Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T09:15:42.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2018

Jean-Christophe Mayer
Affiliation:
French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and Université Paul-Valéry, Montpellier
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare's Early Readers
A Cultural History from 1590 to 1800
, pp. 230 - 250
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Anonymous. The First Printed Catalogue of the Bodleian Library 1605, a Facsimile. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Mansfield Park. Ed. Wiltshire, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Novum Organum (1620). Trans. and ed. Devey, Joseph. New York: P. F. Collier, 1902.Google Scholar
Baret, John. An Aluearie or Quadruple Dictionarie Londini: Henricus Denhamus, 1580.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John. Comedies and Tragedies. Never Printed Before. London: Humphrey Robinson and Humphrey Moseley, 1647.Google Scholar
Bell, John. Bell’s Common-place Book, Form’d Generally upon the Principles Recommended and Practised by Mr. Locke. London: for John Bell, 1770.Google Scholar
Bell, John. Introduction to Shakespeare’s Plays, Containing an Essay on Oratory. London: printed for John Bell, 1773.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. The Life of Samuel Johnson. Ware: Wordsworth, 1999 (1791).Google Scholar
Bowdler, Thomas. The Family Shakspeare, in Ten Volumes. London: printed for Longman et al., 1818.Google Scholar
Bright, Mynors and Warrington, John (eds.). The Diary of Samuel Pepys. 3 vols. London: Dent, 1953.Google Scholar
Brome, Richard. The Weeding of the Covent-Garden, in Five New Playes. London: printed for A. Crook and for H. Brome, 1659.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. CCXI Sociable Letters. London: printed by William Wilson 1664.Google Scholar
Chudleigh, Mary. Poems on Several Occasions. Together with the Song of the Three Children Paraphras’d. London: printed by W.B. for Bernard Lintott, 1703.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel. Coleridge’s Criticism of Shakespeare: A Selection. Ed. Foakes, R. A.. London: The Athlone Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel. Marginalia IV – Pamphlets to Shakespeare. Eds. Jackson, H. J. and Whalley, George. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dennis, John. An Essay on the Genius and Writings of Shakespear. London: printed for Bernard Lintott, 1712.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. The Conquest of Granada by the Spaniards: In Two Parts. London: printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman, 1672.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. Of Dramatick Poesie, an Essay. London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryden, John. An Evening’s Love, or, The Mock-Astrologer Acted at the Theatre-Royal. London: printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman, 1671.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. The State of Innocence, and Fall of Man: An Opera. London: printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman, 1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Thomas. The Canons of Criticism and Glossary, Being a Supplement to Mr. Warburton’s Edition of Shakespear. London: C. Bathurst, 1750.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Collected Works of Erasmus. Literary and Educational Writings 2 De Copia / De Ratione Studii. Ed. Thompson, Craig R.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 1 Padua Macbeth. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1960.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth century, vol. 2, Padua Measure for Measure. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1963.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 3 Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1964.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 5, Smock Alley Macbeth. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1970.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 8. Charlottesville: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar
Eyre, G. E. B. (ed.). A Transcript of the Registers of the Worshipful Company of Stationers; from 1640–1708 A.D. 3 vols. London: Priv. print, 1913–14.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. The Criticism of Henry Fielding. Ed. Williams, Joan. London: Routledge, 1970.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. The History of Tom Jones A Foundling [1749]. Ed. Bowers, Fredson. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1975.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. Miscellanies by Henry Fielding, esq. Ed. Miller, Henry Knight. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, Richard. The Spiritual Quixote: Or, The Summer’s Ramble of Mr. Geoffry Wildgoose. 3 vols. London: printed for J. Dodsley, Pall-Mall, 1773.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert. Greenes, Groats-vvorth of Witte. London: imprinted for William Wright, 1592.Google Scholar
Grey, Zachary. Critical, Historical, and Explanatory Notes on Shakespeare. In Two Volumes. London: Richard Manby, 1754.Google Scholar
Hurd, Richard. A Dissertation on the Idea of Universal Poetry. London: printed for A. Millar, 1766.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. Prefaces, Biographical and Critical, to the Works of the English Poets. 10 vols. London: printed by J. Nichols, 1779.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Epicoene or The Silent Woman. A Comoedie, in The Workes of Benjamin Jonson. London: printed by William Stansby, 1616, pp. 524–99.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Volpone, or The Fox. London: printed for Thomas Thorpe, 1607.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph. Lichtenberg’s Visits to England, as Described in his Letters and Diaries (1776–8). Trans. Mare, Margaret L. and Quarrell, W. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Marston, John. Parasitaster, or The Favvne. London: printed by T.P. for W.C., 1606.Google Scholar
Marston, John. The Wonder of Women, or The Tragedie of Sophonisba. London: printed by Iohn Windet, 1606.Google Scholar
Meres, Francis. Palladis Tamia. Wits Treasury Being the Second Part of Wits Common Wealth. Printed by P. Short, for Cuthbert Burbie, 1598.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas. The Mayor of Quinborough: A Tragedy. London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1661.Google Scholar
Montagu, Elizabeth. The Letters of Mrs. Elizabeth Montagu: With Some of the Letters of Her Correspondents. Ed. Montagu, Matthew. 3 vols. Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1825.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Essays of Montaigne (1588). Trans. Frame, Donald M.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, John. Wild Oats: Or, The Strolling Gentlemen. A Comedy, in Five Acts, As Performed at the Theatre Royal, Covent-Garden. Dublin: printed for the booksellers, 1791.Google Scholar
Parrot, Henry. The Mastiue, or Young-Whelpe of the Olde-Dogge. Epigrams and Satyrs. London: printed by Tho: Creede, for Richard Meighen, and Thomas Iones, 1615.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Twickenham Edition of the Poems of Alexander Pope, Vol. 7: The Iliad of Homer. Books I-IX. Eds. Mack, Maynard et al. London: Methuen, 1967.Google Scholar
Prynne, William. Histrio-mastix. The Players Scourge, or, Actors Tragædie, Divided into Two Parts … London: printed by E. A[llde]. et al. for Michael Sparke, 1633.Google Scholar
Reed, Isaac. Diaries, 1762–1804. Ed. Jones, Claude E.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Savage, Richard (ed.). Shakespearean Extracts from ‘Edward Pudsey’s Booke’. Stratford-upon-Avon: John Smith, 1888.Google Scholar
Scott, William. The Model of Poesy. Ed. Alexander, Gavin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. All’s Well, that Ends Well, A Comedy, by Shakespeare, As Performed at the Theatre-Royal, Drury-Lane. Regulated from the Prompt-Book, with Permission of the Managers, By Mr. Hopkins, Prompter. An Introduction, and Notes Critical and Illustrative, Are Added by the Authors of the Dramatic Censor. London: printed for John Bell, 1773.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Cymbeline. A Tragedy … With Alterations, &c. by David Garrick, Esq. As It Is Performed at the Theatre-Royal in Drury-Lane. Dublin: printed for R. Watts, and W. Whitestone, 1762.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark; a Tragedy, As It Is Now Acted by His Majesty’s Servants. London: printed by J. Darby, 1723.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The History of King Henry IV, As Revised by Sir Edward Dering, Bart., a Facsimile Edition. Eds. Williams, George Walton and Evans, Gwynne Blakemore. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1974.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies: Published According to the True Original Copies. London: printed by Isaac Iaggard and Ed. Blount, 1623.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays of William Shakespeare, in Eight Volumes. Ed. Johnson, Samuel. London: printed for J. and R. Tonson, et al., 1765.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays and Poems of William Shakspeare, In Ten Volumes. Ed. Malone, Edmond. London: printed by H. Baldwin, 1790.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays of William Shakspeare. In Fifteen Volumes. Eds. Johnson, Samuel and Steevens, George. London: printed [by H. Baldwin] for T. Longman et al., 1793.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Poems Written by Wil. Shake-speare. Gent. Printed at London: By Tho. Cotes, and are to be sold by Iohn Benson, 1640.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Ed. Duncan-Jones, K.. London: Thomas Nelson, 1997.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Shakespeare’s Sonnets and A Lover’s Complaint. Ed. Kerrigan, J.. London: Penguin Books, 1995 (1986).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear; in Six Volumes. Adorn’d with Cuts. Revis’d and Corrected, with an Account of the Life and Writings of the Author. Ed. Rowe, Nicholas. London: printed for Jacob Tonson, 1709.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear. In Ten Volumes. Publish’d by Mr. Pope and Dr. Sewell. London: printed for J. and J. Knapton, 1728.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Shakespeare: in Seven Volumes. Ed. Theobald, Lewis. London: printed for A. Bettesworth et al., 1733.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Shakespear. In Six Volumes. Ed. Hanmer, Thomas. Oxford: printed at the Theatre, 1744.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Shakespear in Eight Volumes. Ed. Warburton, William. London: printed for J. and P. Knapton et al., 1747.Google Scholar
Shirley, James. Love Tricks, or, The School of Complements As It Is Now Acted by His Royal Highnesse the Duke of York’s Servants. London: printed by R.T., 1667.Google Scholar
Tate, Nahum. The Loyal General a Tragedy: Acted at the Duke’s. London: printed for Henry Bonwicke, 1680.Google Scholar
Terence, Andria. The First Comoedie … in English (1551). Trans. Kyffin, Maurice. London: by T.E. for Thomas Woodcocke, 1588.Google Scholar
Tomkis, Thomas. Lingua, or the Combat of the Tongue. London: printed by G. Eld, for Simon Waterson, 1607.Google Scholar
Traherne, Thomas. The Poetical Works. Ed. Dobell, Bertram. London: published by the editor 1906.Google Scholar
Whetstone, George. The Right Excellent and Famous Historye, of Promos and Cassandra. London: Richarde Ihones, 1578.Google Scholar
