Book contents
- Soldiers, Politicians, and Civilians
- Soldiers, Politicians, and Civilians
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Military Reform, Civil-Military Relations, and Democratization
- 2 Civil-Military Developments in the Southern Cone and Brazil: An Overview
- 3 Reducing Military Power
- 4 Devising a New Legal Framework
- 5 Building Defense Institutions
- 6 Generating Knowledge
- 7 Achieving Convergence
- 8 Achieving Effectiveness
- 9 Explaining Civil-Military Relations Reform
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
Select Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2017
Book contents
- Soldiers, Politicians, and Civilians
- Soldiers, Politicians, and Civilians
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 Military Reform, Civil-Military Relations, and Democratization
- 2 Civil-Military Developments in the Southern Cone and Brazil: An Overview
- 3 Reducing Military Power
- 4 Devising a New Legal Framework
- 5 Building Defense Institutions
- 6 Generating Knowledge
- 7 Achieving Convergence
- 8 Achieving Effectiveness
- 9 Explaining Civil-Military Relations Reform
- Select Bibliography
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Soldiers, Politicians, and CiviliansReforming Civil-Military Relations in Democratic Latin America, pp. 342 - 382Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Select Bibliography
Abrao, Paulo and Torelly, Marcelo D., “Resistance to Change: Brazil’s Persistent Amnesty and Its Alternatives for Truth and Justice,” in Lessa, Francesca and Payne, Leigh (eds.), Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability: Comparative and International Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 152–81.Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe, Militares, civiles y democracia: La España posfranquista en perspectiva comparada (Madrid: Alianza, 1995).Google Scholar
Agüero, Felipe, Soldiers, Civilians and Democracy: Post-Franco Spain in Comparative Perspective (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Aguilar, Sergio Luis Cruz, “Brasil,” in Sepulveda, Isidro (ed.), La educación de la seguridad y la defensa en las Américas (Washington, DC: William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies, 2013), 273–309.Google Scholar
Aguilera de Prat, Cesáreo and Martínez, Rafael, Sistemas de gobierno, partidos y territorio (Madrid: Tecnos, 2000).Google Scholar
Alexander, Gerard, The Sources of Democratic Consolidation (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
Álvarez Veloso, David, “Chile: evaluación del funcionamiento de la Comisión de Defensa del Parlamento,” in Follietti, Gilda and Tibiletti, Luis (eds.), Parlamento y defensa en América Latina: El Papel de las Comisiones. Vol. I Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Uruguay (Buenos Aires: Ser en el 2000, 2004), 94–107.Google Scholar
Amorim Neto, Octavio, “O papel do Congresso nas questões de defesa: entre a abdicacão e o comprometimento,” in Jobim, Nelson A. and Etchegoyen, Sérgio W. (eds.), Seguranca internacional: Perspectivas brasileiras (Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora, 2010), 435–48.Google Scholar
Anzelini, Luciano and Poczynok, Iván, “El planeamiento estratégico militar en la Argentina (2003–2013): reflexiones en torno al gobierno político de la defensa,” Austral: Revista Brasileira de Estratégia & Relacões Internacionais, 3, 6 (July–December 2014), 143–67.Google Scholar
Arceneaux, Craig, Bounded Missions: Military Regimes and Democratization in the Southern Cone and Brazil (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah, Political Institutions and Military Change: Lessons from Peripheral Wars (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baeza, Jaime, Dockendorff, Andrés Valdés and Vargas Palacios, Natalia, “El rol de la Comisión de Defensa de la Cámara de Diputados en la formulación de la política de defensa,” Revista Chilena de Derecho y Ciencia Política, 2, 1 (2010), 67–86.Google Scholar
Barany, Zoltan, The Soldier and the Changing State: Building Democratic Armies in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Battaglino, Jorge, “The Politics of Defense Revival in Argentina,” Defense and Security Analysis, 29, 1 (2013), 3–15.Google Scholar
Bebler, Anton, “Typologies Based on Civilian-Dominated versus Military-Dominated Political Systems,” in Bebler, Anton and Seroka, Jim (eds.), Contemporary Political Systems: Classifications and Typologies (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, Inc., 1990), 261–74.Google Scholar
Bebler, Anton, “The Regionwide Perspective on Post-Communist Civil-Military Relations,” in Bebler, Anton (ed.), Civil-Military Relations in Post-Communist States: Central and Eastern Europe in Transition (Westport: Praeger, 1997), 65–76.Google Scholar
Benítez Manaut, Raúl, “Las relaciones civiles-militares en una democracia: releyendo a los clásicos,” Revista Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad, 19, 1 (2005), 153–68.Google Scholar
Besio, Félix, “Uruguay,” in Sepúlveda, Isidro (ed.), La educación de la seguridad y la defensa en las Américas (Washington, DC: William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies), 428–59.Google Scholar
