Part III - Case Studies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 December 2018
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Study of Word Stress and AccentTheories, Methods and Data, pp. 225 - 424Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
References
Alderete, J. and Bob, T.. (2005). A corpus-based approach to Tahltan stress. In Hargus, S. and Rice, K. (eds.) Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 369–391.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2004). Positional weight constraints in Optimality Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 692–703.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. and Luna, E.. (2004). An intergenerational study of Hupa stress. Berkeley Linguistic Society 30: 105–117.Google Scholar
Hargus, S. (2005a). Prosody in two Athabaskan languages of northern British Columbia. In Hargus, S. and Rice, K. (eds.) Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 393–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargus, S(2005b). Stress in polysyllabic morphemes: Sekani and Deg Xinag. Proceedings of the (2005) Athabaskan Languages Conference. Alaska Native Language Center Working Papers Number 5. University of Alaska Fairbanks, 39–66.Google Scholar
Hargus, S(2007). Witsuwit’en grammar. Phonetics, Phonology, Morphology. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargus, S(2010). Vowel quality in Deg Xinag. In Tuttle, S. and Spence, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the (2009) Dene (Athabaskan) Languages Conference. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 39–66.Google Scholar
Hargus, S(2013). Dene. In Hargus, S., Vajda, E., and Hieber, D. W. (eds.) Working Papers in Athabaskan (Dene) Languages 2012. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 13–23.Google Scholar
Jaker, A. (2012). Prosodic reversal in Dogrib (Weledeh dialect). PhD dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Kari, J. (1978). Deg Xinag: Ingalik Noun Dictionary (Preliminary). Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kari, J(1990). Ahtna Athabaskan Dictionary. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Kari, J(2007). Dena’ina Topical Dictionary. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. E. and Leer, J.. (1981). Athabaskan, Eyak, and Tlingit sonorants. Alaska Native Language Center Research Papers Number 5. University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Leer, J. (1996). Comparative Athabaskan lexicon fileslips. Fairbanks: Alaska Native Language Archive. www.uaf.edu/anla/collections/search/resultDetail.xml?resource=(1641).5&sessionId=&searchId=Google Scholar
Leer, J(2005). How stress shapes the stem-suffix complex in Athabaskan. In Hargus, S. and Rice, K. (eds.) Athabaskan Prosody. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 278–318.Google Scholar
Manker, J. (2012). An acoustic analysis of stem prominence in Hän Athabascan. MA thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
Manker, J(2013). Reanalysis of stem prominence in Hän Athabascan: Evidence from disyllabic stems. Proceedings of the (2012) Athabascan Languages Conference. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 43–55.Google Scholar
Rice, K. (2014). Convergence of prominence systems? In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress. Theoretical and Typlogical Issues. Cambridge University Press, 194–227.Google Scholar
Sapir, E. (1925). Pitch accent in Sarcee: An Athabaskan language. Journal de la Société des Américanistes de Paris 17: 185–205.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S. (1994). The peg prefix, the foot, and the word minimum: Evidence from Salcha Athabaskan. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S(1998). Metrical and tonal structures in Tanana Athabaskan. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S(2008). Phonetics and word definition in Ahtna Athabascan. Linguistics 46(2): 439–470.Google Scholar
Tuttle, S. G. and Hargus, S.. (2004). Explaining variability in affix order: The Athabaskan areal and third person prefixes. In Holton, G. and Tuttle, S. (eds.) Working Papers in Athabaskan Linguistics 4. Alaska Native Language Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, 70–99.Google Scholar
References
Alonso, A. (1930). Problemas de dialectología hispanoamericana. Buenos Aires: Instituto de Filología, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Alvord, S. M. (2003). The psychological unreality of quantity sensitivity in Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 22: 1–12.Google Scholar
Aske, J. (1990). Disembodied rules versus patterns in the lexicon. In Hall, K., Koenig, J.-P., Meacham, M., Reinman, S. and Sutton, L. A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley Linguistics Society, 30–45.Google Scholar
Barkanyi, Z. (2002). A fresh look at quantity sensitivity in Spanish. Linguistics 40: 375–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. (2006). Morphological structure and phonological domains in Spanish denominal derivation. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.) Optimality-Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 278–311.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2013). The Spanish lexicon stores stems with theme vowels, not roots with inflectional class features. Probus 25(1): 3–103.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo (2016). Stratal Phonology. In Hannahs, S. J. and Bosch, A. R. K. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Phonological Theory. Abingdon: Routledge, 100–34.Google Scholar
Bonet, E. (2006). Gender allomorphy and epenthesis in Spanish. In Optimality-Theoretic Advances in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 312–38.Google Scholar
Bradley, T. G. (2014). Fonología de laboratorio. In Núñez Cedeño, A. R., Colina, S. and Bradley, T. (eds.) Fonología generativa contemporánea de la lengua española. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 318–67.Google Scholar
Buckley, E. (2014). Spanish secondary stress without gradient alignment. NELS 43: 37–50.Google Scholar
Buckley, E (2016). Foot alignment in Spanish secondary stress. In Heinz, J., Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst, H. (eds.) Dimensions of Phonological Stress. Cambridge University Press, 79–100.Google Scholar
