Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction – Risk Anaysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field
- PART ONE FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTER OF RISK
- PART TWO METHODS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT
- PART THREE NEW APPROACHES AND NEEDS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT
- 9 The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management
- 10 Global Change and Transboundary Risks
- 11 Environmental Risks and Developing Countries: An Asian Perspective
- SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- Index
- References
9 - The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
By
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Contributors
- 1 Introduction – Risk Anaysis and Society: An Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field
- PART ONE FUNDAMENTAL CHARACTER OF RISK
- PART TWO METHODS FOR RISK ASSESSMENT
- PART THREE NEW APPROACHES AND NEEDS FOR RISK MANAGEMENT
- 9 The Challenge of Integrating Deliberation and Expertise: Participation and Discourse in Risk Management
- 10 Global Change and Transboundary Risks
- 11 Environmental Risks and Developing Countries: An Asian Perspective
- SUMMARY AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
- Index
- References
Summary
INTRODUCTION
The State Department of Environmental Protection was holding a public hearing in Lancaster, a small town in central Massachusetts, concerning the siting of a municipal waste incinerator (Renn and Webler, 1992, p. 84f., similar accounts in Freudenburg, 1983; Elliot, 1984; Davis, 1986; Brion, 1988; Rosa, 1988; positive examples in Lynn, 1987). The town hall was still nearly filled at 10:20 p.m., almost an hour after the scheduled closing time. For two hours residents listened peacefully while regulatory officials explained why the plant was needed, how much trash it would burn, and how much pollution it could legally emit. Expert scientists supported the officials by supplying evidence and arguments about the “acceptability” of the level of risk posed by an incinerator. The regulators thought they were being sensitive to the citizens when they kept to the agenda and, at 9:00 p.m., opened the floor for half an hour of questions. Now it was late, but the citizens were in an uproar, and they showed no sign of letting up.
“What about our gardens?” one woman asked, “Will we be able to eat the vegetables we grow? I have an organic garden and I don't want it contaminated with dioxin.” Another gentleman was interested in the contract. “Are you telling us that we have to sign a contract to supply 2,000 tons of trash every year? What if we want to start a recycling program?”
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Risk Analysis and SocietyAn Interdisciplinary Characterization of the Field, pp. 289 - 366Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
References
Adams, J. 1995. Risk.UCL Press, London
Alexander, J., ed. 1985. Neofunctionalism. Sage, Beverley Hills, CA
Alexander, J., and Colomy, P. 1990. Neofunctionalism: Reconstructing a theoretical tradition. In G. Ritzer, ed., Frontiers of Social Theory: The New Syntheses, pp. 33–67. Columbia University Press, New York
1983. Environmental mediation: An alternative approach to policy stalemates. Policy Sciences, 15: 345–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amy, D. J. 1987. The Politics of Environmental Mediation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York
Andersen, I.-E. 1995. Feasibility Study on New Awareness Initiatives. Studying the Possibilities to Implement Consensus Conferences and Scenario Workshops. Interfaces, Science, Technology, Society. European Commission, DG Research, Copenhagen and Brussels
Apel, K.-O. 1992. Diskursethik vor der Problematik von Recht und Politik: Können die Rationalitätsdifferenzen zwischen Moralität, Recht und Politik selbst noch durch Diskursethik normativ-rational gerechtfertigt werden? In K.-O. Apel and M. Kettner, eds., Zur Anwendung der Diskursethik in Politik, Recht und Wissenschaft, pp. 29–61. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main
Applegate, J. 1998. Beyond the usual suspects: The use of citizens advisory boards in environmental decisionmaking. Indiana Law Journal, 73: 903
Armour, A. 1995. The citizen's jury model of public participation. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 175–88. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
1979. Citizen participation at government expense. Public Administration Review, 39: 477–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ash, A., ed. 1997. Beyond Market and Hierarchy: Interactive Governance and Social Complexity. Elgar, Cheltenham
Atherton, C. C. 1977. Legal requirements for environmental impact reporting. In J. McEvoy III and T. Dietz, eds., Handbook for Environmental Planning: The Social Consequences of Environmental Change. Wiley Interscience, New York
Attorney General's Commission on Administrative Procedure. 1941. Administrative Procedure in Government Agencies. ACAP, Washington, DC
Bachrach, P. 1967. The Theory of Democratic Elitism: A Critique. Little Brown, Boston
Bacow, L. S., and Wheeler, M. 1984. Environmental Dispute Resolution. Plenum: New York
Bailey, K. D. 1994. Sociology and the New Systems Theory. Toward a Theoretical Synthesis State University of New York Press, Albany
Barber, B. R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. University of California Press, Berkeley
Baughman, M., Mediation. In O. Renn, Th.Webler, and P. Wiedemann eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 253–66. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Toward a New Modernity, translated by Mark A. Ritter. Sage, London
Benhabib, S. 1992. Autonomy, modernity, and community: Communitarianism and critical theory in dialogue. In A. Honneth, T. McCarthy, C. Offe, and A. Wellmer, eds., Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, pp. 39–61. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Bennet, P. G. 2000. Applying the precautionary principle: Aconceptual framework. In M. P.Cottam, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Paper, and J. Tait, eds., Foresight and Precaution, Vol. 1, pp. 223–7. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam and Brookfield
Bingham, G. 1984. Resolving Environmental Disputes: A Decade of Experience. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC
, , , , , and 1987. Applying alternative dispute resolution to government litigation and enforcement cases. Administrative Law Review, 1 (Fall): 527–51Google Scholar
1997. Reflections on scientific advice and EC transboundary pollution policy. Science and Public Policy, 22 (3): 195–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, J. 1997. Deliberative democracy and effective social freedom: Capabilities, resources, and opportunities. In J. Bohman and W. Rehg, eds., Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 321–48. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