Born, Hans, Control parlamentario del sector de seguridad: Principios, mecanismos y prácticas (Madrid: IPU, DCAF, and IUGM, 2006).Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C., “Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: The Hedgehog and the Fox Revisited,” Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad, 19 (2005), 111–31.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C., “Efficiency in the Use of Resources,” in Bruneau, Thomas C. and Florina, Cristiana Matei (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Civil-Military Relations (New York: Routledge, 2013), 39–47.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C. and Goetze, Richard B. Jr., “Ministries of Defense and Democratic Control,” in Bruneau, Thomas C. and Tollefson, Scott D. (eds.), Who Guards the Guardians and How: Democratic Civil-Military Relations (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006), 71–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C. and Matei, Florina Cristiana (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Civil-Military Relations (New York: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C. and Tollefson, Scott D., “Civil-Military Relations in Brazil: A Reassessment,” Journal of Politics in Latin America, 2 (2014), 107–38.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Thomas C. and Tollefson, Scott D. (eds.), Who Guards the Guardians and How: Democratic Civil-Military Relations (Austin: University of Texas Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Brysk, Alison, The Politics of Human Rights in Argentina (Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
Burk, James, “The Logic of Crisis and Civil-Military Relations Theory: A Comment on Desch, Feaver, and Dauber,” Armed Forces & Society, 24, 3 (Spring 1998), 455–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabanellas de Torres, Guillermo, Diccionario Jurídico Elemental (Madrid: Editorial Heliasta Madrid, 2006).Google Scholar
Caforio, Giuseppe (ed.), Cultural Differences between the Military and Parent Society in Democratic Countries (Cambridge: Elsevier, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camarasa, Jorge A., Felice, Rubén and González, Daniel, El juicio: Proceso al horror (Buenos Aires: Sudamericana/Planeta, 1985).Google Scholar
Candina, Azun, “The Institutional Identity of the Carabineros de Chile,” in Bailey, John and Dammert, Lucía (eds.), Public Security and Police Reform in the Americas (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2006), 75–93.Google Scholar
Carouthers, Thomas, “The End of the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy, 13 (January 2002), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castrillón, Liliana and von Chrismar, Pia, “Women and the Armed Forces in the South American Context: A Vision from Chile,” Estudios de Seguridad y Defensa, 2 (December 2003), 91–116.Google Scholar
Chiappini, Andrea, “La educación de los militares en democracia: el caso Argentina, colegio militar de la nación,” in Klepak, Hal (ed.), Formación y educación militar (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2012), 15–27.Google Scholar
Collado, Liza Zuñiga, “Escuela militar chilena: tradición y adaptación en un nuevo contexto,” in Klepak, Hal (ed.), Formación y educación militar (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2012), 107–18.Google Scholar
Collins, Cath, Post-Transitional Justice: Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Consejo Argentino para las Relaciones Internacionales, La opinión pública argentina sobre política exterior y defensa 2010 (Buenos Aires: CARI, 2011).Google Scholar
Conticho, Marta Iturvide, “La mujer en la defensa y la seguridad de Uruguay,” Security and Defense Studies Review, 11 (Fall–Winter 2010), 25–42.Google Scholar
Cottey, Andrew, Edmunds, Timothy and Forster, Anthony, “The Second Generation Problematic: Rethinking Democracy and Civil-Military Relations,” Armed Forces & Society, 29, 1 (Fall 2002), 7–30.Google Scholar
Croissant, Aurel, Kuehn, David, Chambers, Paul and Wolf, Siegfried O., “Beyond the Fallacy of Coup-ism: Conceptualizing Civilian Control of the Military in Emerging Democracies,” Democratization, 17, 5 (2010), 950–75.Google Scholar
Croissant, Aurel, Kuehn, David, Lorenz, Phillip and Chambers, Paul W. (eds.), Democratization and Civilian Control in Asia (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013).Google Scholar
Dahl, Enrique and Garro, Alejandro M., “Argentina: National Appeals Court (Criminal Division) Judgment on Human Rights Violations by Former Military Leaders: An Introductory Note,” International Legal Materials, 26 (January–May 1987), 317–72.Google Scholar
Dandeker, Christopher, “The Military in Democratic Societies: New Times and New Patterns of Civil-Military Relations,” in Kuhlmann, Jürgen and Callaghan, Jean (eds.), Military and Society in 21st Century in Europe: A Comparative Analysis (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers & Lit Verlag, 2000), 27–43.Google Scholar
D’Araujo, Maria Celina, “Ensino militar no Brazil e interfaces com a sociedade,” in Klepak, Hal (ed.), Formación y educación militar (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2012), 81–92.Google Scholar
de Castro Santos, Maria Helena, “The Brazilian Military in Post-Democratic Transition,” Revista Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad, 18, 3–4 (2004), 115–46.Google Scholar