White, R. S. Keats As a Reader of Shakespeare. Norman, OK: University Oklahoma Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Yamada, Akihiro (ed.). The First Folio of Shakespeare, A Transcript of Contemporary Marginalia in a Copy of the Kodama Memorial Library of Meisei University. Tokyo: Yushodo Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Adams, Thomas R. and Barker, Nicolas. ‘A New Model for the Study of the Book’, in Finkelstein, David and McCleery, Alistair (eds.), The Book History Reader. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 4765.Google Scholar
Allan, David. Commonplace Books and Reading in Georgian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, David. Libraries in Georgian England. London: The British Library, 2008.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakespere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Barry, Jonathan. ‘Literacy and Literature in Popular Culture: Reading and Writing in Historical Perspective’, in Harris, Tim (ed.), Popular Culture in England, c. 1500–1850. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995, pp. 6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador, 1997.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter. ‘“Notions in Garrison”: The Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Book’, in Speed Hill, W. (ed.), New Ways of Looking at Old Texts, Papers of the Renaissance English Society, 1985–1991. Binghamton, NY: Renaissance English Text Society, 1993, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar
Bedford, Ronald, Davis, Lloyd and Kelly, Philippa (eds.) Early Modern Autobiography: Theories, Genres, Practices Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M. Making the Modern Reader: Cultural Mediation in Early Modern Literary Anthologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas L. and Massai, Sonia (eds.). Paratexts in English Printed Drama to 1642. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birrell, T. A. English Monarchs and Their Books: From Henry VII to Charles II. London: The British Library, 1987.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann M. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M.The Alleged Popularity of Playbooks’. Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1991.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M.The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott (eds.), A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997, pp. 383422.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1979). Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L. ‘Marking Shakespeare’. Shakespeare 13.4 (2017): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L.Vide Supplementum: The Free Library of Philadelphia’s First Folio in Seventeenth-Century England’, in Acheson, Katherine (ed.), Early Modern Marginalia. London: Routledge, 2018, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Caines, Michael. Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. The Cornucopian Text, Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life, Vol. 1 (1980). Trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. ‘Binding and Unbinding: The Seven Publishing Lives of William Shakespeare’. Cahiers Élisabéthains: A Journal of English Renaissance Studies 93.1 (2017): 90106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, Roger. Inscription and Erasure: Literature and Written Culture from the Eleventh to the Eighteenth Century (2005). Trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries (1992). Trans. Cochrane, Lydia G.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet. ‘Art Made Tongue-tied by Authority’, Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Clegg, Cyndia Susan. Press Censorship in Elizabethan England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatalen, Guillaume. ‘Shakespeare and Other “Tragicall Discourses” in an Early Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Book from Oriel College, Oxford’. English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700 13 (2007): 120–64.Google Scholar
Colclough, Stephen. Consuming Texts Readers and Reading Communities, 1695–1870. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar
Colclough, Stephen. ‘Recovering the Reader: Commonplace Books and Diaries as Sources of Reading Experience’. Publishing History 44 (1998): 537.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. La seconde main ou Le travail de la citation. Paris: Seuil, 1979.Google Scholar
Cormack, Bradin and Mazzio, Carla. Book Use, Book Theory 1500–1700. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 2005.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cressy, David. Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Framing the Sign: Criticism and its Institutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian. ‘Shakespeare and Inquisition’. Shakespeare Survey 65 (2012): 306–22.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. ‘Extraordinary Commonplaces’. New York Review of Books (21 December 2000): 82–7.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. ‘First Steps towards a History of Reading’. Australian Journal of French Studies 23 (1986): 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, Robert. The Kiss of Lamourette, Reflections in Cultural History. New York and London: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Darnton, RobertWhat Is the History of Books?’. Daedalus 111.3 (1982): 6583.Google Scholar
Décultot, Élisabeth (ed.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobranski, Stephen B. Readers and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael. The Making of the National Poet; Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Donker, Marjorie. Shakespeare’s Proverbial Themes, A Rhetorical Context for the Sententia as Res. Westport, CT, and London: Greenwood Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Dutton, Richard. Licensing, Censorship, and Authorship in Early Modern England: Buggeswords. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Richard. Mastering the Revels, The Regulation and Censorship of English Renaissance Drama. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Egan, Gabriel. ‘Precision, Consistency and Completeness in Early-Modern Playbook Manuscripts: The Evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber’. The Library 12.4 (2011): 376–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as a Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura. ‘Commonplacing Readers’, in Kidnie, Margaret Jane and Massai, Sonia (eds.), Shakespeare and Textual Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 149–62.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura. Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts, Watching, Reading, Changing Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘The Douai Manuscript – Six Shakespearean Transcripts (1694–95)’. Philological Quarterly 41.1 (1962): 158–72.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor: The Folger Manuscript’, in Fabian, Bernhard and von Rosador, Kurt Tetzeli (eds.), Shakespeare: Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Martin Spevack. Zurich and New York: Olms-Weidman, 1987, pp. 5779.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘A Seventeenth-Century Reader of Shakespeare’. The Review of English Studies 21, no. 84 (1945): 271–9.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”: A Seventeenth-Century Manuscript’. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 41.4 (1942): 401–17.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. ‘“Whoores subtile shifts”: Commonplacing Women in the Meisei Copy of the Shakespeare First Folio’. Unpublished article presented at the Shakespeare Association of America Meeting, Vancouver, 2015; 13 pp.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, Zachary. ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’. Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, ZacharyStructures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade’. Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 206–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, ZacharyWhat Is Print Popularity? A Map of the Elizabethan Book Trade’, in Kesson, Andy and Smith, Emma (eds.), The Elizabethan Top Ten: Defining Print Popularity in Early Modern England. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013, pp. 1954.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien and Martin, Henri-Jean. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing, 1480–1800 (1958). Trans. Gerard, David. London: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar
Fehrenbach, R. J. and Leedham-Green, E. S. (eds.). Private Libraries in Renaissance England: A Collection and Catalogue of Tudor and Early Stuart Book-Lists. 3 vols. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1992.Google Scholar
Field, Catherine. ‘“Many hands hands”: Writing the Self in Early Modern Women’s Recipe Books’, in Dowd, Michelle M. and Eckerle, Julie A. (eds.), Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 4963.Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. ‘Afterword’. Huntington Library Quarterly 73.3 (2010): 543–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. Graffiti and the Writing Arts of Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Forster, Antonia. ‘Avarice or Interest: The Secrets of Eighteenth-Century Reviewing’. Yale University Library Gazette 81 (2007): 167–76.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 3: The Care of the Self (1984). Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Freund, Elizabeth. The Return of the Reader: Reader Response Criticism. London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Frye, Roland. Shakespeare and Christian Doctrine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Stuart and Rhodes, Neil (eds.). Shakespeare and Elizabethan Popular Culture. London: Centage Learning, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowan, Juliet Mary. ‘An Edition of Edward Pudsey’s Commonplace Book (c.1600–1615) from the Manuscript in the Bodleian Library’. University of London, M.Phil., 1967.Google Scholar
Goyet, Francis. Le sublime du ‘lieu commun’, L’invention rhétorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance. Paris: Champion, 1996.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. The Culture of Correction in Renaissance Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. ‘Is the History of Reading a Marginal Enterprise? Guillaume Budé and His Books’. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 91.2 (1997): 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. ‘The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets’. Shakespeare Survey 46 (1994): 3549.Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’, in Marsden, Jean I. (ed.), The Appropriation of Shakespeare. Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1991, pp. 5791.Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. Shakespeare Verbatim. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de, Quilligan, Maureen and Stallybrass, Peter (eds.). Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespearean Stage 1574–1642. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hackel, Heidi Brayman. Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hammond, Paul. Figuring Sex between Men from Shakespeare to Rochester. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, L. W.The Shakespeare Collection in the Bodleian Library, Oxford’. Shakespeare Survey 4 (1951): 7895.Google Scholar
Hao, Tianhu. ‘Hesperides, or the Muses’ Garden and its Manuscript History’. The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 10.4 (2009): 372404.Google Scholar
