google Scholar
Green, C. R. and Morrison, M. E. (2016). Somali wordhood and its relationship to prosodic structure. Morphology 26: 3–32.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2015). Does phonological prominence exist? Lingue e Linguaggio 14: 7–24.Google Scholar
Harris, J. (2004). Release the captive coda: The foot as a domain of phonetic interpretation. In Local, J., Ogden, R., and Temple, R. (eds.) Phonetic Interpretation: Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6. Cambridge University Press, 103–129.Google Scholar
Harris, J. and Urua, E.-A. (2001). Lenition degrades information: Consonant allophony in Ibibio. Speech, Hearing and Language: Work in Progress 13. Department of Phonetics and Linguistics, University College London, 72–105.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der, Rice, K., and Wetzels, L. (2010). The languages of Middle America. In van der Hulst, H., Goedemans, R., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 249–311.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, L. M. (ed.) Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 37–82.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(1981). Tonal accent in Somali. Studies in African Linguistics 12: 169–203.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(1990). Non-exhaustive syllabification: Evidence from Nigeria and Cameroon. Papers from the Parasession on the Syllable in Phonetics and Phonology 26. Chicago Linguistic Society, 175–195.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(1998). Positional prominence and the “prosodic trough” in Yaka. Phonology 15: 41–75.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(2008). Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46: 309–350.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M.(2014). Do all languages have word accent? In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 56–82.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2017). Prefixal vowel length in Lulamogi: A stratal account. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 38: 65–87.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. and Merrill, J. (2016). Morphology, irregularity, and Bantu frication: The case of Lulamogi. In Léonard, J.-L. and Petit, D. (eds.) Actualité des Néogrammariens, Mémoires de la Société de Linguistique de Paris. Paris: Peeters, 139–157.Google Scholar
Kutsch Lojenga, C. (2007). Minimality and morae in Malila (M.24). In Payne, D. L. and Peña, J. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference on African Linguistics. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceeding Project, 77–87.Google Scholar
Kwenzi Mikala, J. (1980). Esquisse phonologique du punu. In Nsuka-Nkutsi, F. (ed.) Eléments de description du punu. CRLS, Université Lyon II, 7–18.Google Scholar
Levi, S. V. (2005). Acoustic correlates of lexical accent in Turkish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35: 73–97.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry 12: 373–418.Google Scholar
Nabirye, M. (2013). Confronting Busoga with Lusoga: What is the relationship between Lutenga, Lulamoogi, Lusiginhi and Lunyole? Paper presented at Conference on African Languages, Leiden. Department of Languages and Cultures, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Urua, E.-A. (1999). Length and syllable weight in Ibibio. Studies in African Linguistics 28(2): 241–266.Google Scholar
Urua, E.-A.(2000). Ibibio Phonetics and Phonology. Cape Town: Centre for Advanced Studies of African Society.Google Scholar
Welmers, W. E.(1973). African Language Structures. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Zanten, E. van and Dol, P. (2010). Word stress and pitch accent in Papuan languages. In van der Hulst, H., Goedemans, R., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 113–154.Google Scholar
References
Alber, B. (2005). Clash, lapse and directionality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 23: 485–542.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2002). Positional neutralization: A phonologization approach to typographical patterns. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (2001). Nhanda: An Aboriginal Language of Western Australia. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P. and Weenink., D. (2014). Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.3.78. www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. and Hewitt., M. (1995). Directional footing, degeneracy and alignment. Proceedings of NELS 25. Amherst: GLSA, 47–61. http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Crystal, T. and House., A. (1990). Articulation rate and duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 88: 101–112.Google Scholar
Derbyshire, D. (1985). Hixkaryana and Linguistic Typology. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Deschenes, N., Kalivoda, N., and Lunden, A.. (2012). Evidence for final lengthening as prominence. Poster given at WCCFL 30, UC Santa Cruz, April 15.Google Scholar
Dubĕda, T. and Votrubec, J.. (2005). Acoustic analysis of Czech stress: Intonation, duration and intensity revisited. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, September 4–8, Lisbon, 1429–1432.Google Scholar
