Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-ph5wq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T13:36:03.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - His father John Shakespeare

from Part I - Family

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

David Fallow
Affiliation:
Independent scholar
Paul Edmondson
Affiliation:
The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust
Stanley Wells
Affiliation:
The Shakespeare Birthplace Trust
Get access

Summary

The first biography of William Shakespeare in 1709 describes the playwright's father as ‘a considerable dealer in wool’ (Rowe 1709, p. ii). Winnow out the subsequent speculative or anecdotal descriptions of John Shakespeare and what emerges is a successful self-made man, active in the business that then dominated the nation's economy. He lived almost two decades longer than his famous son, dying in 1601 aged 71 or so, still litigating on business debts in his final years.

John Shakespeare's apparent standing in the Stratford community changed over his lifetime, but there were solid financial reasons for this as legislation and regulation sought to restrict those who dealt in wool. Both father and playwright son died wealthy landed gentlemen, and the similarities in their handling of money rather than the differences in career choices have, remarkably, been largely ignored. Sufficient records exist to show how the Shakespeare fortune was accumulated, and understanding the economic necessities of their business illuminates much of the family's lives. William Shakespeare was never the romantic poor boy from an impoverished family. To better comprehend the son, we must understand the father. William Shakespeare's ‘works’ are poems and plays; John Shakespeare's ‘work’ was broking wool and lending money. Here I present a revisionist view of the father's business success through reference to Stratford-upon-Avon's borough records, his court cases and an analysis of English woolbroking in the sixteenth century. John Shakespeare was, in reality, a successful and astute individual who voluntarily left public life when his woolbroking business was threatened. Through an analysis of the social, political and economic contexts surrounding the 1576 Royal proclamation against woolbrokers or ‘broggers’, it can be shown that the Shakespeare family never experienced any economic adversity. This has significant implications for understanding William Shakespeare‘s prosperity, shifting the onus away from his artistic endeavours to the family business.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Shakespeare Circle
An Alternative Biography
, pp. 26 - 39
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, K. J. 1958.‘Flock Management in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, Economic History Review 2.11: 98–112Google Scholar
Bearman, Robert 2005. ‘John Shakespeare: A Papist or Just Penniless’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56.4: 411–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beresford, M. W. 1957. ‘The Common Informer, the Penal Statutes and Economic Regulation’, Economic History Review 10.2: 221–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindoff, S. T. 1950. Tudor England. London. PenguinGoogle Scholar
Bland, Mark 2004. ‘Ben Jonson and the Legacies of the Past’, Huntington Library Quarterly 67.3: 371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, Peter 1962. The Wool Trade in Tudor and Stuart England. London. MacmillanCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, T. 1906. Shakespeare: Puritan and Recusant. Edinburgh. OliphantGoogle Scholar
Chambers, E. K. 1923. The Elizabethan Stage, 4 vols. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Chambers, E. K. 1930 William Shakespeare, 2 vols. Oxford. Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
Dasent, J. R. (ed.) 1894. Acts of the Privy Council of England Vol. 10, 32 vols. London. HMSOGoogle Scholar
Dasent, J. R. 1895 Acts of the Privy Council of England Vol. 10. London. HMSOGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine 2001. Ungentle Shakespeare. London. ArdenGoogle Scholar
Fallow, David 2008. ‘Like Father Like Son: Financial Practices in the Shakespeare Family’, Studies in Theatre and Performance 28.3 (2008): 253–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fripp, Edgar 1930. Shakespeare Studies. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Halliday, F. E. 1964. A Shakespeare Companion. London. PenguinGoogle Scholar
Halliwell-Phillipps, J. O. 1889. Outlines of the Life of Shakespeare, 2 vols. London. LongmansGoogle Scholar
Hewart, Beatrice 1900. ‘The Cloth Trade in the North of England in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries’, The Economic Journal 10.37: 20–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Mervyn 1974. Family, Lineage and Civil Society. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Law, Jonathan, and Martin, Elizabeth E. 2009. A Dictionary of Law. Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogue, Kate Emery 2006. Shakespeare's Friends. London. PraegerGoogle Scholar
Rich, E. E. 1937. The Ordinance of the Book of the Staple. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Nicholas 1709. The Works of William Shakespear. London. TonsonGoogle Scholar
Savage, Richard 1921–1929. Minutes and Accounts of the Corporation of Stratford-upon-Avon and Other Records 1553–1620, 4 vols. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Schoenbaum, S. 1975. William Shakespeare: A Documentary Life. Oxford. ClarendonGoogle Scholar
Sisson, C. J. 1928. ‘Marks as Signatures’, The Library 9.1: 1–37. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sisson, C. J. 1939. ‘Shakespeare Man and Artist by Edgar Fripp’, The Modern Language Review (MHRA) 34 .3: 433–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, Lawrence 1949. ‘Elizabethan Overseas Trade’, The Economic History Review 2.1: 30–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, D. L., and Evans, N. E. 1984. ‘John Shakespeare in the Exchequer’, Shakespeare Quarterly 35.3: 315–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TNA The National Archives
Unwin, George (ed.) 1918. Finance and Trade Under Edward IIIwww.british-history.ac.uk/manchester-uni/london-lay-subsidy/1332/pp221-232 [accessed 6 May 2015]
Wells, Stanley 2002. Shakespeare for All Time. London. MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Wells, Stanley and Dobson, Michael (eds.) 2001. The Oxford Companion to Shakespeare. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, John 1620. Court Leet. London. IslipGoogle Scholar
Youngs, Frederic A. 1976. The Proclamations of the Tudor Queens. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×