De Montesquieu, Charles, The Spirit of the Laws (New York: Hafner Publishing Company, 1949).Google Scholar
DerGhougassian, Khatchik, “Toward the Citizenization of the Armed Forces,” in Morteyra, Maria Julia (ed.), Defense Policy in Latin America (Geneva: Geneva Centre for Democratic Control of Armed Forces, 2011), 1–23.Google Scholar
Desch, Michael, Civilian Control of the Military: The Changing Security Environment (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (ed.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry (ed.), Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry and Molino, Leonardo, Assessing the Quality of Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry and Plattner, Marc F. (eds.), Civil-Military Relations and Democracy (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Linz, Juan, and Lipset, Seymour Martin (eds.), Politics in Developing Countries: Comparing Experiences with Democracy (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1995).Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry, Fukuyama, Francis, Horowitz, Donald L., and Plattner, Marc F., “Reconsidering the Transition Paradigm,” Journal of Democracy, 25, 1 (January 2014), 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, Donald Alexander and Murtazashvili, Ilia, Arms and the University: Military Presence and the Civic Education of Non-Military Students (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Easton, David, “A Re-assessment of the Concept of Political Support,” British Journal of Political Science, 5, 4 (1975), 435–57.Google Scholar
Edwin Andersen, Martin, “Argentine Police and the ‘Dirty War’: A Study of What Not to Do, and When Not to Do It,” Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 3, 3 (2009), 264–74.Google Scholar
Ensalaco, Mark, “In with the New, Out with the Old?: The Democratising Impact of Reform in Chile,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 26, 2 (May 1994), 409–29.Google Scholar
Fau, Yamandú, “Defensa nacional: la visión del partido Colorado,” in González Guyer, Julián (ed.), Debate nacional sobre defensa: Aportes para una ley de defensa nacional (Montevideo: Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, 2006), 55–9Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter D., Armed Servants: Agency, Oversight, and Civil-Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter D., “Civil-Military Relations,” Annual Review of Political Science, 2 (1999), 211–41.Google Scholar
Feaver, Peter D. and Kohn, Richard H. (eds.), Soldiers and Civilians: The Civil-Military Gap and American National Security (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Fernández Vargas, Valentina, Busquets, Julio, and Rodríguez, Maria Luisa (eds.), La mujer en las fuerzas armadas en España (Madrid: Ministerio de Defensa, 1991).Google Scholar
Finer, S. E., The Man on Horseback: The Role of the Military in Politics (Boulder: Westview Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Fitch, J. Samuel, The Armed Forces and Democracy in Latin America (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Flisfisch, Ángel and Robledo, Marcos, Gobernabilidad democrática de la defensa en Chile. Un índice para el periodo 1990–2010 (Santiago, Chile: PNUD, 2012).Google Scholar
Follietti, Gilda and Tibiletti, Luis (eds.), Parlamento y defensa en América Latina: el papel de las comisiones, Vol. I Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Uruguay (Buenos Aires: National Endowment for Democracy, RESDAL, 2004.)Google Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio A., “After Pinochet: Civilian Policies toward the Military in the 1990s,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42, 3 (Fall 2000), 111–42.Google Scholar
Franko-Jones, Patricia, The Brazilian Defense Industry (Boulder: Westview Press, 1992).Google Scholar
García Caneiro, José, “Seguridad exterior e interior: misiones de las fuerzas armadas en América Latina,” in Sepúlveda, Isidro (ed.), Seguridad humana y nuevas políticas de defensa en Iberoamérica (Madrid: Instituto Universitario General Gutiérrez Mellado, 2007), 351–62.Google Scholar
García Pino, Gonzalo and Esteban Montes, Juan, “Modernización de la defensa en Chile, 2006–2010,” UNISCI Discussion Papers, 21 (2009), 80–105.Google Scholar
Gianini, Renata Avelar, “Promover gênero e consolidar a paz: a experiencia brasileira,” Artigo Estratégico, 9 (2014).Google Scholar
Gibson, Christopher P. and Snider, Don M., “Civil-Military Relations and the Potential to Influence: A Look at the National Security Decision-Making Process,” Armed Forces & Society, 25, 2 (Winter 1999), 193–218.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Charles G., Negotiating Democracy: Politicians and Generals in Uruguay (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
Goes, Iasmin, “Between Truth and Amnesia: State Terrorism, Human Rights Violations and Transitional Justice in Brazil,” European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 94 (April 2013), 83–96.Google Scholar
González, Luis E., Political Structures and Democracy in Uruguay (South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1991).Google Scholar