Dutoit, T., Pagel, V., Pierret, N., Bataille, F., and van der Vreken, O.. (1996). The MBROLA project: Towards a set of high-quality speech synthesizers free of use for noncommercial purposes. Proceedings International Congress of Spoken Language Processing, Volume 3. Philadelphia, 1393–1396.Google Scholar
Eades, D. (2005). A Grammar of Gayo: A Language of Aceh, Sumatra. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Flemming, E. (2005). A phonetically-based model of phonological vowel reduction. Unpublished ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst., H. (2014). Stresstyp database. [Database accessed in 2014 before expansion to the current StressTyp2.] http://st2.ullet.net.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2002). A factorial typology of quantity-insensitive stress. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 491–552.Google Scholar
Gordon, M(2014). Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In van den Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 83–118.Google Scholar
Gordon, M., Jany, C., Nash, C., and Takara, N.. (2010). Syllable structure and extrametricality: A typological and phonetic study. Studies in Language 34: 131–166.Google Scholar
Hale, K. and White Eagle, J.. (1980). A preliminary metrical account of Winnebago accent. International Journal of American Linguistics 46: 117–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, K. C. and Hansen, L. E.. (1969). Pintupi phonology. Oceanic Linguistics 8: 153–170.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1982). Extrametricality and English stress. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 227–276.Google Scholar
Hayes, B.(1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (2010). Word accent: Terms, typologies, and theories. In Goedemans, Rob, van der Hulst, Harry, and van Zanten, Ellen (eds.) A Survey of World Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 3–54.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der(2014). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 325–365.Google Scholar
Kager, R(2001). Rhythmic directionality by positional licensing. Paper presented at HILP-5, University of Potsdam, 11 January, ROA-514. http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Kager, R(2005). Rhythmic licensing: An extended typology. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Phonology. Seoul: The Phonology-Morphology Circle of Korea, 5–31.Google Scholar
Keating, P., Cho, T., Fourgerson, C., and Hus, C.. (2003). Domain-initial strengthening in four languages. Laboratory Phonology 6: 145–163.Google Scholar
Lacy, P.de. (2014). Evaluating evidence for stress systems. In van der Hulst, Harry (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 149–193.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. and Prince, A.. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 249–336.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1968). Temporal organization of syllable production. Speech Transmission Laboratory Quarterly Progress, Volume 2–3. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology, 1–6.Google Scholar
Lunden, A. (2016). Effects of position and stress on English and Norwegian vowel quality. Unpublished ms., College of William and Mary.Google Scholar
Lunden, A. and Kalivoda, N.. (2016). Stress correlate database. Online database of stress correlates: http://wmpeople.wm.edu/sllund/stresscorrelatedatabase.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (1978). A Grammar of Lenakel. Pacific Linguistics B55. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. (2000). A Grammar of Anejom˜. Pacific Linguistics 507. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Mihas, E. (2010). Essentials of Ashéninka Perené grammar. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.Google Scholar
Miner, K. (1979). Dorsey’s law in Winnebago-Chiwere and Winnebago accent. International Journal of American Linguistics 45: 25–33.Google Scholar
Oller, D. K. (1973). The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54: 1235–1247.Google Scholar
Prince, A and Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Unpublished ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick and University of Colorado.Google Scholar
Quigley, E C. (2003). Awara phonology. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Dakota.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A and van Heuven., V. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100: 2471–2485.Google Scholar
Tegey, H. and Robson, B.. (1996). A Reference Grammar of Pashto. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tryon, D. (1970). An Introduction to Maranungku. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Walker, R. (1996). Prominence-driven stress. Unpublished ms., University of California, Santa Cruz. http://roa.rutgers.edu.Google Scholar
Wightman, C., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., and Price, P.. (1992). Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91: 1707–1717.Google Scholar
References
- ARIPUC
= Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.
- EPP
= Estonian Papers in Phonetics.
- Estonian Prosody
= Lehiste, I. and Ross, J. (eds.) (1997). Estonian Prosody: Papers from a Symposium. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language.