Hao, TianhuHesperides, or the Muses’ Garden: Commonplace Reading and Writing in Early Modern England’. PhD, Columbia University, 2006.Google Scholar
Havens, Earle (ed.). Commonplace Books: A History of Manuscripts and Printed Books from Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. New Haven, CT: Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Heale, Elizabeth. ‘Songs, Sonnets and Autobiography: Self-Representation in Sixteenth-Century Verse Miscellanies’, in Dragstra, Henk, Ottway, Sheila and Wilcox, Helen (eds.), Betraying Our Selves: Forms of Self-Representation in Early Modern English Texts. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000, pp. 5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedbäck, Ann-Mari. ‘The Douai Manuscript Reexamined’. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 73 (1979): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbert, Christopher. George III: A Personal History. London: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Hinman, Charlton. ‘A Proof-Sheet in the First Folio of Shakespeare’, The Library, 4th Ser. 23 (1942): 101–7.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. The Ornament of Action: Text and Performance in Restoration Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter and Orgel, Stephen (eds.). From Performance to Print in Shakespeare’s England. London: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Adam G.Commonplace Books’, in Stewart, Alan and Sullivan, Garrett et al. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of English Renaissance Literature. 3 vols. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 206–9.Google Scholar
Huang, Alexander C. Y.Global Shakespeare as Methodology’. Shakespeare 9.3. (2013): 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. K.The Marking of Sententiae in Elizabethan Printed Plays, Poems, and Romances’. The Library, 5th series, 6 (Dec. 1951): 171–88.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Mariko. The Shakespearean Stage Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, Grace. Dramatists and Their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (1976). Trans. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. J. Marginalia, Readers Writing in Books. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa and Grafton, Anthony. ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’. Past and Present 129 (1990): 3078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Simon. ‘Criticism, Taste, Aesthetics’, in Keymer, Thomas and Mee, Jon (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to English Literature 1740–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 2442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Simon. Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys. The Origins of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Jowett, John. ‘Private Iteration and Public Life: The Dering Manuscript of Henry IV’. Unpublished seminar paper presented at the European Shakespeare Research Association congress. Montpellier, France, June 2013, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Jowett, John. Shakespeare and Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. ‘“A rarity most beloved”: Shakespeare and the Idea of Tragedy’, in Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E. (eds.), A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Vol I: The Tragedies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, pp. 422.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kennedy-Skipton, A. L. D.John Ward and Restoration Drama’. Shakespeare Quarterly 11.4 (1960): 493–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan, John. ‘The Editor as Reader: Constructing Renaissance Texts’, in Raven, James, Small, Helen and Tadmor, Naomi (eds.), The Practice and Representation of Reading in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 102–24.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane and Massai, Sonia (eds.). Shakespeare and Textual Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, Nicolas K. The Library of Anthony Wood. Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society, 2002.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Arthur C.A Caroline Commentary on the Drama’. Modern Philology 66 (1969): 256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, Peter ‘The First Collected “Shakespeare Apocrypha”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 62 (2011): 594601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd. ‘Making Shakespeare’s Books: Assembly and Intertextuality in the Archives’. Shakespeare Quarterly 60:3 (2009): 304–40.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan Brody. Making the English Canon: Print-Capitalism and the Cultural Past, 1700–1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Langhans, Edward A. Restoration Promptbooks. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas. Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Joan Marie. Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Lee, Sidney. Elizabethan and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Leedham-Green, Elisabeth and Webber, Teresa (eds.). The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland, Volume I: To 1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennam, T. N.Sir Edward Dering’s Collection of Playbooks, 1619–1624’. Shakespeare Quarterly 16 (1995): 145–53.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. ‘Playbooks’, in Raymond, Joad (ed.), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, Volume 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660, pp. 520–34.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Linton, Marion. ‘The Bute Collection of English Plays’. Times Literary Supplement (21 Dec. 1956): 772. Times Literary Supplement Historical Archive (online).Google Scholar
Littau, Karin. Theories of Reading: Books, Bodies and Bibliomania. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Macé, Marielle. Façons de lire, Manière d’être. Paris: Gallimard, 2011.Google Scholar
Maguin, Jean-Marie and Maguin, Angela. William Shakespeare. Paris: Gallimard, 1996.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, Giles and Manley, K. A. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland, Volume II: 1640–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence. ‘Shakespeare and the Countess of Bridgewater: Playing, Patronage, and the Biography of Books’. Paper presented at the Shakespeare Association of America Conference, San Diego, April 2007.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. John Donne Coterie Poet. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. and Estill, Laura. ‘Shakespeare and the Manuscript Circulation of Texts’, in Kinney, Arthur (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 5370.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean. The Re-Imagined Text: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1995.Google Scholar
Mascuch, Michael. Origins of the Individualist Self: Autobiography and Self-Identity in England, 1591–1791. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Matchinske, Megan. ‘Serial Identity: History, Gender, and Form in the Diary Writing of Lady Anne Clifford’, in Dowd, Michelle M. and Eckerle, Julie A. (eds.). Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 6580.Google Scholar
Jean-Christophe, Mayer. ‘The Saint-Omer First Folio: Perspectives on a New Shakespearean Discovery’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 87 (2015): 720.Google Scholar
Jean-Christophe, Mayer. ‘Shakespeare and the Order of Books’. Early Modern Literary Studies, special issue no. 21, https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-21/05-Mayer_Shak&theOrderOfBooks.htm.Google Scholar
McKitterick, David. ‘“Ovid with a Littleton”: The Cost of English Books in the Early Seventeenth Century’. Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society 11th ser. 2 (1997): 184234.Google Scholar
McKitterick, David. ‘Women and Their Books in Seventeenth-Century England: The Case of Elizabeth Puckering’. The Library 1.4 (2000): 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManaway, James G. Studies in Shakespeare, Bibliography, and Theater. New York: The Shakespeare Association of America, 1969.Google Scholar
Meynell, G. G.John Locke’s Method of Common-Placing, as Seen in His Drafts and His Medical Notebooks, Bodleian MSS Locke d. 9, f. 21 and f. 23’. Seventeenth Century 8 (1993): 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Susan. Assuming the Positions: Cultural Pedagogy and the Politics of Commonplace Writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Morgan, P.Frances Wolfreston and “Hor Bouks”: A Seventeenth-Century Woman Book-Collector’. The Library, 6th Series, 11.3 (1989): 197219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Shakespeare for the People: Working-Class Readers, 1800–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Myers, Robin, Harris, Michel and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds). Owners, Annotators and the Signs of Reading. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. La communauté désœuvrée. Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1990 (1986).Google Scholar
Nelsen, Paul. ‘Chedworth and the Territoriality of the Reader’, in Gondris, Joanna (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century, Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1998, pp. 140–63.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan H.Shakespeare and the Bibliophiles: From the Earliest Years to 1616’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.), Owners, Annotators and the Signs of Reading. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2005, pp. 4973.Google Scholar
Newman, Gerald. The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.Commonplace Rhapsody: Ravisius Textor, Zwinger and Shakespeare’, in Bolgar, R. R. (ed.), Classical Influences on European Culture A.D. 1500–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 91126.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. ‘The Authentic Shakespeare’. Representations 21 (1988): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. The Reader in the Book, A Study of Spaces and Traces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon and Stern, Tiffany. Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasupathi, Vimala C.Arms and the Book: “Workes”, “Playes”, and “Warlike Accoutrements” in William Cavendish’s The Country Captain’. Philological Quarterly 91.2 (2012): 277303.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Censorship and Interpretation, The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone. Theatre of the Book 1480–1880, Print, Text, and Performance in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Price, Leah. The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel: From Richardson to George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000; repr. 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Kathryn. ‘Shakespeare and English Nationalism’, in Ritchie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 277–94.Google Scholar
Randall, Dale B. J. Winter Fruit, English Drama 1642–1660. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric and West, Anthony. The Shakespeare First Folios: A Descriptive Catalogue. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012.Google Scholar
