Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: December 2009

14 - Singleembryo transfer: the Swedish experience

from Section 2 - Clinical aspects

Related content

Powered by UNSILO


1. P. C. Steptoe and R. G. Edwards, Birth after the reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet, 2: 8085 (1978), 366.
2. A. N. Andersen, V. Goossens, L. Gianaroliet al., Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2003. Results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum. Reprod., 22 (2007), 1513–1525.
3. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry Fertil Steril, 2004; 81: 1207–1220.
4. T. Bergh, A. Ericson, T. Hillensjö, K.-G. Nygren and U.-B. Wennerholm, Deliveries and children born after in-vitro fertilization in Sweden 1982–95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet, 354 (1999), 1579–1585.
5. F. M. Helmerhorst, D. A. Perquin, D. Donker and M. J. Keirse, Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. BMJ, 328 (2004), 261–265.
6. R. A. Jackson, K. A. Gibson and M. S., Croughan, Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol., 103 (2004), 551–563.
7. U. B. Wennerholm and C. Bergh, Outcome of IVF pregnancies. Fetal Matern. Med. Rev., 15 (2004), 27–57.
8. B. Strömberg, G. Dahlquist, A. Ericson, et al., Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet, 359: 9305 (2002), 461–465.
9. B. Källen, O. Finnström, K.-G. Nygren and P. O. Olausson, In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden. Infant outcome after different fertilization methods. Fertil. Steril., 84 (2005a), 611–617.
10. B. Källen, O. Finnström, K.-G. Nygren and P. O. Olausson, In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden. Child morbidity including cancer risk. Fertil. Steril., 84 (2005b), 605–610.
11. S. Vilska, A. Tiitinen, C. Hyden-Granskog and O. Hovatta, Elective transfer of one embryo results in an acceptable pregnancy rate and eliminates the risk of multiple birth. Hum. Reprod., 14: 9 (1999), 2392–2395.
12. A. Strandell, C. Bergh and K. Lundin, Selection of patients suitable for one-embryo transfer reduces the rate of multiple births by half without impairment of overall birth rates. Hum. Reprod., 15 (2000), 2520–2525.
13. A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjöet al., Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in-vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med., 351 (2004), 2392–2402.
14. A. T. Kjellberg, P. Carlsson and C. Bergh, Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum. Reprod., 21 (2006), 210–216.
15. C. Bergh, How to promote singletons. Contributions from the Bertarelli Foundation Meeting: “Triplets End Point” (online only publication). Reprod. Biomed. Online, 15: Suppl. 3 (2007).
16. A. Thurin, T. Hardarsson, J. Hauskenet al., Predictors of ongoing implantation in IVF in a good prognosis group of patients. Hum. Reprod., 20 (2005), 1876–1880.
17. P. O. Karlström and C. Bergh, Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum. Reprod., 22: 8 (2007), 2202–2207. Epub 2007 Jun 11.
18. J. Holte, T. Bergh, J. Tilly, H. Petterson and L. Berglund, The construction and application of a prediction model to minimize twin implantation rate at a preserved high pregnancy rate. Hum. Reprod., 19: Suppl. 1 (2004), Abstract Book. 20th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE, P-394.
19. J. Holte, L. Berglund, K. Miltonet al., Construction of an evidence-based integrated morphology cleavage embryo score for implantation potential of embryos scored and transferred on day 2 after oocyte retrieval. Hum. Reprod., 22 (2007), 548–557.
20. Z. Veleva, S. Vilska, C. Hydén-Granskoget al., Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36–39 years. Hum. Reprod., 21 (2006), 2098–2102.
21. P. Saldeen and P Sundström, Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?Hum. Reprod., 20 (2005), 4–8.
22. K. Lundin and C. Bergh, Cumulative impact of adding frozen-thawed cycles to single versus double fresh embryo transfers. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 15 (2007), 742–748.
23. A. Pinborg, A. Loft, L. Schmidt and A. N. Andersen, Attitudes of IVF/ICSI-twin mothers towards twins and single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod., 18 (2003), 621–627.
24. C. R. Newton, J. McBride, V. Feyles, F. Tekpetey and S. Power, Factors affecting patients' attitudes towards single- and multiple-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril., 87 (2007), 269–278.
25. C. M. Verhaak, J. M. J. Smeenk, A. W. M. Everset al., Women's emotional adjustment to IVF: a systematic review of 25 years of research. Hum. Reprod. Update, 13 (2007), 27–36.
26. C. Bergh, V. Söderström-Anttila, A. Selbinget al., Attitudes towards and management of single embryo transfer among Nordic IVF doctors. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 86 (2007), 1222–1230.
27. J. E. Ware, K. K. Snow, M. Kosinski and B. Gandek, SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. (Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute, 1993).
28. M. Sullivan and J. Karlsson, SF-36 Hälsoenkät. Swedish Manual and Interpretation Guide. (Sektionen för vårdforskning, Medicinska fakulteten, Göteborgs Universitet och Sahlgrenska sjukhuset, 1994).
29. R. R. Abidin, Parenting Stress Index (PSI) – Manual. (Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 1990).
30. M. Östberg, B. Hagekull and S. Wettergren, A measure of parental stress in mothers with small children: dimensionality, stability and validity. Scand. J. Psychol., 38 (1997), 199–208.
31. A. A. A. Fiddelers, J. L. Severens, C. D. Dirksenet al., Economic evaluations of single versus double-embryo transfer in IVF. Hum. Reprod. Update, 13 (2007), 5–13.
32. J. Gerris, P. De Sutter, D. De Neubourget al., A real-life prospective health economic study of elective single embryo transfer versus two-embryo transfer in first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum. Reprod., 19: 4 (2004), 917–923.
33. H. G. Lukassen, D. D. Braat, A. M. Wetzelset al., Two cycles with single embryo transfer versus one cycle with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod., 20: 3 (2005), 702–708.
34. A. A. A. Fiddelers, A. P. A. van Montfoort, C. D. Dirksenet al., Single versus double embryo transfer: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomized trial. Hum. Reprod., 21 (2006), 2090–2097.