Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T11:57:16.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Urbanisation and development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Norman Maclean
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

Summary

Over the last 50 years, the human population of the UK (Britain and Northern Ireland, excluding overseas territories) has both expanded and become substantially more urbanised. The consequences for wildlife have undoubtedly been complex, with the low priority that has been given to monitoring schemes in urban environments compounding the difficulty in drawing overall conclusions. Nonetheless, it is clear that substantial areas of natural and semi-natural habitats have been lost, and that the richness and abundance, particularly of more specialist and previously narrowly distributed species associated with these habitats, have declined. Conversely, some more generalist species have greatly benefited, as have others that could exploit some of the more novel environments occurring in urban areas. Moreover, urban areas have become more significant for wildlife over the past 50 years, in large part because they figure more prominently in landscapes, because of a marked increase in awareness of and conservation efforts for urban biodiversity, and because urban areas hold a substantial proportion of the national populations of some species that have experienced dramatic declines in the wider countryside.

Introduction

Over the last 50 years the human population of the UK has grown by more than 15% (Figure 6.1; from 52.8 million in 1961 to 60.6 million in 2006; National Statistics 2007a). The annual growth rate has been an order of magnitude higher in urban areas than in rural ones, such that over 90% of the population now lives in the former.

Type
Chapter
Information
Silent Summer
The State of Wildlife in Britain and Ireland
, pp. 72 - 83
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angilletta, M.J., Wilson, R.S.Niehaus, A.C.et al. (2007). Urban physiology: city ants possess high heat tolerance. PLoS One, 2, e258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baillie, S.R., Marchant, J.H., Crick, H.Q.P.et al. (2007). Breeding birds in the wider countryside: their conservation status 2007, BTO Research Report No. 487 (http://www.bto.org/birdtrends).
Brown, A. and Grice, P. (2005). Birds in England, London, Poyser.Google Scholar
Cheptou, P-O., Carrue, O., Rouifed, S. and Cantarel, A. (2008). Rapid evolution of seed dispersal in an urban environment in the weedCrepis sancta. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 3796–3799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, H., Banks, A. and Coombes, R. (2003). Findings of the national Peregrine survey 2002. BTO News, 248, 8–9.Google Scholar
Davis, B.N.K. (1978). Urbanisation and the diversity of insects. In Mound, L.A. and Waloff, N., eds., Diversity of Insect Faunas, Oxford, Blackwell Scientific, pp. 126–138.Google Scholar
Davis, B.N.K. (1979). The ground arthropods of London gardens. London Naturalist, 58, 15–24.Google Scholar
,DEFRA (2003) Measuring Progress: Baseline Assessment, London, DEFRA.Google Scholar
,DEFRA (2006) e-Digest of Environmental Statistics, http:www.defra.gov.uk/environment/statistics/index.htm.Google Scholar
Laet, J. and Summers-Smith, J.D. (2007). The status of the urban house sparrow Passer domesticus in north-western Europe: a review. Journal of Ornithology, 148 (Supplement 2), S275-S278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DfT, (2007). Transport trends, 2007 edn, London, Department for Transport.Google Scholar
Fox, R., Conrad, K.F., Parsons, M.S., Warren, M.S. and Woiwod, I.P. (2006). The State of Britain's Larger Moths, Newbury, Pisces Publications.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.M., Smith, G.M., Sanderson, J.M. et al. (2002). Countryside Survey 2000 Module 7. Land Cover Map 2000. Final Report CSLCM/Final. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood.
Guest, P., Jones, K.E. and Tovey, J. (2002). Bats in Greater London: unique evidence of a decline over 15 years. British Wildlife, 14, 1–5.Google Scholar
Haines-Young, R.H., Barr, C.J., Black, H.I.J. et al. (2000). Accounting for Nature: Assessing Habitats in the UK Countryside, London, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions.Google Scholar
Hardy, P.B. and Dennis, R.L.H. (1999). The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodiversity and Conservation, 8, 1261–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, I., Chamberlain, D., Davis, S. and Noble, D. (2007). Changes in breeding bird populations due to housing development based on bird densities and assemblages along urban-rural gradients, BTO research report no. 464, Thetford, BTO.
Hitchings, S.P. and Beebee, T.J.C. (1997). Genetic substructuring as a result of barriers to gene flow in urban Rana temporaria (common frog) populations: implications for biodiversity conservation. Heredity, 79, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodkinson, D.J. and Thompson, K. (1997). Plant dispersal: the role of man. Journal of Applied Ecology, 34, 1484–1496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistics, National (2007a). Population Trends 130, London, National Statistics.Google Scholar
Statistics, National (2007b). News release: UK population set to increase to 65 million over the next ten years, London, National Statistics.Google Scholar
Pauleit, S., Ennos, R. and Golding, Y. (2005). Modeling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change – a study in Merseyside, UK. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, R.A. and Sutherland, W.J. (2002). Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. Journal of Applied Ecology, 39, 157–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollution, Royal Commission on Environmental (2007). Twenty-sixth report: the urban environment. Available at http://www.rcep.org.uk.
,RSPB (2008). Bird Garden BirdWatch. Available at http://www.rspb.org.uk/birdwatch/about.
Sadler, J.P., Small, E.C., Fiszpan, H., Telfer, M.G. and Niemelä, J. (2006). Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban-rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. Journal of Biogeography, 33, 1126–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tratalos, J., Fuller, R.A., Evans, K.L.et al. (2007). Bird densities are associated with household densities. Global Change Biology, 13, 1685–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×