Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
11 - Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
from Part II - Privacy: practical controversies
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 July 2015
Book contents
- Half title page
- Title page
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Book part
- Glossary
- Table of cases
- Table of statutes
- Introduction
- Part I The social dimensions of privacy
- Part II Privacy: practical controversies
- 5 The feminist critique of privacy: past arguments and new social understandings
- 6 Privacy in the family
- 7 How to do things with personal big biodata
- 8 Should personal data be a tradable good? On the moral limits of markets in privacy
- 9 Privacy, democracy and freedom of expression
- 10 How much privacy for public officials?
- 11 Privacy, surveillance, and the democratic potential of the social Web
- Part III Issues in privacy regulation
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Social Dimensions of PrivacyInterdisciplinary Perspectives, pp. 202 - 222Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Abelson, H., Ledeen, K. and Lewis, H. R. 2008. Blown to Bits: Your Life, Liberty, and Happiness After the Digital Explosion. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) 2013. “Supreme Court Dismisses ACLU’s Challenge to NSA Warrantless Wiretapping Law.” Accessed February 26, 2013 from www.aclu.org/national-security/supreme-court-dismisses-aclus-challenge-nsa-warrantless-wiretapping-law.Google Scholar
Allen, A. 1988. Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Austin, L. M. 2012. “Getting past privacy? Surveillance, the Charter and the rule of law,” Canadian Journal of Law and Society 27(3): 381–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. J. 1992. Regulating Privacy: Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, C. J. and Raab, C. D. 2006. The Governance of Privacy: Policy Instruments in Global Perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J.Parsons, C. and Molnar, A. 2014a. “Real and substantial connections: enforcing Canadian privacy laws against American social networking companies,” Journal of Law, Information & Science 23(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Bennett, C. J., Parsons, C., and Molnar, A. 2014b. “Forgetting, Non-Forgetting and Quasi-Forgetting in Social Networking: Canadian Policy and Corporate Practice,” in Gutwirth, S., Leenes, R., and De Hert, P. (eds.) Reloading Data Protection: Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges. New York: Springer, pp. 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berners-Lee, T., Fischetti, M. and Michael, L. 2000. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor. New York: Harper Business.Google Scholar
boyd, d. 2011. “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics: Affordances, Dynamics, and Implications,” in Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 39–58.Google Scholar
Cronin, C. and DeGreiff, P. (eds.) 1998. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Danezis, G. and Clayton, R. 2007. “Introducing Traffic Analysis,” in Acquisti, A., Gritzalis, S., Lambrinoudakis, C., and Vimercati, S. di (eds.) Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices. New York: Auerbach, pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
DeCew, J. Wagner 1997. In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diffie, W. and Landau, S. 2007. Privacy on the Line: The Politics of Wiretapping and Encryption. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2013. “First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. NSA.” Accessed from www.eff.org/cases/first-unitarian-church-los-angeles-v-nsa.Google Scholar
European Union Article 29 Working Party 2009. Opinion 5/2009 on Online Social Networking. 01189/09/enwp163. Adopted on 12 June.Google Scholar
Feiler, L. 2010. “The legality of data retention directive in light of the fundamental rights to privacy and data protection,” European Journal of Law and Technology 1(3). Accessed from http://ejlt.org/article/view/29/75.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. 2010. Internet and Society: Social Theory in the Information Age. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gallagher, S. 2013. “Googlers say ‘f*** you’ to NSA, company encrypts internal network,” Ars Technica, 6 November. Accessed from http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2013/11/googlers-say-f-you-to-nsa-company-encrypts-internal-network/.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998a. “A Genealogical Analysis of the Cognitive Content of Morality,” in Cronin, C. and DeGreiff, P. (eds.) The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 3–46.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1998b. “Three Normative Models of Democracy,” in Cronin, C. and DeGreiff, P. (eds.), The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political TheoryCambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 239–52.Google Scholar
Haggerty, K. and Ericson, R. (eds.) 2006. The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility. University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kaye, B. K. 2011. “Between Barack and a Net Place: Motivations for Using Social Network Sites and Blogs for Political Information,” in Papacharissi, Z. (ed.) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge, pp. 208–31.Google Scholar
Kerr, I., Binnie, M. and Aoki, C. 2008. “Tessling on my brain: the future of lie detection and brain privacy in the criminal justice system,” Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice 50(3): 367–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kies, R. 2010. Promises and Limits of Web-deliberation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kravets, D. 2010. “Judge Tosses NSA Spy Cases,” Wired Online, January 2010. Accessed from www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/01/nsa-spy-cases-tossed/.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, R. 2012. Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform how We Live, Work, and Think. New York: Houghton-Mifflin-Harcourt.Google Scholar
Mergel, I. 2012. Social Media in the Public Sector: A Guide to Participation, Collaboration and Transparency in the Networked World. San Francisco: Jon Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
Millar, J. 2009. “Core Privacy: A Problem for Predictive Data Mining,” in Kerr, I., Lucock, C. and Steeves, V. (eds.) Lessons from the Identity Trail. Oxford University Press, pp. 103–20.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, H. 2009. Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opsahl, K. 2013. “Why Metadata Matters,” Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), June 7. Accessed from www.eff.org/deeplinks/2013/06/why-metadata-matters.Google Scholar
Regan, P. M. 1995. Legislating Privacy: Technology, Social Values and Public Policy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Saveri, A., Rheingold, H. and Vian, K. 2005. “Technologies of Cooperation,” Institute for the Future. Accessed from www.rheingold.com/cooperation/Technology_of_cooperation.pdf.Google Scholar
Schwartz, P. M. 1999. “Privacy and democracy in cyberspace,” Vanderbilt Law Review 52: 1610–702.Google Scholar
Stalder, F. 2002. “Privacy is not the antidote to surveillance,” Surveillance and Society 1(1): 120–4.Google Scholar
Steeves, V. 2009. “Reclaiming the Social Value of Privacy,” in Kerr, I., Lucock, C. and Steeves, V. (eds.) Lessons from the Identity Trail. Oxford University Press, pp. 191–208.Google Scholar
Strandburg, K. J. 2007. “Surveillance of Emergent Associations: Freedom of Association in a Network Society,” in Acquisti, A., Gritzalis, S., Lambrinoudakis, C. and Vimercati, S. di (eds.) Digital Privacy: Theory, Technologies, and Practices. New York: Auerbach, pp. 435–58.Google Scholar
Taddicken, M. 2012. “Privacy, Surveillance, and Self-Disclosure in the Social Web: Exploring the User’s Perspective via Focus Groups,” in Fuchs, C., Boersma, K., Albrechtslund, A. and Sandoval, M. (eds.) Internet and Surveillance: The Challenges of Web 2.0 and Social Media. New York: Routledge, pp. 255–72.Google Scholar
Turkle, S. 2012. Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Warren, S. and Brandeis, L. 1890 “The right to privacy,” Harvard Law Review 4(5): 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, I. M. 2001. “Activist challenges to deliberative democracy,” Political Theory 29(5): 670–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by