Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:07:02.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Status Accommodation through Institutional Means: India’s Rise and the Global Order

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

T. V. Paul
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Mahesh Shankar
Affiliation:
Skidmore College, New York
T. V. Paul
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal
Deborah Welch Larson
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
William C. Wohlforth
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

The rise of India as a state with major power attributes is expected to take place before the third decade of the twenty-first century. As its power capabilities – especially in the economic, military and demographic arenas – have begun to increase, India has started to make a claim for a leadership role in several institutions of global governance, and thereby for a higher status in the global system. Although it remains to be seen whether India lives up to its promise, and if so how willing it would be to bear the costs of such a role, New Delhi’s status claims are based on several hard and soft power resources, both actual and potential, which have been elaborated elsewhere. This claim is equally driven by ideational factors, as Indians in general have always had a tendency to view their country as destined to become a leading power, an ambition that many in the country have concluded will finally be achieved in the twenty-first century. Encouraging this perception are leaders of the United States and other Western countries who have started referring to India as a rising great power. In this chapter, we seek to answer a key question: Assuming India has the potential ingredients for great-power status, what are the prospects for its peaceful status accommodation?

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Nayar, Baldev Raj and Paul, T. V., India in the World Order: Searching for Major Power Status (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, The United States and Great Powers: World Politics in the Twenty-First Century (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004), 63–73Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch and Shevchenko, Alexei, “Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy,”International Security 34, no. 4 (Spring 2010), 63–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, C. Wohlforth, “Unipolarity, Status Competition and Great Power War,”World Politics 61, no. 9 (January 2009), 28–57Google Scholar
Thompson, William R., On Global War (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1988)Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001)Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Organski, A. F. K. and Kugler, Jacek, The War Ledger (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980)Google Scholar
Midlarsky, Manus I., On War: Political Violence in the International System (New York: Free Press, 1975)Google Scholar
East, Maurice A., “Status Discrepancy and Violence in the International System: An Empirical Analysis,” in The Analysis of International Politics: Essays in Honor of Harold and Margaret Sprout, eds. Rosenau, James N., Davis, Vincent, and East, Maurice A. (New York: The Free Press, 1972), 299–319Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, “Is China a Status Quo Power?”International Security 27, no. 4 (Spring 2003), 5–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lanteigne, Marc, China and International Institutions: Alternate Paths to Global Power (London: Routledge, 2005)Google Scholar
Mercer, Jonathan, “Anarchy and Identity,”International Organization 49, no. 2 (Spring 1995), 229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, Peter Hays, “Social Psychology and the Identity-Conflict Debate: Is a ‘China Threat’ Inevitable?”European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 2 (June 2005), 235–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wight, Martin, Power Politics, eds. Bull, Hedley and Holbraad, Carsten (New York: Holmes & Meier, 1978), 46–47Google Scholar
John Ikenberry, G., After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984)Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Martin, Lisa L., “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,”International Security 20, no. 1 (Summer 1995), 39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lisa L., “An Institutionalist View: International Institutions and State Strategies,” in International Order and the Future of World Politics, eds. Paul, T. V. and Hall, John A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 78–98Google Scholar
Johnston, Alastair Iain, “Treating International Institutions as Social Environments,”International Studies Quarterly 45, no. 4 (December 2001), 487–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, National Interests in International Society (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996)Google Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: Avon Books, 1992), 197–198Google Scholar
Cohen, Stephen P., “India Rising,”Wilson Quarterly 24 (Summer 2000), 46Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M., The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1987)Google Scholar
Chan, Steve, China, the US and the Power-Transition Theory: A Critique (London: Routlege, 2007)Google Scholar
Layne, Christopher, The Peace of Illusions: American Grand Strategy from 1940 to the Present (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006), 165–168Google Scholar
Ganguly, Sumit, “India and China: Border Issues, Domestic Integration, and International Security,” in The India-China Relationship: What the United States Needs to Know, eds. Frankel, Francine R. and Harding, Harry (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2004), 103–133Google Scholar
Garver, John W., Protracted Contest: Sino-Indian Rivalry in the Twentieth Century (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2001), 103–105Google Scholar
Haidar, Ziad, “Baluchis, Beijing, and Pakistan’s Gwadar Port,”Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 6, no. 1 (Winter 2005), 95–103Google Scholar
Yergin, Daniel, “Ensuring Energy Security,”Foreign Affairs 85, no. 2 (March/April 2006), 69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitra, Pramit and Thompson, Drew, “China and India: Rivals or Partners?Far Eastern Economic Review (April 2005)Google Scholar
Beri, Ruchita, “Africa’s Energy Potential: Prospects for India,”Strategic Analysis 29, no. 3 (July 2005), 370–394Google Scholar
Alden, Chris, “China in Africa,”Survival 47, no. 3 (Autumn 2005), 147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladwig, Walter C., “Delhi’s Pacific Ambition: Naval Power, ‘Look East,’ and India’s Emerging Influence in the Asia-Pacific,Asian Security 5, no. 2 (2009), 87–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., “The Systemic Bases of India’s Challenge to the Global Nuclear Order,”The Nonproliferation Review 6, no. 1 (Fall 1998), 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew, and Narlikar, Amrita, “A New Politics of Confrontation? Brazil and India in Multilateral Trade Negotiations,”Global Society 20, no. 4 (October 2006), 433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravi, N., “India Expects a Positive Outcome from G20 Summit,”The Hindu, April 2, 2009Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W., “The New New World Order,”Foreign Affairs 86 (March/April 2007), 34–46Google Scholar
Pant, Harsh V., “India in the Asia-Pacific: Rising Ambitions with an Eye on China,”Asia-Pacific Review 14, no. 1 (May 2007), 54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrero-Waldner, Benita, “Why the Ninth EU-India Summit Matters,”The Hindu, September 29, 2008Google Scholar
Sachs, Goldman, “Dreaming With BRICs: The Path to 2050,”Global Economics 99, no. 12 (October 2003), 1–24Google Scholar
Armijo, Leslie Elliott, “The Brics Countries (Brazil, Russia, India and China) as Analytical Category: Mirage or Insight?”Asian Perspective 31, no. 4 (October 2007), 7–42Google Scholar
Brawley, Mark, “Building Blocks or Bric Wall? Fitting U.S. Foreign Policy to the Shifting Distribution of Power,”Asian Perspective 31, no. 4 (February 2008), 151–175Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×