Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:54:04.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

Susan Gal
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Judith T. Irvine
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Signs of Difference
Language and Ideology in Social Life
, pp. 289 - 310
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarsleff, Hans. 1982. From Locke to Saussure: Essays on the Study of Language and Intellectual History. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, Andrew. 2000. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abondolo, Daniel, ed. 1998. The Uralic Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Abrams, Floyd. 2017. The Soul of the First Amendment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005a. “Introduction: Semiosis across encounters.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):15.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2005b. “Voice, footing, enregisterment.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):3859.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Agha, Asif, and Wortham, Stanton, eds. 2005. “Discourse across speech events: Intertextuality and interdiscursivity in social life.” Special issue of Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1).Google Scholar
Alden, John Richard. 1961. The First South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. 1995. “A revolution to measure: The political economy of the metric system in France.” In The Values of Precision, ed. Wise, M. N., 3971. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. 1997. Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 17631815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. 2002. The Measure of All Things: The Seven-Year Odyssey and Hidden Error That Transformed the World. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Alder, Ken. 2003. The Measure of the World. Dibner Library Lecture. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Althusser, Louis. 1994 [1970]. “Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes toward an investigation).” In Mapping Ideology, ed. Žižek, Slavoj, 100140. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Amsterdamska, Olga. 1987. Schools of Thought: The Development of Linguistics from Bopp to Saussure. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Anburey, Thomas. 1789. Travels through the Interior Parts of America in a Series of Letters. Vol. 2. London: William Lane.Google Scholar
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. Rev. ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Andrásfalvy, Bertalan. 1978. “A táji munkamegosztás néprajzi vizsgálata.” Ethnographia 2:231243.Google Scholar
Andrews, William L. 1986. To Tell a Free Story: The First Century of Afro-American Autobiography, 17601865. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce O. 1992. “The ‘agrarian myth’ in the early Republic.” In Liberalism and Republicanism in the Historical Imagination, 253276. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Appleby, Joyce O. 2000. Inheriting the Revolution: The First Generation of Americans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2005. “The construction of linguistic borders and the linguistic construction of borders.” Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 273:330.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter, and Jürgen, Erich Schmidt, eds. 2010. Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation. Vol. 1. Theories and Methods. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ayers, Edward A., and Onuf, Peter S., eds. 1996. All over the Map: Rethinking American Regions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Baggioni, Daniel. 1989. “Hugo Schuchardts Beitrag zur allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft.” Historiagraphia Linguistica 16(3):327350.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Discourse in the Novel. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Ball, Christopher. 2014. “On dicentization.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 24(2):151173.Google Scholar
Baron, Dennis E. 1982. Grammar and Good Taste: Reforming the American Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Barrie, James. 1904. Peter Pan. Play produced at Duke of York's Theatre, London.Google Scholar
Barth, Fredrik. 1969. “Introduction.” In Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference, ed. Barth, Fredrik, 938. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Bassin, Mark. 1991. “Inventing Siberia: Visions of the Russian East in the early nineteenth century.” American Historical Review 96(3):763794.Google Scholar
Basso, Keith. 1979. Portraits of the “Whiteman.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1935. “Culture contact and schismogenesis.” Man 35:178183.Google Scholar
Bateson, Gregory. 1958 [1936]. Naven: The Culture of the Iatmul People of New Guinea as Revealed through a Study of the “Naven” Ceremonial. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard. 2004. A World of Others’ Words. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles. 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beer, Mathias, and Dahlmann, Dittmar, eds. 1999. Migration nach Ost- und Südosteuropa von 18. bis zum Beginn des19. Jahrhunderts. Stuttgart: Jan Thorbecke Verlag.Google Scholar
Békés, Vera. 1997. A hiányzó paradigma. Debrecen: Latin Betűk.Google Scholar
Benes, Tuska. 2008. In Babel's Shadow: Language, Philology and the Nation in Nineteenth Century Germany. Detroit: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
Bercovitch, Sacvan. 1978. The American Jeremiad. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Bindorffer, Györgyi. 2001. Kettős identitás: Etnikai és nemzeti azonosságtudat Dunabogdányban. Budapest: Új Mandátum Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Bleek, Wilhelm. 1869 [1867]. On the Origin of Language. ed. Haeckel, Ernst, trans. Davidson, Thomas. New York: L.W. Schmidt.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan, ed. 1999. Language Ideological Debates. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Blommaert, Jan. 2015. “Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44:105116.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, Thomas. 2002. Race and the Rise of Standard American. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. Trans. Raymond, G. and Adamson, M., ed. Thompson, John. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Julian, ed. 1950. The Papers of Thomas Jefferson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Charles. 1986. Learning How to Ask. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brisard, Frank. 2002. Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Brix, Emil. 1982. Umgangsprache in Altösterreich zwischen Agitation und Assimilation. Vienna: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter H., and Abel, Daniel G.. 2003. Outgunned: Up Against the NRA. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Roger, and Gilman, Albert. 1960. “The pronouns of power and solidarity.” In Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, Thomas, 253276. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2015. Grounds for Difference. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buchler, Justus. 1955. “Introduction.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, Justus, ixxvi. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary. 2010. White Kids: Language, Youth and Style in Youth Identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bushman, Richard L. 1992. The Refinement of America: Persons, Houses, Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1991. “Imitation and gender insubordination.” In Inside/Out: Lesbian Themes, Gay Themes, ed. Fuss, Diana, 1331. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Byron, George Gordon, Lord, . 1814. The Corsair. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Carr, E. Summerson. 2011. Scripting Addiction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, E. Summerson, and Lempert, Michael, eds. 2016. Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Caruthers, William Alexander. 1834. The Kentuckian in New-York; or, The Adventures of Three Southerners by a Virginian. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Castrén, M. Alexander. 1853. Reiseerinnerungen aus den Jahren 1838–1844, ed. Schiefner, A.. Saint Petersburg: Buchdrückerei der Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
Cavanaugh, Jillian R., and Shankar, Shalini, eds. 2017. Language and Materiality: Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2000. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chumley, Lily, and Harkness, Nicholas. 2013. “Introduction: Qualia.” Anthropological Theory 13(1–2):311.Google Scholar
