Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:10:01.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Diagnostic Imaging: Focusing a Lens on Sex and Gender

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2016

Alyson J. McGregor
Affiliation:
Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University
Esther K. Choo
Affiliation:
Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University
Bruce M. Becker
Affiliation:
Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NHAMCS. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2008 Emergency Department Summary Tables. Medical Care (2008).Google Scholar
Smith-Bindman, R. et al. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996–2010. JAMA 307, 2400–9 (2013).Google Scholar
Miller, M. E. MedPAC recommendations on imaging services. Secretary (2005). At http://vns.aan.com/media/031705_testimonyimaging-hou.pdf.Google Scholar
Kocher, K. E., Meurer, W. J., Desmond, J. S. & Nallamothu, B. K. Effect of testing and treatment on emergency department length of stay using a national database. Academic Emergency Medicine 19, 525–34 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trzeciak, S. & Rivers, E. P. Emergency department overcrowding in the United States: an emergeing threat to patient safety and public health. Emergency Medicine Journal 20, 402–5 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volk, M. & Ubel, P. Better off not knowing. Archives of Internal Medicine 171, 487–88 (2011).Google ScholarPubMed
Stone, J. H. Incidentalomas – clinical correlation and translational science required. New England Journal of Medicine 354, 2748–9 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U. S. F. and D. A. Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging. Ncrp Rep. (2010). At www.fda.gov/downloads/Radiation-EmittingProducts/RadiationSafety/RadiationDoseReduction/UCM200087.pdf.Google Scholar
Berdahl, C. T., Vermeulen, M. J., Larson, D. B. & Schull, M. J. Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada. Annals of Emergency Medicine 62, 48694.e3 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hricak, H. et al. Managing radiation use in medical imaging: A multifaceted challenge. Radiology 258, 889905 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iakovou, I. et al. Impact of gender on the incidence and outcome of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 15, 1822 (2003).Google ScholarPubMed
Lang, D. M., Alpern, M. B., Visintainer, P. F. & Smith, S. T. Gender risk for anaphylactoid reaction to radiographic contrast media. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 95, 813–7 (1995).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sistrom, C. L. The appropriateness of imaging: A comprehensive conceptual framework. Radiology 251, 637–49 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Congress. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. (2010). At http://democrats.senate.gov/pdfs/reform/patient-protection-affordable-care-act-as-passed.pdf.Google Scholar
Swensen, S. J. Patient-centered Imaging. American Journal of Medicine 125, 115–17 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pines, J. M. Trends in the rates of radiography use and important diagnoses in emergency department patients with abdominal pain. Medical Care 47, 782–6 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westphalen, A. C., Hsia, R. Y., Maselli, J. H., Wang, R. & Gonzales, R. Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: National trends, diagnoses, and predictors. Academic Emergency Medicine 18, 699707 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, R. H. et al. CT in detecting urinary tract calculi: Influence on patient imaging and clinical outcomes. Radiology 225, 441–9 (2002).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, L. C., Atlas, S. W. & Afendulis, C. C. Expanded use of imaging technology and the challenge of measuring value. Health Affairs (Millwood) 27, 1467–78 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazelle, G. S. et al. A framework for assessing the value of diagnostic imaging in the era of comparative. Radiology 261, 692–8 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuur, J. D. et al. A top-five list for emergency medicine. JAMA Internal Medicine (2014). doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.12688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. I., Haims, A. H., Monico, E. P., Brink, J. A. & Forman, H. P. Diagnostic CT scans: Assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 231, 393–8 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ozasa, K. et al. Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors, Report 14, 1950–2003: An overview of cancer and noncancer diseases. Radiation Research 177, 229–43 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doss, M. Linear no-threshold model may not be appropriate for estimating cancer risk from CT. Radiology 270, 307–8 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, J. M. et al. AAPM Report No. 204: Size-Specific Dose Estimates in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. American Association of Physicists in Medicine 1–24 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Guidelines for Multislice Computed Tomography Appendix 1. At www.msct.eu/PDF_FILES/Appendix MSCT Dosimetry.pdf.Google Scholar