Raymond, Joad (ed.). The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, Volume 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Neil. Shakespeare and the Origins of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (eds.). Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. ‘Engendering the Female Reader: Women’s Recreational Reading of Shakespeare in Early Modern England’, in Hackel, Heidi Brayman and Kelly, Catherine E. (eds.), Reading Women Literacy, Authorship, and Culture in the Atlantic World, 1500–1800. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007, pp. 3654.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. Reading Shakespeare’s Poems in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. ‘Reading Shakespeare’s Tragedies of Love: Romeo and Juliet, Othello, and Antony and Cleopatra in Early Modern England’, in Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E. (eds.), A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, pp. 108–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. ‘Shakespeare “creepes into the women’s closets about”: Women Reading in a Room of Their Own’, in Mcmullan, G (ed.), Renaissance Configurations: Voices/Bodies/Spaces, 1580–1690. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998, pp. 3063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha and Thompson, Ann (eds.). Women Reading Shakespeare, 1660–1900: An Anthology of Criticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rose, Jonathan. The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Rumbold, Kate. Shakespeare and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Cultures of Quotation from Samuel Richardson to Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Scott-Warren, Jason. ‘Reading Graffiti in the Early Modern Book’. Huntington Library Quarterly 73.3 (2010): 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Charlotte. Shakespeare and the Idea of the Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. Reading Revolutions: The Politics of Reading in Early Modern England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shattuck, Charles H. The Shakespeare Promptbooks: A Descriptive Catalogue. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Shell, Alison. Shakespeare and Religion. London: Methuen Drama, 2010.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. John Dee and the Politics of Reading and Writing in the English Renaissance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H.The Social Life of Books’, in Raymond, Joad (ed), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, Vol. 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 164–71.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrank, Cathy. ‘Reading Shakespeare’s Sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 Poems’. Shakespeare 5.3 (2009): 271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. The Illustrated Shakespeare, 1709–1875. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. Painting Shakespeare: The Artist As Critic, 1720–1820. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sisson, Charles J.Shakespeare Quartos as Prompt-Copies: With Some Account of Cholmeley’s Players and a New Shakespeare Allusion’. Review of English Studies 18, no. 70 (1942): 129–43.Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith. Tudor Autobiography: Listening for Inwardness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. Shakespeare Cut: Rethinking Cutwork in an Age of Distraction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Emma. Shakespeare’s First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise (eds.). Renaissance Paratexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Adam. Autobiography in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Smyth, Adam“Divines into dry Vines”: Forms of Jesting in Renaissance England’, in Deutermann, Allison K. and Kiséry, András (eds.), Formal Matters: Reading the Matters of English Renaissance Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013, pp. 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Adam. ‘Profit and Delight’: Printed Miscellanies in England, 1640–1682. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Snow, Vernon F.Francis Bacon’s Advice to Fulke Greville on Research Techniques’. Huntington Library Quarterly 23 (1960): 369–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton. Shakespeare Improved, The Restoration Versions in Quarto and on the Stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spufford, M.First Steps in Literacy: The Reading and Writing Experiences of the Humblest Seventeenth-Century Spiritual Autobiographers’. Social History 4 (1979): 407–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Clair, William. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter, Roger Chartier, J. Mowery, Franklin and Wolfe, Heather. ‘Hamlet’s Tables and the Technologies of Writing in Renaissance England’. Shakespeare Quarterly 55.4 (2004): 379419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter and Chartier, Roger. ‘Reading and Authorship: The Circulation of Shakespeare, 1590-1619’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007, pp. 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter and Lesser, Zachary. ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’. Shakespeare Quarterly 59.4 (2008): 371420.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Stern, TiffanySermons, Plays and Note-Takers: Hamlet Q1 as a “Noted” Text’. Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013): 123.Google Scholar
Stern, TiffanyShakespeare in Drama’, in Ritchie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 141–57.Google Scholar
Stern, TiffanyWatching as Reading: The Audience and Written Text in Shakespeare’s Playhouse’, in Maguire, Laurie (ed.), How to Do Things with Shakespeare: New Approaches, New Essays, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008, pp. 136–59.Google Scholar
Stern, Virginia F. Gabriel Harvey, His Life, Marginalia and Library. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Roger E. (ed.). Marks in Books, Illustrated and Explained. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1985.Google Scholar
Sumimoto, Noriko ‘Updating Folios: Readers’ Reconfigurations and Customisations of Shakespeare’, in Mayer, Jean-Christophe, Sherman, William H., Sillars, Stuart and Vasileiou, Margaret (eds.), Shakespearean Configurations, Early Modern Literary Studies Special Issue 21 (2013): http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-21/07-Sumimoto_Updating%20Folios.htm.Google Scholar
Tan, Marcus. ‘Spectres of Shakespeare: Ong Keng Sen’s Search Hamlet and the Intercultural Myth’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 90.1 (2016): 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989; repr. 2001.Google Scholar
Taylor, F.The Books and Manuscripts of Scipio Le Sqyer, Deputy Chamberlain of the Exchequer (1620–59)’. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library 25 (1941): 137–64.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. ‘The Meaning of Literacy in Early Modern England’, in Baumann, Gerd (ed.), The Written Word: Literacy in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 97131.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. ‘“I’ll have grounds / More relative than this”: The Puzzle of John Ward’s Hamlet Promptbooks’. The Yearbook of English Studies 29 (1999): 138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Patrick. Theatre of Crisis: The Performance of Power in the Kingdom of Ireland, 1662–1692. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. ‘The Emergence of Character Criticism, 1774–1800’. Shakespeare Survey 34 (1981): 1121.Google Scholar
Vincent, David. Literacy and Popular Culture, England 1750–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. ‘George Steevens and the 1778 Variorum: A Hermeneutics and a Social Economy of Annotation’, in Sabor, Peter and Yachnin, Paul Edward (eds.), Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008, pp. 7183.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. ‘Literary Scholarship and the Life of Editing’, in Rivers, Isabel (ed.), Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England: New Essays. London; New York: Continuum, 2001, pp. 191215.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. Shakespeare, Milton and Eighteenth-Century Literary Editing: The Beginnings of Interpretative Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul. Early Modern Playhouse Manuscripts and the Editing of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werstine, Paul“Foul Papers” and “Prompt-Books”: Printer’s Copy for Shakespeare’s Comedy of Errors’. Studies in Bibliography 41 (1988): 232–46Google Scholar
West, Anthony James. The Shakespeare First Folio, The History of the Book, Volume I: An Account of the First Folio Based on Its Sales and Prices, 1623–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wheale, Nigel. Writing and Society: Literacy, Print and Politics in Britain 1590–1660. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Wiggins, M.Shakespeare Jesuited: The Plagiarisms of “Pater Clarcus”’. The Seventeenth Century 20.1 (2005): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, Michèle. ‘From Janus to Prometheus: The Paradoxical Construction of the Shakespeare Myth from the Restoration Onwards’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 90.1 (2016): 5868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael E. St Alban’s College Valladolid, Four Centuries of English Catholic Presence in Spain. London: Hurst & Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward M.Shakespeare and Christian Doctrine: Some Qualifications’. Shakespeare Survey 23 (1970): 7989.Google Scholar
Williams, Owen and Lazzuri, Caryn (eds.). Foliomania! Stories behind Shakespeare’s Most Important Book. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 2011.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 1971; repr. 2009.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Susan. Drama and Politics during the English Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Ian. Understanding Material Culture. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woudhuysen, H. R. ‘Writing-Tables and Table Books’. Electronic British Library Journal (2004): 111.Google Scholar
Yamada, Akihiro. Experiencing Drama in the English Renaissance: Readers and Audiences. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeandle, Laetitia. ‘The Dating of Sir Edward Dering’s Copy of “The History of King Henry the Fourth”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 37.2 (1986): 224–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicker, Steven N.“What Every Literate Man Once Knew”: Tracing Readers in Early Modern England’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michel and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.), Owners, Annotators and the Signs of Reading. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2005, pp. 7590.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Anonymous. The First Printed Catalogue of the Bodleian Library 1605, a Facsimile. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Austen, Jane. Mansfield Park. Ed. Wiltshire, John. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, Francis. The Novum Organum (1620). Trans. and ed. Devey, Joseph. New York: P. F. Collier, 1902.Google Scholar
Baret, John. An Aluearie or Quadruple Dictionarie Londini: Henricus Denhamus, 1580.Google Scholar
Beaumont, Francis and Fletcher, John. Comedies and Tragedies. Never Printed Before. London: Humphrey Robinson and Humphrey Moseley, 1647.Google Scholar
Bell, John. Bell’s Common-place Book, Form’d Generally upon the Principles Recommended and Practised by Mr. Locke. London: for John Bell, 1770.Google Scholar