Bullock, B., Amengual, M. and Toribio, A. J.. (2014). The status of s in Dominican Spanish. Lingua 143: 20–35.Google Scholar
Carreira, M. (1990). The diphthongs of Spanish: Stress, syllabification, and alternations. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Colina, S. (1996). Spanish truncation processes: The emergence of the Unmarked. Linguistics 34: 1199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colina, S (2003). The status of word-final [e] in Spanish. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 22: 87–107.Google Scholar
Crowhurst, M. (1992). Diminutives and augmentatives in Mexican Spanish: A prosodic analysis. Phonology 9: 221–53.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1984). L’accentuation dans les phrases en français. In Dell, F., Hirst, D. and Vergnaud, J.-R. (eds.) Les représentations en phonologie. Paris: Hermann, 65–122.Google Scholar
Den Os, E. and Kager, R.. (1986). Extrametricality and stress in Spanish and Italian. Lingua 69: 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, E. (1991). Issues in the moraic structure of Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Eddington, D. (2000). Spanish stress assignment within the analogical modeling of language. Language 76: 92–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eddington, D (2004). Spanish Phonology and Morphology: Experimental and Quantitative Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.linguistics.byu.edu/faculty/eddingtond/stress2.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. (2004). Perceiving what isn’t there: Non-acoustic cues for perceiving Spanish stress. In Face, T. L. (ed.) Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 117–41. linguistlist.org/issues/17/17–359.html.Google Scholar
Face, T. L. and Alvord, S. M.. (2005). Descriptive adequacy versus psychological reality: The case of two restrictions on Spanish stress placement. Studies in the Linguistics Sciences 32(2): 1–16. scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/349/.Google Scholar
Farrell, P. (1990). Spanish stress. A cognitive analysis. Hispanic Linguistics 4: 21–56.Google Scholar
Feliu, E. (2001). Output constraints on two Spanish word-creation processes. Linguistics 39: 871–91.Google Scholar
Franks, S. (1989). The monosyllabic head effect. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7(4): 551–63.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. W. N. and van der Hulst, H. G.. (2014). The separation of accent and rhythm: evidence from StressTyp. In van der Hulst, H. G. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 119–48.Google Scholar
Halle, M. and Idsardi, W.. (1995). General properties of stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, 403–43.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1975). Stress assignment rules in Spanish. In Milan, W. G., Staczek, J. J. and Zamora, J. C. (eds.) 1974 Colloquium on Spanish and Portuguese Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 56–83.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1980). Nonconcatenative morphology and Spanish plurals. Journal of Linguistic Research 1: 15–31.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1985). Spanish word markers. In Nuessel, F. H. (ed.) Current Issues in Hispanic Phonology and Morphology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club, 34–54.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1988). Spanish stress: The extrametricality issue. Ms, MIT. Distributed 1992, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1991b). With respect to metrical constituents in Spanish. In Campos, H. and Martinez-Gil, F. (eds.) Current Studies in Spanish Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 447–73.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1992). The form classes of Spanish substantives. In Gooij, G. and van Marle, J. (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 65–88.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1995). Projection and edge marking in the computation of stress in Spanish. In Goldsmith, J. A. (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, 867–87.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1980). A metrical theory of stress rules. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed 1981, Indiana University Linguistics Club. Published 1985, New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Hochberg, J. (1988). Learning Spanish stress: Developmental and theoretical perspectives. Language 64: 683–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. B. and Terrell, T.. (1976). Stress assignment in Spanish: A natural generative approach. Glossa 10: 64–110.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2007). Stress removal and stress addition in Spanish. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 5(2)/6(1): 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2010). Secondary stress and stress clash in Spanish. In Ortega-Llebaria, M. (ed.) Selected Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project,11–19.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. and Nadeu, M.. (2014). Rhetorical stress in Spanish. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress. Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 228–52.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (1984). Syllable Structure and Stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1996). Separating primary accent and secondary accent. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H. and Visch, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (1997). Primary accent is non-metrical. Rivista di Linguistica 9(1): 99–127.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2009). Brackets and grid marks or theories of primary accent and rhythm. In Raimy, E. and Cairns, C. (eds.) Contemporary Views on Architecture and Representations in Phonological Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 225–45.Google Scholar