City of Baltimore, Department of Transportation. 2004. “City benches to get a face-lift.” Transportation News, September 1.Google Scholar
Clapp, Elizabeth J. 2003. “The boundaries of femininity: The travels and writings of Mrs. Anne Royall, 1823–31.” American Nineteenth Century History 4:128.Google Scholar
Clapp, Elizabeth J. 2016. A Notorious Woman: Anne Royall in Jacksonian America. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Cmiel, Kenneth. 1990. Democratic Eloquence: The Fight over Popular Speech in Nineteenth Century America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coen, Deborah R. 2016. “Big is a thing of the past: Climate change and methodology in the history of ideas.” Journal of the History of Ideas 77(2):305321.Google Scholar
Cole, David. 2016. “The terror of our guns.” New York Review of Books 63(July 14):12.Google Scholar
Colvin, Lucie. 1974. “Islam and the state of Kajoor: A case of successful resistance to jihad.” Journal of African History 4:587607.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Conforti, Joseph A. 2001. Imagining New England: Explorations of Regional Identity from the Pilgrims to the Mid-Twentieth Century. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Conrad, Sebastien. 2012. German Colonialism: A Short History. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas, ed. 2016. Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crowley, Tony. 1997. “Uniform, excellent, common: Reflections on standards in language.” Language Sciences 19(1):1521.Google Scholar
Crowther, Samuel Ajayi. 1852. Vocabulary of the Yoruba Language. London: Seeleys.Google Scholar
Cust, Robert Needham. 1883. A Sketch of the Modern Languages of Africa, Accompanied by a Language Map. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Cust, Robert Needham. 1887. Linguistic and Oriental Essays, Second Series. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Dard, Jean. 1826. Grammaire wolofe. Paris: Imprimerie Royale.Google Scholar
Das, Sonia. 2016. Linguistic Rivalries: Tamil Migrants and Anglo-Franco Conflicts. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Charles T., and Gates, Henry Louis Jr. eds. 1985. The Slave's Narrative. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Beauvoir, Simone. 1968. The Second Sex. New York: Modern Library.Google Scholar
de Certeau, Michel, Julia, Dominique, and Revel, Jacques, eds. 1975. Une politique de la langue: La révolution française et les patois. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Defoe, Daniel. 1720. The Life, Adventures, and Pyracies, of the Famous Captain Singleton. London: Brotherton.Google Scholar
Defoe, Daniel. 1999 [1724]. A General History of the Robberies and Murders of the Most Notorious Pirates. New York: Carroll & Graf.Google Scholar
Deniau, Xavier. 2001. La Francophonie. 5th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1976. Of Grammatology. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Diop, Abdoulaye-Bara. 1981. La société wolof: Tradition et changement. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Diouf, Mamadou. 1990. Le Kajoor au XIXe siècle: Pouvoir ceddo et conquête coloniale. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Diouf, Mamadou. 2000. Histoire du Sénégal. Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose.Google Scholar
Dlamini, Sibusisiwe Nombuso. 2005. Youth and Identity Politics in South Africa 19901994. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Douglass, Frederick. 1950–1975 [1849]. “Gavitt's original Ethiopian serenaders.” North Star, June 29. Reprinted in The Life and Writings of Frederick Douglass, 5 vols., ed. Foner, Philip S., 1:141142. New York: International.Google Scholar
Du Bois, W. E. B. 1896. The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nikolas 1903. The Souls of Black Folk. Chicago: McClurg.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1980 [1979]. Homo Hierarchicus: The Caste System and Its Implications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dunlop, Catherine Tatiana. 2015. Cartophilia: Maps and the Search for Identity in the French-German Borderland. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro. 1994. From Grammar to Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, Alessandro, and Goodwin, Charles, eds. 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 2010. “The decision that threatens democracy.” New York Review of Books, May 31.Google Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. 2007. Ideology: An Introduction. 2nd ed. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eisenlohr, Patrick. 2006. Little India: Diaspora, Time and Ethnolinguistic Belonging in Hindu Mauritius. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Elgin, Catherine Z. 2000. “Worldmaker: Nelson Goodman, 1906–1998.” Journal of General Philosophy 31:118.Google Scholar
Erb, Mária. 2012. “Sprachgebrauch der Ungarndeutschen: Tendenzen und Perspektiven.” In Traditionspflege und Erneuerung: Perspektiven der deutschen Nationalität in Ungarn im 21. Jahrhundert, ed. Müller, Marta and Gábor, Kerekes, 3557. Budapest: Ad Librum.Google Scholar
Erb, Mária, and Knipf-Komlósi, Elizabeth, eds. 2007. Tradition und Innovation: Beiträge zu neueren ungarndeutschen Forschungen. Budapest: ELTE Universität Germanistisches Institut.Google Scholar
Erman, Adolph. 1850. Travels in Siberia: Down the Obi, to the Polar Circle. Vols. 1–2. Trans. Cooley, W. D.. Philadelphia: Lea and Blanchard.Google Scholar
Errington, Joseph. 1985. “On the nature of the sociolinguistic sign: Describing the Javanese speech levels.” In Semiotic Mediation, ed. Mertz, Elizabeth and Parmentier, Richard, 287310. Orlando, FL: Academic.Google Scholar
Espeland, Wendy, and Mitchell, L. Stevens. 1998. “Commensuration as a social process.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:313343.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1969 [1940]. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, E. E. 1976 [1936]. Witchcraft, Oracles and Magic among the Azande. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Faidherbe, Louis. 1887. Langues sénégalaises: Wolof, arabe-hassania, soninké, sérère. Paris: Leroux.Google Scholar
Fal, Arame, Rosine, Santos, and Jean Léonce, Doneux. 1990. Dictionnaire wolof-français, suivi d'un index français-wolof. Paris: Karthala.Google Scholar
Fanon, Frantz. 1967 [1952]. Black Skin, White Masks. Trans. Charles Lam Markmann. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Fata, Márta, ed. 1997. Die Schwäbische Türkei: Lebensformen der Ethnien in Südwestungarn. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke Verlag.Google Scholar
Faust, Drew Gilpin. 1988. Confederate Nationalism: Ideology and Identity in the Civil War South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1983. “Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation.” Language in Society 12:153172.Google Scholar
Fernandes, Valentim. 1940 [1509]. O Manuscrito “Valentim Fernandes,” oferecido à Academia por Joaquim Bensaúde. Lisbon: Academia Portuguesa da História.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb. 2008 [1808]. Addresses to the German Nation, ed. and trans. Moore, Gregory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fleck, Ludwig. 1979 [1935]. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fliegelman, Jay. 1993. Declaring Independence: Jefferson. Natural Language and the Cult of Performance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Floan, Howard Russell. 1958. The South in Northern Eyes. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Florusbosch, J. Henrike. 2011. “The powers of observation: Ideologies and practices of paying attention among rural Malian Muslims in Mande.” PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 1995 [1970]. Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Men: The Ideology of the Republican Party before the Civil War. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foner, Eric. 1998. The Story of American Freedom. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Formisano, Ronald P. 2008. For the People: American Populist Movements from the Revolution to the 1850s. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Forsythe, James. 1992. A History of the Peoples of Siberia: Russian's North Asian Colony, 1581–1990. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. Smith, Sheridan. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1977. “Nietzsche, genealogy, history.” In Language, Counter-Memory, Practice, ed. Bouchard, D. F., 139164. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990 [1978]. “Qu'est-ce que la critique?Bulletin de la Société française de philosophie 84(2):3563.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1996 [1978]. “The impossible prison.” In Foucault Live (Interviews, 1961–1984), ed. Lotringer, Sylvère, trans. Hochroth, Lysa and Johnston, John, 275291. New York: Semiotext(e).Google Scholar
