Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:01:10.769Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Differences in foraging behaviour and feeding ecology in giant petrels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2009

Jacob Gonzáles-Solís
Affiliation:
Departamento Biologia Animal (Vertebrats), Av Diagonal 645, Barcelona 08028, Spain
John P. Croxall
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge
Kathreen Ruckstuhl
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Peter Neuhaus
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

OVERVIEW

The two sibling species of giant petrels (northern Macronectes halli and the southern M. giganteus), the dominant scavengers of the sub-Antarctic and Antarctic environment, are one of the best examples of sexual segregation in avian foraging and feeding ecology. During breeding, males and females feed mainly on penguin and seal carrion, but females also feed extensively on marine prey such as cephalopods, fish and krill. Sexual differences in diet are reflected not only in analyses of regurgitations, but also in the isotopic composition of carbon and nitrogen, as well as in their heavy metal burdens. Direct observations and tracking of pelagic movements showed that males of both species usually forage closer to the breeding grounds, exploiting carcasses on beaches, whereas females show more pelagic habits. In consequence, foraging effort, foraging efficiency, predictability of resources exploited, optimum foraging time and activity budgets differ between sexes. During winter, however, studies on activity and pelagic movements suggest more similar feeding habits between sexes. Overall, differences in foraging and feeding ecology are probably related to the substantial sexual size dimorphism; males of both species are 16–35% heavier and have disproportionately larger bills than females. The importance of size in contest competition to access carrion may explain their large body size as well as the competitive exclusion of females from coastal habitats, reducing intraspecific competition for food. Ultimately, a differential exploitation of carrion probably increased sexual dimorphism not only in body size but also in the feeding structures such as bill size.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×