Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Print publication year: 2012
  • Online publication date: October 2012




In this part we shall discuss the regularity of boundaries of those sets of finite perimeter which arise as minimizers in some of the variational problems considered so far. The following theorem exemplifies the kind of result we shall obtain. We recall from Section 16.2 that E is a local perimeter minimizer (at scale r0) in some open set A, if spt μE = E (recall Remark 16.11) and

whenever EΔF ⊂⊂ B(x, r0) ∩ A and xA.

TheoremIf n ≥ 2, A is an open set inn, and E is a local perimeter minimizer in A, then AE is an analytic hypersurface with vanishing mean curvature which is relatively open in AE, while thesingular set of E in A,

satisfies the following properties:

(i) if 2 ≤ n ≤ 7, then Σ(E; A) is empty;

(ii) if n = 8, then Σ(E; A) has no accumulation points in A;

(iii) if n ≥ 9, then Hs(Σ(E; A)) = 0 for every s > n − 8.

These assertions are sharp: there exists a perimeter minimizer E in8such that H0(Σ(E; ℝ8)) = 1; moreover, if n ≥ 9, then there exists a perimeter minimizer E inn such that Hn−8(Σ(E;ℝn)) = ∞.

The proof of this deep theorem, which will take all of Part III, is essentially divided into two parts. The first one concerns the regularity of the reduced boundary in A and, precisely, it consists of proving that the locally Hn−1- rectifiable set AE is, in fact, a C1,γ-hypersurface for every γ ∈ (0, 1).

Related content

Powered by UNSILO