- LU
= Linguistica Uralica.
- KK
= Keel ja Kirjandus.
= Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, University of Copenhagen.
= Estonian Papers in Phonetics.
= Lehiste, I. and Ross, J. (eds.) (1997). Estonian Prosody: Papers from a Symposium. Tallinn: Institute of Estonian Language.
= Linguistica Uralica.
= Keel ja Kirjandus.
Andersen, P. (1954). Dansk Fonetik. In Hjelmslev, L. and Andersen, P. (eds.) Nordisk Lærebog for Talepædagoger. København: Rosenkilde og Bagger, 305–354.Google Scholar
Asu, E. L. (2004). The phonetics and phonology of Estonian INtonation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge .Google Scholar
Asu, E. L.(2005). Intonational contour alignment in Saaremaa and Standard Estonian. LU 41: 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asu, E. L and Nolan, F.. (2007). The analysis of low accentuation in Estonian. Language and Speech 50: 567–588.Google Scholar
Asu, E. L. and Salveste, N.. (2012). The phonetic and phonological analysis of the fall-rise intonation pattern in the Kihnu variety of Estonian. LU 48(3): 171–179.Google Scholar
Basbøll, H(2008). Stød, diachrony and the non-stød model. In Barnes, M., Bremmer Jr, R.., Lerchner, G., and Nielsen, H. F. (eds.) North-Western European Language Evolution 54/55. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 147–189.Google Scholar
Brink, L. and Lund, J.. (1975). Dansk Rigsmål: Lydudviklingen siden (1840) med særligt henblik på sociolekterne i København 1–2. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Bundgaard, M. (1980). An acoustic investigation of intrinsic vowel duration in Danish. ARIPUC 14: 99–119.Google Scholar
Corbett, G G. (2007). Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83: 8–42.Google Scholar
Corbett, G G.(2010). Defective paradigms: Missing forms and what they tell us. Proceedings of the British Academy 163: 1–18.Google Scholar
Corbett, G G.(2015). Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91(1): 145–193.Google Scholar
Dahl, Ö. and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M. (eds.) (2001). The Circum-Baltic Languages: Typology and Contact, vol. 1–2. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins .Google Scholar
Dressler, W. (1979). Reflections of phonological typology. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientarum Hungaricae 29(3–4): 259–273.Google Scholar
Eek, A. (1973). Observations in Estonian palatalization: An articulatory study. IEPP 18–36.Google Scholar
Eek, A(1987). The perception of word stress: A comparison of Estonian and Russian. In Shannon, R. and Shockey, L. (eds.) In Honor of llse Lehiste. Dordrecht, Providence: Foris Publications, 19–32.Google Scholar
Eek, A(1990). Units of temporal organisation and word accents in Estonian. LU 26(4): 251–263.Google Scholar
Eek, A. and Meister, E. (1997). Simple perception experiments on Estonian word prosody: Foot structure versus segmental quantity. In Estonian Prosody, 71–99.Google Scholar
Eek, A. and Meister, E.(1998). Quality of standard Estonian vowels in stressed and unstressed syllables of the feet in three distinctive quantity degrees. LU 34(3): 226–233.Google Scholar
Eek, A. and Meister, E.(2003). Foneetilisi katseid ja arutlusi kvantiteedi alalt (I): Häälikukestusi muutvad kontekstid ja välde. KK 11, 815–837; 12, 904–918.Google Scholar
Eek, A. and Meister, E.(2004). Foneetilisi katseid ja arutlusi kvantiteedi alalt (II). Takt, silp ja välde. KK 4, 251–71; 5, 337–357.Google Scholar
Ejskjær, I. (1990). Stød and pitch accents in the Danish dialects. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22(1): 49–76.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1984). The acoustic manifestation of stress in Danish with particular reference to the reduction of stress in compounds. ARIPUC 18: 45–161.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E(1989). Phonetic analysis of the stød in standard Danish. Phonetica 46(1): 1–59.Google Scholar
Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic features and prosodic structure: The phonology of ‘suprasegmentals’. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giegerich, H. J. (2015). Lexical structures: Compounding and the modules of grammar. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van Zanten, E. (2014). No stress typology. In Caspers, J., Chen, Y., Heeren, W., Pacilly, J., Schiller, N. O., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) Above and Beyond the Segments: Experimental Linguistics and Phonetics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 83–95.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (1997). Phonetic correlates of stress and the prosodic hierarchy in Estonian. Estonian Prosody, 100–124.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. and Kashube, D.. (1976). Word prosodic systems: A preliminary report. Working Papers on Language Universals 20: 1–18.Google Scholar
Gress-Wright, J. (2008). A simpler view on Danish stød. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 14(1): 189–200.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N. (1998). Intonation in Danish: A survey of twenty languages. In Hirst, D. and Cristo, A. (eds.) Intonation Systems. Cambridge University Press, 131–151.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N(2001). Fonetik og Fonologi – Almen og Dansk, 2nd edn. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N(2015). F0, voice quality, and Danish stød revisited. In Wolters, M. et al. (eds.) Proceedings of ICPhS (2015)., vol. 18. University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N. and Basbøll, H. (2002). Stød and length: Acoustic and cognitive reality. In Bel, B. and Martin, I. (eds.) Proceedings of the Speech Prosody (2002). Conference. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage, 355–358.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N. and Basbøll, H.(2007). Danish stød. Phonological and cognitive issues. In Solé, M.-J., Beddor, P. S., and Ohala, M. (eds.) Experimental Approaches to Phonology. Oxford University Press, 192–206.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N. and Basbøll, H.(2012). Danish stød. Towards simpler structural principles? In Niebuhr, O. (ed.) Understanding Prosody: The Role of Context, Function, and Communication. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 27–46.Google Scholar
Grønnum, N., Vazquez-Larruscaín, M., and Basbøll, H. (2013). Danish stød: laryngealization or tone. Phonetica 70(1–2): 66–92.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C(2006). Between stress and tone in Nubi word prosody. Phonology 23, 193–223.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. and Peters, J.. (2004). A tonal analysis of Cologne Schärfung. Phonology 21(2): 251–285.Google Scholar
Hallap, V. (1980). Stepeni udarenija estonskogo jazyka. In Ikola, O. (ed.) Congressus quintus internationalis fenno-ugristarum, VIII. Turku: Suomen kielen seura, 17.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. and Lund., J. (eds.) (1983). Skolen, Samfundet og Dialekten. Frederikshavn: Dafolo.Google Scholar
Hansen, G. F. (2015). Stød og stemmekvalitet. En akustisk-fonetisk undersøgelse af ændringer i stemmekvaliteten i forbindelse med stød. PhD dissertation, Københavns Universitet.Google Scholar
Harms, R. (1978). Some observations and hunches concerning Estonian prosody. EPP, 31–34.Google Scholar
Heger, S. (1981). Sprog og Lyd. Elementær dansk fonetik, 2nd edn. Copenhagen: Gjellerup.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (2010). Notes on Waima’a intonation. In Ewing, M. and Klamer, M. (eds.) Typological and Areal Analyses: Contributions from East Nusantara. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, 47–69.Google Scholar
Hint, M. (1973). Eesti keele sõnafonoloogia I. Rõhusüsteemifonoloogia ja morfofonoloogia põhiprobleemid. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia.Google Scholar
Hint, M.(1978). Changes in the prosodical system of contemporary Estonian. EPP, 39–43.Google Scholar
Hint, M(1980). Minevikuline ja ja tulevikuline aines keelesüsteemis. Prosoodiatüübi nihked ja selle tagajärjed. KK 23, 215–223, 271–278, 349–355.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (1999). Word accent. In Hulst, H.van der (ed.) Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–116.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der(2011). Pitch accent systems. In van Oostendorp, M., Even, C., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Vol. 2. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1003–1026.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der(2014a). The study of word accent and stress: Past, present, and future. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–55.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der(2014b). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press, 3–55.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1977). On the nature of linguistic stress. In Hyman, L. M. (ed.) Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 37–82.Google Scholar
