Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T05:31:49.969Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 January 2018

Lionel Wee
Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Singlish Controversy
Language, Culture and Identity in a Globalizing World
, pp. 195 - 208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agha, A. (2011). Commodity registers. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 21(1), 2253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsagoff, L. (2007). Singlish: Negotiating culture, capital and identity. In Vaish, V., Gopinathan, S. and Liu, Y., eds., Language, Capital, Culture. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 2546.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, L. (2010). English in Singapore: Culture, capital and identity in linguistic variation. World Englishes, 29, 336348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsagoff, L. (2014). Book review of Singapore English: Structure, Variation and Usage by Jakob Leimgruber. Journal of Language Contact, 7(2), 441445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsagoff, L. and Ho, C. L. (1998). The grammar of Singapore English. In Foley, J. A., Kandiah, T., Bao, Z. M., Gupta, A. F., Alsagoff, L., Ho, C. L., Wee, L., Talib, I. S. and Bokhorst-Heng, W., eds., English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 127151.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edn. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Andreas, P. (2014). Dialogue of the deaf: Scholars, policymakers and the drug war in US foreign relations. In Lowenthal, A. F. and Bertucci, M. E., eds., Scholars, Policymakers, and International Affairs: Finding Common Cause. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 7487.Google Scholar
Ansaldo, U. (2004). The evolution of Singapore English. In Lim, L., ed., Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 127149.Google Scholar
Aw, Z. (2013). Singaporelang – What the Singlish?. Self-published.Google Scholar
Baetens, B. H. (1986). Bilingualism: Basic Principles, 2nd edn. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bao, Z. M. (1998). The sounds of Singapore English. In Foley, J. A. et al., eds. English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 152174.Google Scholar
Bao, Z. (2005). The aspectual system of Singapore English and the systemic substratist explanation. Journal of Linguistics, 41, 237267.Google Scholar
Bauman, R. and Briggs, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 5988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1992). Institutions of Post-Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Beck, U., Giddens, A., and Lash, S., eds. (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (2013). The Guidebook to Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benjamin, G. (1976). The cultural logic of Singapore's ‘multiracialism’. In Hassan, Riaz, ed., Singapore: Society in Transition. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 115133.Google Scholar
Betts, R. (1975). Multiracialism, Meritocracy and the Malays of Singapore. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Bex, T. and Watts, R. J. (1999). Introduction. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. J., eds., Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge, 112.Google Scholar
Birch, D. (2007). Interlogue: Studies in Singapore Literature, vol. 6: Haresh Sharma. Singapore: Ethos Books.Google Scholar
Blom, J. and Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code switching in Northern Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D., eds., Directions in Sociolinguistcs. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 407434.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (1999). The debate is open. In Blommaert, J., ed., Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2013). Ethnography, Superdiversity and Linguistic Landscapes: Chronicles of Complexity. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Rampton, B. (2016). Language and superdiversity. In Arnaut, K., Blommaert, J., Rampton, B. and Spotti, M., eds., Language and Superdiversity. New York: Routledge, 2148.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. and Verschueren, J. (1998). Debating Diversity: Analyzing the Discourse of Tolerance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bloom, D. (1986). The English language in Singapore: A critical survey. In Kapur, B. K., ed., Singapore Studies: Critical Surveys of the Humanities and Social Sciences. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 337458.Google Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, W. (1998). Language and Imagining the Nation in Singapore. PhD diss., University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, W. (1999). Singapore's Speak Mandarin Campaign: Language ideological debates and the imagining of the nation. In Blommaert, J., ed., Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 235265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bokhorst-Heng, W. (2005). Debating Singlish. Multilingua, 24, 185209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1980). The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus, Collier, P., trans. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Braga-Blake, M. (1992) Eurasians in Singapore: An overview. In Braga-Blake, M. and Edbert-Oehlers, A., eds., Singapore Eurasians: Memories and Hopes. Singapore: Times Publishers, 1123.Google Scholar
