Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T17:07:58.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Preface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2018

Get access

Summary

On 7 October 2016, the research groups Business & Law and Government & Law of the University of Antwerp organised a study event on the Single Resolution Mechanism or SRM. This study event's aim was to take stock of this new regime relating to the resolution of banks in the Eurozone after the first months of application. This book is the direct result of that study event.

The SRM constitutes the second pillar of the so-called Banking Union; the first pillar being the Single Supervisory Mechanism or SSM. The SRM is complementary to the SSM. While the SSM aims to reduce the risk of bank failure, by unifying the supervision of banks, the SRM increases the likelihood that a bank has been made “safe to fail”, if it is likely to fail, and reduces the risk that governments might have to bail out a bank, were it to actually fail.

The SRM is built around the Single Resolution Board, or SRB, a newly established independent European agency with legal personality. The SRB is responsible for the SRM's effective and consistent functioning. This involves the responsibility to draw up resolution plans and to adopt all of the decisions relating to resolution for the institutions that are within its purview. The actual execution of the resolution scheme adopted must be closely monitored by the SRB, but it is carried out by the national resolution authorities. The SRB is also in charge of the so-called Single Resolution Fund, which comprises a European pool of money that is transferred from domestic resolution funds, financed by the banking sector and is set up to ensure that medium-term funding support is available while a credit institution is being restructured.

As of 1 January 2016, both the SSM and the SRM function alongside each other; there are various interrelations between both mechanisms. One example of this is the assessment of the conditions for resolution of a significant bank or banking group, in which both the ECB (as a key actor in the SSM) and the SRB have roles to play. Three conditions apply here. Firstly, a bank should be failing or likely to fail.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Intersentia
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×