Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T02:40:44.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - “Legal Theory,” Strategies of Learned Production, and the Relatively Weak Autonomy of the Subfield of Learned Law

from Part I - Histories of the Legal Contemporary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2017

By
Yves Dezalay  and
Bryant G. Garth
Edited by
Justin Desautels-Stein  and
Christopher Tomlins
Justin Desautels-Stein
Affiliation:
University of Colorado School of Law
Christopher Tomlins
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Searching for Contemporary Legal Thought , pp. 137 - 154
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited – Chapter 7

Auerbach, Jerold 1976. Unequal Justice: Lawyers and Social Change in Modern America. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Harold J. 1983. Law and Revolution: The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Biskupic, Joan, Roberts, Janet, and Shiffman, John 2014. “The echo chamber: a small group of lawyers and its outsized influence at the U.S. Supreme Court,” Reuters Special Report, December 8. http://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/scotus/1/52Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Sidney 1988. The Rise of the Counter-Establishment. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1986. “The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field,” Hastings Law Journal 38: 805–53.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 1998. The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre 2012. Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992). Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Brundage, James 2008. The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coates, Benjamin 2015. “Securing hegemony through law: Venezuela, the U.S. asphalt trust, and the uses of international law, 1904–1909,” The Journal of American History 102: 380–405.Google Scholar
Coates, Benjamin 2016. Legalist Empire: The United States, Civilization, and International Law in the Early Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Condliffe, Ellen Lagemann 1992. The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy, and Public Policy. New York: Carnegie.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Development of a Transnational Legal Field. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves, and Garth, Bryant G 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant 2006. “From the cold war to Kosovo: The rise and renewal of international human rights law as a socio-legal field,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2: 231–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G 2015. “Public interest law, corporate law firms, and the structure of the U.S. legal field: the sociological context for ‘law and social change.’” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Yves and Garth, Bryant G 2016. “Constructing a transatlantic marketplace of disputes on the symbolic foundations of international justice,” in Mallard, Grégoire and Sgard, Jérôme (eds.), Contractual Knowledge: One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets. Cambridge University Press, pp. 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, Neil 1995. Patterns of American Jurisprudence. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fourcade, Marion 2009. Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garth, Bryant G. and Sterling, Joyce 1998. “From legal realism to law and society: reshaping law for the last stages of the social activist state,” Law and Society Review 32: 409–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gawalt, Gerald W. (ed.) 1984. The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert W. 1984. “The ideal and the actual in the law: fantasies and practices of New York City lawyers, 1870–1910,” in Gawalt, (ed.), pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
Hackney, James R. 2012. Legal Intellectuals in Conversation: Reflections on the Construction of Contemporary Legal Theory. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey 1996. The World Turned Right Side Up. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2011. “Support structures and constitutional change,” Law & Social Inquiry 36: 551–74.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2012. “Helping ideas have consequences,” Denver University Law Review 89: 197–243.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2013. “It's the network: the Federalist Society as a supplier of intellectual capital for the Supreme Court,” Studies in Law, Politics, & Society 61: 137–78.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda 2015. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kabaservice, Geoffrey 2005. The Guardians: Kingman Brewster, His Circle, and the Rise of the Liberal Establishment. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst 1997. The King's Two Bodies: A Study in Medieval Political Theology. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kolko, Gabriel 1965. Railroads and Regulation, 1877–1916. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Michael 1988. From Patrician to Professional Elite: The Transformation of the New York City Bar Association. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Reich, Charles 1964. “The new property,” The Yale Law Journal 73: 733–78.Google Scholar
Sacriste, Guillaume 2011. La République des Constitutionnalistes: Professeurs de Droit et Légitimation de l’État en France (1870–1914). Paris: Sciences-Po.Google Scholar
Sacriste, Guillaume and Vauchez, Antoine 2007. “The force of international law: lawyers’ diplomacy on the international scene in the 1920s.” Law and Social Inquiry 32: 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlegel, John Henry 1995. American Legal Realism and Empirical Social Science. University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Shamir, Ronen 1995. Managing Legal Uncertainty. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Southworth, Ann 2008. Lawyers of the Right: Professionalizing the Conservative Coalition. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven 2008. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control over the Law. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teles, Steven 2009. “Transformative bureaucracy: Reagan's lawyers and the dynamics of political investment,” Studies in American Political Development 23: 61–88.Google Scholar
Tomlins, Christopher 2000. “Framing the field of law's disciplinary encounters: a historical narrative,” Law & Society Review 34: 911–72.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark 1979. “Truth, justice, and the American Way: an interpretation of public law scholarship in the seventies,” Texas Law Review 57: 1307–58.Google Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2007. “Une élite d'intermédiaires. Genèse d'un capital juridique européen (1950 – 1970),“ Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales 1, 166–7): 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, Antoine 2014. “The international way of expertise: the first world court and the genesis of transnational expert fields,” European University Institute. Working Paper 2014–80.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×