Berrington de González, A. et al. Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Archives of Internal Medicine 169, 2071–7 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith-Bindman, R. et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Archives of Internal Medicine 169, 2078–86 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Academy of Sciences. Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation: BIER VII – Phase 2 (Executive Summary). 2 (2006).Google Scholar
Pearce, M. S. et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 6736, 17 (2012).Google Scholar
Lukasciewicz, A. & Moore, C. L. Radiation dose index of renal colic protocol CT studies in the United States: A report from the American College of Radiology National Radiology Data Registry. Radiology (2014). At http://pubs.rsna.org/doi/full/10.1148/radiol.14131601.Google Scholar
Niemann, T., Kollmann, T. & Bongartz, G. Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: A meta-analysis. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 191, 396401 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhuiya, F. A., Pitts, S. R. & McCaig, L. F. Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999–2008. NCHS Data Brief 18 (2010). At www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20854746.Google Scholar
Redberg, R. F. Radiation minimization strategies for medical imaging. JAMA Internal Medicine 173, 2014 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benacerraf, B. R., McLoud, T. C., Rhea, J. T., Tritschler, V. & Libby, P. An assessment of the contribution of chest radiography in outpatients with acute chest complaints: A prospective study. Radiology 138, 293–9 (1981).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. L., Molina, A. & Lin, H. Ultrasonography in community emergency departments in the United States: Access to ultrasonography performed by consultants and status of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography. Annals of Emergency Medicine 47, 147–53 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labovitz, A. J. et al. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: A consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 23, 1225–30 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, R. A. et al. Point-of-care focused cardiac ultrasound for the assessment of thoracic aortic dimensions, dilation, and aneurysmal disease. Academic Emergency Medicine 19, 244–7 (2012).Google ScholarPubMed
Parker, M. S. et al. Female breast radiation exposure during CT pulmonary angiography. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 185, 1228–33 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kosowsky, J. M. Approach to the ED patient with “low-risk” chest pain. mergency Medicine Clinics of North America 29, 721–7, vi (2011).Google Scholar
Jones, I. D. & Slovis, C. M. Pitfalls in evaluating the low-risk chest pain patient. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 28, 183201, ix (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Einstein, A. J. & York, N. Effects of radiation exposure from cardiac imaging. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 59, 553–65 (2012).Google ScholarPubMed
Einstein, A. J., Tilkemeier, P., Fazel, R., Rakotoarivelo, H. & Shaw, L. J. Radiation safety in nuclear cardiology – current knowledge and practice: Results from the 2011 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology member survey. JAMA Internal Medicine 173, 2013–15 (2014).Google Scholar
Weigold, W. G. Coronary computed tomography angiography in the emergency department: The high stakes game of low risk chest pain. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 61, 893–5 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hausleiter, J. et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301, 500507 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ayaram, D. et al. Triple Rule-out computed tomographic angiography for chest pain: A diagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis. Academic Emergency Medicine. 20, 861–71 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiener, R. S., Schwartz, L. M. & Woloshin, S. Time trends in pulmonary embolism in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine 171, 831–7 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, J. Further illumination of the test threshold approach in the care of emergency department patients with symptoms of pulmonary embolism. Annals of Emergency Medicine 55, 327–30 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, J. et al. D-dimer threshold increase with pretest probability unlikely for pulmonary embolism to decrease unnecessary computerized tomographic pulmonary angiography. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 10, 572–81 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, P. S. et al. Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging. Ann Int Med, 135: 98107 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kabrhel, C. et al. Factors associated with positive D-dimer results in patients evaluated for pulmonary embolism. Academic Emergency Medicine 17, 589–97 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkatesh, A. et al. Evaluation of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department and consistency with a national quality measure: Quantifying the Opportunity for Improvement. Archives of Internal Medicine 1 (2012). doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2012.1804Google Scholar