Fox, Dixon Ryan. 1940. Yankees and Yorkers. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy, and Gordon, Linda. 1994. “A genealogy of dependency: Tracing a keyword of the U.S. welfare state.” Signs 19(2):309336.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1996. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2003. Ideology: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Füzes, Miklós. 1986. “A népesség anyanyelv szerinti összetételét befolyásoló tényezők dél-kelet Dunántúlon 1941 és 1945 között.” Baranyai Helytörténetírás 1985–1986:715772.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1987. “Codeswitching and consciousness in the European periphery.” American Ethnologist 14(4):637653.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1989. “Language and political economy.” Annual Review of Anthropology 18:345367.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1991. “Bartók's funeral: Representations of Europe in Hungarian political rhetoric.” American Ethnologist 18(3):440458.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 1994. “Diversity and contestation in linguistic ideologies: German-speakers in Hungary.” Language in Society 22:337359.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2001. “Linguistic theories and national images in nineteenth century Hungary.” In Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority, ed. Gal, Susan and Woolard, Kathryn A., 3045. Manchester: St. Jerome's Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2002. “A semiotics of the public/private distinction.” differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 13(1):7795.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2005. “Language ideologies compared: Metaphors of public and private.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):2337.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2006. “Contradictions of standard language in Europe: Implications for the study of practices and publics.” Social Anthropology 14:163181.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2011a. “Polyglot nationalism: Alternative perspectives on language in 19th century Hungary.” Langage et société 136:124.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2011b. “Language and political space.” In Language and Space, ed. Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, 3350. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2012. “Sociolinguistic regimes and the management of ‘diversity.’” In Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit, ed. Monica Heller, and Duchêne, Alexandre, 2242. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2013. “Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs.” Anthropological Theory 31:3148.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2015a. “Politics of translation.” Annual Review of Anthropology 44:225240.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2015b. “Imperial linguistics and polyglot nationalism in Austria-Hungary: Hunfalvy, Gumplowicz, Schuchardt.” Balkanististica 28:151174.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2016a. “Sociolinguistic differentiation.” In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, ed. Coupland, Nikolas, 115135. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2016b. “Scale-making: Comparison and perspective as ideological projects.” In Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life, ed. Carr, E. Summerson and Lempert, Michael, 91111. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2017a. “Qualia as value and knowledge: Histories of European porcelain.” Signs and Society 15(1):128153.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2017b. “Visions and revisions of minority languages: Standardization and its dilemmas.” In Standardizing Minority Languages in the Global Periphery: Competing Ideologies of Authority and Authenticity, ed. Lane, Pia and Costa, James, 222242. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan. 2018. “Registers in circulation: The social organization of interdiscursivity.” Signs and Society 6(1):124.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Judith, T. Irvine. 1995. “The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference.” Social Research 62(4):9671001.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Kligman, Gail. 2000. The Politics of Gender after Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, Kowalski, Julia, and Moore, Erin. 2015. “Rethinking translation in feminist NGOs: Rights and empowerment across borders.” Social Politics 22(4):610635.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Woolard, Kathryn A.. 2014 [2001]. “Constructing languages and publics: Authority and representation.” In Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority, ed. Gal, Susan and Woolard, Kathryn A., 112. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gal, Susan, and Woolard, Kathryn A., eds. 2014 [2001]. Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 2003. Einstein's Clocks; Poincaré's Maps. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Gauchat, Louis. 1903. “Gibt es Mundartgrenzen?Archiv für das Studium der neueren Sprachen und Literaturen LVII, CXI: 365402.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973 [1964]. “Ideology as a cultural system.” In Interpretation of Cultures, 193233. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan. 2003. The Essential Child: Origins of Essentialism in Everyday Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Geraci, Robert P. 2001. Window on the East: National and Imperial Identities in Late Tsarist Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Andre. 2005. “The German-speaking countries.” In One Discipline Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology, ed. Barth, Fredrik et al., 60153. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gleick, James. 1987. Chaos: Making a New Science. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1940. “Analysis of a social situation in modern Zululand.” Bantu Studies 14:130.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max. 1972. “Foreword.” In Victor Turner, Schism and Continuity in an African Society, xvxx. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1972. “Seven strictures on similarity.” In Problems and Projects, 437446. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1978. Ways of Worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Graan, Andrew 2016. “The nation brand regime: Nation branding and the semiotic regimentation of public communication in contemporary Macedonia.” Signs and Society 4(1):S70S105.Google Scholar
Graber, Kathryn, and Murray, Jesse D.. 2015. “The local history of an imperial category: Language and religion in Russia's eastern borderlands, 1860–1930.” Slavic Review 74(1):127152.Google Scholar
Grabill, Jeffrey, and Blythe, Stuart. 2010. “Citizens doing science in public spaces: Rhetorical invention, semiotic remediation, and simple little texts.” In Exploring Semiotic Remediation as Discourse Practice, ed. Prior, Paul and Hengst, Julie, 184205. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio. 1985. Selections from Cultural Writings, ed. Forgacs, David and Nowell-Smith, Geoffrey. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grandgent, Charles. 1920. “The dog's letter.” In Grandgent, Charles, Old and New Sundry Papers, 3156. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Granger, Gilles-Gaston. 1954. “Langage universelle et formalisation des sciences: Un fragment inédit de Condorcet.” Revue d'histoire des sciences 7:197219.Google Scholar
Grant, Bruce. 1993. “Siberia hot and cold: Reconstructing the image of Siberian indigenous peoples.” In Between Heaven and Hell: The Myth of Siberia in Russian Culture, ed. Diment, Galya and Slezkine, Yuri, 227254. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Grasso, Christopher. 1999. A Speaking Democracy: Transforming Public Discourse in Eighteenth Century Connecticut. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Grégoire, Henri. 1975 [1794a]. Rapport sur la nécessité et les moyens d'anéantir les patois et d'universaliser l'usage de la langue française. Reprinted in Une politique de la langue: La révolution française et les patois, ed. Certeau, Michel de, Julia, Dominique, and Revel, Jacques, 300317. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Grégoire, Henri. 1794b. Rapport sur les destructions opérées par le Vandalisme, et sur les moyens de le réprimer. Paris: Convention Nationale. Imprimerie Nationale.Google Scholar