Hyde, B. and McCord, B. (2012). The inadequacy of a faithfulness-based approach to Spanish secondary stress. Ms., Washington University. Rutgers Optimality Archive, ROA (1154). roa.rutgers.edu/content/article/files/(1213)._hyde_1.pdf.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. (2014). The Interplay of Morphology and Phonology. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kager, R. (2012). Stress in windows: Language typology and factorial typology. Lingua 122(13): 1454–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (2015). Stratal OT: A synopsis and FAQs. In Hsiao, Y. E. and Wee, L.-H. (eds.) Capturing Phonological Shades. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Klein, P. W. (1989). Spanish ‘gender’ vowels and lexical representation. Hispanic Linguistics 3: 147–62.Google Scholar
Larramendi, M. de. (1729). El imposible vencido: Arte de la lengua vascongada. Salamanca: Antonio Joseph Villagordo Alcaraz.Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (2005). Latin syllable structure in typological perspective. Journal of Latin Linguistics 9(1): 127–48. www.christianlehmann.eu/publ/Latin_syllable_in_typological_perspective.pdf.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. and Prince, A. (1977) On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry 8(2): 249–336.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1995). Spanish hypocoristics: Towards a unified prosodic analysis. Hispanic Linguistics 6/7: 387–434.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. M. (1997). Spanish word stress: The interaction of moras and minimality. In Martinez-Gil, F., and Morales-Front, A (eds.) Issues in the Phonology and Morphology of the Major Iberian Languages. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 559–93.Google Scholar
Martínez-Paricio, V. (2013). The intricate connection between diphthongs and stress in Spanish. Norlyd 40: 166–95.Google Scholar
Menéndez Pidal, R. (1962). Manual de Gramática Histórica Española, 11th edn. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
Morales-Front, A. (2014). El acento. In Núñez Cedeño, A. R., Colina, S. and Bradley, T. (eds.) Fonología generativa contemporánea de la lengua española. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 235–65.Google Scholar
Morin, R. (1999). Spanish substantives: How many classes? In Gutierrez-Rexach, J. and Martinez-Gil, F. (eds.) Advances in Hispanic linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Vol. 1. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 214–30.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T. (1959). Manual de pronunciación española, 9th edn Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.Google Scholar
Núñez Cedeño, R. A. and Morales-Front, A.. (1999). Fonología generativa contemporánea de la lengua española. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Núñez Cedeño, R., Badiola, L. and Sande, A.. (forthcoming). Segmental, syllabic, and phrasal stratum domains of Dominican Surprise-[s] hypercorrection. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.) Handbook of Spanish Phonology, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I. and Arregi, K.. (2005). Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 43–84.Google Scholar
Otero, C. P. (1986). A unified metrical account of Spanish stress. In Brame, M., Contreras, H. and Newmeyer, F. J. (eds.) A Festschrift for Sol Saporta. Seattle: Noit Amrofer. 299–332.Google Scholar
Pater, J. (2010). Morpheme-specific phonology: Constraint indexation and inconsistency resolution. In Parker, S. (ed.) Phonological Argumentation: Essays on Evidence and Motivation. London: Equinox, 123–54.Google Scholar
Pensado, C. (1984). On the Interpretation of non-existent, non-occurring syllable types in Spanish phonology. In Dressier, W. U., Pfeiffer, O. E. and Rennison, E. R. J. (eds.) Discussion Papers for the 5th International Phonology Meeting. Vienna:University Press, 194–8.Google Scholar
Piñeros, C.-E. (2000a). Prosodic and segmental unmarkedness in Spanish truncation. Linguistics 38: 63–98.Google Scholar
Piñeros, C.-E (2000b). Foot-sensitive word minimization in Spanish. Probus 12: 291–324.Google Scholar
Piñeros, C.-E (2016). The phonological weight of Spanish syllables. In Nuñez Cedeño, R. A. (ed.) The Syllable and Stress: Studies in Honor of James W. Harris. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 271–314.Google Scholar
Polo, N. and Roca, I. (2015). A revision of Spanish stress first language acquisition. Poster presented at the Phonetics and Phonology in Europe 2015 meeting. University of Cambridge, 29–30 June. www.ling.cam.ac.uk/pape/PAPE%20ABSTRACTS/PAPE15–052.pdf.Google Scholar
Prieto, P. (1992a). Truncation processes in Spanish. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 22: 143–58.Google Scholar
Prieto, P (1992b). Morphophonology of Spanish diminutive formation: A case for prosodic sensitivity. Hispanic Linguistics 5: 169–205.Google Scholar
Quilis, A. and Fernández, J. A.. (1969). Curso de fonética y fonología españolas. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
RAE (Real Academia Española). (1973). Esbozo de una nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar
RAE (Real Academia Española) (2011). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Fonética y fonología. Barcelona: Espasa Libros SLU.Google Scholar
Roca, I (1988). Theoretical implications of Spanish word stress. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 393–423.Google Scholar
Roca, I (1991). Stress and syllables in Spanish. In Campos, H. and Martínez Gil, F. (eds.) Current Issues in Spanish Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 599–635Google Scholar
Roca, I (1997a). On the role of accent in stress systems: Spanish evidence. In Martinez-Gil, F. and Morales-Front, A. (eds.) Issues in the Phonology and Morphology of the Major Iberian Languages. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 619–64.Google Scholar
Roca, I (1997b). There are no ‘glides’, at least in Spanish: An optimality account. Probus 9: 233–65.Google Scholar
Roca, I (1999). Stress in the Romance languages. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Prosodic Systems of the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 659–811.Google Scholar
Roca, I (2005a). Saturation of parameter settings in Spanish word stress. Phonology 22(3): 345–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roca, I (2005b). La gramática y la biología en el género del español. Revista Española de Lingüística 35(1): 17–44; 35(2): 397–432.Google Scholar