Bell, John. Introduction to Shakespeare’s Plays, Containing an Essay on Oratory. London: printed for John Bell, 1773.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. The Life of Samuel Johnson. Ware: Wordsworth, 1999 (1791).Google Scholar
Bowdler, Thomas. The Family Shakspeare, in Ten Volumes. London: printed for Longman et al., 1818.Google Scholar
Bright, Mynors and Warrington, John (eds.). The Diary of Samuel Pepys. 3 vols. London: Dent, 1953.Google Scholar
Brome, Richard. The Weeding of the Covent-Garden, in Five New Playes. London: printed for A. Crook and for H. Brome, 1659.Google Scholar
Cavendish, Margaret. CCXI Sociable Letters. London: printed by William Wilson 1664.Google Scholar
Chudleigh, Mary. Poems on Several Occasions. Together with the Song of the Three Children Paraphras’d. London: printed by W.B. for Bernard Lintott, 1703.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel. Coleridge’s Criticism of Shakespeare: A Selection. Ed. Foakes, R. A.. London: The Athlone Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel. Marginalia IV – Pamphlets to Shakespeare. Eds. Jackson, H. J. and Whalley, George. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Dennis, John. An Essay on the Genius and Writings of Shakespear. London: printed for Bernard Lintott, 1712.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. The Conquest of Granada by the Spaniards: In Two Parts. London: printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman, 1672.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. Of Dramatick Poesie, an Essay. London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryden, John. An Evening’s Love, or, The Mock-Astrologer Acted at the Theatre-Royal. London: printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman, 1671.Google Scholar
Dryden, John. The State of Innocence, and Fall of Man: An Opera. London: printed by T.N. for Henry Herringman, 1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, Thomas. The Canons of Criticism and Glossary, Being a Supplement to Mr. Warburton’s Edition of Shakespear. London: C. Bathurst, 1750.Google Scholar
Erasmus, Desiderius. The Collected Works of Erasmus. Literary and Educational Writings 2 De Copia / De Ratione Studii. Ed. Thompson, Craig R.. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 1 Padua Macbeth. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1960.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth century, vol. 2, Padua Measure for Measure. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1963.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 3 Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1964.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 5, Smock Alley Macbeth. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1970.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.). Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century, vol. 8. Charlottesville: Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia, 1996.Google Scholar
Eyre, G. E. B. (ed.). A Transcript of the Registers of the Worshipful Company of Stationers; from 1640–1708 A.D. 3 vols. London: Priv. print, 1913–14.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. The Criticism of Henry Fielding. Ed. Williams, Joan. London: Routledge, 1970.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. The History of Tom Jones A Foundling [1749]. Ed. Bowers, Fredson. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1975.Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. Miscellanies by Henry Fielding, esq. Ed. Miller, Henry Knight. 3 vols. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, Richard. The Spiritual Quixote: Or, The Summer’s Ramble of Mr. Geoffry Wildgoose. 3 vols. London: printed for J. Dodsley, Pall-Mall, 1773.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert. Greenes, Groats-vvorth of Witte. London: imprinted for William Wright, 1592.Google Scholar
Grey, Zachary. Critical, Historical, and Explanatory Notes on Shakespeare. In Two Volumes. London: Richard Manby, 1754.Google Scholar
Hurd, Richard. A Dissertation on the Idea of Universal Poetry. London: printed for A. Millar, 1766.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. Prefaces, Biographical and Critical, to the Works of the English Poets. 10 vols. London: printed by J. Nichols, 1779.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Epicoene or The Silent Woman. A Comoedie, in The Workes of Benjamin Jonson. London: printed by William Stansby, 1616, pp. 524–99.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben. Volpone, or The Fox. London: printed for Thomas Thorpe, 1607.Google Scholar
Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph. Lichtenberg’s Visits to England, as Described in his Letters and Diaries (1776–8). Trans. Mare, Margaret L. and Quarrell, W. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Marston, John. Parasitaster, or The Favvne. London: printed by T.P. for W.C., 1606.Google Scholar
Marston, John. The Wonder of Women, or The Tragedie of Sophonisba. London: printed by Iohn Windet, 1606.Google Scholar
Meres, Francis. Palladis Tamia. Wits Treasury Being the Second Part of Wits Common Wealth. Printed by P. Short, for Cuthbert Burbie, 1598.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas. The Mayor of Quinborough: A Tragedy. London: printed for Henry Herringman, 1661.Google Scholar
Montagu, Elizabeth. The Letters of Mrs. Elizabeth Montagu: With Some of the Letters of Her Correspondents. Ed. Montagu, Matthew. 3 vols. Boston: Wells and Lilly, 1825.Google Scholar
Montaigne, Michel de. The Complete Essays of Montaigne (1588). Trans. Frame, Donald M.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Keefe, John. Wild Oats: Or, The Strolling Gentlemen. A Comedy, in Five Acts, As Performed at the Theatre Royal, Covent-Garden. Dublin: printed for the booksellers, 1791.Google Scholar
Parrot, Henry. The Mastiue, or Young-Whelpe of the Olde-Dogge. Epigrams and Satyrs. London: printed by Tho: Creede, for Richard Meighen, and Thomas Iones, 1615.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander. The Twickenham Edition of the Poems of Alexander Pope, Vol. 7: The Iliad of Homer. Books I-IX. Eds. Mack, Maynard et al. London: Methuen, 1967.Google Scholar
Prynne, William. Histrio-mastix. The Players Scourge, or, Actors Tragædie, Divided into Two Parts … London: printed by E. A[llde]. et al. for Michael Sparke, 1633.Google Scholar
Reed, Isaac. Diaries, 1762–1804. Ed. Jones, Claude E.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1946.Google Scholar
Savage, Richard (ed.). Shakespearean Extracts from ‘Edward Pudsey’s Booke’. Stratford-upon-Avon: John Smith, 1888.Google Scholar
Scott, William. The Model of Poesy. Ed. Alexander, Gavin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. All’s Well, that Ends Well, A Comedy, by Shakespeare, As Performed at the Theatre-Royal, Drury-Lane. Regulated from the Prompt-Book, with Permission of the Managers, By Mr. Hopkins, Prompter. An Introduction, and Notes Critical and Illustrative, Are Added by the Authors of the Dramatic Censor. London: printed for John Bell, 1773.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Cymbeline. A Tragedy … With Alterations, &c. by David Garrick, Esq. As It Is Performed at the Theatre-Royal in Drury-Lane. Dublin: printed for R. Watts, and W. Whitestone, 1762.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark; a Tragedy, As It Is Now Acted by His Majesty’s Servants. London: printed by J. Darby, 1723.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The History of King Henry IV, As Revised by Sir Edward Dering, Bart., a Facsimile Edition. Eds. Williams, George Walton and Evans, Gwynne Blakemore. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1974.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Mr. William Shakespeares Comedies, Histories, & Tragedies: Published According to the True Original Copies. London: printed by Isaac Iaggard and Ed. Blount, 1623.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays of William Shakespeare, in Eight Volumes. Ed. Johnson, Samuel. London: printed for J. and R. Tonson, et al., 1765.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays and Poems of William Shakspeare, In Ten Volumes. Ed. Malone, Edmond. London: printed by H. Baldwin, 1790.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Plays of William Shakspeare. In Fifteen Volumes. Eds. Johnson, Samuel and Steevens, George. London: printed [by H. Baldwin] for T. Longman et al., 1793.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Poems Written by Wil. Shake-speare. Gent. Printed at London: By Tho. Cotes, and are to be sold by Iohn Benson, 1640.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Ed. Duncan-Jones, K.. London: Thomas Nelson, 1997.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. Shakespeare’s Sonnets and A Lover’s Complaint. Ed. Kerrigan, J.. London: Penguin Books, 1995 (1986).Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear; in Six Volumes. Adorn’d with Cuts. Revis’d and Corrected, with an Account of the Life and Writings of the Author. Ed. Rowe, Nicholas. London: printed for Jacob Tonson, 1709.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear. In Ten Volumes. Publish’d by Mr. Pope and Dr. Sewell. London: printed for J. and J. Knapton, 1728.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Shakespeare: in Seven Volumes. Ed. Theobald, Lewis. London: printed for A. Bettesworth et al., 1733.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Shakespear. In Six Volumes. Ed. Hanmer, Thomas. Oxford: printed at the Theatre, 1744.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. The Works of Shakespear in Eight Volumes. Ed. Warburton, William. London: printed for J. and P. Knapton et al., 1747.Google Scholar
Shirley, James. Love Tricks, or, The School of Complements As It Is Now Acted by His Royal Highnesse the Duke of York’s Servants. London: printed by R.T., 1667.Google Scholar
Tate, Nahum. The Loyal General a Tragedy: Acted at the Duke’s. London: printed for Henry Bonwicke, 1680.Google Scholar
Terence, Andria. The First Comoedie … in English (1551). Trans. Kyffin, Maurice. London: by T.E. for Thomas Woodcocke, 1588.Google Scholar
Tomkis, Thomas. Lingua, or the Combat of the Tongue. London: printed by G. Eld, for Simon Waterson, 1607.Google Scholar
Traherne, Thomas. The Poetical Works. Ed. Dobell, Bertram. London: published by the editor 1906.Google Scholar
Whetstone, George. The Right Excellent and Famous Historye, of Promos and Cassandra. London: Richarde Ihones, 1578.Google Scholar
White, R. S. Keats As a Reader of Shakespeare. Norman, OK: University Oklahoma Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Yamada, Akihiro (ed.). The First Folio of Shakespeare, A Transcript of Contemporary Marginalia in a Copy of the Kodama Memorial Library of Meisei University. Tokyo: Yushodo Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Adams, Thomas R. and Barker, Nicolas. ‘A New Model for the Study of the Book’, in Finkelstein, David and McCleery, Alistair (eds.), The Book History Reader. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2001, pp. 4765.Google Scholar
Allan, David. Commonplace Books and Reading in Georgian England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, David. Libraries in Georgian England. London: The British Library, 2008.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun (ed.). The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. William Shakespere’s Small Latine & Lesse Greeke. 2 vols. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944.Google Scholar