Grimes, William. 2008 [1826]. Life of William Grimes, the Runaway Slave. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gulya, János. 1974. “Some eighteenth century antecedents of nineteenth century linguistics: The discovery of Finno-Ugrian.” In Studies in the History of Linguistics: Traditions and Paradigms, ed. Hymes, Dell, 258276. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J., and Hymes, Dell, eds. 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Gupta, Akhil, and Ferguson, James. 1997. “Discipline and practice: ‘The field’ as site, method, and location in anthropology.” In Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science, ed. Gupta, A. and Ferguson, J., 146. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gustafson, Thomas. 2012. Representative Words: Politics, Literature and the American Language, 1776–1865. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guyer, Jane. 2004. Marginal Gains: Monetary Transaction in Atlantic Africa. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1998. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1999. The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1990. The Dialogic Species: A Linguistic Contribution to the Social Sciences. Trans. Shelly, Sharon. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Basil. 1828. Travels in North America in the Years 1827–1828. Philadelphia: Carey, Lea and Carey.Google Scholar
Hansen, Janson D. 2015. Mapping the Germans: Statistical Science, Cartography, and the Visualization of the German Nation, 1848–1914. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna. 1991. “Situated knowledges.” In Simians, Cyborgs and Women, 183201. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Havel, Vaclav. 1985. “The power of the powerless.” In The Power of the Powerless, ed. Havel, Vaclav, 2396. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. 1996 [1978]. Being and Time: A Translation of Sein und Zeit. Trans. Joan Stambaugh. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica. 2011. Paths to Post-nationalism: A Critical Ethnography of Language and Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heller, Monica, and Duchêne, Alexandre, eds. 2012. Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1987. Anthropology through the Looking Glass. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. 1986. “The refiguration of the anthropology of language.” Cultural Anthropology 1(1):89102.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane. 2008. The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane, and Irvine, Judith T., eds. 1993. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirnsperger, Markus. 2013. “Finno-ugrische Ethnologie und Nationalismus im 19. Jahrhundert: Sjögren, Castrén und Ahlqvist in Spannungsfeld nationaler Ideen.” In Wege zum Norden: Wiener Forschungen zu Arktis und Subarktis, ed. Donecker, Stefan, Eberhard, Igor, and Hirnsperger, Markus, 87106. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Hoyt, David L. 2006. “Dialects of modernization in France and Italy, 1865–1900.” In The Study of Language and the Politics of Community in Global Context, ed. Hoyt, David L. and Oslund, Karen, 85118. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Hundley, Daniel R. 1860. Social Relations in Our Southern States. New York: H.B. Price.Google Scholar
Hunfalvy, Pál. 1874. “Észrevételek Müller Miksa nyelvtudományi felolvasásaira, különösen a nyolczadikra.” In Müller Miksa felolvasásai a nyelvtudományról, ed. Simonyi, Zsigmond, 395413. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Hunfalvy, Pál. 1875. Az éjszaki osztják nyelv. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.Google Scholar
Hunfalvy, Pál. 1876a. “On the study of Turanian languages.” In Transactions of the Second Session of the International Congress of Orientalists Held in London in September 1874, ed. Douglas, Robert K., 6497. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Hunfalvy, Pál. 1876b. Magyarország ethnográphiája. Budapest: A Magyar Tudományos Akadémia Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Hunfalvy, Pál. 1882. “Ueber das bildende Princip der Nationen.” In Abhandlungen und Vortäge des fünften internationalen Orientalisten-Congresses gehalten zu Berlin im September 1881, Zweite Hälfte. Berlin: A. Asher.Google Scholar
Hutterer, Carl. 1991. Aufsätze zur deutschen Dialektologie. Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Ignatiev, Noel. 1995. How the Irish Became White. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako, ed. 2004. “The history of ideology and the ideology of history.” Special issue of Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14(1).Google Scholar
Inoue, Miyako. 2006. Vicarious Language: Gender and Linguistic Modernity in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1974. “Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting.” In Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking, ed. Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J., 167191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1978a. “When is genealogy history? Wolof genealogies in comparative perspective.” American Ethnologist 5:651674.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1978b. “Wolof noun classification: The social setting of divergent change.” Language in Society 7:3764.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1990. “Registering affect: Heteroglossia in the linguistic expression of emotion.” In Language and the Politics of Emotion, ed. Lutz, Catherine A. and Abu-Lughod, Lila, 126161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1993. “Mastering African languages: The politics of linguistics in nineteenth century Senegal.” Social Analysis 33:2745.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1996. “Shadow conversations: The indeterminacy of participant roles.” In Natural Histories of Discourse, ed. Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg, 131159. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2001a. “Genres of conquest: From literature to science in colonial African linguistics.” In Verbal Art across Cultures: The Aesthetics and Proto-Aesthetics of Communication, ed. Knoblauch, Hubert and Kotthoff, Helga, 6390. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2001b. “The family romance of colonial linguistics: Gender and family in nineteenth century representations of African languages.” In Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority, ed. Gal, Susan and Woolard, Kathryn A., 1329. Manchester: St. Jerome's Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2001c. “‘Style’ as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation.” In Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, ed. Eckert, Penelope and Rickford, John R., 2143. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2005. “Commentary: Knots and tears in the interdiscursive fabric.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15:7280.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2008. “Subjected words: African linguistics and the colonial encounter.” Language & Communication 28:323343.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2009. “Stance in a colonial encounter: How Mr. Taylor lost his footing.” In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, ed. Jaffe, Alexandra, 5371. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2011. “Language fields: Robert Needham Cust's language map of South Asia, 1878.” In Knowing India: Colonial and Modern Constructions of the Past, Essays in Honor of Thomas R. Trautmann, ed. , Cynthia Talbot, 3154. New Delhi: Yoda Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2012. “Keeping ethnography in the study of communication.” Langage et Société 139:4766.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2015. “Language as cultural ‘heritage.’” In The Politics of Heritage in Africa: Economies, Histories and Infrastructures, ed. Peterson, Derek R., Gavua, Kodzo, and Rassool, Ciraj, 191208. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2016. “Going upscale: Scales and scale-climbing as ideological projects.” In Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life, ed. Carr, E. Summerson and Lempert, Michael, 213231. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 2018. “Divided values, shadow languages: Positioning and perspective in linguistic ideologies.” Signs and Society 6(1):2544.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T.Forthcoming. “Minerva's orthography: Early colonial projects for print literacy in African languages.” Social Dynamics.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and Gal, Susan. 2000. “Language ideology and linguistic differentiation.” In Regimes of Language, ed. Kroskrity, Paul, 3583. Santa Fe: School of Advanced Research Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T., and Gunner, Liz. 2018. “With respect to Zulu: Revisiting ukuHlonipha.” Anthropological Quarterly 91(1):173208.Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra, ed. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Linguistics and poetics.” In Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, Thomas, 350378. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1990 [1956]. “Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disorders.” In On Language, ed. Waugh, Linda R. and Monville-Burston, Monique, 115133. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, and Pomorska, Krystyna. 1990 [1980]. “The concept of mark.” In On Language, ed. Waugh, Linda R. and Monville-Burston, Monique, 134140. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Janson, Charles William. 1807. The Stranger in America. London: J. Cundee.Google Scholar