Roca, I (2006). The Spanish stress window. In Martínez-Gil, F. and Colina, S. (eds.) Optimality Theoretic Studies in Spanish Phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 239–77.Google Scholar
Roca, I (2013). El género del castellano: Entelequias y realidades. Español Actual 99: 51–95.Google Scholar
Roca, I (2014). Dogma and fact: Spanish stress 30 years on (a personal history). Paper read at the Workshop on Word Stress and Accent, Leiden, 15–17 August.Google Scholar
Roca, I (2016). Gliding ghosts or ghostly glides, and does it matter which? In Nuñez Cedeño, R. A. (ed.) The Syllable and Stress: Studies in Honor of James W. Harris. Berlin and New York: de Gruyter, 51–104.Google Scholar
Roca, I. and Felíu, E. (2003). Morphology in truncation: The role of the Spanish desinence. In Booij, G. and van Marle, J. (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 2002. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 187–243.Google Scholar
Saporta, S. and Contreras, H.. (1962). A Phonological Grammar of Spanish. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Solan, L. (1981). A metrical analysis of Spanish stress. In Cressey, W. and Napoli, D. J. (eds.) Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages, Vol. 9. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 90–104.Google Scholar
Stockwell, R. and Bowen, J. D.. (1965). The Sounds of English and Spanish. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. (1939/1969). Principles of Phonology. Berkely and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
References
Bennett, R. and Henderson, R.. (2013). Accent in Uspanteko. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(3): 589–645.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, R. (2012). The architecture of grammar and the division of labour in exponence. In Trommer, J. (ed.) The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence. Oxford University Press, 8–83.Google Scholar
Blevins, J. (1993). A tonal analysis of Lithuanian nominal accent. Language 69: 237–273.Google Scholar
Campbell, L. (1977). Quichean Linguistic Prehistory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Can Pixabaj, T. (2006). Gramática descriptiva Uspanteka. Antigua, Guatemala: Oxlajuuj Keej Maya’ Ajtz’iib’ (OKMA).Google Scholar
Fournier, R. (2008). Perception of the tone contrast in East Limburgian dialects. Utrecht, LOT Dissertation series, vol. 196.Google Scholar
Grimes, J. (1971). A reclassification of the Quichean and Kekchian (Mayan) languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 37: 15–19.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2000). The lexical tone contrast of Roermond Dutch in Optimality Theory. In Horne, M. (ed.) Prosody: Theory and Experiment. Amsterdam: Kluwer, 129–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutiérrez, A. (2016). The variable prosodic parsings of Nivaĉle glottal stop. LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 16(2): 323–347.Google Scholar
Hermans, B. (2009). The phonological structure of the Limburg tonal accents. In Nasukawa, K. and Backley, P. (eds.) Strength Relations in Phonology. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 317–372.Google Scholar
Hermans, B. (2012). The phonological representation of the Limburgian tonal accents. In Botma, B. and Noske, R. (eds.) Phonological Explorations: Empirical, Theoretical and Diachronic Issues. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 227–244.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der (2011). Pitch Accent Systems. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 1003–1026.Google Scholar
Hyde, B. (2011). The Iambic–Trochaic Law. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C. J., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds.) The Blackwell Companion to Phonology. Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell, 1052–1077.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2007). Universals of tone rules: 30 years later. In Riad, T. and Gussenhoven, C. (eds.) Tones and Tunes: Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–34.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238.Google Scholar
Iosad, P. (2015). Pitch accent and prosodic structure in Scottish Gaelic: Reassessing the role of contact. In Hilpert, M., Duke, J., Mertzlufft, C., Östman, J.-O., and Rießler, M. (eds.) New Trends in Nordic and General Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 28–54.Google Scholar
Ito, J. and Mester, A.. (2011). The perfect prosodic word and the sources of unaccentedness. Ms., University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Kager, R. and Martínez-Paricio, V.. (2014). Antepenultimate mora effects – typology and representation. Paper presented at the Workshop on Word Stress and Accent, Leiden, 15–17 August.Google Scholar
Kehrein, W. (2017). There’s no tone in Cologne: against tone segment interactions in Franconian. In Kehrein, W., Köhnlein, B., Boersma, P., and van Oostendorp, M. (eds.) Segmental Structure and Tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 147–194.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. (2011). Rule reversal revisited: Synchrony and diachrony of tone and prosodic structure in the Franconian dialect of Arzbach. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. (2016). Contrastive foot structure in Franconian tone accent dialects. Phonology 33(1): 87–123.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. (2017). Synchronic alternations between monophthongs and diphthongs in Franconian: a metrical approach. In Kehrein, W., Köhnlein, B., Boersma, P., and van Oostendorp, M. (eds.) Segmental Structure and Tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 211–236.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, G. (2007). Dialect variation in East Norwegian tone. In Riad, T. and Gussenhoven, C. (eds.) Tones and Tunes: Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 91–112.Google Scholar
Lacy, P. (2002a). The interaction of tone and stress in Optimality Theory. Phonology 19: 1–32.Google Scholar
