Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T04:45:44.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Politics as theatre: an alternative view of the rationalities of power

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2009

By
David E. Apter
Edited by
Jeffrey C. Alexander ,
Bernhard Giesen  and
Jason L. Mast
David E. Apter
Affiliation:
Henry J. Heinz Professor Emeritus of Comparative Political and Social Development and Senior Research Scientist, Yale University
Jeffrey C. Alexander
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Bernhard Giesen
Affiliation:
Universität Konstanz, Germany
Jason L. Mast
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Get access

Summary

And what is the aim of that stately and marvelous creature, tragic drama? Is it her endeavor and ambition, in your opinion, merely to gratify the spectators; or, if there be anything pleasant and charming, but evil, to struggle against uttering it, but to declaim and sing anything that is unwelcome but beneficial, whether they like it or not?

Plato, The Gorgias

Life is not determined by consciousness but consciousness by life.

Marx, The German Ideology

Locating the subject

Plato warned against the beguiling qualities of drama. If he was right then Marx was at least half wrong. Consciousness may be determined by life, but life is also determined by consciousness. This essay, a preliminary effort to analyze politics as theatre, emphasizes the second part of Marx's statement. The concern here is with the way theatrical aspects of politics shape consciousness. That is, how they become in effect lifelike, if not as pure representation then something else – display, mystique, mimetics, code, metaphor, symbolic condensation, manipulation – to suggest only a few of the attributes of all the world as a stage. This suggests a twofold purpose: to identify and examine significant aspects of the more general relationship between political discourse and political power, something not normally much dealt with within the framework of conventional political analysis. By the same token, we want to avoid some of the confusion associated with certain very commonly used concepts like political culture and ideology that, undeniably useful in the past, now have too many meanings (see, for example, Eagleton 1991).

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Performance
Symbolic Action, Cultural Pragmatics, and Ritual
 , pp. 218 - 256
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2002. “On the Social Construction of Moral Universals: The ‘Holocaust’ from War Crime to Trauma Drama,” European Journal of Social Theory 5, 1: 5–85.Google Scholar
Apter, David E. 1992. “Democracy and Emancipatory Movements: Notes for a Theory of Inversionary Discourse.” Development and Change 23, 3: 139–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apter, David E. and Saich, Tony. 1994. Revolutionary Discourse in Mao's Republic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Apter, David E. and Sawa, Nagayo. 1984. Against the State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1980. How To Do Things With Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1966. “An Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative.” Communications8.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland 1972. Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, David J. and Merrill, Robert. 1993. Violent Persuasions: The Politics and Imagery of Terrorism. Seattle, Washington: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1952a. A Grammar of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth 1952b. A Rhetoric of Motives. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Cannadine, David. 2001. Ornamentalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clymer, Adam. 2001. “Better Campaign Reporting: A View from the Major Leagues.” Political Science and Politics 34, 4: 779–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debord, Guy. 1987. La Société du Spectacle. Paris: éditions Gerard Lebovici.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1973. Natural Symbols. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 1991. Ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg, Bent. 2001. Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, Michel. 1986. Dialectique et Société. 2 vols. Lausanne: L'Âge d'Honneur.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford 1980. Negara. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1995. One for All: The Logic of Group Conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. 1986. “On Magic Realism in Film.” Critical Inquiry 12, 2: 301–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knabb, Ken. 1984. Situationist International. Berkeley, CA: Bureau of Public Secrets.Google Scholar
Ladurie, Roy. 1979. Carnival in Romans. New York: George Brazillier.Google Scholar
Laitin, David. 2003. “The Perestroikan Challenge to Social Science.” Politics and Society 31, 1: 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Denis-Constant. 2001. “Politics Behind the Mask: Studying Contemporary Carnivals in Political Perspective, Theoretical and Methodological Suggestions.” Questions de Recherche, 2. Paris: Centre d'études et de Recherches Internationals (CERI), Sciences-po.Google Scholar
Moss, David. 1997. “Politics, Violence, Writing: The Rituals of ‘Armed Struggle’ in Italy,” in David, E. Apter (ed.), The Legitimization of Violence. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Nora, Pierre. 1992. Realms of Memory, vol. I: Conflicts and Divisions. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Ozouf, Mona. 1976. La Fête Révolutionnaire 1789–1799. Paris: éditions Gallimard.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1967. The Symbolism of Evil. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schama, Simon. 1989. Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Semiotext, 1982. The German Issue 4, 2.
Skinner, Quentin (ed.). 1985. The Return of Grand Theory in the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Philip. 1991. “Codes and Conflict: Toward a Theory of War as Ritual.” Theory and Society 20, 1: 103–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taussig, Michael. 1993. Mimesis and Alterity. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1974. Dramas, Fields and Metaphors: Symbolic Action in Human Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wagner-Pacifici, Robin Erica. 1986. The Moro Morality Plan: Terrorism as Social Drama. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zedong, Mao. 1976. “Yan'an Forum on Arts and Literature,” in Selected Works of Mao Zedong. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×