González Guyer, Julián (ed.), I. Aportes internacionales, II. Aportes para una ley de defensa nacional, and III. Aportes para una nueva ley orgánica de las fuerzas armadas (Montevideo: UNDP and the Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, 2006/2007).Google Scholar
González Guyer, Julián (ed.), Debate nacional sobre defensa: Aportes para una ley de defensa nacional (Montevideo: Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, 2006).Google Scholar
González Guyer, Julián, “Relaciones FF.AA. y sociedad en Uruguay: De anomalías democráticas de vieja propasia y su posible superación,” in López, Ernesto (ed.), Control civil sobre los militares y política de defensa en Argentina, Brasil, Chile, y Uruguay (Buenos Aires: Editorial Altamira, 2007), 113–41.Google Scholar
González Guyer, Julian and Cagnoni, J. Aníbal (eds.) and Ongay, Carmen, Perdomo, Sandra, Rabuffetti, Fiorella, and Gonnet, Diego, Institución militar estado de derecho en Uruguay: Disciplina y justicia militar (Montevideo: PRISFAS-ICP/FCS Universidad de la República, Centro de Estudios de Derecho Público and Fundación Konrad Adenauer, 2008).Google Scholar
González Guyer, Julián, Rodríguez, Rolando Arbesún, and Ibarra, Diego Gonnet (eds.), Defensa nacional y FF.AA. democracia e integración regional (Montevideo: Programa de Investigación sobre Seguridad Regional, Fuerzas Armadas, Política y Sociedad (PRISFAS), Universidad de la República Oriental del Uruguay, 2007).Google Scholar
Gutiérrez Valdebenito, Omar, Sociología militar: La profesión militar en la sociedad democrática (Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universitaria S.A., 2002).Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan and Kaufman, Robert R., The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Hayes, Margaret Daly, “¿Cuales son los interrogantes? Educación de civiles en seguridad y defensa,” in Olmeda, José A. (ed.), Democracias frágiles: Las relaciones civiles-militares en el mundo iberoamericano (Valencia, Spain: Tirant lo Blanch, 2005), 201–28.Google Scholar
Heredia, José, “Poder militar. Antecedentes, naturaleza e inserción político-constitucional. Perspectivas del factor estratégico militar hacia fines del siglo XX,” in Pérez Royo, Javier (ed.), Posición constitucional de las fuerzas armadas en Iberoamérica y España (Sevilla: Universidad Hispanoamericana Santa María de la Rábida and Ed. Tecnos, 1992), 29–44.Google Scholar
Hoiberg, Anne, “Women as New ‘Manpower’: An Introductory Note,” Armed Forces & Society, 4, 4 (1978), 555–56.Google Scholar
Hou, Na and Chen, Bo, “Military Expenditure and Economic Growth in Developing Countries: Evidence from System GMM Estimates,” Defense and Peace Economics, 24, 3 (2012), 183–93.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, “Assessing Civil-Military Relations in Post-Authoritarian Brazil” in Kingstone, Peter and Power, Timothy (eds.), Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000), 101–25.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians against Soldiers (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, The Transformation of the Worker’s Party in Brazil, 1989–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P., The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Huser, Herbert, Argentine Civil-Military Relations: From Alfonsín to Menem (Washington, DC: National Defense University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Immergut, Ellen M., “The Rules of the Game: The Logic of Health Policy-Making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden,” in Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen and Longstreth, Frank (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 57–89.Google Scholar
Janowitz, Morris, The Professional Soldier: A Social and Political Portrait (New York: The Free Press, 1960).Google Scholar
Jiménez Larraín, Fernando, “El régimen jurídico del Estado de Catástrofe,” Revista de Derecho de la Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, 18 (1997), 305–14.Google Scholar
Johnson, John J., The Military and Society in Latin America (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1964).Google Scholar
Klepak, Hal, “La democracia y las academías militares nacionales modernas: desafíos por delante,” in Klepak, Hal (ed.), Formación y educación militar: Los futuros oficiales y la democracia (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2012), 5–12.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D., “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, 16, 2 (January 1984), 223–46.Google Scholar
Krietz, Neil J. (ed.), Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, Vol. 2 (Washington, DC: United States Institute for Peace, 1995).Google Scholar
Kuehn, David, “Democratization and Civilian Control of the Military in Taiwan,” Democratization, 15, 5 (2008), 870–90.Google Scholar
Kuehn, David and Lorenz, Philip, “Explaining Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies: Structure, Agency and Theory Development,” in Asian Journal of Political Science, 19, 3 (2011), 231–49.Google Scholar
Lederman, Gordon N., Reorganizing the Joint Chiefs of Staff: The Goldwater-Nichols Act of 1986 (Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1999).Google Scholar