Lacy, P. (2002b). The formal expression of markedness. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., Wetterlin, A., and Jönsson-Steiner, E.. (2005). Lexical specification of tone in North Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 28: 61–96.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., Wetterlin, A., and Jönsson-Steiner, E. (2006). Scandinavian lexical tone: Prefixes and compounds. In Bruce, G. and Horne, M. (eds.) Nordic Prosody IX. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 167–173.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. (1995). Extensions of faithfulness: Rotuman revisited. Ms., University of Massachusetts Amherst. Rutgers Optimality Archive 110.Google Scholar
Morén, B. (2001). Distinctiveness, Coercion and Sonority: A Unified Theory of Weight. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morén, B. (2005). Danish stød and Eastern Norwegian pitch accent: The myth of lexical tones. Paper presented at the 13th Manchester Phonology Meeting (mfm 13), Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
Morén-Duolljá, B. (2013). The prosody of Swedish underived nouns: No lexical tones required. Nordlyd 40(1): 196–248.Google Scholar
Morén-Duolljá, B. (forthcoming). Tone, Final Devoicing and Assimilation in Moresnet. In Kehrein, W., Köhnlein, B., Boersma, P., and van Oostendorp, M. (eds.) Segmental Structure and Tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Marc van, Oostendorp (2017). Tone, final devoicing and assimilation in Moresnet. In W. Kehrein, B. Köhnlein, P. Boersma, and M. van Oostendorp (eds.) Segmental Structure and Tone. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 237–252.Google Scholar
Peters, J. (2006). The Cologne word accent revisited. In de Vaan, M. (ed.) Germanic Tone Accents. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Franconian Tone Accents, Leiden, 13–14 June 2003. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 107–133.Google Scholar
Prince, A. and Smolensky, P.. (1993). Optimality Theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder. Published 2004, Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rice, C. 1988. Stress assignment in the Chugach dialect of Alutiiq. CLS 24, Papers from the General Session, 304–315.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1935). The relation of pitch to intensity. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 6(3): 150–154.Google Scholar
Ternes, E. (2006). The Phonemic Analysis of Scottish Gaelic, Based on the Dialect of Applecross, Ross-shire, 3rd rev. edn. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Wetterlin, A. (2010). Tonal Accents in Norwegian: Phonology, Morphology and Lexical Specification. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zec, D. (1999). Footed tones and tonal feet: Rhythmic constituency in a pitch-accent language. Phonology 16: 225–264.Google Scholar
Zec, D. and Zsiga, E.. (2010). Interaction of tone and stress in Standard Serbian. In Browne, W., Cooper, A., Fisher, A., Kesici, E., and Predolac, N. (eds.) Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics (FASL) 18. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications, 536–555.Google Scholar
References
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haraguchi, S. (1977). The Tone Pattern of Japanese: An Autosegmental Theory of Tonology. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Hirayama, T. (1951). Kyūshū Hōgen onchō no Kenkyū [Studies on Tone in Kyushu Dialects]. Tokyo: Gakkaino Shishin-sha.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. K. (2011). Scope, prosody, and pitch accent: The prosodic marking of wh-scope in two varieties of Japanese and South Kyeongsang Korean. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Hwang, H. K. and Ito, S.. (2014). Correlation between prosody and epistemic bias of negative polar interrogatives in Japanese. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, Ireland, 925–928.Google Scholar
Ishihara, S. (2011). Japanese focus prosody revisited: Freeing focus from prosodic phrasing. Lingua 121(13): 1870–1889.Google Scholar
Ishihara, S. (2015). Syntax-phonology interface. In Kubozono, H. (ed.) The Handbook of Japanese Phonetics and Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 569–618.Google Scholar
Kibe, N. (2000). Seinanbu Kyūshū Nikei Akusento no Kenkyū. [Studies on the Two-class-accent Dialects of Southwest Kyushu]. Tokyo: Benseisha.Google Scholar
Kibe, N.(2010). Intonation no chiikisa. In Kobayashi, T. and Shinozaki, K. (eds.) Hōgen no Hakken [Discovery of Dialects]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo, 1–20.Google Scholar
Kibe, N. and Hashimoto, Y.. (2003). Kagoshima-shi hōgen no gairaigo no onchō [Tone of loanwords in Kagoshima Japanese]. Onsei Kenkyu 7(3): 92–100.Google Scholar
Kubo, T. (1989). Fukuoka hoogen no dare/nani tou no gimonshi o fukumu bun no pitch pattern. [The pitch patterns of sentences containing wh-words in the Fukuoka-City dialect]. Kokugogaku 156: 1–12.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H. (1988). The organization of Japanese prosody. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh. Published 1993. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(1997). Lexical markedness and variation: A non-derivational account. In Agbayani, B. and Tang, S.-W. (eds.) Proceedings of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 15. Stanford: CSLI Publication, 273–287.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2004). What does Kagoshima Japanese tell us about Japanese syllables? Kageyama, In T. and Kishimoto, H. (eds.) Nihongo no bunseki to gengo ruikei. [Analysis of Japanese and Language Typology]. Tokyo: Kurosio, 75–92.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2007a) Tonal change in language contact: Evidence from Kagoshima Japanese. In Riad, T. and Gussenhoven, C. (eds.) Tones and Tunes. Volume 1: Typological Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 323–351.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2007b) Focus and intonation in Japanese: Does focus trigger pitch reset? In Ishihara, S. (ed.) Working Papers of the SFB632, Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure (ISIS) 9. Potsdam: University Potsdam, 1–27.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2008). Japanese accent. In Miyagawa, S. and Saito, M. (eds.) The Handbook of Japanese Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–191.