Johnson, Walter. 2013. River of Dark Dreams: Slavery and Empire in the Cotton Kingdom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, Barbara. 2013. Speaking Pittsburghese: The Story of a Dialect. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Joseph, John, and Taylor, Talbot J., eds. 1990. Ideologies of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Judson, Pieter. 2006. Guardians of the Nation: Activists on the Language Frontiers of Imperial Austria. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Justus, James H. 2004. Fetching the Old Southwest: Humorous Writing from Longstreet to Twain. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Kairys, David. 2010. “Money isn't speech and corporations aren't people.” Slate: Jurisprudence, Law, Lawyers and the Court, January 20.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2003. “Semiotics and the social analysis of material things.” Language & Communication 23:409425.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2018. “On semiotic ideology.” Signs and Society 6(1):6487.Google Scholar
Keil, Frank C., and Robert, A. Wilson. 2000. Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Keleti, Károly. 1882. Magyarország nemzetiségei az 1880 népszámlálas alapján. Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.Google Scholar
Kelly, Aileen. 2005. “A great Russian prophet.” Review of Anna Akhmatova's The Word That Causes Death's Defeat: Poems of Memory, trans. Anderson, Nancy. New York Review of Books, November 3, 6366.Google Scholar
Kennard, James K. Jr. 1845. “Who are our national poets?Knickerbocker 26(4):331341.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1970. Federalists in Dissent: Imagery and Ideology in Jeffersonian America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kerber, Linda K. 1992. “The paradox of women's citizenship in the early republic.” American Historical Review 97(2):349378.Google Scholar
Kobès, Alois. 1869. Grammaire de la langue volofe. Saint-Joseph de Ngasobil: Imprimerie de la Mission.Google Scholar
Koelle, Sigismund W. 1854a. Grammar of the Bornu or Kanuri Language. London: Church Missionary House.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. 1854b. Polyglotta Africana. London: Church Missionary House.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor. 1987. “Introduction.” In The African Frontier, ed. Kopytoff, Igor, 386. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kovács, Katalin. 1990. “Polgárok egy sváb faluban.” Tér és Társadalom 1:3376.Google Scholar
Kramer, Elise. 2011. “The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments.” Language in Society 40:137168.Google Scholar
Krige, Eileen. 1950. The Social System of the Zulus. Pietermaritzburg: Shuter and Shooter.Google Scholar
Kroskrity, Paul, ed. 2000. Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities and Identities. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuipers, Joel. 1998. Language, Identity and Marginality in Indonesia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kula, Witold. 1986. Measures and Men. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Laakso, Johanna. 2005. Our Otherness: Finno-Ugrian Approaches to Women's Studies or Vice-Versa. Vienna: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
Lamoise, Paul. 1873. Grammaire de la langue sérère avec des exemples et des exercices renfermant des documents très-utiles. Saint-Joseph de Ngasobil (Sénégambie): Imprimerie de la mission.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemon, Alaina. 2018. Technologies for Intuition: Cold War Circles and Telepathic Rays. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael. 2012. Discipline and Debate: The Language of Violence in a Tibetan Buddhist Monastery. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, Michael, and Silverstein, Michael. 2012. Creatures of Politics: Media, Message, and the American Presidency. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Carl Richard. 1880. Nubische Grammatik mit einer Einleitung über die Völker und Sprachen Afrikas. Berlin: W. Herty.Google Scholar
Lepsius, Carl Richard. 1981 [1863]. Standard Alphabet for Reducing Unwritten Languages and Foreign Graphic Systems to a Uniform Orthography in European Letters. 2nd rev. ed. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
Linder & Associates. 2003. Baltimore Believe: Progress Report: Phase 1. New York: Linder & Associates.Google Scholar
Looby, Christopher. 1996. Voicing America: Language, Literary Form and the Origins of the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lott, Eric. 2013 [1993]. Love and Theft: Blackface Minstrelsy and the American Working Class. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lowell, James Russell. 1977 [1848]. “Introduction.” In The Biglow Papers: A Critical Edition, ed. Wortham, Thomas, 2746. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Lucy, John, ed. 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lukin, Karina. 2017. “Matthias Alexander Castrén's notes on Nenets folklore.” Journal de la Société Finno-Ougrienne (Suomalais-Ugrilaisen Seuran Aikakauskirja) 96:169211.Google Scholar
Ly, Boubacar. 1967. “L'honneur dans les sociétés Ouolof et Toucouleur du Sénégal.” Présence Africaine 61:3267.Google Scholar
Maitz, Péter. 2008. “Linguistic nationalism in 19th century Hungary.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9(1):2047.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. 1978 [1935]. Coral Gardens and Their Magic. Vol. 2. The Language of Magic and Gardening. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Manherz, Karl. 1977. Sprachgeographie und Sprachsoziologie der deutschen Mundarten in Westungarn. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Marchand, Suzanne. 2009. German Orientalism in the Age of Empire: Religion, Race and Scholarship. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, George. 1995. “Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24:95117.Google Scholar
Marone, Oumar. 1969. “Essai sur les fondements de l’éducation sénégalaise à la lumière des métaphores aqueuses de la langue wolof.” Bulletin de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire, sér. B 31:787852.Google Scholar
Marriott, McKim. 1959. “Interactional and attributional theories of caste ranking.” Man in India 39:92107.Google Scholar
Martin, Bernhard. 1933. “Georg Wenkers Kampf um seinen Sprachatlas (1875–1889).” In Von Wenker zu Wrede, ed. Berthold, Luise, Martin, Berhard, Dützmann, Heinz, and Kuhn, Hans, 137. Marburg: N.G. Elwert'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Massin, Benoit. 1996. “From Virchow to Fischer: Physical anthropology and ‘modern race theories’ in Wilhelmine Germany.” In Volksgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, ed. Stocking, George W., 79184. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Mathews, Mitford McLeod, ed. 1931. The Beginnings of American English: Essays and Comments. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McAllister, Marvin. 2011. Whiting Up: Whiteface Minstrels and Stage Europeans in African American Performance. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Janet. 2005. “Language essentialism and social hierarchies among Giriama and Swahili.” Journal of Pragmatics 3(7):19191944.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Fiona, and Villalón, Leonardo. 2011. “Mettre en scène la légitimité: Un discours du feu Xalifa Abdoul Aziz Sy et de son jottalikat.” In Communication wolof et société sénégalaise: Héritage et création, ed. Diagne, Anna, Kesseler, Sascha, and Meyer, Christian, 323344. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Meek, Barbra. 2010. We Are Our Language. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Meinhof, Carl. 1912. Die Sprachen der Hamiten. Berlin: L. Friedrichsen.Google Scholar