Brooks, A. and Wee, L. (2014). Consumption, Cities and States: Comparing Singapore with Asian and Western Cities. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Brown-Saracino, J. (2009). A Neighborhood that Never Changes: Gentrification, Social Preservation and the Search for Authenticity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruthiaux, P. (2003). Squaring the circles: Issues in modeling English worldwide. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 159178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruthiaux, P. (2010). The Speak Good English Movement: A web-user's perspective. In Lim, L., Pakir, A. and Wee, L., eds., English in Singapore: Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 91108.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budach, G., Roy, S., and Heller, M. (2003). Community and commodity in French Ontario. Language in Society, 32, 603627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cai, H. (2011). From dialect to Mandarin and English. Straits Times, 15 January 2011.Google Scholar
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2007). Accent, (ING) and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech, 82, 3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in an Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Cavallaro, F., Ng, B. C., and Seilhamer, M. (2014). Singapore Colloquial English: Issues of prestige and identity. World Englishes, 33(3), 378397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, B. (2016). Singlish all abuzz. Sunday Times, 22 May 2016.Google Scholar
Chan, B. C. (2014). Singlish OK what. Why cannot speak leh? Poached Mag, 16 January 2014. http://poachedmag.com/2014/01/16/singlish-ok-what-why-cannot-speak-leh/; accessed 26 May 2016.Google Scholar
Chew, D. (2007). Getting out of the cultural desert. TODAY, 15 January 2007.Google Scholar
Chew, P. (2005). Change and continuity: English language teaching in Singapore. Asian EFL Journal, 7(1), 424.Google Scholar
Chng, H. H. (2003). ‘You see me no up’: Is Singlish a problem? Language Problems & Language Planning, 27(1), 4562.Google Scholar
Chong, Terence. (2011). The Theatre and the State in Singapore: Orthodoxy and Resistance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chua, B. H. (1995). Communitarian Ideology and Democracy in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. (2012). Theory from the South. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Conquergood, D. (1997). Street literacy. In Flood, J, Heath, S. B. and Lapp, D. (eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching Literacy through the Communicative and Visual Arts. New York: Simon & Schuster: 354375.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coupland, N. and Kelly-Holmes, H. (2017). Making and marketing in the bilingual periphery: Materialization as metacultural transformation. In Cavanaugh, J. R. and Shankar, S., eds., Language and Materiality: Ethnographical and Theoretical Explorations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, T. (1999). Curiouser and curiouser: Falling standards in the standard English debate. In Bex, T. and Watts, R. J., eds., Standard English: The Widening Debate. London: Routledge, 271282.Google Scholar
De Costa, P., Park, J., and Wee, L. (2016). Language learning as linguistic entrepreneurship: Implications for language education. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(5), 695702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deely, J. (1990). Basics of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
de Kock, L. (1992). “Interview with Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak: New Nation Writers Conference in South Africa.” ARIEL: A Review of International English Literature, 23(3), 2947.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1981). Rhizome. Ideology and Consciousness, 8, 4971.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. (1987). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. (2002). Dialogues II. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deterding, D. (2011). Language in Brunei: Woodleigh. Brunei Linguistics, 11 July 2011. http://brunei-linguistics/blogspot.sg/2011/07/woodleigh.html; accessed 20 September 2012.Google Scholar
Duchêne, A. (2008). Ideologies across Nations: The Construction of Linguistic Minorities at the United Nations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duchêne, A. and Heller, M. (2012). Multilingualism and the new economy. In Martin-Jones, M, Blackledge, A. and Creese, A. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism, London: Routledge: 369383.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12, 453476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (2012). Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farías, I. (2010). Introduction. In Farías, Ignacio and Bender, Thomas, eds., Urban Assemblages. New York: Routledge, 124.Google Scholar
Feher, M. (2009). Self-appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital. Public Culture, 21(1), 2141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1959). Diglossia. Word, 15, 325340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1967). Bilingualism with and without diglossia; diglossia with and without bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues, 23, 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foley, J. A. (1998). Language in the school. In Foley, J. A. et al., eds., English in New Cultural Contexts: Reflections from Singapore. Singapore: Oxford University Press, 244269.Google Scholar