Hyman, L(1978). Tone and/or accent. In Napoli, D. J. (ed.) Elements of Tone, Stress and Intonation. Washington DC: Georgetown University, 1–20.Google Scholar
Hyman, L(2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238.Google Scholar
Hyman, L(2014a). Towards a canonical typology of prosodic systems. In Zendejas, E. H. (ed.) Tono, accento y estructuras métricas en lenguas mexicanas. El Colegio de México, 12–38.Google Scholar
Hyman, L(2014b). Do all languages have word accent? In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press, 56–82.Google Scholar
Iosad, P. (2016a). Prosodic structure and suprasegmental features: Short-vowel stød in Danish. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 19: 221–268.Google Scholar
ChapIosad, P(2016b). Tonal stability and tonogenesis in North Germanic. In Giles, I., Chapot, L., Cooimans, Ch, Foster, R., and Tesio, B. (eds.) Beyond Borealism: New Perspectives on the North. London: Norvik Press, 80–97.Google Scholar
Ito, J. and Mester, A.. (2015). The perfect prosodic word in Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 38(1): 5–36.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. V. (1975). K sinhronnoj i diahroničeskoj tipologii prosodičeskih sistem s laringalizovannymi ili faringalizovannymi tonemami. In Elizarenkova, T. Ja (ed.) Očerki po fonologii vostočnyh jazykov. Moscow: Nauka, 3–58.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. O. (1962a). K kharakteristike jevrazijskogo jazykovogo sojuza (1931a). In Selected Writings. I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton, 144–201.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. O.(1962b). Die Betonung und ihre Rolle in der Wort- und Syntagmaphonologie (1931b). In Selected Writings. I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton, 117–136.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. O.(1962c). Sur la théorie des affinités phonologiques entre les langues (1938). In Selected Writings. I: Phonological Studies. The Hague: Mouton, 234–246).Google Scholar
Kalvik, M.-L. (2004). Kvantiteedisuhted rannikumurdes. Master’s thesis, Tartu Ülikool.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. (2016). Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone-accent dialects. Phonology 33(1): 87–123.Google Scholar
Krull, D. (1998). Perception of Estonian word prosody. A study of words extracted from conversational speech. LU 34(3): 167–171.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, N. (2007). Le status fonctionnel du pied phonologique en Gouro. Mandenkan 43: 13–45.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, N(2009). Suprasegmentnaja fonologija sojkinskogo dialekta ižorskogo jazyka v tipologičeskom aspekte. Voprosy jazykoznanija 5: 18–47.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, N(2014). Ob istorii, suš’nosti i izmerenijah fonemy. In Vydrin, V. F. and Kuznetsova, N. V. (eds.) Ot Bikina do Bambal’umy, iz var’ag v greki. Ekspedicionnyje et’udy v čest’ E.V. Perehval’skoj. St Petersburg: Nestor-Istorija, 406–442.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, N(2015). Two phonological rarities in Ingrian dialects. In Hilpert, M., Duke, J., Mertzlufft, Ch, Östman, J.O., and Rießler, M. (eds.) New Trends in Nordic and General Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter, 91–117.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A. and Wetterlin, A.. (2015). The diachronic development of stød and tone accent in North Germanic. In Haug, D. T. T. (ed.) Historical linguistics 2013: Selected Papers from the 21st International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 53–67.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. (1976). Det sjællandske ‘tostavelsesord’. In Hald, K., Lisse, C., and Sørensen, J. K. (eds.) Studier i dansk dialektologi og sproghistorie tilegnede Poul Andersen.København: Akademisk forlag, 193–206.