Levine, Daniel H. and Molina, José E., The Quality of Democracy in Latin America (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2011).Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven and Roberts, Kenneth N. (eds.), The Resurgence of the Latin American Left (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Yagil, “A Revised Model of Civilian Control of the Military: The Interaction between the Republican Exchange and the Control Exchange,” Armed Forces & Society 38, 4 (2012), 529–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J. The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, & Re-equilibration (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. and Miley, T. J., “Cautionary and Unorthodox Thoughts about Democracy Today,” in Chalmers, Douglas and Mainwaring, Scott (eds.), Problems Confronting Contemporary Democracies: Essays in Honor of Alfred Stepan (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 2012), 227–52.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and Post-Communist Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred, “Relaciones civiles militares en recientes transiciones democráticas del Cono Sur de América Latina,” Síntesis: Revista Documental de Ciencias Sociales, 11 (1994), 77–85.Google Scholar
Little, Walter, “Civil-Military Relations in Contemporary Argentina,” Government and Opposition, 19 (Spring 1984), 207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López, Ernesto, “Latin America: Objective and Subjective Control Revisited,” in Pion-Berlin, David (ed.), Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001), 88–107.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian, “¿Misión Cumplida? Civil-Military Relations and the Chilean Political Transition,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 33, 3 (Fall 1991), 35–73.Google Scholar
Loveman, Brian and Davies, Thomas Jr. (eds.), The Politics of Antipolitics: The Military in Latin America (Wilmington: SR Books, 1997).Google Scholar
Luckham, Robin A., “A Comparative Typology of Civil-Military Relations,” Government & Opposition, 6, 1 (1971), 5–35.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Scully, Timothy R., and Cullell, Jorge V., “Measuring Success in Democratic Governance,” in Mainwaring, Scott and Scully, Timothy R. (eds.), Democratic Governance in Latin America (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), 11–51.Google Scholar
Malamud, Marina, “La medición de los ‘valores’ y motivaciones profesionales en las fuerzas armadas,” Revista Política y Estrategia, 122 (2013), 79–100.Google Scholar
Mani, Kristina, “Military Entrepreneurs: Patterns in Latin America,” Latin American Politics and Society, 53, 3 (Fall 2011), 25–55.Google Scholar
March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P., “The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life,” The American Political Science Review, 78 (September 1984), 734–49.Google Scholar
Mares, David, Civil-Military Relations: Building Democracy and Regional Security in Latin America, Southern Asia, and Central Europe (Boulder: Westview Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Mares, David and Martínez, Rafael (eds.), Debating Civil-Military Relations in Latin America (Great Britain: Sussex Academic Press, 2014).Google Scholar
Marqués, Adriana A., “El ministerio de defensa en Brasil: limitaciones y perspectivas,” Revista Fuerzas Armadas y Sociedad, 3–4 (2004), 27–51.Google Scholar
Martínez, Pablo and Pascale, Norberto, “El parlamento y la defensa en la Argentina,” in Follietti, Gilda and Tibiletti, Luis (eds.), Parlamento y Defensa en América Latina: El papel de las comisiones, Vol. I Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Uruguay (Buenos Aires: National Endowment for Democracy, RESDAL, 2004), 53–69.Google Scholar
Martínez, Rafael, “Las reales ordenanzas: ¿Una norma inconstitucional?,” in Ramón, Fernando López (ed.), La función militar (Zaragoza: Ed. Trotta, Academia General Militar and Fundación Lucas Mallada, 1995).Google Scholar
Martínez, Rafael, Los mandos de las fuerzas armadas españolas del siglo XXI (Madrid, CIS, 2007).Google Scholar
Martínez, Rafael, “Objectives of Democratic Consolidation of the Armed Forces,” in Mares, David and Martínez, Rafael (eds.), Debating Civil-Military Relations in Latin America (Great Britain: Sussex Academic Press, 2014), 21–60.Google Scholar
Martins Filho, João, “Tensões militares no Governo Lula (2003–2009): a pre-historia do acordo com a Franca,” Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Política, 4 (July–December 2010), 283–306.Google Scholar
Martins Filho, João R. and Zirker, Daniel, “The Brazilian Military under Cardoso: Overcoming the Identity Crisis,” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42, 3 (2000), 143–70.Google Scholar
Matei, Florina Cristiana, “A New Conceptualization of Civil-Military Relations,” in Bruneau, Thomas C. and Florina, Cristiana Matei (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Civil-Military Relations (New York: Routledge, 2013), 26–38.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate, Sociología de la administración pública (Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1985).Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang, “Embedded and Defective Democracies,” Democratization, 11, 5 (December 2004), 33–58.Google Scholar