Barry, Jonathan. ‘Literacy and Literature in Popular Culture: Reading and Writing in Historical Perspective’, in Harris, Tim (ed.), Popular Culture in England, c. 1500–1850. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1995, pp. 6994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, Jonathan. The Genius of Shakespeare. London: Picador, 1997.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter. ‘“Notions in Garrison”: The Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Book’, in Speed Hill, W. (ed.), New Ways of Looking at Old Texts, Papers of the Renaissance English Society, 1985–1991. Binghamton, NY: Renaissance English Text Society, 1993, pp. 131–47.Google Scholar
Bedford, Ronald, Davis, Lloyd and Kelly, Philippa (eds.) Early Modern Autobiography: Theories, Genres, Practices Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Benedict, Barbara M. Making the Modern Reader: Cultural Mediation in Early Modern Literary Anthologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas L. and Massai, Sonia (eds.). Paratexts in English Printed Drama to 1642. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birrell, T. A. English Monarchs and Their Books: From Henry VII to Charles II. London: The British Library, 1987.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann M. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M.The Alleged Popularity of Playbooks’. Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 3350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 1991.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M.The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John D. and Kastan, David Scott (eds.), A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997, pp. 383422.Google Scholar
Bloom, Harold. The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (1979). Trans. Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L. ‘Marking Shakespeare’. Shakespeare 13.4 (2017): 367–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourne, Claire M. L.Vide Supplementum: The Free Library of Philadelphia’s First Folio in Seventeenth-Century England’, in Acheson, Katherine (ed.), Early Modern Marginalia. London: Routledge, 2018, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Caines, Michael. Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Cave, Terence. The Cornucopian Text, Problems of Writing in the French Renaissance. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life, Vol. 1 (1980). Trans. Rendall, Steven. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. ‘Binding and Unbinding: The Seven Publishing Lives of William Shakespeare’. Cahiers Élisabéthains: A Journal of English Renaissance Studies 93.1 (2017): 90106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chartier, Roger. Inscription and Erasure: Literature and Written Culture from the Eleventh to the Eighteenth Century (2005). Trans. Goldhammer, Arthur. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger. The Order of Books: Readers, Authors, and Libraries in Europe between the Fourteenth and Eighteenth Centuries (1992). Trans. Cochrane, Lydia G.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Clare, Janet. ‘Art Made Tongue-tied by Authority’, Elizabethan and Jacobean Dramatic Censorship. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Clegg, Cyndia Susan. Press Censorship in Elizabethan England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatalen, Guillaume. ‘Shakespeare and Other “Tragicall Discourses” in an Early Seventeenth-Century Commonplace Book from Oriel College, Oxford’. English Manuscript Studies, 1100–1700 13 (2007): 120–64.Google Scholar
Colclough, Stephen. Consuming Texts Readers and Reading Communities, 1695–1870. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2007.Google Scholar
Colclough, Stephen. ‘Recovering the Reader: Commonplace Books and Diaries as Sources of Reading Experience’. Publishing History 44 (1998): 537.Google Scholar
Compagnon, Antoine. La seconde main ou Le travail de la citation. Paris: Seuil, 1979.Google Scholar
Cormack, Bradin and Mazzio, Carla. Book Use, Book Theory 1500–1700. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 2005.Google Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Cressy, David. Literacy and the Social Order: Reading and Writing in Tudor and Stuart England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culler, Jonathan. Framing the Sign: Criticism and its Institutions. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1988.Google Scholar
Cummings, Brian. ‘Shakespeare and Inquisition’. Shakespeare Survey 65 (2012): 306–22.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. ‘Extraordinary Commonplaces’. New York Review of Books (21 December 2000): 82–7.Google Scholar
Darnton, Robert. ‘First Steps towards a History of Reading’. Australian Journal of French Studies 23 (1986): 530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnton, Robert. The Kiss of Lamourette, Reflections in Cultural History. New York and London: Norton, 1990.Google Scholar
Darnton, RobertWhat Is the History of Books?’. Daedalus 111.3 (1982): 6583.Google Scholar
Décultot, Élisabeth (ed.). Lire, copier, écrire. Paris: CNRS Éditions, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobranski, Stephen B. Readers and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Dobson, Michael. The Making of the National Poet; Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Donker, Marjorie. Shakespeare’s Proverbial Themes, A Rhetorical Context for the Sententia as Res. Westport, CT, and London: Greenwood Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Dutton, Richard. Licensing, Censorship, and Authorship in Early Modern England: Buggeswords. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Richard. Mastering the Revels, The Regulation and Censorship of English Renaissance Drama. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Egan, Gabriel. ‘Precision, Consistency and Completeness in Early-Modern Playbook Manuscripts: The Evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber’. The Library 12.4 (2011): 376–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas. Shakespeare as a Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura. ‘Commonplacing Readers’, in Kidnie, Margaret Jane and Massai, Sonia (eds.), Shakespeare and Textual Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015, pp. 149–62.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura. Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts, Watching, Reading, Changing Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘The Douai Manuscript – Six Shakespearean Transcripts (1694–95)’. Philological Quarterly 41.1 (1962): 158–72.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor: The Folger Manuscript’, in Fabian, Bernhard and von Rosador, Kurt Tetzeli (eds.), Shakespeare: Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Martin Spevack. Zurich and New York: Olms-Weidman, 1987, pp. 5779.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘A Seventeenth-Century Reader of Shakespeare’. The Review of English Studies 21, no. 84 (1945): 271–9.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore. ‘Shakespeare’s “Julius Caesar”: A Seventeenth-Century Manuscript’. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology 41.4 (1942): 401–17.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. ‘“Whoores subtile shifts”: Commonplacing Women in the Meisei Copy of the Shakespeare First Folio’. Unpublished article presented at the Shakespeare Association of America Meeting, Vancouver, 2015; 13 pp.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, Zachary. ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’. Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, ZacharyStructures of Popularity in the Early Modern Book Trade’. Shakespeare Quarterly 56 (2005): 206–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, ZacharyWhat Is Print Popularity? A Map of the Elizabethan Book Trade’, in Kesson, Andy and Smith, Emma (eds.), The Elizabethan Top Ten: Defining Print Popularity in Early Modern England. Farnham: Ashgate, 2013, pp. 1954.Google Scholar
Febvre, Lucien and Martin, Henri-Jean. The Coming of the Book: The Impact of Printing, 1480–1800 (1958). Trans. Gerard, David. London: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar
Fehrenbach, R. J. and Leedham-Green, E. S. (eds.). Private Libraries in Renaissance England: A Collection and Catalogue of Tudor and Early Stuart Book-Lists. 3 vols. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, 1992.Google Scholar
Field, Catherine. ‘“Many hands hands”: Writing the Self in Early Modern Women’s Recipe Books’, in Dowd, Michelle M. and Eckerle, Julie A. (eds.), Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 4963.Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. ‘Afterword’. Huntington Library Quarterly 73.3 (2010): 543–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, Juliet. Graffiti and the Writing Arts of Early Modern England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Forster, Antonia. ‘Avarice or Interest: The Secrets of Eighteenth-Century Reviewing’. Yale University Library Gazette 81 (2007): 167–76.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. The History of Sexuality, Volume 3: The Care of the Self (1984). Trans. Hurley, Robert. New York: Pantheon Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Freund, Elizabeth. The Return of the Reader: Reader Response Criticism. London: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
Frye, Roland. Shakespeare and Christian Doctrine. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Stuart and Rhodes, Neil (eds.). Shakespeare and Elizabethan Popular Culture. London: Centage Learning, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowan, Juliet Mary. ‘An Edition of Edward Pudsey’s Commonplace Book (c.1600–1615) from the Manuscript in the Bodleian Library’. University of London, M.Phil., 1967.Google Scholar
Goyet, Francis. Le sublime du ‘lieu commun’, L’invention rhétorique dans l’Antiquité et à la Renaissance. Paris: Champion, 1996.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. The Culture of Correction in Renaissance Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony. ‘Is the History of Reading a Marginal Enterprise? Guillaume Budé and His Books’. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 91.2 (1997): 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. ‘The Scandal of Shakespeare’s Sonnets’. Shakespeare Survey 46 (1994): 3549.Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’, in Marsden, Jean I. (ed.), The Appropriation of Shakespeare. Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1991, pp. 5791.Google Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de. Shakespeare Verbatim. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grazia, Margreta de, Quilligan, Maureen and Stallybrass, Peter (eds.). Subject and Object in Renaissance Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew. The Shakespearean Stage 1574–1642. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Hackel, Heidi Brayman. Reading Material in Early Modern England: Print, Gender, and Literacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Hammond, Paul. Figuring Sex between Men from Shakespeare to Rochester. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, L. W.The Shakespeare Collection in the Bodleian Library, Oxford’. Shakespeare Survey 4 (1951): 7895.Google Scholar
Hao, Tianhu. ‘Hesperides, or the Muses’ Garden and its Manuscript History’. The Library: The Transactions of the Bibliographical Society 10.4 (2009): 372404.Google Scholar
Hao, TianhuHesperides, or the Muses’ Garden: Commonplace Reading and Writing in Early Modern England’. PhD, Columbia University, 2006.Google Scholar