Kline, J. et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 6, 772–80 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocher, K. E. et al. National trends in use of computed tomography in the emergency department. Annals of Emergency Medicine 58, 452–62 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everhart, J. E., Khare, M., Hill, M. & Maurer, K. R. Prevalence and ethnic differences in gallbladder disease in the United States. Gastroenterology 117, 632–9 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Privette, T. W., Carlisle, M. C. & Palma, J. K. Emergencies of the liver, gallbladder, and pancreas. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 29, 293317, viiiix (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Summers, S. M. et al. A prospective evaluation of emergency department bedside ultrasonography for the detection of acute cholecystitis. Annals of Emergency Medicine 56, 114–22 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jang, T. B. Bedside biliary sonography: Advancement and future horizons. Annals of Emergency Medicine 56, 123–5 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, A. E. & Ufberg, J. W. Appendicitis, diverticulitis, and colitis. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 29, 347–68, ix (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, L. et al. Cost and radiation savings of partial substitution of ultrasound for CT in appendicitis evaluation: A national projection. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology 202, 124–35 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez, J. P. & Mattu, A. Abdominal pain in the elderly. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 24, 371–88, vii (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ernst, C. B. Current concepts: Abdominal aortic anuerysm. New England Journal of Medicne 328, 1167–72 (1993).Google Scholar
Guirguis-Blake, J. M., Beil, T. L., Senger, C. A. & Whitlock, E. P. Ultrasonography screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms: A systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Archives of Internal Medicine 160, 321–29 (2014).Google ScholarPubMed
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. (2005). At www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspsaneu.htm.Google Scholar
Moore, C. L., Holliday, R. S., Hwang, J. Q. & Osborne, M. R. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in asymptomatic at-risk patients using emergency ultrasound. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 26, 883–7 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stoker, J., VanRanden, A., Wytze, L. & Boermeester, M. A. Imaging patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiology 253, 3146 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scales, C. D., Smith, A. C., Hanley, J. M. & Saigal, C. S. Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. European Urology 62, 160–5 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. L., Daniels, B., Singh, D., Luty, S. & Molinaro, A. Prevalence and clinical importance of alternative causes of symptoms using a renal colic computed tomography protocol in patients with flank or back pain and absence of pyuria. Academic Emergency Medicine 20, 470–8 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. L. et al. Derivation and validation of a clinical prediction rule for uncomplicated ureteral stone – the STONE score: Retrospective and prospective observational cohort studies. British Medical Journal 348, g2191 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ghani, K. R. et al. Trends in surgery for upper urinary tract calculi in the USA using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample: 1999–2009. BJU International 112, 224–30 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strope, S., Wolf, J. S. & Hollenbeck, B. K. Changes in gender distribution of urinary stone disease. Urology 75, 543–6, 546.e1 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scales, C. D. et al. Changing gender prevalence of stone disease. Journal of Urology 177, 979–82 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sierzenski, P. R. et al. Applications of justification and optimization in medical imaging: Examples of clinical guidance for computed tomography use in emergency medicine. Annals of Emergency Medicine 18 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.08.027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ha, M. & MacDonald, R. D. Impact of CT scan in patients with first episode of suspected nephrolithiasis. Journal of Emergency Medicine 27, 225–31 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coursey, C. A. et al. ACR appropriateness criteria acute onset flank pain – suspicion of stone disease. Ultrasound Quarterly 28, 227–33 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C. L. & Scoutt, L. Sonography first for acute flank pain? Journal of Ultrasound Medicine 31, 1703–11 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goertz, J. K. & Lotterman, S. Can the degree of hydronephrosis on ultrasound predict kidney stone size? American Journal of Emergency Medicine 28, 813–6 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jindal, G. & Ramchandani, P. Acute flank pain secondary to urolithiasis: Radiologic evaluation and alternate diagnoses. Radiologic Clinics of North American 45, 395410, vii (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C., Meyers, A. B., Capotasto, J. & Bokhari, J. Prevalence of abnormal CT findings in patients with proven ovarian torsion and a proposed triage schema. Emergency Radiology 16, 115–20 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2012: With Special Feature on Emergency Care. (2012). At www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus12.pdf#087.Google Scholar