Fong, V., Lim, L., and Wee, L. (2002). Singlish: Used and abused. Asian Englishes, 5(1), 1839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and Punish, Sheridan, A., trans. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In Rabinow, Paul, ed., The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon, 5175.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978 – 1979, Burchell, G., trans. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Fu, G. (2012). National Day speech to Singaporean community in Seoul, Korea. http://app.mewr.gov.sg/web/contents/contents.aspx?contid=1703; accessed 26 October 2012.Google Scholar
Gal, S. (1989). Lexical innovation and loss: The use and value of restricted Hungarian. In Dorian, N., ed., Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 313331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S. and Irvine, J. T. (1995). The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research, 62, 9671001.Google Scholar
Gao, S. (2015). Multilingualism and good citizenship: The making of language celebrities in Chinese media. Paper presented at the Sociolinguistics of Globalization Conference, 3–6 June. Hong Kong University.Google Scholar
Gasmier, M. R. (1997). Finding the right language for stage. Straits Times, 7 September.Google Scholar
Gee, J. P. (2001). Educational linguistics. In Aronoff, M. and Rees-Miller, J., eds., The Handbook of Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 647663.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1987). Social Theory and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: PolityGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (2002). Runaway World: How Globalization Is Reshaping Our Lives, 2nd edn. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Goh, C and Woo, Y.Y. (2009). The Coxford Singlish Dictionary, 2nd edn. Singapore: Angsana Books.Google Scholar
Goh, R. (2009). Uncertain locale: The dialectics of space and the cultural politics of English in Singapore. Paper presented at the workshop on ‘The Politics of English’ in Asia, 4–5 August. Asia Research Institute, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Goh, R. (2016). The anatomy of Singlish: Globalization, multiculturalism, and the construction of the ‘local’ in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 37(8), 748758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gopalakrishnan, R. and Lim, K. (2011). Singapore PM makes rare apology as election campaign heats up. Reuters India, 4 May. http://in.reuters.com/article/2011/05/04/idINIndia-56766220110504; accessed 24 October 2012.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F. (1994). The Step-Tongue: Children's English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. F. (2010). Singapore Standard English revisited. In Lim, L., Pakir, A. and Wee, L., eds., English in Singapore: Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 5790.Google Scholar
Gwee, L. S. (2016). Do you speak Singlish? New York Times, 13 May.Google Scholar
Hagens, S. A. (2005). Attitudes toward Konglish of South Korean teachers of English in the Province of Jeollanamdo. PhD diss., Brock University, Canada.Google Scholar
Haggerty, K. D. and Ericson, R. V. (2000). The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605622.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Han, F. K., Fernandez, W., and Tan, S. 1998. Lee Kuan Yew: The Man and his Ideas. Singapore: Times Editions.Google Scholar
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, R. (2016). Integrationism: A very brief introduction. www.royharrisonline.com/integrational_linguistics/integrationism_introduction.html; accessed 26 August 2016.Google Scholar
Held, D. and McGrew, A. (2003). The great globalization debate: An introduction. In Held, David and McGrew, Anthony, eds., The Global Transformations Reader. Cambridge: Polity, 150.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D., and Perraton, J. (1999). Global Transformation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Heller, M. (2008). Language and the nation-state: Challenges to sociolinguistic theory. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 504524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. (2011). Paths to Post-Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heng, J. (2015). Diplomatic missions screening Singapore films in cultural push. Straits Times, 21 December 2015. www.straitstimes.com/singapore/diplomatic-missions-screening-singapore-films-in-cultural-push; accessed 5 September 2017.Google Scholar
Hill, M. and Lian, K. F. (1995). The Politics of Nation Building and Citizenship in Singapore. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoe, Y. N. (2009). Insistence on bilingualism in early years of education policy was wrong: MM Lee. Channel NewsAsia, 17 November. www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1018826/1/html; accessed 18 November 2009.Google Scholar
Holliday, A. (2005). The Struggle to Teach English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. (1984). Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 8(3): 345365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. (2013). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honey, J. (1997). Language Is Power: The Story of Standard English and Its Enemies. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Honey, J. (1983). The Language Trap: Race, Class, and the Standard Language Issue in British Schools. Middlesex: National Council for Educational Standards.Google Scholar
