Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T16:48:55.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Seasonal Changes in Immune Function

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2009

Randy J. Nelson
Affiliation:
Ohio State University
Gregory E. Demas
Affiliation:
Indiana University
Sabra L. Klein
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Lance J. Kriegsfeld
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Get access

Summary

Another year! – another deadly blow!

Wordsworth, November, 1806

Introduction

In contrast to other physiological processes, immune function has been assumed to remain relatively constant across the seasons (see Sheldon & Verhulst 1996). Thus, seasonal fluctuations in death and disease were, historically, attributed to seasonal cycles in pathogen virulence and not to changes in host immunity (see Chapter 3 for details). Recent evidence, however, suggests that immune function varies substantially on a seasonal basis (Lochmiller et al. 1994; Nelson & Demas 1996). Maintaining maximal immune function is energetically expensive; the cascades of dividing immune cells, the onset and maintenance of inflammation and fever, and the production of humoral immune factors all require significant energy (Chapter 6; Maier et al. 1994; Demas et al. 1997). Energy utilization involves elevation of basal metabolic rate, blood glucose, and free fatty acid levels. Therefore, mounting an energetically costly immune response has the potential to compromise the ability to preserve protein stores in muscle (Beutler & Cerami 1988). Additionally, mounting an immune response requires resources that could otherwise be allocated to other biological functions (Sheldon & Verhulst 1996). Thus, it is reasonable to consider immune function in terms of energetic trade-offs. Individuals may partition resources among the immune system and other biological processes, such as reproduction, growth, or thermogenesis. Consequently, animals may maintain the highest level of immune function that is energetically possible, given the constraints of processes essential for survival, growth, reproduction, thermogenesis, foraging, and other activities (Festa-Bianchet 1989; Richner et al. 1995; Deerenberg et al. 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×