Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:38:28.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Managed, Mended, Supported

How Habitat Conservation and Restoration Function as Elements of Landscape Stewardship

from Part II - Landscape Stewardship on the Ground

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2017

Claudia Bieling
Affiliation:
Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart
Tobias Plieninger
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen
Get access

Summary

In the Anthropocene, habitat conservation achieved simply by establishing protected areas, including community-conserved areas, is unrealistic. A more realistic view from the perspective of landscape stewardship sees habitat conservation as site management, building connections to other sites, and restoring (or mending) degraded sites. Rewilding is a key part of restoration in the context of landscape stewardship. The challenge for landscape stewardship is to provide practical, place-based, frameworks for local communities to manage rapidly evolving landscapes. Any stewardship plan for such landscapes must include development of habitat conservation, restoration and management strategies that comprehend rapid spatial and temporal change, reflecting the complexity of the current landscape patterning. Stewardship is all about management that recognises change is inevitable, and embraces and manages for change. Using restoration as part of landscape stewardship means being prepared for surprises and being prepared to adapt to the new, while valuing the old where it is still sustainable so to do. In the Anthropocene, doing nothing is not an option, and the stewardship approach offers hope and proven results for a more sustainable future.
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acreman, M. C. & Ferguson, A. J. D. (2010). Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshwater Biology, 55, 3248.Google Scholar
Askew, A. P., Fridley, J. D. & Grime, J. P. (2011). Predicting biodiversity dynamics of grasslands under global change: The role of long-term manipulations of climate. In Grassland Productivity and Ecosystem Services, Lemaire, G., Hodgson, J. & Chabbi, A. (eds.). Wallingford: CABI, pp. 123128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BenDor, T. K., Livengood, A., Lester, T. W., Davis, A. & Yonavjak, L. (2015). Defining and evaluating the ecological restoration economy. Restoration Ecology, 23, 209219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besseau, P., Dansou, K. & Johnson, F. (2002). The International Model Forest Network (IMFN): Elements of success. The Forestry Chronicle, 78, 648654.Google Scholar
Bilton, M. C, Whitlock, R., Grime, J. P., Marion, G. & Pakeman, R. J. (2010). Intraspecific trait variation in grassland plant species reveals fine-scale strategy trade-offs and size differentiation that underpins performance in ecological communities. Botany, 88, 939952.Google Scholar
Bridgewater, P. & Walton, D. W. (1995). The species triage: Are we trying to revive the man overboard while the ship sinks? In Reintroduction Biology of Australian and New Zealand Fauna, Serena, M (ed.). Chipping Norton: Surrey Beatty, pp. ixxi.Google Scholar
Bridgewater, P., Russell-Smith, J. & Cresswell, I. (1998). Vegetation science in a cultural landscape. The case of Kakadu National Park. Phytocoenologia, 28, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockington, D. & Wilkie, D. (2015). Protected areas and poverty. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B, 370, 16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, J. & Mitchell, B. (2000). The stewardship approach and its relevance for protected landscapes. The George Wright Forum, 17, 7079.Google Scholar
Catchpole, R. (2012). Ecological Coherence Definitions in Policy and Practice. Final Report to Scottish Natural Heritage. Leeds: Aspen International.Google Scholar
Ceccon, E., Barrera-Cataño, J. I., Aronson, J. & Martínez-Garza, C. (2015). The socioecological complexity of ecological restoration in Mexico. Restoration Ecology, 23, 331336.Google Scholar
CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2004). The Ecosystem Approach. Decision VII/11. (www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7748).Google Scholar