hooks, b. (1990). Marginality as a site of resistance. In Ferguson, R., Gever, M., Trinh, T. M., and West, C., eds., Out There: Marginalization and Contemporary Cultures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 341343.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1998). Emergent grammar. In Tomasello, M., ed., The New Psychology of Language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 155175.Google Scholar
Hussain, Z. (2011). More English in Malay, Tamil homes. Straits Times, 15 January.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T. and Gal, S. (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul, ed., Regimes of Language. Santa Fe: School of American Research, 3583.Google Scholar
Jack, G. (2010). Languages and the market. In Kelly-Holmes, H. and Mautner, G., eds., Language and the Market. Houndmills: Palgrave, 719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. (1999a). Locating power: Corsican translators and their critics. In Blommaert, J., ed., Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 3966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, A. (1999b). Ideologies in Action: Language Politics on Corsica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, Adam, and Thurlow, Crispin. (2010). Introducing semiotic landscapes. In Jaworski, Adam and Thurlow, Crispin, eds., Semiotic Landscapes: Language, Image, Space. London: Continuum, 140.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. (2003). World Englishes: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jing, X. and Zuo, N. (2006). Chinglish in the oral work of non-English majors. CELEA Journal, 29(4), 1520.Google Scholar
Juris, J. S. (2012). Reflections on #Occupy Everywhere: Social media, public space, and emerging logics of aggregation. American Ethnologist, 39(2), 259279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1982). The Other Tongue: English Across Cultures. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: the English language in the Outer Circle. In Quirk, R. and Widdowson, H. G., eds., English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1130.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1986). The Alchemy of English: The Spread, Functions and Models of Nonnative Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1991). Liberation linguistics and the Quirk concern. English Today, 7, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. and Nelson, C. (1996). World Englishes. In McKay, S. and Hornberger, N., eds., Sociolinguistics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 71102.Google Scholar
Kennedy, P. (2001). Introduction: Globalization and the crisis of identities? In Kennedy, P. and Danks, C., eds., Globalization and National Identities: Crisis or Opportunity? New York: Palgrave, 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koh, J. (2016). Singlish in the skies on Aug 9? Must be Jetstar, lah. Straits Times, 2 August.Google Scholar
Kok, M. (2012). ‘Double confirm’ more catchy than ‘confirm confirm’. Straits Times, Life!, 18 August.Google Scholar
Kong, L. (1999). Globalization and Singaporean transmigration: Re-imagining and negotiating national identity. Political Geography, 18(5), 563589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, P. V. (2000). Regimenting languages: Language ideological perspectives. In Kroskrity, P. V., ed., Regimes of Language. Santa Fe: School of American Research, 134.Google Scholar
Kwan, M. Y. (2003). The Speak Good English Movement: A debate of the Englishes. MA thesis, National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1963). The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 18, 142.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Ortony, Andrew, ed., Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lam, L. (2015). Singlish brought to life in new photo book. Asia One, 21 September 2015. www.asiaone.com/singapore/singlish-brought-life-new-photo-book; accessed 31 August 2017.Google Scholar
Larner, W. and Walters, W. (2004). Globalization as governmentality. Alternatives, 29, 495514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latham, A. and McCormack, D. P. (2010). Globalizations big and small. In Farías, Ignacio and Bender, Thomas, eds., Urban Assemblages. London: Routledge, 5372.Google Scholar
Lazzarato, M. (2009). Neoliberalism in action: Inequality, insecurity and the reconstitution of the social. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(6), 109133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Blond, M. (1986). Drama in Singapore: Towards an English language theatre. In Hyland, Peter, ed., Discharging the Canon: Cross-Cultural Readings in Literature. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 112125.Google Scholar
Lee, Jonathan and Nadeau, Kathleen. 2011. Thai Americans: Vernacular language, speech and manner. Encyclopedia of Asian American Folklore and Folklife, Vol. 3. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. (1970). The twain have met. Dillingham Lecture, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, 11 November 1970.Google Scholar
