Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:44:41.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Nature–nurture interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

By
Marla B. Sokolowski  and
Joel D. Levine
Edited by
Tamás Székely ,
Allen J. Moore  and
Jan Komdeur
Marla B. Sokolowski
Affiliation:
University of Toronto at Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Joel D. Levine
Affiliation:
University of Toronto at Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Tamás Székely
Affiliation:
University of Bath
Allen J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Exeter
Jan Komdeur
Affiliation:
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

Overview

Inheritance is associated with a paradox: it roars with the survival of the species, while at the same time it whispers a fragile message that is constantly modified even among kin. The genes, the environmental context and the traits that arise from their interaction are interrelated. A complexity that characterises this three-way relationship has been attributed to the nature–nurture dichotomy. Traditionally, nature is understood to mean the genes, whereas nurture denotes the environment. So, for example, people may debate why one pumpkin is superior to another – was it the quality of the soil or other growth conditions in the pumpkin patch, or was it the specific combination of alleles in that pumpkin's genome?

In recent years, there has been a long-overdue paradigm shift from a limited focus on the nature–nurture dichotomy to a more expansive view that includes gene by environment (G × E) interactions and even gene–environment (G ↔ E) interdependencies, as defined and discussed in this chapter (Rutter 2007). A mechanistic basis for the concept of interdependency arose from advances in molecular biology and genomics which show that DNA is not only inherited but is also environmentally responsive. The latter argument is supported by findings that individuals with dissimilarities in their DNA (DNA polymorphisms) are differentially affected by the same environment. Different environments through development and adulthood can affect individuals with one genetic variant but not another.

