Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T01:01:00.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - The importance of phylogenetic structure in biodiversity studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Jérôme Chave
Affiliation:
Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse
Guillem Chust
Affiliation:
Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse
Christophe Thébaud
Affiliation:
Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse
David Storch
Affiliation:
Charles University, Prague
Pablo Marquet
Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
James Brown
Affiliation:
University of New Mexico
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A central goal of biodiversity research is to understand processes of species coexistence at different spatial and temporal scales. Much empirical research has revolved around documenting patterns of species abundance and distribution with sound sampling techniques and statistics (May, 1975; Magurran, 1988; Krebs, 1998). Such data are of tremendous importance not only for documenting current biological diversity patterns, but also for testing fundamental ecological theories (Ricklefs & Schluter, 1993; Brown, 1995; Hubbell, 2001). A common feature of these approaches is the emphasis placed on species as the appropriate currency for quantifying biological diversity. However, documenting species diversity often represents a considerable practical challenge. First, no one exactly knows the total number of extant species on Earth (Erwin, 1982; May, 1994; Novotný et al., 2002; Alroy, 2002). Second, in any given sample, a sizeable fraction of the individuals may represent previously undescribed species, as is especially the case for lesser known groups, like plants in tropical forests, insects or protists. Third, species recognition usually relies upon a set of morphological cues which are not always observable. Thus, many individuals within a sample cannot be reliably assigned to previously described species. This is obvious in microbial communities, where different operational taxonomic units (OTUs) can only be distinguished by DNA screening or other molecular methods (e.g. see Suau et al., 1999 for a study of the microbial diversity of the human gut, and Green & Bohannan, this volume). This issue is also serious in macroscopic organisms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Scaling Biodiversity , pp. 150 - 167
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alroy, J. (2002). How many named species are valid?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 3706–3711.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Angiosperm Phylogeny Group [APG]. (2003). An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 141, 399–436.CrossRef
Arbogast, B. S., Edwards, S. V., Wakeley, J., Beerli, P. & Slowinksi, J. J. (2002). Estimating divergence times from molecular data on phylogenetic and population genetic timescales. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 707–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, D. I. (1952). A theory of angiosperm evolution. Evolution, 4, 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J. H. (1995). Macroecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A., Clark, D. B., Sandoval, R. M. & Vinicio, Castro M. C. (1995). Edaphic and human effects on landscape-scale distributions of tropical rain forest palms. Ecology, 76, 2581–2594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. (2001). A further biodiversity index applicable to species lists: variation in taxonomic distinctness. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 216, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, C. C., Webb, C. O., Wurdack, K. J., Jaramillo, C. A. & Donoghue, M. J. (2005). Explosive radiation of Malpighiales supports a mid-Cretaceous origin of modern tropical rain forests. American Naturalist, 165, E36–E65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erwin, T. L. (1982). Tropical forests: their richness in coleopteran and other arthropod species. Coleopterists Bulletin, 36, 74–75.Google Scholar
Ewens, W. J. (1972). The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles. Theoretical Population Biology, 3, 87–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faith, D. P. (1994). Phylogenetic pattern and the quantification of organismal diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 345, 45–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, A. H. (1982). Patterns of Neotropical plant species diversity. Evolutionary Biology, 15, 1–84.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. H. (1988). Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 75, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gotelli, N. J. & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodiversity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters, 4, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebert, P. D., Stoeckle, M. Y., Zemlak, T. S. & Francis, C. M. (2004). Identification of birds through DNA barcodes. PLoS Biology, 2-e, 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. (2001). A Unified Neutral Theory of Biodiversity and Biogeography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahn, F. & Mejia, K. (1991). The palm communities of two “terra firme” forests in Peruvian Amazonia. Principes, 35, 22–26.Google Scholar
Krebs, C. J. (1998). Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Reading, MA: Addison-Welsey.Google Scholar
Lande, R. (1996). Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos, 76, 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. P. (2002). Phylogenetic approaches for describing and comparing microbial communities. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3673–3682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