Lee, Kuan Yew. (2012). My Lifelong Challenge: Singapore's Bilingual Journey. Singapore: Straits Times Press.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Ling, A. P., and Nomoto, H. (2009). Colloquial Singapore English got: Functions and substratal influences. World Englishes, 28, 293318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, P. (2016). English most common home language in Singapore, bilingualism also up: Government survey. Straits Times, 10 March.Google Scholar
Lee, S. H. (2011). British or American, it's still English. Sunday Times, 2 October.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. (1992). Activity types and language. In Drew, P. and Heritage, J., eds., Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 66100. Originally published in Linguistics, 17, 356399.Google Scholar
Li, W., Saravanan, V., and Hoon, J. N. L. (1997). Language shift in the Teochew community in Singapore: A family domain analysis. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 18(5), 364384.Google Scholar
Leimgruber, J. (2013). Singapore English: Structure, Variation and Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, L. (2004). English in Singapore and Singapore English. In Lim, L., ed., Singapore English: A Grammatical Description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, L. (2009). ‘Peranakan English’. In Schreier, D., Trudgill, P., Schneider, E., and Williams, J., eds., Lesser Known Varieties of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 327347.Google Scholar
Lim, L. (2010). Migrants and ‘mother tongues’: Extralinguistic forces in the ecology of English in Singapore. In Lim, L., Pakir, A. and Wee, L., eds., English in Singapore: Modernity and Management. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 1954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, R. (2010). Singaporeans split on issue of foreigners’ presence: Poll. Straits Times, 28 June 2010.Google Scholar
Lo Bianco, J. (2004). Language planning as applied linguistics. In Davies, A. and Elder, C., eds., Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 738762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loh, D. (2010). Speak Good English Movement spreads message creatively. Channel NewsAsia, 13 September 2010. www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1080953/1/.html; accessed 29 October 2012.Google Scholar
Loh, D. (2015). Singapore's environment favours entrepreneurship, startups: Venture capitalists. Channel News Asia, 21 April. www.channelnewsasia.com/news/business/singapore/singapore-s-environment/1798640.html; accessed 15 May 2016.Google Scholar
Low, E. L. and Brown, A. (2005). English in Singapore: An Introduction. Singapore: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In Makoni, S. and Pennycook, A., eds., Disinventing and Reconstituting Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 141.Google Scholar
Marx, K. (1967 [1887]). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, vol. I, Moore, S. and Aveling, E., trans. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mathew, M., Chiang, W. F. and Zhang, J. (in press). Language Proficiency, Identity and Management: Results from the IPS Survey on Race, Religion and Language. IPS Exchange Series. Singapore: National University of Singapore.Google Scholar
Mauzy, D. K. and Milne, R. S. (2002). Singapore Politics under the People's Action Party. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers-Scotton, C. (1993). Duelling Languages: Grammatical Structure in Code-Switching. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers-Scotton, C. (2002). Contact Linguistics: Bilingual Encounters and Grammatical Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miel, . (2003). An Essential Guide to Singlish. Singapore: Talisman Pu.Google Scholar
Milani, T. (2007). Debating Swedish: Language politics and ideology in contemporary Sweden. PhD diss., Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Miles, W. (1998). Bridging Mental Boundaries in a Postcolonial Microcosm: Identity and Development in Vanauatu. Hawaii: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Milkman, R., Luce, S., and Lewis, P. (2013). Changing the Subject: A Bottom Up Account of Occupy Wall Street in New York City. New York: City University of New York.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistic, 5(4), 530555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. (1999). Authority in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. (2000). The stage of modernity. In Mitchell, T., ed., Questions of Modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 134.Google Scholar
Modiano, M. (1999). International English in the global village. English Today, 15(2), 2228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniandy, M. K., Nair, G. K. S., Shanmugam, S. K. K., Ahmad, I., and Noor, M. N. B. (2010). Sociolinguistic competence and Malaysian students’ English language proficiency. English Language Teaching, 3(3), 145151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, R. (1970). Spanglish: Language contact in Puerto Rico. American Speech, 45, 223233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and Language Learning: Gender, Ethnicity and Educational Change. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as Exception. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ong, A. (2006). Neoliberalism as Exception: Mutations in Citizenship and Sovereignty. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Othman, Z. (2010), Double-barrelled race system to start on Saturday. Today Online, 30 December 2010. www.todayonline.com/Hotnews/EDC101230-0000209/Double-barrelled-race-system-to-start-on-Saturday; accessed 30 December 2010.Google Scholar