Havens, Earle (ed.). Commonplace Books: A History of Manuscripts and Printed Books from Antiquity to the Twentieth Century. New Haven, CT: Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 2001.Google Scholar
Heale, Elizabeth. ‘Songs, Sonnets and Autobiography: Self-Representation in Sixteenth-Century Verse Miscellanies’, in Dragstra, Henk, Ottway, Sheila and Wilcox, Helen (eds.), Betraying Our Selves: Forms of Self-Representation in Early Modern English Texts. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000, pp. 5975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedbäck, Ann-Mari. ‘The Douai Manuscript Reexamined’. Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 73 (1979): 118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbert, Christopher. George III: A Personal History. London: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Hinman, Charlton. ‘A Proof-Sheet in the First Folio of Shakespeare’, The Library, 4th Ser. 23 (1942): 101–7.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter. The Ornament of Action: Text and Performance in Restoration Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter and Orgel, Stephen (eds.). From Performance to Print in Shakespeare’s England. London: Palgrave, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Adam G.Commonplace Books’, in Stewart, Alan and Sullivan, Garrett et al. (eds.). The Encyclopedia of English Renaissance Literature. 3 vols. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 206–9.Google Scholar
Huang, Alexander C. Y.Global Shakespeare as Methodology’. Shakespeare 9.3. (2013): 373–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. K.The Marking of Sententiae in Elizabethan Printed Plays, Poems, and Romances’. The Library, 5th series, 6 (Dec. 1951): 171–88.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Mariko. The Shakespearean Stage Space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, Grace. Dramatists and Their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse. London and New York: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response (1976). Trans. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, H. J. Marginalia, Readers Writing in Books. New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Jardine, Lisa and Grafton, Anthony. ‘“Studied for Action”: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’. Past and Present 129 (1990): 3078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Simon. ‘Criticism, Taste, Aesthetics’, in Keymer, Thomas and Mee, Jon (eds.). The Cambridge Companion to English Literature 1740–1830. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004, pp. 2442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Simon. Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Jones, Emrys. The Origins of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Jowett, John. ‘Private Iteration and Public Life: The Dering Manuscript of Henry IV’. Unpublished seminar paper presented at the European Shakespeare Research Association congress. Montpellier, France, June 2013, 10 pp.Google Scholar
Jowett, John. Shakespeare and Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. ‘“A rarity most beloved”: Shakespeare and the Idea of Tragedy’, in Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E. (eds.), A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works, Vol I: The Tragedies. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2003, pp. 422.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Kennedy-Skipton, A. L. D.John Ward and Restoration Drama’. Shakespeare Quarterly 11.4 (1960): 493–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerrigan, John. ‘The Editor as Reader: Constructing Renaissance Texts’, in Raven, James, Small, Helen and Tadmor, Naomi (eds.), The Practice and Representation of Reading in England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 102–24.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane and Massai, Sonia (eds.). Shakespeare and Textual Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiessling, Nicolas K. The Library of Anthony Wood. Oxford: Oxford Bibliographical Society, 2002.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Arthur C.A Caroline Commentary on the Drama’. Modern Philology 66 (1969): 256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirwan, Peter ‘The First Collected “Shakespeare Apocrypha”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 62 (2011): 594601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd. ‘Making Shakespeare’s Books: Assembly and Intertextuality in the Archives’. Shakespeare Quarterly 60:3 (2009): 304–40.Google Scholar
Kramnick, Jonathan Brody. Making the English Canon: Print-Capitalism and the Cultural Past, 1700–1770. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Langhans, Edward A. Restoration Promptbooks. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Lanier, Douglas. Shakespeare and Modern Popular Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Joan Marie. Renaissance Concepts of the Commonplaces. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Lee, Sidney. Elizabethan and Other Essays. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Leedham-Green, Elisabeth and Webber, Teresa (eds.). The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland, Volume I: To 1640. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennam, T. N.Sir Edward Dering’s Collection of Playbooks, 1619–1624’. Shakespeare Quarterly 16 (1995): 145–53.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. ‘Playbooks’, in Raymond, Joad (ed.), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, Volume 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660, pp. 520–34.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Linton, Marion. ‘The Bute Collection of English Plays’. Times Literary Supplement (21 Dec. 1956): 772. Times Literary Supplement Historical Archive (online).Google Scholar
Littau, Karin. Theories of Reading: Books, Bodies and Bibliomania. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Macé, Marielle. Façons de lire, Manière d’être. Paris: Gallimard, 2011.Google Scholar
Maguin, Jean-Marie and Maguin, Angela. William Shakespeare. Paris: Gallimard, 1996.Google Scholar
Mandelbrote, Giles and Manley, K. A. (eds.). The Cambridge History of Libraries in Britain and Ireland, Volume II: 1640–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Manley, Lawrence. ‘Shakespeare and the Countess of Bridgewater: Playing, Patronage, and the Biography of Books’. Paper presented at the Shakespeare Association of America Conference, San Diego, April 2007.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. John Donne Coterie Poet. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. Manuscript, Print, and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. and Estill, Laura. ‘Shakespeare and the Manuscript Circulation of Texts’, in Kinney, Arthur (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012, pp. 5370.Google Scholar
Marsden, Jean. The Re-Imagined Text: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1995.Google Scholar
Mascuch, Michael. Origins of the Individualist Self: Autobiography and Self-Identity in England, 1591–1791. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Matchinske, Megan. ‘Serial Identity: History, Gender, and Form in the Diary Writing of Lady Anne Clifford’, in Dowd, Michelle M. and Eckerle, Julie A. (eds.). Genre and Women’s Life Writing in Early Modern England. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, pp. 6580.Google Scholar
Jean-Christophe, Mayer. ‘The Saint-Omer First Folio: Perspectives on a New Shakespearean Discovery’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 87 (2015): 720.Google Scholar
Jean-Christophe, Mayer. ‘Shakespeare and the Order of Books’. Early Modern Literary Studies, special issue no. 21, https://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-21/05-Mayer_Shak&theOrderOfBooks.htm.Google Scholar
McKitterick, David. ‘“Ovid with a Littleton”: The Cost of English Books in the Early Seventeenth Century’. Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society 11th ser. 2 (1997): 184234.Google Scholar
McKitterick, David. ‘Women and Their Books in Seventeenth-Century England: The Case of Elizabeth Puckering’. The Library 1.4 (2000): 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McManaway, James G. Studies in Shakespeare, Bibliography, and Theater. New York: The Shakespeare Association of America, 1969.Google Scholar
Meynell, G. G.John Locke’s Method of Common-Placing, as Seen in His Drafts and His Medical Notebooks, Bodleian MSS Locke d. 9, f. 21 and f. 23’. Seventeenth Century 8 (1993): 245–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Susan. Assuming the Positions: Cultural Pedagogy and the Politics of Commonplace Writing. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Morgan, P.Frances Wolfreston and “Hor Bouks”: A Seventeenth-Century Woman Book-Collector’. The Library, 6th Series, 11.3 (1989): 197219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moss, Ann. Printed Commonplace-Books and the Structuring of Renaissance Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Shakespeare for the People: Working-Class Readers, 1800–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew. Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Myers, Robin, Harris, Michel and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds). Owners, Annotators and the Signs of Reading. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. La communauté désœuvrée. Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1990 (1986).Google Scholar
Nelsen, Paul. ‘Chedworth and the Territoriality of the Reader’, in Gondris, Joanna (ed.), Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century, Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1998, pp. 140–63.Google Scholar
Nelson, Alan H.Shakespeare and the Bibliophiles: From the Earliest Years to 1616’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.), Owners, Annotators and the Signs of Reading. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2005, pp. 4973.Google Scholar
Newman, Gerald. The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1740–1830. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Ong, Walter J.Commonplace Rhapsody: Ravisius Textor, Zwinger and Shakespeare’, in Bolgar, R. R. (ed.), Classical Influences on European Culture A.D. 1500–1700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, pp. 91126.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. ‘The Authentic Shakespeare’. Representations 21 (1988): 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, Stephen. The Reader in the Book, A Study of Spaces and Traces. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon and Stern, Tiffany. Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasupathi, Vimala C.Arms and the Book: “Workes”, “Playes”, and “Warlike Accoutrements” in William Cavendish’s The Country Captain’. Philological Quarterly 91.2 (2012): 277303.Google Scholar
Patterson, Annabel. Censorship and Interpretation, The Conditions of Writing and Reading in Early Modern England. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Peters, Julie Stone. Theatre of the Book 1480–1880, Print, Text, and Performance in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Price, Leah. The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel: From Richardson to George Eliot. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000; repr. 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prince, Kathryn. ‘Shakespeare and English Nationalism’, in Ritchie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 277–94.Google Scholar