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1960). Segmental and syllabic quantity in Estonian. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) American Studies in Uralic Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 21–82.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(1965). The function of quantity in Finnish and Estonian. Language 42(3): 447–456.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(1975). Experiments with synthetic speech concerning quantity in Estonian. In Hallap, V. (ed.) Congressus Tertius Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum, Tallinnae habitus. Tallinn: Valgus, 254–269.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(1978). Polytonicity in the area surrounding the Baltic sea. In Gårding, E., Bruce, G., and Bannert, R. (eds.) Nordic Prosody: Papers from a Symposium. Lund University, 237–247.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(1983). Prosodic change in progress: Evidence from Estonian. In Rauch, I. and Carr, G. (eds.) Language Change. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 10–27.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(1985). An Estonian word game and the phonematic status of long vowels. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3): 490–492.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(1997). Search for phonetic correlates in Estonian prosody. Estonian Prosody, 11–35.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I(2003). Prosodic change in progress: From quantity language to accent language. In Fikkert, P. and Jacobs, H. (eds.) Development in Prosodic Systems. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 47–65.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. and Danforth, D.. (1977). Foneettisten vihjeiden hierarkia viron kvantiteetin havaitsemisessa. Virittäjä 4: 404–411.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. and Fox, R. A.. (1992). Perception of prominence by Estonian and English listeners. Language and Speech 35(4): 419–434.Google Scholar
Liiv, G. (1961). Eesti keele kolme vältusastmevokaalide kestus ja meloodiatüübid. KK 7: 412–24; 8: 480–90.Google Scholar
Liiv, G(1985). Akustičeskije korrel’aty estonskogo slovesnogo udarenija v sootnošenii s differencial’noj dolgotoj. Sovetskoje finno-ugrovedenije 21(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Lippus, P. (2011). The acoustic features and perception of the Estonian quantity system. PhD dissertation, Tartu University.Google Scholar
Lippus, P(2012). Acoustic features of quantity in early recordings of Estonian. In Ross, J. (ed.) Encapsulated Voices: Estonian Sound Recordings from the German Prisoner-of-War Camps in 1916–1918. Cologne, Weimar and Vienna: Böhlau, 85–98.Google Scholar
Lippus, U. and Remmel, M.. (1976). Some contributions to the study of Estonian word intonation. EPP, 37–65.Google Scholar
Lippus, P., Asu, E. L., and Kalvik, M.-L.. (2014). An acoustic study of Estonian word stress. In Campbell, N., Gibbon, D., and Hirst, D. (eds.) Speech Prosody 7 – Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Speech Prosody. Dublin, 232–235.Google Scholar
Lippus, P., Pajusalu, K., and Allik, J.. (2009). The tonal component of Estonian quantity in native and non-native perception. Journal of Phonetics 37(4): 388–396.Google Scholar
Lippus, P., Pajusalu, K., and Teras, P.. (2006). The temporal structure of penta- and hexasyllabic words in Estonian. In Hoffmann, R. and Mixdorff, H. (eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference Speech Prosody. Dresden: TUD Press, 759–762.Google Scholar
Lippus, P., Asu, E. L., Teras, P., and Tuisk, T.. (2013). Quantity-related variation of duration, pitch and vowel quality in spontaneous Estonian. In Journal of Phonetics 41(1): 17–28.Google Scholar
Lockwood, D. (1983). Tone in a non-substantive theory of language. In LACUS Forum 10: 131–140.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1981). A prosodic theory of nonconcatenative morphology. In Linguistic Inquiry 12(3): 373–418.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1978). What is a tone language? In Fromkin, V. (ed.) Tone: A Linguistic Survey. New York: Academic Press, 113–131.Google Scholar
McRobbie-Utasi, Z. (2007). The instability of systems with ternary length distinctions: The Skolt Saami evidence. In Toivonen, I. and Nelson, D. (eds.) Saami linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 167–205.Google Scholar