Pakir, A. (1992). English-knowing bilingualism in Singapore. In Choon, B. K, Pakir, A. and Kiong, T. C., eds., Imagining Singapore, 2nd ed. Singapore: Times Academic Press, 254278.Google Scholar
Pakir, A. (2000). Singapore. In Ho, W. K. and Wong, R. Y. L., eds., Language Policies and Language Education: The Impact in East Asian Countries in the Next Decade. Singapore: Times Academic Press, 259284.Google Scholar
Park, J. (2009). The Local Construction of a Global Language: Ideologies of English in South Korea. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. and Wee, L. (2009). Three Circles redux: A Market-theoretic Perspective on World Englishes. Applied Linguistics, 30, 389406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. and Wee, L. (2012). Markets of English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Park, J. and Wee, L. (2013). Linguistic baptism and the disintegration of ELF. Applied Linguistics Review, 4(2), 339359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2003). Global Englishes, Rip Slyme and performativity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 513533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2008). Multilithic English(es) and language ideologies. Language in Society, 37, 435444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrons, D. (2004). Globalization and Social Change: People and Places in a Divided World. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, R. A. and Kern, R. M. (1996). Changing highbrow taste: From snob to omnivore. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 900907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, W. (2001). Theatre and the Politics of Culture in Contemporary Singapore. Middleton, CT: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. (2000). Constructing a Tongan nation-state through language ideology in the courtroom. In Kroskrity, P. V., ed., Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa Fe: School of American Research, 229257.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. E. (1971). Culture, diffusion and Japlish. Linguistics, 9, 4558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piller, I. and Cho, J. (2013). Neoliberalism as language policy. Language in Society, 42, 2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platt, J. T. (1975). The Singapore English speech continuum and its basilect ‘Singlish’ as a ‘creoloid’. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 363374.Google Scholar
Platt, J. T. and Weber, H. (1980). English in Singapore and Malaysia. Petaling, Jaya: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poedjosoedarmo, G. (1995). Lectal variation in the media and the classroom: A preliminary analysis of attitudes. In Teng, S. C. and Ho, M. L., eds., The English Language in Singapore: Implications for Teaching. Singapore: Singapore Association for Applied Linguistics, 5367.Google Scholar
Popatial, A. (2010), Double-barrelled listing won't have big impact on ethnic policies: PM Lee. Channel News Asia, 15 January 2010. www.channelnewsasia.com/stories/singaporelocalnews/view/1030929/1/.html; accessed 15 January 2010.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. (1999). African American Vernacular English is not Standard English with mistakes. In Wheeler, Rebecca, ed., The Workings of Language: From Prescriptions to Perspectives. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers, 3958.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1988). The question of standards in the international use of English. In Lowenberg, P., ed., Language Spread and Language Policy: Issues, Implications and Case Studies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 229241.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. (1990). Language varieties and standard language. English Today, 21, 310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajadurai, J. (2005). Revisiting the concentric circles: Conceptual and sociolinguistic considerations. Asian EFL Journal, 7(4), 111130.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1998). Language crossing and the redefinition of reality. In Auer, P., ed., Code-Switching in Conversation. London: Routledge, 290317.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1999). Deutsch in Inner London and the animation of an instructed foreign language. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 3(4), 480504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. (2006). Language in Late Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappa, A. L. (2000). Surviving the politics of late modernity: The Eurasian fringe community in Singapore. Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28(2), 153180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rappa, A. and Wee, L. (2006). Language Policy and Modernity in Southeast Asia. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C. and Sarangi, S. (1999). Hybridity in gatekeeping discourse: Issues of practical relevance for the researcher. In Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C, eds., Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 473503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romaine, S. (2001). Contact between English and other languages. In Algeo, John, ed., Cambridge History of the English Language, vol. 6: English in North America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 154183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, A. (2011). Conclusion: Postcolonial urbanism. In Roy, A. and Ong, A.. eds., Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Oxford: Blackwell, 307335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubdy, R. (2001). Creative destruction: Singapore's Speak Good English Movement. World Englishes, 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rymes, B. (2014). Communicating beyond Language. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saravanan, V. (1994). Language and social identity amongst Tamil-English bilinguals in Singapore. In Khoo, R., Kreher, U., and Wong, R., eds., Languages in Contact in a Multilingual Society: Implications for Language Learning and Teaching. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 7993.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. (2006). Territory, Authority, Rights: From Medieval to Global Assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sbisà, M. (2001). Illocutionary force and degrees of strength in language use. Journal of Pragmatics, 33(12), 17911814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sebeok, T. A. (1994). Signs. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, E. (2007). Postcolonial Englishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. (2014). New reflections on the evolutionary dynamics of world Englishes. World Englishes, 33(1), 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholte, J. A. (2000). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. (2007). Nexus analysis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 608625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. and Wong Scollon, S. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, T. A. Jr. (2014). The long diplomacy: How a changing world creates new opportunities for partnership between scholars and practitioners. In Lowenthal, A. F. and Bertucci, M. E., eds., Scholars, Policymakers, and International Affairs: Finding Common Cause. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 187196.Google Scholar
Siddique, S. (1997). The phenomenology of ethnicity: A Singapore case study. In Hui, O. J., Kiong, T. C. and Ser, T. E., eds., Understanding Singapore Society. Singapore: Times Academic Press, 107124.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. (1999). Stigmatized and standardized varieties in the classroom: Interference or separation. TESOL Quarterly, 33(4), 701728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1998). The uses and utility of ideology: A commentary. In Schieffelin, B., Woolard, K. A. and Kroskrity, P. V., eds., Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23, 193229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sim, J. J. (2002). Good English campaign reinforces prejudices. Straits Times, 14 May.Google Scholar
Slater, D. and Ritzer, G. (2001). Interview with Ulrich Beck. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1(2), 261277.Google Scholar
Soh, F. (2005). ‘You see there got, got. Not there, no got’. Sunday Times, 15 May.Google Scholar
Sowell, T. (2004). Affirmative Action around the World. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Speak Good English Movement. (2001). Speak Well, Be Understood. The Speak Good English Movement Committee. Singapore: Ministry of Information and the Arts.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In Nelson, C. and Grossberg, L., eds., Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 271313.Google Scholar
Spivak, G. C. (1999). A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spolsky, B. (2004). Language Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, S. (2013). Tinglish: Thai to English. 28 November, https://prezi.com/vtczmddany9l/tinglish-thai-to-english/; accessed 31 January 2015.Google Scholar
Stroud, C. and Wee, L. (2007). Consuming identities: Language planning and policy in Singaporean late modernity. Language Policy, 6, 253279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. and Wee, L. (2010). Language policy and planning in Singaporean late modernity. In Lim, L., Pakir, A. and Wee, L., eds., English in Singapore: Unity and Utility. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 181204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroud, C. and Wee, L. (2011). Style, Identity and Literacy: English in Singapore. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, C. (2015). Theatre review: Off Centre revival is profoundly affecting. Straits Times, 24 April.Google Scholar
Tan, E. S. (2005). Globalization, nation-building and emigration: The Singapore case. In Lorente, B. P., Piper, N., Shen, H. H and Yeoh, B., eds., Asian Migrations. Singapore: Singapore University Press, 8798.Google Scholar
Teschke, B. and Heine, C. (2002). The dialectics of globalization. In Rupert, M. and Smith, H., eds., Historical Materialism and Globalization. London: Routledge, 165187.Google Scholar
Toh, P. C. S. (2011). The Complete Eh, Goondu! Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.Google Scholar
Uekrongtham, E. (1988). Local drama: Food for thought. Business Times, 17 September.Google Scholar
Van Doorn, N. (2014). The neoliberal subject of value: Measuring human capital in information economies. Cultural Politics, 10(3), 354375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2006). The Emergence of Super-Diversity in Britain. Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, Working Paper No. 25.Google Scholar
Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(6), 10241054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wade, R. (2001). Is Globalization Making World Income Distribution More Equal? London School of Economics DESTIN, Working Paper No. 01-01.Google Scholar
Wee, C. J. W.–L. (2007). Afterword: Language, capitalist development, cultural change. In Vaish, V., Gopinathan, S. and Liu, Y. –B., eds., Language, Capital, Culture: Critical Studies of Language and Education in Singapore. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, 249257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2002a). Lor in colloquial Singapore English. Journal of Pragmatics, 34(6), 711725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2002b). When English is not a mother tongue: Linguistic ownership and the Eurasian community in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 23(4), 282295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2003). Linguistic instrumentalism in Singapore. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 24(3), 211224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2004). Extreme communicative acts and the boosting of illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 21612178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2005). Intra-language discrimination and linguistic human rights. Applied Linguistics, 26, 4869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2007). The hunger strike as a communicative act: Intention without responsibility. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 17(1), 6176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2006). The semiotics of language ideologies in Singapore. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 10(3), 344361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2009). English in the Eurasian community. In Schreier, D., Trudgill, P., Schneider, E. and Williams, J., eds., Lesser Known Varieties of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 313326.Google Scholar
Wee, L. (2010). Neutrality in language policy. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development, 31(4), 421434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2010). ‘Burdens’ and ‘handicaps’ in Singapore's language policy: On the limits of language management. Language Policy, 9(2), 97114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2011). Metadiscursive convergence in the Singlish debate. Language & Communication, 31, 7585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. (2013). The evolution of Singlish: Migration and commodification. Paper presented at the 14th Malaysia-Singapore Forum, University of Malaya, 9-10 December 2013. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Google Scholar
Wee, L. (2014). Language politics and global city. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(5), 649660.Google Scholar
Wee, L. (2015). The party's over? Singapore politics and the ‘new normal’. Journal of Language and Politics, 14(3), 455478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wee, L. and Bokhorst-Heng, W. (2005). Language policy and nationalist ideology: Statal narratives in Singapore. Multilingua, 24, 159183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1994). The ownership of English. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 377389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wise, J. M. (2005). Assemblage. In Stivale, C. J., ed., Gilles Deleuze: Key Concepts, Montreal: McGill and Queen's University Press, 7787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, J. O. (2004). The particles of Singapore English. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(4), 739793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, K. S. (2006). Launch of the Overseas Singaporean Portal. 26 August 2006. www.mha.gov.sg/news_details.aspx?nid=MzIy-WzpmKhqwnZs%3D; accessed 26 October 2012.Google Scholar
Yap, M. T. (2015). Immigration and integration in Singapore: Trends, rationale and policy response. In Yap, M. T., Koh, G. and Soon, D., eds., Migration and Integration in Singapore. London: Routledge, 2538.Google Scholar
Yeoh, Brenda. (2007). Singapore: Hungry for foreign workers at all skill levels. Migration Information Source. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute. www.migrationinformation.org/Profiles/display.cfm?ID=570, accessed 22 September 2007.Google Scholar
Yuen, S. (2016). Who's afraid of ‘chao ah beng’? Overseas universities use Singaporean literature to teach. Straits Times, 15 February 2016. www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/whos-afraid-of-chao-ah-beng-overseas-universities-use-singaporean-literature-to; accessed 31 August 2017.Google Scholar
Zukin, S. (2010). The Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Lionel Wee, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Singlish Controversy
  • Online publication: 19 January 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855331.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Lionel Wee, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Singlish Controversy
  • Online publication: 19 January 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855331.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Lionel Wee, National University of Singapore
  • Book: The Singlish Controversy
  • Online publication: 19 January 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316855331.010
Available formats
×