Randall, Dale B. J. Winter Fruit, English Drama 1642–1660. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric and West, Anthony. The Shakespeare First Folios: A Descriptive Catalogue. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012.Google Scholar
Raymond, Joad (ed.). The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, Volume 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, Neil. Shakespeare and the Origins of English. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (eds.). Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. ‘Engendering the Female Reader: Women’s Recreational Reading of Shakespeare in Early Modern England’, in Hackel, Heidi Brayman and Kelly, Catherine E. (eds.), Reading Women Literacy, Authorship, and Culture in the Atlantic World, 1500–1800. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2007, pp. 3654.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. Reading Shakespeare’s Poems in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. ‘Reading Shakespeare’s Tragedies of Love: Romeo and Juliet, Othello, and Antony and Cleopatra in Early Modern England’, in Dutton, Richard and Howard, Jean E. (eds.), A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003, pp. 108–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha. ‘Shakespeare “creepes into the women’s closets about”: Women Reading in a Room of Their Own’, in Mcmullan, G (ed.), Renaissance Configurations: Voices/Bodies/Spaces, 1580–1690. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1998, pp. 3063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha and Thompson, Ann (eds.). Women Reading Shakespeare, 1660–1900: An Anthology of Criticism. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Rose, Jonathan. The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Rumbold, Kate. Shakespeare and the Eighteenth-Century Novel: Cultures of Quotation from Samuel Richardson to Jane Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Scott-Warren, Jason. ‘Reading Graffiti in the Early Modern Book’. Huntington Library Quarterly 73.3 (2010): 363–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Charlotte. Shakespeare and the Idea of the Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharpe, Kevin. Reading Revolutions: The Politics of Reading in Early Modern England. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Shattuck, Charles H. The Shakespeare Promptbooks: A Descriptive Catalogue. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Shell, Alison. Shakespeare and Religion. London: Methuen Drama, 2010.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. John Dee and the Politics of Reading and Writing in the English Renaissance. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H.The Social Life of Books’, in Raymond, Joad (ed), The Oxford History of Popular Print Culture, Vol. 1: Cheap Print in Britain and Ireland to 1660. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 164–71.Google Scholar
Sherman, William H. Used Books: Marking Readers in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrank, Cathy. ‘Reading Shakespeare’s Sonnets: John Benson and the 1640 Poems’. Shakespeare 5.3 (2009): 271–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. The Illustrated Shakespeare, 1709–1875. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sillars, Stuart. Painting Shakespeare: The Artist As Critic, 1720–1820. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Sisson, Charles J.Shakespeare Quartos as Prompt-Copies: With Some Account of Cholmeley’s Players and a New Shakespeare Allusion’. Review of English Studies 18, no. 70 (1942): 129–43.Google Scholar
Skura, Meredith. Tudor Autobiography: Listening for Inwardness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Bruce R. Shakespeare Cut: Rethinking Cutwork in an Age of Distraction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Emma. Shakespeare’s First Folio: Four Centuries of an Iconic Book. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise (eds.). Renaissance Paratexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Adam. Autobiography in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Smyth, Adam“Divines into dry Vines”: Forms of Jesting in Renaissance England’, in Deutermann, Allison K. and Kiséry, András (eds.), Formal Matters: Reading the Matters of English Renaissance Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2013, pp. 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Adam. ‘Profit and Delight’: Printed Miscellanies in England, 1640–1682. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Snow, Vernon F.Francis Bacon’s Advice to Fulke Greville on Research Techniques’. Huntington Library Quarterly 23 (1960): 369–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Hazelton. Shakespeare Improved, The Restoration Versions in Quarto and on the Stage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spufford, M.First Steps in Literacy: The Reading and Writing Experiences of the Humblest Seventeenth-Century Spiritual Autobiographers’. Social History 4 (1979): 407–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St Clair, William. The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter, Roger Chartier, J. Mowery, Franklin and Wolfe, Heather. ‘Hamlet’s Tables and the Technologies of Writing in Renaissance England’. Shakespeare Quarterly 55.4 (2004): 379419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter and Chartier, Roger. ‘Reading and Authorship: The Circulation of Shakespeare, 1590-1619’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.), A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 2007, pp. 3556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stallybrass, Peter and Lesser, Zachary. ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’. Shakespeare Quarterly 59.4 (2008): 371420.Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Documents of Performance in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Stern, TiffanySermons, Plays and Note-Takers: Hamlet Q1 as a “Noted” Text’. Shakespeare Survey 66 (2013): 123.Google Scholar
Stern, TiffanyShakespeare in Drama’, in Ritchie, Fiona and Sabor, Peter (eds.), Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012, pp. 141–57.Google Scholar
Stern, TiffanyWatching as Reading: The Audience and Written Text in Shakespeare’s Playhouse’, in Maguire, Laurie (ed.), How to Do Things with Shakespeare: New Approaches, New Essays, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2008, pp. 136–59.Google Scholar
Stern, Virginia F. Gabriel Harvey, His Life, Marginalia and Library. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Stoddard, Roger E. (ed.). Marks in Books, Illustrated and Explained. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, 1985.Google Scholar
Sumimoto, Noriko ‘Updating Folios: Readers’ Reconfigurations and Customisations of Shakespeare’, in Mayer, Jean-Christophe, Sherman, William H., Sillars, Stuart and Vasileiou, Margaret (eds.), Shakespearean Configurations, Early Modern Literary Studies Special Issue 21 (2013): http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-21/07-Sumimoto_Updating%20Folios.htm.Google Scholar
Tan, Marcus. ‘Spectres of Shakespeare: Ong Keng Sen’s Search Hamlet and the Intercultural Myth’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 90.1 (2016): 129–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989; repr. 2001.Google Scholar
Taylor, F.The Books and Manuscripts of Scipio Le Sqyer, Deputy Chamberlain of the Exchequer (1620–59)’. Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library 25 (1941): 137–64.Google Scholar
Taylor, Gary. Reinventing Shakespeare: A Cultural History from the Restoration to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.Google Scholar
Thomas, Keith. ‘The Meaning of Literacy in Early Modern England’, in Baumann, Gerd (ed.), The Written Word: Literacy in Transition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986, pp. 97131.Google Scholar
Thompson, Ann. ‘“I’ll have grounds / More relative than this”: The Puzzle of John Ward’s Hamlet Promptbooks’. The Yearbook of English Studies 29 (1999): 138–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuite, Patrick. Theatre of Crisis: The Performance of Power in the Kingdom of Ireland, 1662–1692. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Vickers, Brian. ‘The Emergence of Character Criticism, 1774–1800’. Shakespeare Survey 34 (1981): 1121.Google Scholar
Vincent, David. Literacy and Popular Culture, England 1750–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. ‘George Steevens and the 1778 Variorum: A Hermeneutics and a Social Economy of Annotation’, in Sabor, Peter and Yachnin, Paul Edward (eds.), Shakespeare and the Eighteenth Century. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008, pp. 7183.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. ‘Literary Scholarship and the Life of Editing’, in Rivers, Isabel (ed.), Books and Their Readers in Eighteenth-Century England: New Essays. London; New York: Continuum, 2001, pp. 191215.Google Scholar
Walsh, Marcus. Shakespeare, Milton and Eighteenth-Century Literary Editing: The Beginnings of Interpretative Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Werstine, Paul. Early Modern Playhouse Manuscripts and the Editing of Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werstine, Paul“Foul Papers” and “Prompt-Books”: Printer’s Copy for Shakespeare’s Comedy of Errors’. Studies in Bibliography 41 (1988): 232–46Google Scholar
West, Anthony James. The Shakespeare First Folio, The History of the Book, Volume I: An Account of the First Folio Based on Its Sales and Prices, 1623–2000. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Wheale, Nigel. Writing and Society: Literacy, Print and Politics in Britain 1590–1660. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar
Wiggins, M.Shakespeare Jesuited: The Plagiarisms of “Pater Clarcus”’. The Seventeenth Century 20.1 (2005): 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willems, Michèle. ‘From Janus to Prometheus: The Paradoxical Construction of the Shakespeare Myth from the Restoration Onwards’. Cahiers Élisabéthains 90.1 (2016): 5868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Michael E. St Alban’s College Valladolid, Four Centuries of English Catholic Presence in Spain. London: Hurst & Company, 1986.Google Scholar
Wilson, Edward M.Shakespeare and Christian Doctrine: Some Qualifications’. Shakespeare Survey 23 (1970): 7989.Google Scholar
Williams, Owen and Lazzuri, Caryn (eds.). Foliomania! Stories behind Shakespeare’s Most Important Book. Washington, DC: Folger Shakespeare Library, 2011.Google Scholar
Winnicott, Donald. Playing and Reality. London: Routledge, 1971; repr. 2009.Google Scholar
Wiseman, Susan. Drama and Politics during the English Civil War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Ian. Understanding Material Culture. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woudhuysen, H. R. ‘Writing-Tables and Table Books’. Electronic British Library Journal (2004): 111.Google Scholar
Yamada, Akihiro. Experiencing Drama in the English Renaissance: Readers and Audiences. Abingdon: Routledge, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeandle, Laetitia. ‘The Dating of Sir Edward Dering’s Copy of “The History of King Henry the Fourth”’. Shakespeare Quarterly 37.2 (1986): 224–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwicker, Steven N.“What Every Literate Man Once Knew”: Tracing Readers in Early Modern England’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michel and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.), Owners, Annotators and the Signs of Reading. New Castle, DE: Oak Knoll Press, 2005, pp. 7590.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×