Montenegro, Esteban Germán, “Más vale pájaro en mano que cien volando: la implementación del control político civil sobre las fuerzas armadas,” in Pion-Berlin, David and Ugarte, José Manuel (eds.), Organización de la defensa y control civil de las fuerzas armadas en América Latina (Buenos Aires: Jorge Baudino Ediciones, 2013), 195–225.Google Scholar
Moskos, Charles and Wood, Frank R. The Military: More Than Just a Job? (New York: Elmsford Park, Pergamon-Brassey’s, 1987).Google Scholar
Moskos, Charles C., Williams, John Allen, and Segal, David R., The Postmodern Military: Armed Forces after the Cold War (New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Nielsen, Suzanne C. and Snider, Don M. (eds.), American Civil-Military Relations: The Soldier and the State in a New Era (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Nohlen, Dieter (ed.), Elections in the Americas: A Data Handbook, Vol. 1 North America, Central America, and the Caribbean (Huntington Beach, CA: Oxford University Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Norden, Deborah, Military Rebellion in Argentina: Between Coups and Consolidation (Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Nordlinger, Eric, Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Governments (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, “Illusions about Consolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 7 (April 1996), 38.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo and Schmitter, Philippe, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Larry, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Southern Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Oelsner, Andrea, “Pluralistic Security Communities in Latin America,” in Mares, David R. and Kacowicz, Arie M. (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Latin American Security (London and New York: Routledge, 2016), 173–84.Google Scholar
Olmeda, José A., “Escape from Huntington’s Labyrinth: Civil-Military Relations and Comparative Politics,” in Bruneau, Thomas C. and Matei, Florina Cristiana (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Civil-Military Relations (New York: Routledge, 2013), 61–76.Google Scholar
Palou Trías, Juan Carlos, “Las fuerzas armadas y la transición constitucional en Colombia,” in Pérez Royo, Javier (ed.), Posición constitucional de las fuerzas armadas en Iberoaméricana y España (Sevilla: Universidad Hispanoamericana Santa María de la Rábida, 1992).Google Scholar
Pereira, Anthony W., Political (In)justice: Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law in Brazil, Chile, and Argentina (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Perelli, Carina, “La percepción de la amenaza y el pensamiento politico de los militares en América del Sur,” in Goodman, Louis, Mendelson, Johanna, and Rial, Juan (eds.), Los militares y la democracia (Montevideo: PEITHO 1990), 143–55.Google Scholar
Pérez Bravo, Claudia, “Una aproximación a la construcción de identidad de mujeres cadetes en la Escuela Militar del Ejército de Chile,” Calidad en la educación, 35 (December 2011), 165–92.Google Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal and Mainwaring, Scott, “Democratic Survival in Latin America (1945–2005),” América Latina Hoy, 68 (2014), 139–68.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul, Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “Military Autonomy and Emerging Democracies in South America,” Comparative Politics, 25 (October 1992), 83–102.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “To Prosecute or to Pardon?: Human Rights Decisions in the Latin American Southern Cone,” Human Rights Quarterly, 16 (February 1994), 105–30.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, Through Corridors of Power: Institutions and Civil-Military Relations in Argentina (University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “Civil-Military Circumvention: How Argentine State Institutions Compensate for a Weakened Chain of Command,” in Pion-Berlin, David (ed.), Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001), 135–60.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “The Pinochet Case and Human Rights Progress in Chile: Was Europe a Catalyst, Cause or Inconsequential?’ Journal of Latin American Studies, 36 (August 2004), 479–505.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “The Political Management of the Military in Latin America,” Military Review, 85 (January–February 2005), 19–31.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “Defense Organizations and Civil-Military Relations in Latin America,” Armed Forces & Society, 35, 3 (April 2009), 562–86.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “Informal Civil-Military Relations in Latin America: Why Politicians and Soldiers Choose Unofficial Venues,” Armed Forces & Society, 36, 3 (2010), 526–44.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, “Las misiones constitucionales militares en América Latina,” in Donadio, Marcela and Tibiletti, María de la Paz (dir.), Atlas comparativo de la defensa en América Latina y Caribe, 2010 (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2010), 36–38.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David, Military Missions in Democratic Latin America (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016).Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David and Arceneaux, Craig, “Tipping the Civil-Military Balance: Institutions and Human Rights Policy in Argentina and Chile,” Comparative Political Studies, 31 (October 1998), 633–61.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David and Arceneaux, Craig, “Decision-Makers or Decision-Takers? Military Missions and Civilian Control in Democratic South America,” Armed Forces & Society, 26 (2000), 413–36.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David and Trinkunas, Harold, “Attention Deficits: Why Politicians Ignore Defense Policy in Latin America,” Latin American Research Review, 42, 3 (Fall 2007), 76–100.Google Scholar