Type
Chapter
Information
Social Behaviour
Genes, Ecology and Evolution
 , pp. 11 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Krupp, J. J., Kent, C., Billeter, J.-C.et al. (2008) Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behaviour in male Drosophila melanogaster. Current Biology, 18, 1373–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. (2007) Gene–environment interdependence. Developmental Science, 10, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolowski, M. B. & Wahlsten, D. (2001) Gene–environment interaction and complex behavior. In Methods in Genomic Neuroscience, ed. Moldin, S. O.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Suomi, S. J. (2006) Risk, resilience, and gene × environment interactions in rhesus monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szyf, M., Weaver, I. C., Champagne, F. A., Diorio, J. & Meaney, M. J. (2005) Maternal programming of steroid receptor expression and phenotype through DNA methylation in the rat. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 26, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allee, W. C. (1958) The Social Life of Animals. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bird, A. (2007) Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature, 447, 396–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloch, G. & Robinson, G. E. (2001) Reversal of honeybee behavioral rhythms. Nature, 410, 1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burkhardt, R. W. (2005) Patterns of Behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of Ethology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Caspi, A., Sugden, K., Moffitt, T. E.et al. (2003) Influence of life stress on depression: moderation by a polymorphism in the 5-HTT gene. Science, 301, 386–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crabbe, J. C., Wahlsten, D. & Dudek, B. C. (1999) Genetics of mouse behavior: interactions with laboratory environment. Science, 284, 1670–1672.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1871) The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1872/1965) The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. & Mackay, T. F. C. (1996) Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 4th edn. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, M. J., Ben Shahar, Y., Smid, H. M.et al. (2005) Candidate genes for behavioural ecology. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganguly-Fitzgerald, I., Donlea, J. & Shaw, P. J. (2006) Waking experience affects sleep need in Drosophila. Science, 313, 1775–1781.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hensch, T. K. (2005) Critical period plasticity in local cortical circuits. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 877–888.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaun, K. R., Riedl, C. A. L., Chakaborty-Chatterjee, M.et al. (2007) Natural polymorphism in a cGMP-dependent protein kinase affects food intake and absorption inDrosophila. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 3547–3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kent, C., Azanchi, R., Smith, B., Formosa, A. & Levine, J. D. (2008) Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Current Biology, 18, 1384–1389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kent, C. F., Daskalchuk, T., Cook, L., Sokolowski, M. B. & Greenspan, R. J. (2009) The Drosophila foraging gene mediates adult plasticity and gene–environment interactions in behaviour, metabolites, and gene expression in response to food deprivation. PLoS Genetics, 5 (8): e1000609.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krupp, J. J., Kent, C., Billeter, J.-C., So, A.-K.et al. (2008) Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behaviour in maleDrosophila melanogaster. Current Biology, 18, 1373–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruuk, H. (2003) Niko's Nature: A Life of Niko Tinbergen and his Science of Animal Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehrman, D. S. (1953) A critique of Konrad Lorenz's theory of instinctive behavior. Quarterly Review of Biology, 28, 337–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehrman, D. S. (1970) Semantic and conceptual issues in the nature–nurture problem. In: Development and Evolution of Behavior, ed. Aronson, L. R., Tobach, E., Lehrman, D. S. & Rosenblatt, J. S.San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman, pp. 17–50.Google Scholar
Logan, C. A. & Johnston, T. D. (2007) Synthesis and separation in the history of ‘nature’ and ‘nurture’. Developmental Psychobiology, 49, 758–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, K. Z. (1981) The Foundations of Ethology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meaney, M. J. (2001) Nature, nurture, and the disunity of knowledge. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 935, 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, A. J., Brodie, E. D. & Wolf, J. B. (1997) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution, 51, 1352–1362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,National Center for Biotechnology Information (2004) ESTs: gene discovery made easier. Science Primer. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/About/primer/est.html (accessed 26 October 2009).
Osborne, K., Robichon, A., Burgess, E.et al. (1997) Natural behaviour polymorphism due to a cGMP-dependent protein kinase of Drosophila. Science, 277, 834–836.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petfield, D., Chenoweth, S. F., Rundle, H. D. & Blows, M. W. (2005) Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 6045–6050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. E. (2004) Beyond nature and nurture. Science, 304, 397–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, G. E., Grozinger, C. M. & Whitfield, C. W. (2005) Sociogenomics: social life in molecular terms. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M. (2007) Gene–environment interdependence. Developmental Science, 10, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolowski, M. B. (1980) Foraging strategies of Drosophila melanogaster: a chromosomal analysis. Behaviour Genetics, 10, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sokolowski, M. B. & Wahlsten, D. (2001) Gene–environment interaction and complex behavior. In: Methods in Genomic Neuroscience, ed. Moldin, S. O.Raton, Boca, FL: CRC Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
Suomi, S. J. (2006) Risk, resilience, and gene × environment interactions in rhesus monkeys. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szyf, M., Weaver, I. C., Champagne, F. A., Diorio, J. & Meaney, M. J. (2005) Maternal programming of steroid receptor expression and phenotype through DNA methylation in the rat. Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 26, 139–162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tinbergen, N. (1951) The Study of Instinct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Toma, D. P., Bloch, G., Moore, D. & Robinson, G. E. (2000) Changes in period mRNA levels in the brain and division of labor in honeybee colonies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 97, 6914–6919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahlsten, D. & Gottlieb, G. (1997) The invalid separation of effects of nature and nurture: lessons from animal experimentation. In: Intelligence, Heredity and Environment, ed. Sternberg, R. J. & Grigorenko, E.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–192.Google Scholar
Wahlsten, D., Metten, P., Phillips, T. J.et al. (2003) Different data from different labs: lessons from studies of gene–environment interaction. Journal of Neurobiology, 54, 283–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wahlsten, D., Bachmanov, A., Finn, D. A. & Crabbe, J. C. (2006) Stability of inbred mouse strain differences in behavior and brain size between laboratories and across decades. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103, 16364–16369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Y., Jorda, M., Jones, P. L.et al. (2007) Functional CpG methylation system in a social insect. Science, 314, 645–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, I. C., Cervoni, N., Champagne, F. A.et al. (2004) Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 847–854.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, I. C., Champagne, F. A., Brown, S. E.et al. (2005) Reversal of maternal programming of stress responses in adult offspring through methyl supplementation: altering epigenetic marking later in life. Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 11045–11054.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. (1971) The Insect Societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, J. B. (2000) Gene interactions from maternal effects. Evolution, 54, 1882–1898.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, J. B. (2003) Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 100, 4655–4660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D., Cheverud, J. M., Moore, A. J. & Wade, M. J. (1998) Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 13, 64–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, J. B., Brodie, E. D. & Moore, A. J. (1999) Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process II. Selection resulting from social interactions. American Naturalist, 153, 254–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolf, J. B., Vaughn, T. T., Pletscher, L. S. & Cheverud, J. M. (2002) Contribution of maternal effects QTL to genetic architecture of early growth in mice. Heredity, 89, 300–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×