Ceauşu, S., Hofmann, M., Navarro, L. M., Carver, S., Verburg, P. H. & Pereira, H. M. (2015). Mapping opportunities and challenges for rewilding in Europe. Conservation Biology, 29, 10171027.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Defra (2011). The Natural Choice: Securing the Value of Nature. London: TSO.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. C., Fuller, D. Q., Kaplan, J. O. & Lutters, W. G. (2013). Dating the Anthropocene: Towards an empirical global history of human transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Elementa: Science of Anthropocene, 1, 18.Google Scholar
Elphick, C. S., Meiman, S. & Rubega, M. A. (2015). Tidal-flow restoration provides little nesting habitat for a globally vulnerable saltmarsh bird. Restoration Ecology, 23, 439446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, J. K., Mulongoy, J., Lawrence, K., Game, E., Sheppard, D., Bridgewater, P., Bennett, G., Gidda, S. B. & Bos, P. (2010). Making protected areas relevant: A guide to integrating protected areas into wider landscapes, seascapes and sectoral plans and strategies. Convention on Biological Diversity Technical Series, 44, 5.Google Scholar
Eustice, G. (2015). New Environmental Scheme for Farmers to Prioritise Biodiversity. (www.gov.uk/government/news/new-environmental-scheme-for-farmers-to-prioritise-biodiversity).Google Scholar
Folke, C., Jansson, Å., Rockström, J., Olsson, P., Carpenter, S. R., Chapin, F. S., III, Crépín, A. S., Daily, G., Danell, K., Ebbesson, J., Elmqvist, T., Galaz, V., Moberg, F., Nilsson, M., Österblom, H., Ostrom, E., Persson, Å., Peterson, G., Polasky, S., Steffen, W., Walker, B. & Westley, F. (2011). Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio, 40,719738.Google Scholar
Gaywood, M. (ed.) (2015). Beavers in Scotland: A Report to the Scottish Government. Inverness: Scottish National Heritage.Google Scholar
Good, R. B. (1981). The role of fire in conservation reserves. In Fire and the Australian Biota, Gill, A. M, Groves, R. H & Noble, I. R (eds.). Canberra: Australian Academy of Science, pp. 529550.Google Scholar
Grime, J. P. & Pierce, S. (2012). The Evolutionary Strategies that Shape Ecosystems. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hewins, E., Pinches, C., Lush, M., Plant, B., Frith, R. & Toogood, S. (2008). Baseline Evaluation of Higher Level Stewardship Grassland Options. Report to Natural England. Gloucestershire: Just Ecology.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. S. & Hall, C. A. (eds.). (2013). Novel Ecosystems: Intervening in the New Ecological World Order. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hobbs, R. J., Higgs, E. S., Hall, C. A., Bridgewater, P., Chapin, F. C., III, Ellis, E. C., Ewel, J. J., Hallett, L. M., Harris, J., Hulvey, K. B., Jackson, S. T., Kennedy, P. L., Kueffer, C., Lach, L., Lantz, T. C., Lugo, A. E., Mascaro, J., Murphy, S. D., Nelson, C. R., Perring, M. P., Richardson, D. M., Seastedt, T. R., Standish, R. J., Starzomski, B. M., Suding, K. N., Tognetti, P. M., Yakob, L. & Yung, L. (2014). Managing the whole landscape: Historical, hybrid, and novel ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 12, 557564.Google Scholar
JNCC (2015). European Legislation. (http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-1372).Google Scholar
Jongman, R. H. G., Külvik, M. & Kristiansen, I. (2004). European ecological networks and greenways. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 305319.Google Scholar
Keith, D. A., Williams, J. E. & Woinarski, J. C. Z. (2002). Fire management and biodiversity conservation: Key approaches and principles. In Flammable Australia. The Fire Regimes and Biodiversity of a Continent, Bradstock, R. A, Williams, J. E & Gill, A. M (eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 401428.Google Scholar
Laven, D. N., Jewiss, J. L. & Mitchell, N. J. (2012). Toward landscape-scale stewardship and development: A theoretical framework of United States national heritage areas. Society & Natural Resources, 26, 762777.Google Scholar
