Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T19:47:49.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Stress-resistant families and stress-resistant children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2010

Jon Rolf
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University
Ann S. Masten
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Dante Cicchetti
Affiliation:
University of Rochester, New York
Keith H. Nüchterlein
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Sheldon Weintraub
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access

Summary

The purpose of this chapter is to help explain why some children in high-risk circumstances develop more cognitive competence than would be expected considering their backgrounds. One of the factors, we believe, is a certain stress resistance in their families.

The sample of families that we are investigating includes some whose children may become school dropouts, delinquent, drug users, or pregnant within the next 5 years. We have, however, seen some high-risk families whose children appear to have escaped these outcomes. We shall report on the characteristics of these families that seem likely to prevent the poor outcomes that so often befall children in these neighborhoods.

Garmezy (1982) has stimulated great interest in the study of stress-resistant children. In our study we have been impressed by the fact that some high-risk families protect their children from the dangers that surround them. In these cases it seems to us that it is the families, rather than the children, that are stress-resistant. This is not to deny that there are factors in the children that help them resist the influence of a high-risk environment. Even if exposed to such dangers as drugs or alcohol, they are able to cope with them.

Proximal versus distal variables

One purpose of this chapter is to distinguish between stress-resistant children and stress-resistant families. In order to conceptualize this difference we need to recognize that risk variables differ from one another in the degree to which they directly impinge on the child. Social class, for example, is an important risk variable – we shall see later how powerfully social class predicts cognitive outcome. But social class does not impinge directly on the child.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×