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2010). Accentuation of alphabetic acronyms in varieties of Japanese. Lingua 120(10): 2323–2335.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2011a) Japanese pitch accent. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, E., and Rice, K. (eds.)The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 5. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2879–2907.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2011b) Akusento to intoneeshon [Accent and intonation]. Ningen Bunka 13: 11–16.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2012a) Varieties of pitch accent systems in Japanese. Lingua 122: 1395–1414.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2012b) Word-level versus sentence-level prosody in Koshikijima Japanese. The Linguistic Review 29: 109–130.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2018a) Post-lexical tonal neutralizations in Kagoshima Japanese. In Kubozono, H. and Giriko, M. (eds.) Tonal Change and Neutralization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 27–57.Google Scholar
Kubozono, H.(2018b) Bilingualism and accent changes in Kagoshima Japanese. In Kubozono, H. and Giriko, M. (eds.) Tonal Change and Neutralization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 279–329.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leben, W. (1973). Suprasegmental Phonology. PhD dissertation, MIT. Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Matsuura, T. (2014). Nagasaki Hōgen kara mita Go-onchō no Kōzō. [Word Prosodic Structure from the Perspective of Nagasaki Japanese]. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D.(1978). What is a tone language? In Fromkin, V. (ed.) Tone: A Linguistic Survey. New York: Academic Press, 113–131.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. and Beckman, M.. (1988). Japanese Tone Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tanaka, S. and Kubozono, H. (1999). Nihongo no Hatsuon Kyōshitsu [Introduction to Japanese Pronunciation]. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
Uwano, Z. (1997). Fukugō meishi kara mita nihongo shohōgen no akusento. [Accent of various dialects of Japanese seen from the viewpoint of compound nouns]. In Kunihiro, T., Hirose, H., and Kohno, M. (eds.) Accent, Intonation, Rhythm and Pause. Tokyo: Sanseido, 231–270.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, M.and Féry, C.. (2009). Information Structure: Theoretical, Typological, and Experimental Perspectives. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
References
Booij, G. (1999). Morpheme structure constraints and the phonotactics of Dutch. In van Hulst, H. and Ritter, N. (eds.) The Syllable: Views and Facts. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 53–68.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2009). Vowel duration, syllable quantity and stress in Dutch. In Hanson, K. and Inkelas, S. (eds.) The Nature of the Word: Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 181–98.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2014). Possible and impossible exceptions in Dutch word stress. In van Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 276–96.Google Scholar
Hinskens, F., Köhnlein, B. and van Oostendorp, M. (2013). Dutch stress assignment in biblical names: General patterns and sociolinguistic variation in a large-scale web survey. Paper presented at the workshop on ‘Word stress: dialectal variation and perception’ the International Congress of Linguists (ICL), Genève.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (1989). A Metrical Theory of Stress and Destressing in English and Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (2000). Stem stress and peak correspondence in Dutch. In Dekkers, J., van der Leeuw, F., van de Weijer, J. and Dekkers, J. (eds.) Optimality Theory: Phonology, Syntax, and Acquisition. Oxford University Press, 121–50.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. (2015). The morphological structure of complex place names: The case of Dutch. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 18: 183–212.Google Scholar
Köhnlein, B. (2016). Word stress. www.taalportaal.org/taalportaal/topic/pid/topic-(1402)(0545)(8521)(1203)0.Google Scholar
Nouveau, D. (1994). Language acquisition, metrical theory, and optimality: A case study of Dutch word stress. PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, M. van. (1997). Lexicale variatie in optimaliteitstheorie. Nederlandse Taalkunde 2: 133–54.Google Scholar
Oostendorp, M. van. (2012). Quantity and the three-syllable window in Dutch word stress. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 343–58.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M. and Zonneveld, W. (1989a). Klemtoon en metrische fonologie. Muiderberg:Coutinho.Google Scholar
Trommelen, M. and Zonneveld, W. (1989b). Stress, diphthongs, [r] in Dutch. In Bennis, H. and van Kemenade, A. (eds.) Linguistics in the Netherlands. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Zonneveld, W. (1993). Schwa, superheavies, stress and syllables in Dutch. The Linguistic Review 10: 61–110.Google Scholar
References
Anttila, A. (2002). Morphologically conditioned phonological alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
Bennett, R. (2013). The uniqueness of metrical structure: Rhythmic phonotactics in Huariapano. Phonology 30: 355–398.Google Scholar
Bickmore, L. and Broadwell, G. A.. (1998). High tone docking in Sierra Juárez Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 64(1): 37–67.Google Scholar
Caballero, G. (2011). Morphologically conditioned stress assignment in Choguita Rarámuri (Tarahumara). Linguistics 49(4): 749–790.Google Scholar
Dietrich, W. (1986). El idioma Chiriguano: Gramática, textos, vocabulario. Madrid: Ediciones Cultura Hispánica, Instituto de Cooperación Iberoamericana.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst, H. (2013). Rhythm types. In Dryer, M. S. and Haspelmath, M. (eds.) The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. wals.info/chapter/17.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and van der Hulst, H.(2014). The separation of accent and rhythm: Evidence from StressTyp. In van der Hulst, H. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 119–146.Google Scholar