Pion-Berlin, David and Trinkunas, Harold, “Latin America’s Growing Security Gap,” Journal of Democracy, 22, 1 (2011), 39–53.Google Scholar
Pridham, Geoffrey, Transitions to Democracy. Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe, Latin America and Eastern Europe (London: Dartmouth Publishing Company Limited, 1995).Google Scholar
Ramsey, G. K., “Problemática suscitada por la presencia de la mujer en puestos de mando y de combate en Gran Bretaña,” in Fernández Vargas, Valentina, Busquets, Julio, and Rodríguez, María Luisa (eds.), La mujer en las fuerzas armadas en España (Madrid: Ministerio de Defensa, 1991).Google Scholar
Rattenbach Commission, Informe Rattenbach: El Drama de Malvinas (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Espartaco, 1988).Google Scholar
Red de Seguridad y Defensa de América Latina (RESDAL), Atlas Comparativo de la Defensa en América Latina, 2007 (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2007).Google Scholar
Red de Seguridad y Defensa de América Latina (RESDAL), 2010 Atlas of Defense in Latin America and the Caribbean. Security and Defense in Latin America (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2010).Google Scholar
Red de Seguridad y Defensa de América Latina (RESDAL), The Comparative Atlas of Defense in Latin America and Caribbean, 2012 (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2012).Google Scholar
Republic of Chile, Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation, Vol. II (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Requena, Miguel, “Presentación,” in Mejías, Sonia Alda (ed.), Sistemas de enseñanza militar y educación para la defensa en Iberoamérica (Madrid: Instituto Universitario General Gutiérrez Mellado – UNED, 2010), 7–12.Google Scholar
Rial, Juan, Estructura legal de las fuerzas armadas del Uruguay: un analisis político (Montevideo: Centro de Informaciones y Estudios del Uruguay (CIESU), 1992).Google Scholar
Rivas Pardo, Pablo, “Estrategia nacional de seguridad y defensa de Chile: Sistematización de sus críticas y alcances,” Estudios de Seguridad y Defensa, 4 (December 2014), 121–52.Google Scholar
Rivas Pardo, Pablo, “Un proceso histórico de larga data: la justicia militar como regulación de una institución total,” in Rial, Juan (ed.), La justicia militar entre la reforma y la permanencia (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2010).Google Scholar
Robledo, Marcos, “Más allá de las reformas de la defensa,” in Pion-Berlin, David and Ugarte, José Manuel (eds.), Organización de la defensa y control civil de las fuerzas armadas en América Latina (Buenos Aires: Jorge Baudino Ediciones, 2013), 145–94.Google Scholar
Rocha, Fernando, Saint-Pierre, Hector Luis, and da Silva, Sérgio Paulo, “Parlamento e defesa: o caso brasileiro,” in Follietti, Gilda and Tibiletti, Luis (eds.), Parlamento y defensa en América Latina, Vol. I Argentina, Brasil, Chile y Uruguay (Buenos Aires: RESDAL, 2004).Google Scholar
Roehrig, Terence, “Executive Leadership and the Continuing Quest for Justice in Argentina,” Human Rights Quarterly, 31 (2009), 721–47.Google Scholar
Rojas Aravena, Francisco, “Confidence Building Measures and Strategic Balance: A Step toward Expansion and Stability,” in Tulchin, Joseph S. and Aravena, Francisco Rojas (eds.), Strategic Balance and Confidence Building Measures in the Americas (Washington, DC/Stanford: Woodrow Wilson Center/Stanford University Press, 1998), 121–38.Google Scholar
Roniger, Luis, “Transitional Justice and Protracted Accountability in Re-democratised Uruguay, 1985–2011,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 43, 4 (November 2011), 693–724.Google Scholar
Rustow, Dankwart A., “Transitions to Democracy,” Comparative Politics, 2, 1 (1970), 337–63.Google Scholar
Saint-Pierre, Hector Luis and Donadelli, Laura M., “El empleo de las fuerzas armadas en asuntos internos,” in Maihold, Günther and Jost, Stefan (eds.), El narcotraficante y su combate. Sus efectos sobre las relaciones internacionales (México: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 2014), 61–75.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andres, “How Should We Study Democratic Consolidation?” Democratization, 5, 4 (Winter 1998), 1–19.Google Scholar
Scheetz, Thomas, “Military Business in Argentina,” in Brommelhorster, Jorn and Paes, Wolf-Christian (eds.), The Military as an Economic Actor (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
Schiff, Rebecca, The Military and Domestic Politics. A Concordance Theory of Civil-Military Relations (New York: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C., “Civil Society East and West,” in Diamond, Larry, Plattner, Marc, Chu, Y. H., and Tien, H. M. (eds.), Consolidating the Third Wave Democracies: Themes and Perspectives (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997), 239–62.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. and Karl, Terry L. “What Democracy Is … And Is Not,” Journal of Democracy, 2 (Summer 1991), 75–88.Google Scholar