Niit, E. (1977). On the perception of tone contours with simple frequency changes. EPP, 71–79.Google Scholar
Niit, E(1978). Further results on the perception of tone contours with simple frequency changes. EPP, 66–70.Google Scholar
Niit, E(1980). The structure of the Baltic prosodic area and the place of Estonian dialects in it. Preprint KKI-17. Tallinn.Google Scholar
Pajusalu, K. (2009). Dynamics of Estonian phonology. STUF, Akademie Verlag 62(1/2): 109–121.Google Scholar
Pajusalu, K., Help, T., Lippus, P., Niit, E., Teras, P., and Viitso, T.-R.. (2005). On the temporal structure of Estonian secondary-stressed feet. LU 41(2): 98–106.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1948). Tone Languages. A Technique for Determining the Number and Type of Pitch Contrasts in a Language, with Studies in Tonemic Substitution and Fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Põldre, E. (1937). Intonatsiooni, kvantiteedi ja dünaamilise rõhu suhteist eesti keeles. Eesti Keel 6: 164–183.Google Scholar
Prillop, K. (2013). Feet, syllables, moras and the Estonian quantity system. Linguistica Uralica 49(1): 1–29.Google Scholar
Prince, A. (1980). A metrical theory for Estonian quantity. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 511–562.Google Scholar
Riad, T. (2000). The origin of Danish stød. In Lahiri, A. (ed.) Analogy, Levelling, Markedness: Principles of Change in Phonology and Morphology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 261–300.Google Scholar
Riber Petersen, P. (1973). An instrumental investigation of the Danish stød. ARIPUC 7: 195–234.Google Scholar
Rischel, J. (2003). The Danish syllable as a national heritage. In Jacobsen, G., Bleses, D., Madsen, T. O., and Thomsen, P. (eds.) Take Danish – For Instance: Linguistic Studies in Honour of Hans Basbøll Presented on the Occasion of his 60th birthday 12 July 2003. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark, 273–282.Google Scholar
Sepp, A. (1980). Some additional data on the duration of unstressed vowels in Estonian. EPP, 93–103.Google Scholar
Sutrop, U. (1999). Eesti keele välted ja Balti polütooniline keeleliit. KK 4, 235–238.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Prague: Akciová moravská knihtiskárna Polygrafie v Brně.Google Scholar
Viitso, T.-R.(1979). Problemy udarenija v estonskom jazyke. Sovetskoje finno-ugrovedenije 15(3): 136–52.Google Scholar
Viitso, T.-R.(1981). Läänemeresoome fonoloogia küsimusi. Tallinn: Keele ja Kirjanduse Instituut.Google Scholar
Viitso, T.-R.(1982). Morosčitajuš’ij li jazyk estonskij? Sovetskoje finno-ugrovedenije 8(1): 8–20.Google Scholar
Viitso, T.-R.(1983). Osnovnyje problemy fonologičeskoj struktury pribaltijsko-finskih jazykov i ee istorii. PhD dissertation, Tallinn.Google Scholar
Viitso, T.-R.(2003). Structure of the Estonian language: Phonology, morphology and word formation. In Erelt, M. (ed.) Estonian Language. Tallinn: Teaduste Akadeemia Kirjastus, 9–92.Google Scholar
Viitso, T.-R.(2008). Liivi keel ja läänemeresoome keelemaastikud. Tartu, Tallinn: Eesti Keele Instituut.Google Scholar
Voorhoeve, J(1973). Safwa as restricted tone system. Studies in African Linguistics 4: 1–21.Google Scholar
Vydrine, V. (2005). Quelques recommendations méthodologiques concernant la description des langues mandé-sud. Mandenkan 41: 1–22.Google Scholar
Vydrine, V(2010). Le pied métrique dans les langues mandé. In Florcic, F. (ed.) Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale. Lyon: ENS Éditions, 53–62.Google Scholar
Vydrine, V(2017). Vowel reduction in Bamana disyllabic feet. Book of abstracts, 50th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea, 10–13 September, University of Zurich, Switzerland, 723.Google Scholar
Welmers, W. E. (1959). Tonemics, morphotonemics, and tonal morphemes. General Linguistics 4: 1–9.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, F. J. (1875). Grammatik der ehstnischen Sprache zunächst wie sie in Mittelehstland gesprochen wird, mit Berücksichtigung der anderen Dialekte. St Petersburg: Eggers.Google Scholar
Zanten, E. and Dol, P.. (2011). Word stress and pitch accent in Papuan languages. In van der Hulst, H., Goedemans, R. and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 113–154.Google Scholar