Lawton, J. H., Brotherton, P. N. M., Brown, V. K., Elphick, C., Fitter, A. H., Forshaw, J., Haddow, R. W., Hilborne, S., Leafe, R. N., Mace, G. M., Southgate, M. P., Sutherland, W. J., Tew, T. E., Varley, J. & Wynne, G. R. (2010). Making Space for Nature: A Review of England's Wildlife Sites and Ecological Network. Report to DEFRA.Google Scholar
Marshall, K. N., Hobbs, N. T. & Cooper, D. J. (2013). Stream hydrology limits recovery of riparian ecosystems after wolf reintroduction. Proceeding of the Royal Society of London B, 280, 20122977.Google Scholar
Metcalf, E. C., Mohr, J. J., Yung, L., Metcalf, P. & Craig, D. (2015). The role of trust in restoration success: Public engagement and temporal and spatial scale in a complex social-ecological system. Restoration Ecology, 23, 315324.Google Scholar
Milder, J. C., Hart, A. K., Dobie, P., Minai, J. & Zaleski, C. (2014). Integrated landscape initiatives for African agriculture, development, and conservation: A region-wide assessment. World Development, 54, 6880.Google Scholar
Natural England (2014). Nature Improvement Areas: Improved Ecological Networks. (www.gov.uk/government/publications/nature-improvement-areas-improved-ecological-networks).Google Scholar
Natural England (2015a). Nature England Statement on the Possible Introduction of Lynx. (www.gov.uk/government/news/natural-england-statement-on-the-possible-reintroduction-of-lynx).Google Scholar
Peach, W., Lovett, L., Wotton, S. & Jeffs, C. (2001). Countryside stewardship delivers cirl buntings (Emberiza cirlus) in Devon, UK. Biological Conservation, 101, 361373.Google Scholar
Posey, D. A. (ed.) (1999). Cultural and Spiritual Values of Biodiversity. Nairobi: UNEP (United Nation Environmental Programme).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prach, K., Karešová, P., Jírová, A., Dvořáková, H., Konvalinková, P. & Řehounková, K. (2015). Do not neglect surroundings in restoration of disturbed sites. Restoration Ecology, 23, 310314.Google Scholar
Ripple, W. J., Estes, J. A., Beschta, R. L., Wilmers, C. C., Ritchie, E. G., Hebblewhite, M., Berger, J., Elmhagen, B., Letnic, M., Nelson, M. P., Schmitz, O. J., Smith, D. W., Wallach, A. D. & Wirsing, A. J. (2014). Status and ecological effects of the world's largest carnivores. Science, 343, 1241484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapi, F. S., III, Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., Nykvist, B., de Wit, C. A. Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P. K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, D., Crutzen, P. & Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sayre, N. F., Kelty, R., Simmons, M., Clayton, S., Kassam, K.-A., Pickett, S. T. A., Chapin, F. S., III (2013). Invitation to earth stewardship. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11, 339.Google Scholar
Sells, A. (2014). Nature Improvement Areas Partnership. (www.gov.uk/government/speeches/nature-improvement-areas-partnerships).Google Scholar
SER (Society for Ecological Restoration) (2004). SER International Primer on Ecological Restoration. Tucson: Society for Ecological Restoration International.Google Scholar
Tolunay, A., Türkoglu, T., Elbakidze, M. & Angelstam, P. (2014). Determination of the support level of local organizations in a model forest initiative: Do local stakeholders have willingness to be involved in the model forest development? Sustainability, 6, 71817196.Google Scholar
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) (2000). Solving the Puzzle: The Ecosystem Approach and Biosphere Reserves. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McMeely, J. A. & Oviedo, G. (eds.) (2010). Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture. London/Washington, DC: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Watling, J. I., Brandt, L. A., Mazzotti, F. J. & Romañach, S. S. (2013). Use and Interpretation of Climate Envelope Models: A Practical Guide. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.Google Scholar
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., Hockings, M. (2014). The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature, 515, 67743.Google Scholar
Wu, J. G. (2013). Landscape sustainability science: Ecosystem services and human well-being in changing landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 28, 9991023.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×