González, C. (2016). Tipología de los sistemas métricos de veinticinco lenguas pano. Amerindia 39(1): 129–172.Google Scholar
Guillaume, A. (2008b). Le Cavineña et les langues tacana comme exemples de systèmes à transitivité très fortement grammaticalisée. Paper presented at the Atelier de Morphosyntaxe, Lyon, Laboratoire Dynamique Du Langage, November.Google Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (1984). Syllable Structure and Stress in Dutch. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. van der. (1996). Separating primary accent and secondary accent. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H., and Visch, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hyde, B. (2011). The iambic-trochaic law. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, B., and Rice, K. (eds.), A Companion to Phonology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 1052–1077.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences 31: 213–238.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. (1998). The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: A case study from dominance. In Booij, G. and Marle, J. (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1997. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 121–155.Google Scholar
Inkelas, S. and Zoll, C.. (2007). Is grammar dependence real? A comparison between cophonological and indexed constraint approaches to morphologically conditioned phonology. Linguistics 45: 133–171.Google Scholar
Kager, R. (2012). Stress in windows: Language typology and factorial typology. Lingua 122: 1454–1493.Google Scholar
Kawahara, S. (2015). The phonology of Japanese accent. In Kubozono, H. (ed.) The Handbook of Japanese Language and Linguistics: Phonetics and Phonology. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter, 445–492Google Scholar
Kawahara, S. and Kao, S.. (2012). The productivity of a root-initial accenting suffix, [-zu]: Judgement studies. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(3): 837–857.Google Scholar
Kawahara, S. and Wolf, M.. (2010). On the existence of root-initial-accenting suffixes: An elicitation study of Japanese [-zu]. Linguistics 48: 837–864.Google Scholar
Key, M. R. (1968). Comparative Tacanan Phonology, with Cavineña Phonology and Notes on Pano-Tacanan Relationships. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Key, M. R. and Wyma, R.. (1964). Analyzing stress in Chama (Tacanan). Chapman College Research Bulletin 1(1): 28–37.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1984). A compositional approach to Vedic word accent. In Joshi, S. D. (ed.) Amrtadhara: Prof R. N. Dandekar felicitation volume. Delhi: Ajanta, 201–210.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. and Halle, M.. (1977). Towards a reconstruction of the Indo-European accent. In Hyman, L. (ed.) Studies in Stress and Accent. Los Angeles: University of Southern California, 209–238.Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1968). The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Michael, L., Chang, W., and Stark, T.. (2014). Exploring phonological areality in the circum-Andean region using a naive bayes classifier. Language Dynamics and Change 4(1): 27–86.Google Scholar
Orgun, C. O. (1996). Sign-based morphology and phonology: With special attention to Optimality Theory. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Palancar, E. L. and Léonard, J. L.. (2016). Tone and Inflection. Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pitman, D. and Pitman, M.. (1978). Araona syllable and stress. In Wiesemann, U. (ed.) Working Papers of the Summer Institute of Linguistics 1972–1976. Riberalta: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1–17.Google Scholar
Poser, W. (1984). The phonetics and phonology of tone and intonation in Japanese. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Prince, A. and Smolenksy, P.. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science Technical Report 2.Google Scholar
Rolle, Nicholas. (2013). Ese Ejja accent. UC Berkeley Phonology Lab Annual Report 2013, 268–280.Google Scholar
Tallman, A. J. (2014). The prosody of split and glued verb constructions in Chácobo (Pano). Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 40: 495–522.Google Scholar
Tejada, L. (2012). Tone gestures and constraint interaction in Sierra Juarez Zapotec. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, P. (2003). Transitivity in Shipibo-Konibo grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, P. (2010). Multi-verb predicates and transitivity harmony in Shipibo-Konibo. In Aikhenvald, A. Y. and Muysken, P. C. (eds.) Multi-verb Constructions: A View from the Americas. Leiden: Brill, 139–159.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, M. (2006). L’ese eja de Bolivie (langue tacana): Esquisse phonologique et phonétique. Master Thesis, Université Lumière Lyon 2.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, M. (2008). La transitivité en ese ejja. Paper presented at the Atelier de Morphosyntaxe, Lyon, Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, November.Google Scholar
Vuillermet, M. (2012). A grammar of Ese Ejja, a Takanan language of the Bolivian Amazon. PhD dissertation, Université Lumière Lyon 2. www.marinevuillermet.com/%20these/complete-thesis/.Google Scholar
Wetzels, L. and Meira, S.. (2010). A survey of South American stress systems. In van der Hulst, H., Goedemans, R., and van Zanten, E. (eds.) A Survey of Word Accentual Patterns in the Languages of the World. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter, 313–380.Google Scholar
Wynen, D. van and de Garrard, M. van Wynen, . (1962). Fonemas Tacana y modelos de acentuacion. Notas linguisticas de Bolivia No. 6. Cochabamba, Bolivia: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano.Google Scholar
References
Garde, P.(1968). Les propriétés accentuelles des morphèmes dans les langues slaves. Revue des études slaves 47(1–4): 29–37.Google Scholar