May, R. M. (1975). Patterns of species abundance and diversity. In Ecology and Evolution of Communities, ed. Cody, M. L. & Diamond, J. M., pp. 81–120. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1994). Conceptual aspects of the quantification of the extent of biological diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 345, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mooers, A. O. & Heard, S. B. (1997). Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Quarterly Review of Biology, 72, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, C. & Cicero, C. (2004). DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls. PLoS Biology, 2-e, 279.Google Scholar
Nee, S. & May, R. M. (1997). Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science, 278, 692–694.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M. (1973). Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 70, 3321–3323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nei, M. (1987). Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Novotný, V., Basset, Y., Miller, S. E., et al. (2002). Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature, 416, 841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavoine, S., Ollier, S. & Dufour, A. B. (2005). Is the originality of a species measurable? Ecology Letters, 8, 579–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, O. L. & Miller, J. (2002). Global Patterns of Plant Diversity: Alwyn H. Gentry's Forest Transect Data Set. St. Louis, MO: Missouri Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
Prance, G. T. (1994). A comparison of the efficacy of higher taxa and species numbers in the assessment of biodiversity in the Neotropics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 345, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. (2004). A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity. Ecology Letters, 7, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricklefs, R. E. & Schluter, D. (eds) (1993). Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Saladin, N., Hodkinson, T. R. & Savolainen, V. (2005). Towards building the tree of life: a simulation study for all angiosperm genera. Systematic Biology, 54, 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. J. (1997). A nonparametric approach to estimating divergence times in the absence of rate constancy. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14, 1218–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, M. J. (2002). Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: a penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 19, 101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slatkin, M. (1991). Inbreeding coefficients and coalescent times. Genetic Research, 58, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N., Mori, S. A., Henderson, A., Stevenson, D. W. & Heald, S. V. (2004). Flowering plants of the Neotropics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Soltis, P. S., Soltis, D. E., Savolainen, V., Crane, P. E. & Barraclough, T. G. (2002). Rate heterogeneity among lineages of tracheophytes: integration of molecular and fossil data and evidence for molecular living fossils. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 4430–4435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suau, A., Bonnet, R., Sutren, M., et al. (1999). Direct analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA from complex communities reveals many novel molecular species within the human gut. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 65, 4799–4807.Google ScholarPubMed
Takhtajan, A. (1969). Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
Steege, H., Pitman, N., Sabatier, D., et al. (2003). A spatial model of tree alpha-diversity and tree density for the Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, 2255–2277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomisto, H. & Poulsen, A. D. (2000). Pteridophyte diversity and species composition in four Amazonian rain forests. Journal of Vegetation Science, 11, 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuomisto, H., Ruokolainen, K. & Yli-Halla, M. (2003). Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of Western Amazonian forests. Science, 299, 241–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. (1991). What to protect? Systematics and the agony of choice. Biological Conservation, 55, 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vormisto, J., Svenning, J. C., Hall, P. & Balslev, H. (2004). Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in terra firme forests in the western Amazon basin. Journal of Ecology, 92, 577–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, R. M. & Clarke, K. R. (2001). Practical measures of marine biodiversity based on relatedness of species. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 39, 207–231.Google Scholar
Watterson, G. A. (1974). Models for the logarithmic species abundance distributions. Theoretical Population Biology, 6, 217–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, C. O. (2000). Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. American Naturalist, 156, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, C. O. & Donoghue, M. J. (2004). Phylomatic: tree retrieval for applied phylogenetics. Molecular Ecology Notes, 5, 181–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, C. O. & Pitman, N. C. A. (2002). Phylogenetic balance and ecological evenness. Systematic Biology, 51, 898–907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. (2002). Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 475–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R. H. (1972). Evolution and measurement of species diversity. Taxon, 21, 213–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikström, N., Savolainen, V. & Chase, M. W. (2001). Evolution of the angiosperms: calibrating the family tree. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 268, 2211–2220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics, 16, 97–159.Google ScholarPubMed
Yule, G. U. (1925). A mathematical theory of evolution based on the conclusions of Dr J. C. Willis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 213, 21–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×