Korley, F. K., Pham, J. C. & Kirsch, T. D. Use of advanced radiology during visits. JAMA 304, 1465–71 (2010).Google ScholarPubMed
Huber-Wagner, S. et al. Effect of whole-body CT during trauma resuscitation on survival: A retrospective, multicentre study. Lancet 373, 1455–61 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zondervan, R. L., Hahn, P. F., Sadow, C. A., Liu, B. & Lee, S. I. Body CT scanning in young adults: Examination indications, patient outcomes, and risk of radiation-induced cancer. Radiology 267, 460–9 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Healy, D. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of routine total body CT compared with selective CT in trauma patients. Emergency Medicine Journal 31, 101–8 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gupta, M. et al. Selective use of computed tomography compared with routine whole body imaging in patients with blunt trauma. Annals of Emergency Medicine 58, 407–16, e15 (2011).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Diercks, D. B. et al. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute blunt abdominal trauma. Annals of Emergency Medicine 57, 387404 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalea, T. M. et al. Focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST): Results from an International Consensus Conference. Journal of Trauma 57, 466–72 (1999).Google Scholar
Niska, R., Bhuiya, F. & Xu, J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. National Health Statistics Report. 131 (2010). At www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20726217.Google Scholar
Devries, A. et al. CT scan utilization patterns in pediatric patients with recurrent headache. Pediatrics (2013). doi:10.1542/peds.2012–3862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuppermann, N. et al. Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: A prospective cohort study. Lancet 374, 1160–70 (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saber Tehrani, A. S. et al. Rising annual costs of dizziness presentations to U.S. emergency departments. Academic Emergency Medicine 20, 689–96 (2013).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stiell, I. G. et al. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet 357, 1391–6 (2001).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haydel, M. J. et al. Indications for computed tomography in patients with minor head injury. New England Journal of Medicine 343, 100105 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Melnick, E. R. et al. CT overuse for mild traumatic brain injury. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 38, 483–9 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Friedman, B. W. & Grosberg, B. M. Diagnosis and management of the primary headache disorders in the emergency department setting. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 27, 7187, viii (2009).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, J. E. ACR appropriateness criteria: Headache. American Journal of Neuroradiology 28, 1824–6 (2007).Google Scholar
Edlow, J., Panagos, P. D., Godwin, S., Thomas, T. L. & Decker, W. W. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting to the emergency department with acute headache. Annals of Emergency Medicine 52, 407–36 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, S., Lavonas, E. J., Mace, S. E., Napoli, A. M. & Fesmire, F. M. Clinical policy: Critical issues in the initial evaluation and management of patients presenting to the emergency department in early pregnancy. Annals of Emergency Medicine 60, 381–90, e28 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, C. & Promes, S. B. Ultrasound in pregnancy. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America 22, 697722 (2004).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, C., Todd, W. M., O’Brien, E. & Lin, H. Free fluid in Morison’s pouch on bedside ultrasound predicts need for operative intervention in suspected ectopic pregnancy. Academic Emergency Medicine 14, 755–8 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andersen, B. & Nielsen, T. F. Appendicitis in pregnancy: Diagnosis, management and complications. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 78, 758–62 (1999).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia-bournissen, F., Shrim, A. & Koren, G. Safety of gadolinium during pregnancy. Canadian Family Physician 52, 309–11 (2006).Google ScholarPubMed
Revel, M. P. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for an acute pulmonary embolism: Results of the “IRM-EP” study. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 10, 743–50 (2012).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×