Melish, Joanne Pope. 1998. Disowning Slavery: Gradual Emancipation and “Race” in New England, 1780–1860. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Melzer, Scott. 2009. Gun Crusaders: The NRA's Culture War. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Menand, Louis. 2001. The Metaphysical Club. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Mertz, Elizabeth. 2007. The Language of Law School. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Michell, Joel. 1986. “Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms.” Psychological Bulletin 100(3):398407.Google Scholar
Michell, Joel. 1999. An Introduction to the Logic of Psychological Measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Minor, Lucian. 1834–1835. “Letters from New England, #1, 2, 3, 4, 5.” Southern Literary Messenger, November, 84–88; December, 166–169; July, 217–219; February, 273–276; April, 421–426.Google Scholar
Moore, Adam. 2008. “Rethinking scale as a geographical category: From analysis to practice.” Progress in Human Geography 32(2):203225.Google Scholar
Morford, Janet. 1997. “Social indexicality in French pronominal address.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1):337.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. 2001. “Models, stories and the economic world.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8(3):361384.Google Scholar
Morpurgo Davies, Anna. 1992. History of Linguistics. Vol. 4. Nineteenth Century Linguistics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles. 1970. The Pragmatic Movement in American Philosophy. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Mosko, Mark S., and Damon, Frederick H., eds. 2005. On the Order of Chaos: Social Anthropology and the Science of Chaos. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Moyn, Samuel. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mugglestone, Lynda. 1997. “Talking Proper”: The Rise of Accent as Social Symbol. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, F. Max. 1866. Lectures on the Science of Language. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Munkácsi, Bernát. 1892. “A vogul-osztják népköltés irodalma.” In Regék és énekek a világ teremtéséről, vogul szövegek és forditásaik. Budapest: Magyar Tudományos Akadémia.Google Scholar
Munn, Nancy D. 1986. The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim Society. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 2010. “Language and space: The neogrammarian tradition.” In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, ed. Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, 7087. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Németh, Béla. 1900. Geschichte der Grossgemeinde Németh-Bóly. Pécs: Literarische und Buchdruckerei.Google Scholar
Nickels, Cameron C. 1993. New England Humor: From the Revolution to the Civil War. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
North American Review. 1837. “An oration delivered on the anniversary of the New England Society.” January, 237261.Google Scholar
Nyelv és Tudomány. 2014. “Látogassa meg rokonait az állatkertben!” January 17. http://in.nyest.hu/renhirek/latogassa-meg-rokonait-az-allatkertben.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Michael. 2010. Intellectual Life in the American South, 1810–1860. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor. 2004. “Narrative lessons.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. Duranti, Alessandro, 269289. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Krista, Bridenthal, Renata, and Reagin, Nancy R., eds. 2005. The Heimat Abroad: The Boundaries of Germanness. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Olender, Maurice. 1992. The Languages of Paradise: Race, Religion and Philology in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Onion. 2004. The Onion ad Nauseam (Complete News Archives) 15.Google Scholar
Onuf, Peter S. 1996. “Federalism, republicanism and the origins of American sectionalism.” In All over the Map: Rethinking American Regions, ed. Ayers, Edward A. and Onuf, Peter, 1137. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Osnos, Evan. 2016. “Making a killing: The business and politics of selling guns.” New Yorker 92(June 27):3645.Google Scholar
Otto, Ton, and Bubandt, Nils, eds. 2010. Experiments in Holism: Theory and Practice in Contemporary Anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley.Google Scholar
Parmentier, Richard. 1994. Signs in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Paulding, James Kirke. 1817. Letters from the South. New York: James Eastburn.Google Scholar
Paulston, Christina. 1976. “Pronouns of address in Swedish: Social class semantics and a changing system.” Language in Society 5(3):359386.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1877. “The fixation of belief.” Popular Science Monthly 12:115.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1906. “Prolegomena to an Apology for Pragmaticism.” Monist 16(4):492546.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955a. “Logic as semiotic: The theory of signs.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, Justus, 98119. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955b. “Perceptual judgments.” In Philosophical Writings of Peirce, ed. Buchler, Justus, 302305. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1955c. “Pragmatism in retrospect: A last formulation.” In The Philosophy of Peirce: Selected Writings, ed. Buchler, Justus, 269289. London: Routledge, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998 [1895]. “Of reasoning in general.” In The Essential Peirce, vol. 2, ed. Peirce Edition Project Staff, 1126. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders 1998 [1903]. “Sundry logical conceptions.” In The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings, vol. 2, ed. Peirce Edition Project, 267288. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Penny, H. Glenn, and Bunzl, Matti, eds. 2003. Worldly Provincialism: German Anthropology in the Age of Empire. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. 1998. “Language ideologies in institutions of power.” In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. Schieffelin, Bambi, Woolard, Kathryn, and Kroskrity, Paul, 211225. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. 2000. “Constructing a Tongan nation-state through language ideology in the courtroom.” In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, ed. Kroskrity, Paul, 229257. Santa Fe, NM: School of Advanced Research.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. 2016. “Balancing the scales of justice in Tonga.” In Scale: Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life, ed. Carr, E. Summerson and Lempert, Michael, 112132. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Polányi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Post, Robert C. 2014. Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, Elizabeth. 2001. “Radical worlds: The anthropology of incommensurability and inconceivability.” Annual Review of Anthropology 30:319334.Google Scholar
Pugach, Sara. 2012. Africa in Translation: A History of Colonial Linguistics in Germany and Beyond, 1814–1945. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Pukánszky, Béla. 2000 [1940]. Német polgár magyar földön. Budapest: Lucidus.Google Scholar
Pusztay, János. 1977. Az ‘ugor-török háború’ után: Fejezetek a magyar nyelvhasonlitás történetéből. Budapest: Magvető.Google Scholar
Reagin, Nancy R. 2005. “German Brigadoon? Domesticity and metropolitan Germans’ perceptions of Auslandsdeutschen in Southwest Africa and Eastern Europe.” In The Heimat Abroad: The Boundaries of Germanness, ed. O'Donnell, Krista, Bridenthal, Renate, and Reagin, Nancy, 248266. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Richland, Justin. 2008. Arguing with Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rivarol, Antoine de. 1784. De l'universalité de la langue française; discours qui a remporté le prix à l'académie de Berlin. Ed. Juin, H.. Paris: Belfond.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T. 1987. Contested Truths: Keywords in American Politics since Independence. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rodgers, Daniel T., and Wilentz, Sean. 1991. “Languages of power in the United States.” In Language, History and Class, ed. Corfield, Penelope J., 240263. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roediger, David. 1999. “Race, labor and gender in the languages of antebellum social protest.” In Terms of Labor: Slavery, Serfdom and Free Labor, ed. Engerman, Stanley L., 168187. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roger, Jacques-François. 1828. Fables sénégalaises; recueillies de l'Ouolof, et mises en vers français. Paris: Nepveu.Google Scholar
