Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2008
  • Online publication date: December 2009

8 - Sequentialembryo selection for single embryo transfer

from Section 2 - Clinical aspects

REFERENCES

1. C. Bergh, How to promote singletons. Contributions from the Bertarelli Foundation Meeting: “Triplets End Point” (online-only publication). Reprod. Biomed. Online, 15: Suppl. 3 (2007). www.rbmonline.com/Article/2749.
2. Bertarelli Foundation Meeting: “Triplets End Point” (online-only publication). Reprod. Biomed. Online, 15: Suppl. 3 (2007).
3. J. Collins, Global epidemiology of multiple birth. Contributions from the Bertarelli Foundation Meeting: “Triplets End Point” (online-only publication). Reprod. Biomed. Online, 15: Suppl. 3 (2007). www.rbmonline.com/Article/2578.
4. P. Saldeen and P. Sundström, Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment?Hum. Reprod., 20 (2005), 4–8.
5. S. de Lacey, M. Davies, G. Homan, N. Briggs and R. Norman, Factors and perceptions that influence women's decisions to have a single embryo transferred, Reprod. Biomed. Online, 15 (2007), 526– 531.
6. Z. Pandian, S. Bhattacharya, O. Ozturk, G. Serour and A. Templeton, Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 18 (2004), CD003416.
7. A. Styer, D. Wright, A. Wolkovich, C. Veiga and T. Toth, Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome. Fertil. Steril., 89(6) (2008), 1702–1708 Epub 2007 Jul 20.
8. V. Wright, L. Schieve, A. Vahratian and M. Reynolds, Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF. Hum. Reprod., 19 (2004), 1831–1836.
9. M. Johnson and M. Day, Egg timers: how is developmental time measured in the early vertebrate embryo?BioEssays, 22 (2000), 57–63.
10. B. Bartoov, A. Berkovitz, F. Elteset al., Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil. Steril., 80 (2003), 1413–1419.
11. J. Van Blerkom, Occurrence and developmental consequences of aberrant cellular organization in meiotically mature human oocytes after exogenous ovarian hyperstimulation. J. Electron Microsc. Tech., 16 (1990), 324–346.
12. G. Familiari, M. Relucenti, R. Heyn, G. Micara and S. Correr, Three-dimensional structure of the zona pellucida at ovulation. Microsc. Res. Tech., 69 (2006), 415–426.
13. S. Nottola, S. Makabe, T. Stalloneet al., Surface morphology of the zona pellucida surrounding human blastocysts obtained after in vitro fertilization. Arch. Histol. Cytol., 68 (2005), 133–141.
14. P. Schwartz, B. Hinney, P. Nayudu and H. Michelmann, Oocyte-sperm interaction in the course of IVF: a scanning electron microscopy analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 7 (2003), 192–198.
15. M. Montag, T. Schimming, M. Kösteret al., Oocyte zona birefringence intensity is associated with embryonic implantation potential in ICSI cycles. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 16 (2008), 239–244.
16. L. Scott, Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo development. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 6 (2003), 57–70.
17. L. Scott, R. Alvero, M. Leondires and B. Miller, The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum. Reprod., 15(11) (2000), 2394–2403.
18. S. Sadowy, G. Tomkin and S. Munne, Impaired development of zygotes with uneven pronuclear size. Zygote, 63 (1998), 137–141.
19. J. Tesarik and E. Greco, The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum. Reprod., 14(5) (1999), 1318–1323.
20. L. Scott, A. Finn, T. O'Leary, S. McLellan and J. Hill, Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum. Reprod., 22 (2007), 230–240.
21. A. Borini, M. Cattoli, E. Sereni, R. Sciajno and C. Flamigni, Predictive factors for embryo implantation potential. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 10 (2005), 653–668.
22. S. Kahraman, M. Bahce, H. Samliet al., Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum. Reprod., 15 (2000), 2003–2007.
23. M. Ludwig, B. Schopper, A. Katalinicet al., Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the condittions of the German embryo protection law. Hum. Reprod., 15(2) (2000), 325–329.
24. A. Senn, F. Urner, A. Chansonet al., Morphological scoring of human pronuclear zygotes for prediction of pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod., 21 (2006), 234–239.
25. U. Zollner and T. Steck, Pronuclear scoring. Time for international standardization. J. Reprod. Med., 48 (2003), 365–369.
26. T. Pedersen, Growth factors in the nucleolus?J. Cell Biol., 143 (1998), 279–281.
27. G. Goessens, Nucleolar structure. Int. Rev. Cytol., 87 (1984), 107–108.
28. P. Dimitri, N. Corradini, F. Rossi and F. Vernì, The paradox of functional heterochromatin. BioEssays, 27 (2005), 29–41.
29. H. Schwarzacher and W. Mosgoeller, Ribosome biogenesis in man: current views on nucleolar structure and function. Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 91 (2000), 243–252.
30. W. Edirisinghe, R. Jemmott, C. Smith and J. Allen, Association of pronuclear Z scores with rates of aneuploidy in in vitro-fertilised embryos. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 17 (2005), 529–534.