Goedemans, R. and Hulst, H.G. van der (2014). The separation of accent and rhythm: Evidence from StressTyp. In van der Hulst, H. G. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 119–145.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. (2006). Syllable Weight: Phonetics, Phonology, Typology. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halle, M. and Idsardi, W. J. (1995). General properties of stress and metrical structure. In Goldsmith, J. (ed.) A Handbook of Phonological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 403–443.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hulst, H.G. van der(1996). Separating primary and secondary accent. In Goedemans, R., van der Hulst, H. G., and Visch, E. (eds.) Stress Patterns of the World. Part I. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics, 1–26.Google Scholar
Hulst, H.G. van der(1997). Primary accent is non-metrical. Rivista di Linguistica 9(1): 99–127.Google Scholar
Hulst, H.G. van der(1999). Word accent. In van der Hulst, H. G. (ed.) Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 3–116.Google Scholar
Hulst, H.G. van der(2014). Representing rhythm. In van der Hulst, H. G. (ed.) Word Stress: Theoretical and Typological Issues. Cambridge University Press, 325–365.Google Scholar
Idsardi, W. J. (1992). The computation of prosody. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. www.ai.mit.edu/projects/dm/theses/idsardi92.pdfGoogle Scholar
Inkelas, S. (1998). The theoretical status of morphologically conditioned phonology: A case study from dominance. In Booij, G. and van Marle, J. (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology, Dordrecht: Kluwer, 121–155.Google Scholar
Itkonen, E. (1955). Uber die Betonungsverhaltnisse in den finnischugrischen Sprachen. Acta Linguistica 5: 21–32.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1984). A compositional approach to Vedic word accent. In Joshi, S. D. (ed.) Amṛtadhārā. Delhi: Ajanta Publications, 201–210.Google Scholar
McGarrity, L. W. (2003). Constraints on patterns of primary and secondary stress. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Indiana University, IN. http://roa.rutgers.edu/files/651–0404/651-MCGARRITY-1–0.PDFGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, A. R. (1976). Taz Selkup: The phonology and morphology of the verb. Unpublished PhD dissertation, Columbia University, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Normanskaya, J. (2008). Rekonstrukcija prafinno-volžskogo udarenija. Moscow: Tezaurus.Google Scholar
Normanskaya, J.(2011). Prasamodijskoje udarenie i ego vnešnie sootvetstvija. Čast’ I. Raznomestnoe udarenie v central’nyx i južnyx dialektax sel’kupskogo jazyka. Uralo-altajskie issledovanija 1(6): 117–148.Google Scholar
Normanskaya, J.(2012). Udarenie v central’nyx i južnyx sel’kupskix dialektax. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta 116(1): 16–21.Google Scholar
Normanskaya, J., Fedotov, N., and Šešenin, S. (2011). Udarenie v govore obskix čumyl’kupov sel’kupskogo jazyka, ego sootvetstvija v jazyke pervyx sel’kupskix knig i v lesnom dialekte neneckogo jazyka. Genezis prasamodijskogo vokalizma v zavisimosti ot prosodičeskix faktorov. Congressus XI. Internationalis Fenno-Ugristarum. Pars V: Dissertationes sectionum et symposiorum ad linguisticam, Piliscaba, Hungary, August 9–14, 2010, 9–35.Google Scholar
Parker, S. G. (1989). The sonority grid in Chamicuro phonology. Linguistic Analysis 19: 3–58.Google Scholar
Riese, T., Bradley, J., Yakimova, E., and Krylova, G. (2012). Оҥай марий йылме: A comprehensive introduction to the Mari language. Department of Finno-Ugric Studies, University of Vienna. www.univie.ac.at/maridict/book/book_en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, S. and van der Hulst, H. G. (1999). Weight-by-position by position. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17(3): 499–450.Google Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. and Ingemann, F. J. (1961). An Eastern Cheremis Manual. Phonology, Grammar, Texts and Glossary. Bloomington: Indiana University and The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Tranel, B. (1991). CVC light syllables, geminates and Moraic Theory. Phonology 8(2): 291–302.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A. (2014a). Accent assignment in a lexical accent system: Extending PAF. Poster presented at the 4th Annual UConn Language Fest, University of Connecticut, Storrs, April 26.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2014b). The smell of morphemes in the PAF theory: The case of Eastern Mari. Poster presented at the 4th Workshop on Word Stress and Accent, Leiden University, August 15–17.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2015a). Diacritic weight scales: A novel approach to lexical accent systems. Poster presented at the 12th Old World Conference in Phonology, University of Barcelona, January 27–30.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2015b). Hybrid weight scales in the Extended PAF theory. Paper presented at the 39th Penn Linguistics Conference, University of Pennsylvania, March 20–22.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2016a). Diacritic weight in the Extended Accent First Theory, University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1). https://repository.upenn.edu/pwpl/vol22/iss1/32/.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2016b). Weight scales in the computation of word accent: The case of Central Selkup. Paper presented at the 9th North American Phonology Conference, Concordia University, May 7–8.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2016c). The Accent Locality Hypothesis and parameter dependency: Toward a perfect fit. Poster presented at the 24th Manchester Phonology Meeting, University of Manchester, May 26–28.Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2016d). How to beat without feet: Weight scales and parameter dependencies in the computation of word accent. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/1266/Google Scholar
Vaxman, A.(2017). The Scales-and-Parameters approach to morpheme-specific exceptions in accent assignment. Paper presented at the 25th Manchester Phonology Meeting, University of Manchester, May 25–27.Google Scholar
Vaysman, O. (2009). Segmental alternations and metrical theory. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/47830Google Scholar