Rogin, Michael. 1992. “Blackface, white noise: The Jewish jazz singer finds his voice.” Critical Inquiry 18(3):417453.Google Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan. 2018. Looking Like a Language, Sounding Like a Race. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rosslyn, Wendy. 1995. “Poem without a hero: Overview.” In Reference Guide to World Literature, 2nd ed., ed. Henderson, Lesley. Detroit, MI: St James Press.Google Scholar
Royall, Anne Newport. 1826. Sketches of History, Life and Manners in the United States, by a Traveller. New Haven, CT: Printed for the Author.Google Scholar
Royall, Anne Newport. 1969 [1830]. Letters from Alabama, 1817–1822, with Biographical Notes and Introduction by Lucille Griffith. University: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1921. Language. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1949 [1938]. “Why cultural anthropology needs the psychiatrist.” Psychiatry 1:7–12. Reprinted in Selected Writings of Edward Sapir, ed. Mandelbaum, David, 569577. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sarfaty, Galit. 2012. Values in Translation: Human Rights and the Culture of the World Bank. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1959 [1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. Baskin, Wade. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1967 [1916]. Cours de linguistique générale. Édition critique préparé par Tullio Mauro. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore. 2002. The Site of the Social: A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore. 2005. “Peripheral vision: The site of organizations.” Organization Studies 26:465483.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Israel. 2001. “My quarrels with Goodman.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62(3):665677.Google Scholar
Scheuringer, Hermann. 2010. “Mapping the German language.” In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, Vol. 2: Language Mapping, pt. 1, ed. Lameli, Alfred, Kehrein, Roland, and Rabanus, Stefan, 158179. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi. 1990. The Give and Take of Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi. 2014. “Christianizing language and the dis-placement of culture in Bosavi, Papua New Guinea.” Current Anthropology 55(S10):226237.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi, Woolard, Kathryn A., and Kroskrity, Paul, eds. 1998. Language Ideologies: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schilling, Roger. 1942. A német nyelvatlasz Magyarországon. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Schirmunski, Viktor M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde: Vergleichende Laut- und Formlehre der deutschen Mundarten. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Robert, and Volbers, Jörg. 2011. “Siting praxeology: The methodological significance of ‘public’ in theories of social practices.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 41(4):419440.Google Scholar
Schrambke, Renate. 2010. “Language and space: Traditional dialectology.” In Language and Space: An International Handbook of Linguistic Variation, ed. Auer, Peter and Schmidt, Jürgen Erich, 87106. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1882. “Zur afrikanischen Sprachmischung.” Das Ausland: Wochenschrift für Länder und Völkerkunde 25:867869.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1884. Slawo-deutsches und Slawo-italienisches. Graz: Leuschner und Lubensky k.k. Universitäts-Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Schuchardt, Hugo. 1928 [1870]. “Über die Klassifikation der romanischen Mundarten.” Leipziger Probevorlesung von 1870. Reprinted in Schuchardt Brevier: Ein Vademekum der allgemeinen Sprachwissenschaft, ed. Spitzer, Leo, 166188. Halle: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1970. On Phenomenology and Social Relations: Selected Writings. Ed. Wagner, Helmut R.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James C. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Walter. 1822. The Pirate. Edinburgh: Archibald Constable.Google Scholar
Seewann, Gerhard. 2000. Ungarndeutsche und Ethnopolitik. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
Seewann, Gerhard, and Hösch, Edgar, eds. 1991. Aspekte ethnischer Identität: Ergebnisse des Forschungsprojekts “Deutsche und Magyaren als nationale Minderheiten in Donauraum.” Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag.Google Scholar
Segal, Daniel. n.d. “Translation effects in historical writing.”Google Scholar
Shapero, Natalie. 2001. “The city that reads now the greatest city in America.” Johns Hopkins News-Letter, February 15.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. “Shifters, linguistic categories and cultural description.” In Meaning in Anthropology, ed. Basso, Keith H. and Selby, Henry A., 1155. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1979. “Language structure and linguistic ideology.” In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, ed. Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol L., 193247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. Lucy, John, 3358. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1998 [1992]. “The uses and utility of ideology.” In Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory, ed. Schieffelin, Bambi, Woolard, Kathryn, and Kroskrity, Paul, 123145. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2001 [1981]. “The limits of awareness.” Sociolinguistic Working Paper 84. Reprinted in Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader, ed. Duranti, Alessandro, 382401. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language and Communication 23 (3–4):193229.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2005. “Axes of evals: Token versus type interdiscursivity.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1):622.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2013a. “From inductivism to structuralism: The ‘method of residues’ goes to the field.” History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences. https://hipilangsci.net/2013/09/11/from-inductivism-to-structuralism-the-method-of-residues-goes-to-the-field.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2013b. “Discourse and the no-thing-ness of culture.” Signs and Society 1(2):327366.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Urban, Greg, eds. 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1971 [1908]. On Individuality and Social Forms. Ed. Levine, Donald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, David R. 1986. The Politics of American English, 1776–1850. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Simpson, Rita. 1997. “Metapragmatic discourse and the ideology of impolite pronouns in Thai.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 7(1):3862.Google Scholar
Sine, Babacar. 1974. “Esquisse d'un réflexion autour de quelques éléments de philosophie wolof.” Présence Africaine 1974(3):2640.Google Scholar
Slezkine, Yuri. 1994. Arctic Mirrors: Russia and the Small Peoples of the North. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Christopher. 2013. The Creolization of American Culture. Carbondale: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Henry Ash. 1960. Virgin Land: The American West as Symbol and Myth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Van, and Siegel, Fred. 2001. “Can Mayor O'Malley save ailing Baltimore?City Journal 11(1). http://www.city-journal.org/html/issue_11_1.html.Google Scholar
Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll. 1992. “Dis-covering the subject of the ‘Great Constitutional Discussion,’ 1786–1789.” Journal of American History 79(3):841873.Google Scholar
Sonneck, Oscar G. 1909. Report on Star Spangled Banner, Hail Columbia, America and Yankee Doodle. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Southern Literary Messenger. 1837. “The New England character.” July:412416.Google Scholar
Southern Literary Messenger. 1842. “Eloquence in New England: Scraps from the diary of a Virginian sojourning in Boston.” 8(1):6871.Google Scholar
Southern Literary Messenger. 1860. “The difference of race between the Northern and Southern people.” 30(26):401409.Google Scholar
Southern Literary Messenger. 1861. “A true question: A contest for the supremacy of race, as between the Saxon Puritan of the North and the Norman of the South.” 33(1):1925.Google Scholar
Spannenberger, Norbert. 2005. A magyarországi Volksbund: Berlin és Budapest között. Budapest: Lucidus Kiadó.Google Scholar