31. P. Gamiz, C. Rubio, M. de los Santos, A. Mercader and C. Simone, The effect of pronuclear morphology on early development and chromosomal abnormalities in cleavage stage embryos. Hum. Reprod., 18 (2003), 2413–2419.
32. L. Gianaroli, M.C. Magli, A.P. Ferraretti, D. Fortini and N. Grieco, Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil. Steril., 80:2 (2003), 341–349.
33. C. Lawler, H. Baker and D. Edgar, Relationships between timing of syngamy, female age and implantation potential in human in vitro-fertilised oocytes. Reprod. Fertil. Dev., 19 (2007), 482–487.
34. K. Lundin, C. Bergh and T. Hardarson, Early embryo cleavage is a strong indicator of embryo quality in human IVF. Hum. Reprod., 16 (2001), 2652–2657.
35. A. Salumets, C. Hydén-Granskog, S. Mäkinenet al., Early cleavage predicts the viability of human embryos in elective single embryo transfer procedures. Hum. Reprod., 18 (2003), 821–825.
36. A. Van Montfoort, J. Dumoulin, A. Kester and J. Evers, Early cleavage is a valuable addition to existing embryo selection parameters: a study using single embryo transfers. Hum. Reprod., 19 (2004), 2103–2106.
37. M. Antczak and J. Van Blerkom, Oocyte influences on early development: the regulatory proteins leptin and STAT3 are polarized in mouse and human oocytes and differentially distributed within the cells of the preimplantation stage embryo. Mol. Hum. Reprod., 3(12) (1997), 1067–1086.
38. R. Gardner, The early blastocyst is bilaterally symmetrical and its axis of symmetry is aligned with the animal-vegetal axis of the zygote in the mouse. Development, 124 (1997), 289–301.
39. R. Gardner and T. Davies, An investigation of the origin and significance of bilateral symmetry of the pronuclear zygote in the mouse. Hum. Reprod., 21 (2006), 492–502.
40. C. Hansis and R. Edwards, Cell differentiation in the preimplantation human embryo. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 6 (2003), 215–220.
41. C. Hansis, J. Grifo and L. Krey, Candidate lineage marker genes in human preimplantation embryos. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 8 (2004), 577–583.
42. H. Ciray, L. Karagenc, U. Ulug, F. Bener and M. Bahceci, Use of both early cleavage and day 2 mononucleation to predict embryos with high implantation potential in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil. Steril., 84 (2005), 1411–1416.
43. R. Edwards and C. Hansis, Initial differentiation of blastomeres in 4-cell human embryos and its significance for early embryogenesis and implantation. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 11 (2005), 206–218.
44. C. Roux, R. Borodkine, C. Joanne, J. L. Bresson and G. Agnani, Morphological classification of human in-vitro fertilization embryos based on the regularity of the asynchronous division process. Hum. Reprod. Update, 1(5) (1995), 488–496.
45. C. Racowsky, K. Jackson, N. Cekleniaket al., The number of eight-cell embryos is a key determinant for selecting day 3 or day 5 transfer. Fertil. Steril., 73 (2000), 558–564.
46. S. Pickering, A. Taylor, M. Johnson and P. Braude, An analysis of multinucleated blastomere formation in human embryos. Hum. Reprod., 10 (1995), 1912–1922.
47. T. Hardarson, C. Hanson, A. Sjogren and K. Lundin, Human embryos with unevenly sized blastomeres have lower pregnancy and implantation rates: indications for aneuploidy and multinucleation. Hum. Reprod., 16 (2001), 313–318.
48. C. Hnida, I. Agerholm and S. Ziebe, Traditional detection versus computer-controlled multilevel analysis of nuclear structures from donated human embryosHum. Reprod., 20 (2004), 665–671.
49. J. Meriano, C. Clarke, K. Cadesky, and C. Laskin, Bi-nucleated and micronucleated blastomeres in embryos derived from human assisted reproduction cycles. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 9 (2004), 511–520.
50. T. Moriwaki, N. Suganuma, M. Hayakawaet al., Embryo evaluation by analysing blastomere nuclei. Hum. Reprod., 19:1 (2004), 152–156.
51. E. Van Royen, K. Mangelschots, D. De Neubourget al., Calculating the implantation potential of day 3 embryos in women younger than 38 years of age: a new model. Hum. Reprod., 16:2 (2001), 326–332.
52. I. Kligman, C. Benadiva, M. Alikani and S. Munne, The presence of multinucleated blastomeres in human embryos is correlated with chromosomal abnormalities. Hum. Reprod., 11 (1996), 1492–1498.
53. M. Pelinck, M. De Vos, M. Dekenset al., Embryos cultured in vitro with multinucleated blastomeres have poor implantation potential in human in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 13 (1998), 960–963.
54. B. Balaban, B. Urman, A. Isklaret al., The effects of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Hum. Reprod., 16 (2001), 2357–2361.
55. B. Balaban, B. Urman, A. Sertacet al., Blastocyst quality affects the success of blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril., 74 (2000), 282–287.
56. D. Gardner, M. Lane, J. Stevens, T. Schlenker and W. Schoolcraft, Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil. Steril., 73 (2000), 1155–1158.
57. L. Scott, The origin of monozygotic twinning. Reprod. Biomed. Online, 5 (2002), 276–284.
58. L. Scott, The biological basis of non-invasive strategies for selection of human oocytes and embryos. Hum. Reprod. Update, 9 (2003), 237–249.