Serra, Narcís, “Globalización, fuerzas armadas y democracia en América Latina,” FASOC, 17, 4 (2002), 5–20.Google Scholar
Serra, Narcís, La transición militar: Reflexiones en torno a la reforma democrática de las fuerzas armadas (Barcelona: Random House Mondadori, 2008).Google Scholar
Serra, Narcís, The Military Transition: Democratic Reform of the Armed Forces (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Servicio Paz y Justicia, Uruguay Nunca Más: Human Rights Violations, 1972–1985 (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Shain, Yossi and Linz, Juan J., Between States: Interim Governments in Democratic Transitions (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Skaar, Elin, Judicial Independence and Human Rights in Latin America: Violations, Politics and Prosecution (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
Skidmore, Thomas E., The Politics of Military Rule in Brazil: 1964–85 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Sohr, Raul, “Las fuerzas armadas latinoamericanas en la década de los noventa,” in Royo, Javier Pérez (ed.), Posición constitucional de las fuerzas armadas en Iberoamérica y España (Sevilla: Universidad Hispanoamericana Santa María de la Rábida, 1992), 71–80.Google Scholar
Sotomayor, Arturo, The Myth of the Democratic Peacekeeper: Civil-Military Relations and the United Nations (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
Steinmo, Sven, Thelen, Kathleen, and Longstreth, Frank (eds.), Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, The Military in Politics: Changing Patterns in Brazil (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Stepan, Alfred, Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Szeinfeld, Jorge, “Argentina,” in Sepulveda, Isidro (ed.), La educación de la seguridad y la defensa en las Américas (Washington, DC: William J. Perry Center for Hemispheric Defense Studies, 2013), 240–72.Google Scholar
Taylor, Brian, Politics and the Russian Army: Civil-Military Relations, 1689–2000 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Thelen, Kathleen, How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Trinkunas, Harold, Crafting Civilian Control of the Military in Venezuela: A Comparative Perspective (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2005).Google Scholar
Ugarte, José Manuel, El control público de la actividad de inteligencia en America Latina (Buenos Aires: Ediciones Ciccus, 2012).Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto, “Democratic Transitions and the Latin American Military,” in Arab Reform Initiative Thematic Studies: Security Sector Reform (Arab Reform Initiative, 2011), 1–16.Google Scholar
Varas, Augusto, Fuentes, Claudio, and Agüero, Felipe, Instituciones cautivas: Opinión pública y nueva legitimidad social de las fuerzas armadas (Santiago, Chile: FLASCO-Chile, 2008).Google Scholar
Vargas Velasquez, Alejo, “Los ministerios de defensa en Iberoamérica en la formulación y conducción de la política de seguridad y defensa,” in Sepúlveda, Isidro and Mejías, Sonia Alda (eds.), La administración de la defensa en América Latina, Vol. III: Estudios comparados (Madrid: IUGM, 2008), 77–97.Google Scholar
Vera Nova, Adolfo, “Responsabilidad social de defensa y desarrollo sustentable en Chile,” Cuadernos Avance Investigación, 2 (November 2011), 1–19.Google Scholar
Von Clausewitz, Carl, On War [Edited and translated by Howard, Michael and Paret, Peter] (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
Weeks, Gregory, The Military and Politics in Post-Authoritarian Chile (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Williams, John Allen and Moskos, Charles, “Civil-Military Relations after the Cold War,” in Bebler, Anton A. (ed.), Civil-Military Relations in Post-Communist States: Central and Eastern Europe in Transition (Westport, London: Praeger, 1997), 25–35.Google Scholar
Yopo, Mladen and Prince, Sergio, “Desde la seguridad nacional a la complejidad transdisciplinaria de la seguridad y la defensa: el caso de ANEPE de Chile,” in Mejías, Sonia Alda (ed.), Sistemas de enseñanza militar y educación para la defensa en Iberoamérica (Madrid: Instituto Universitario General Gutiérrez Mellado, 2010), 261–88.Google Scholar
Zaverucha, Jorge, “The Degree of Military Political Autonomy during the Spanish, Argentine, and Brazilian Transitions,” Journal of Latin American Studies, 25, 2 (May 1993), 283–99.Google Scholar
Zaverucha, Jorge, “The Fragility of the Brazilian Defense Ministry,” Revista de Sociología Política, 25 (2006), 107–21.Google Scholar
Zaverucha, Jorge, “La militarización de la seguridad publica en Brasil,” Nueva Sociedad, 213 (January–February 2008), 128–46.Google Scholar
Zaverucha, Jorge, “How the Military Competes for Expenditure in Brazilian Democracy: Arguments for an Outlier,” International Political Science Review, 30, 4 (2009), 407–29.Google Scholar
Zirker, Daniel, “Amazonia: Democracy, Ecology, and the Brazilian Military Prerogatives in the 1990s,” Armed Forces & Society, 20, 2 (Winter 1994), 259–81.Google Scholar