Spitzmüller, Jürgen. 2007. “Staking the claims of identity: Purism, linguistics and the media in post-1990 Germany.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11:261285.Google Scholar
Stammler-Gossmann, Anna. 2009. “A life for an ideal: Matthias Alexander Castrén.” Polar Record 45(234):193206.Google Scholar
Stein, Roger B. 1965. “Royall Tyler and the question of our speech.” New England Quarterly 38:454474.Google Scholar
Steinthal, Heymann. 1867. Die Mande-Neger-Sprachen: Psychologisch und phonetisch betrachtet. Berlin: F. Dümmler.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. [Stanley Smith]. 1946. “On the theory of scales of measurement.” Science 103:667680.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Robert Louis. 1993 [1883]. Treasure Island. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Stone, Geoffrey. 2004. Perilous Times: Free Speech in Wartime. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Storing, Herbert. 2008. What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1988. The Gender of the Gift. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, John. 2017. Tangible Belonging: Negotiating Germanness in Twentieth Century Hungary. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Swigart, Leigh. 2001. “The limits of legitimacy: Language ideology and shift in contemporary Senegal.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10(1):90130.Google Scholar
Swiggers, Pierre. 1990. “Ideology and the ‘clarity’ of French.” In Ideologies of Language, ed. Joseph, John and Taylor, Talbot, 112130. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sylla, Assane. 1978. La philosophie morale des Wolof. Dakar: Sankoré.Google Scholar
Szelényi, Balázs A. 2003. “Enlightenment from below: German-Hungarian patriots in eighteenth century Hungary.” Austrian History Yearbook 34:111143.Google Scholar
Szelényi, Balázs A. 2007. “From minority to Übermensch: The social roots of ethnic conflict in the German diaspora of Hungary, Romania and Slovakia.” Past and Present 196(1):215251.Google Scholar
Taylor, William Robert. 1961. Cavalier and Yankee: The Old South and American National Character. New York: G. Braziller.Google Scholar
Teachout, Zephyr. 2014. Corruption in America: From Benjamin Franklin's Snuff Box to Citizens United. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thacher, James. 1823. A Military Journal during the American Revolutionary War, 1775–1783. Boston: Cottons and Barnard.Google Scholar
Thiam, Ndiassé. 1998. “Catégorisations de locuteurs et representations sur le mélange wolof-français à Dakar.” In Imaginaires linguistiques en Afrique, ed. Canut, Cécile, 91105. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Timberlake, Phil. 2003. “‘A voice so cruel, and cold, and ugly’: In search of the pirate accent.” Voice and Speech Review 3(1):8597.Google Scholar
Tomb, Howard. 1989. Wicked French for the Traveler. New York: Workman.Google Scholar
Toobin, Jeffrey. 2012. “Money unlimited: How Chief Justice John Roberts orchestrated the Citizens United decision.” New Yorker, May 21, 3647.Google Scholar
Trautmann, Thomas R. 1997. Aryans and British India. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsitsipis, Lukas. 2003. “Implicit linguistic ideology and the erasure of Arvanitika (Greek-Albanian) discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 35:539558.Google Scholar
Tyler, Royall. 1970 [1887]. The Contrast: A Comedy. New York: Burt Franklin. (First performed in 1787).Google Scholar
Urciuoli, Bonnie. 1996. Exposing Prejudice: Puerto Rican Experiences of Language, Race and Class. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Urla, Jacqueline. 2012. Reclaiming Basque: Language, Nation and Cultural Activism. Reno: University of Nevada Press.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, Hans F. 2015. Before Boas: The Genesis of Ethnography and Ethnology in the German Enlightenment. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1995. “The pragmatic return to meaning: Notes on the dynamics of communication, degrees of salience, and communicative transparency.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 5(2):127156.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, Cécile. 2009. “A relational understanding of language practice: Interacting timespaces in a single ethnographic site.” In Globalization and Language in Contact: Scale, Migration and Communicative Practices, ed. Collins, James, Slembrouck, S., and Baynham, M., 6284. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, ed. Michael Cole. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Waldstreicher, David. 1997. In the Midst of Perpetual Fetes: The Making of American Nationalism, 1776–1820. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda. 1982. “Marked and unmarked: A choice between unequals in semiotic structure.” Semiotica 38(3–4):299318.Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Webster, Noah. 1967 [1789]. Dissertations on the English Language. Boston: Isaiah Thomas and Co.Google Scholar
Wegener, Philip. 1880. “Über deutsche Dialektforschung.” Zeitschrift für deutsche Philologie 11:450480.Google Scholar
Weiner, Annette. 1984. “From words to objects to magic: ‘Hard words’ and the boundaries of social interaction.” In Dangerous Words: Language and Politics in the Pacific, ed. Brenneis, Donald and Myers, Fred, 161191. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, and Herzog, Marvin I.. 1968. “Empirical foundations for a theory of language change.” In Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, ed. Lehmann, W. P. and Malkiel, Yakov, 97195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Weinrib, Laura. 2016. The Taming of Free Speech: America's Civil Liberties Compromise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wenker, Georg. 1877. Das rheinische Platt. Düsseldorf: Im Selbstverlage des Verfassers.Google Scholar
Wenker, Georg. 1886. “Vortrag.” Verhandlungen der 38. Versammlung deutscher Philologen und Schulmänner in Gießen vom 30. Sept. bis 3. Okt. 1885, 187194. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Werth, Paul W. 2002. On the Margins of Orthodoxy: Mission, Governance and Confessional Politics in Russia's Volga Kama Region, 1827–1905. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wickman, Bo. 1988. “The history of Uralic linguistics.” In The Uralic Languages: Description, History and Foreign Influences, ed. Sinor, Denis, 792818. New York: Brill.Google Scholar
Wild, Katharina. 2003. Zur komplexen Analyze der ‘Fuldauer’ deutschen Mundarten Südungarns. Ungarndeutsches Archiv 6. Budapest: ELTE Germanistisches Institut.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1977. Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Willson, Beckles. 1909. The Life and Letters of James Wolfe. New York: Dodd Mead.Google Scholar
Winkler, Adam. 2018. We the Corporations: How American Businesses Won Their Civil Rights. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 2016. Singular and Plural: Ideologies of Linguistic Authority in 21st Century Catalonia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A. 2019. “Language ideologies.” In International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ed. Stanlaw, J. M.. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woolard, Kathryn A., and Bambi, B. Schieffelin. 1994. “Language ideology.” Annual Review of Anthropology 23:5582.Google Scholar
Wortham, Stanton. 2001. Narratives in Action. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. Skelly. 1976. “Politics and the constitution: Is money speech?Yale Law Journal 85:10011021.Google Scholar
Wright, Robert. 1864. The Life and Letters of Major General James Wolfe. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances. 1966. The Art of Memory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zahan, Dominique. 1970. Religion, spiritualité et pensée africaine. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Andrew. 2001. Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zsigmond, Gábor. 1977. “Hunfalvy Pál útja az embertudománytól az etnográfiáig.” In Népi kultúra – népi társadalom, ed. Ortutay, Gyula, 207251. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Susan Gal, University of Chicago, Judith T. Irvine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Signs of Difference
  • Online publication: 17 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Susan Gal, University of Chicago, Judith T. Irvine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Signs of Difference
  • Online publication: 17 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Susan Gal, University of Chicago, Judith T. Irvine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Signs of Difference
  • Online publication: 17 June 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209.013
Available formats
×