Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Print publication year: 2004
  • Online publication date: December 2009

1 - Shakespeare and language: an introduction

Summary

TONGUE

In ‘Shakespeare's talking animals’, Terence Hawkes makes a fundamental claim about language and Shakespeare's work. The plays, he says, contain ‘ideas about language’ which we neglect ‘because we are anaethetized to them by our own literacy’ (Hawkes: p. 69, this volume). Nothing could be more important in seeking to understand Early Modern ideas about language and use of language than becoming aware of our own narcotic unawareness of them. We are used to historicizing Shakespeare in every respect except his language, and, as Hawkes implies, our ignorance is matched only by our ignorance of our ignorance. But I would go further than Hawkes: as I will try to show in this introduction, there are not only ideas about language we miss; there are usages of language we misinterpret because we mistake the nature of language in the Early Modern period.

From the point of view of linguistics, and taken as a product of human cognition, language can be assumed to be the same thing in all cultures, and at all times in attested human history. However, taken as a cultural entity, within literary or cultural criticism, language changes radically between the Early Modern period and our own – as radically as other cultural entities such as government, religion, and duty change. In the first part of this introduction, I will try to make language strange, to give an idea of its different cultural status in the Early Modern period; in the second, I will examine the curious reality our culture has bestowed on ‘wordes’, and what this does to our readings of Shakespeare.

REFERENCES
Allen, Don Cameron, ed., 1946, Essayes by Sir William Cornwallis the Younger (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press)
Barber, Charles 1997, Early Modern English (2nd edn) (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press)
Benson, Philip 2001, Ethnocentrism and the English Dictionary (London: Routledge)
Bradbrook, Muriel 1964, ‘St George for Spelling Reform!’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 15, 129–41
Cameron, Lynne J. 1998, ‘Review of Andrew Goatly, The Language of Metaphor’, English Language and Linguistics, 2: 1, 162–5
Danielson, Bror and Arvid Gabrielson, eds., 1972, Alexander Gill's Logonomia Anglica (1619), (two vols.) (Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell)
Davis, Herbert and Harry Carter, eds., 1958, Joseph Moxon 1683–4 Mechanick Exercises on the Whole Art of Printing (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Dobson, E. J., ed., 1957, The Phonetic Writings of Robert Robinson (London: English Early Text Society 238)
Dobson, E. J., ed. 1968, English Pronunciation 1500–1700 (two vols., second edn) (Oxford: Clarendon Press)
Gaskell, Philip 1972, A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oxford: Oxford University Press)
Hope, Jonathan and Michael Witmore, forthcoming, ‘The Very Large Textual Object: a Prosthetic Reading of Shakespeare’, Early Modern Literary Studieswww.shu.ac.uk/emls/emlshome.html
Jucker, Andreas, ed., 1995, Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English (Amsterdam: John Benjamins)
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg, eds., 1996, Sociolinguistics and Language History: Studies Based on the Corpus of Early English Correspondence (Amsterdam: Rodopi)
Nevalainen, Terttu and Helena Raumolin-Brunberg 2003, Historical Sociolinguistics: Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England (London: Longman)
Ong, Walter 1965, ‘Oral Residue in Tudor Prose Style’, PMLA 80, 144–55
Ong, Walter 1967, The Presence of the Word (New Haven: Yale University Press)
Ong, Walter 1982, Orality and Literacy: The Technologising of the Word (London: Routledge)
Parker, Pat 1996, Shakespeare from the Margins: Language, Culture, Context (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
Rissanen, Matti Merja Kytö and Minna Palander, eds., 1993, Early English in the Computer Age: Explorations through the Helsinki Corpus (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter)
Salmon, Vivian 1979, The Study of Language in Seventeenth Century England (Amsterdam: John Benjamins)
Sex Pistols, 1977, ‘Pretty Vacant’ (Virgin Records Ltd: vs184)
Shen, Yeshayahu and Michal, Cohen, 1998, ‘How come Silence is Sweet but Sweetness is not Silent: A Cognitive Account of Directionality in Poetic Synaesthesia’, Language and Literature, 7: 2, 123–40
Speed Hill, W., ed., 1993, New Ways of Looking at Old Texts (New York: Renaissance English Text Society)
Sturrock, John 2003, ‘Call Her Daisy-Ray’, London Review of Books, 25: 17, 11.9.2003
Taylor, Gary 2004, Buying Whiteness: Race, Skin, Slavery from the European Renaissance to African American Literature (Palgrave, 2004), chapter 6
Vorlat, Emma 1975, The Development of English Grammatical Theory 1586–1737 (Leuven: Leuven University Press)
Wright, Laura 1995, ‘Syntactic structure of witnesses’ narratives from the Sixteenth Century Court Minute Books of the Royal Hospitals of Bridewell and Bedlam', Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 96: 1, 93–105
Wright, Laura ed., 2000, The Development of Standard English 1300–1800 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)