1998. Survey article: The coming of age of deliberative democracy. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 6 (4): 400–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1998. Integrating technical analysis and public values in risk based decision making. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59, 151–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Comparative studies of risk perception: A review of twenty years of research. Journal of Risk Research, 1 (2): 135–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1994. Multivariate approach for suitability assessment and environmental conflict resolution. Journal of Environmental Management, 41: 187–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borcherding, K., Rohrmann, B., and Eppel, T. 1986. A psychological study on the cognitive structure of risk evaluations. In B. Brehmer, H. Jungermann, P. Lourens, and G. Sevon, eds., New Directions in Research on Decision Making, pp. 254–62. North-Holland, Amsterdam
1989. The policy implications of differing concepts of risk. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14 (4): 380–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breyer, S G. 1993. Breaking the Vicious Circle.Toward Effective Risk Regulation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
Breyer, S. G., Sunstein, C. R., and Stewart, R. B. 2001. Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy: Problems, Text, and Cases. Aspen, New York
Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S., and Ilgen, T. 1985. Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
1988. An essay on LULU, NIMBY, and the problem of distributive justice. Environmental Affairs, 15: 437–503Google Scholar
1984. The resolution of technically intensive public policy disputes. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 9 (Winter) 39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. Jurgen Habermas:Anexegesis for human ecologists. Human Ecology Bulletin, 8 (Spring/Summer): 29–40Google Scholar
, and 1986. Placing environmental mediation in context: Lessons from “failed” mediations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 6: 55–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1968. Citizen participation strategies. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35: 287–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, T. R., and Überhorst, R. 1988. Creative Democracy: Systematic Conflict Resultion and Policymaking in a World of High Science and Technology. Praeger, New York
Buser, M. 1995. Die Wertbaumanalyse im Projekt Aargau: eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Manuscript. Swiss Institute of Technology, Zürich
Catton, W. R. 1980. Overshoot: The Ecological Basis of Revolutionary Change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Charnley, G. 2000. Democratic Science: Enhancing the Role of Science in Stakeholder-Based Risk Management Decision-Making. Report of Health Risk Strategies. Washington, DC, July
Charnley, G., and Elliott, E. D. 2000. Risk versus precaution: A false dichotomy. In M. P. Cottam, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Paper, and J. Tait, eds., Foresight and Precaution, Vol. 1, pp. 209–12. Balkema, Rotterdam and Brookfield
1981. The politics of public hearings. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17 (4): 566–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkoway, B., and Van Til, J. 1978. What do we know about citizen participation? A selective review of research. In S. Langton, ed., Citizen Participation in America. Lexington Books, Lexington, MA
, , , and 1979. Value oriented social decision analysis: Enhancing mutual understanding to resolve public policy issues. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-9: 567–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1993. Social organization and risk: Some current controversies. Annual Review of Sociology, 19: 375–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, F. 1995. The Varresbecker Bach participatory process: The model of citizen initiatives. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 189–201. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
1997. Assessing consensus: The promise and performance of negotiated rule making. Duke Law Journal, 46: 1255–1333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, C. 1999. Limits of consensus. Environment, 28: 28
Coglianese, C. N. D. Is Consensus an Appropriate Basis for Regulatory Policy? Manuscript. Harvard University, Kennedy School of Government, Boston
Cohen, J. 1997. Procedure and substance in deliberative democracy. In J. Bohman and W. Rehg, eds., Deliberative Democracy. Essays on Reason and Politics, pp. 407–37. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Collingridge, D. 1996. Resilience, flexibility, and diversity in managing the risks of technologies. In C. Hood and D. K. C. Jones, eds., Accident and Design. Contemporary Debates in Risk Management, pp. 40–5. UCL-Press, London
1993. A generic design for public involvement programs. Constructive Citizen Participation, 21 (June & September): 1–2Google Scholar
1985. Interactions between scientists and public officials: A comparison of the use of science in regulatory programs in the United States and West Germany, Policy Sciences, 18: 371–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1980. The “theory” and practice of environmental mediation. Environmental Mediation and Conflict Management, Special Issue of The Environmental Professional, 2 (1): 24–33Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. 1956. The Function of Social Conflict. Free Press, New York
1983. The perception of technological risks: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 23: 285–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1972. The why, where and how of broadened public participation in the administrative process. Georgetown Law Journal, 60: 525–32Google Scholar
Creighton, J. L. 1991. A comparison of successful and unsuccessful public involvement: A practioner's viewpoint. In C. Zervos, ed., Risk Analysis: Prospects and Opportunities, pp. 135–141. Plenum Press, New York
Creighton, J. L., Dunning, C. M., and Delli Priscoli, J., eds. 1998. Public Involvement and Dispute Resolution: A Reader on the Second Decade of Experience at the Institute of Water Resources. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Institute of Water Resources, Fort Belvoir
Crosby, N. 1995. Citizen juries: One solution for difficult environmental questions. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 157–74. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
, , and 1986. Citizen panels: A new approach to citizen participation. Public Administration Review, 46: 170–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1992. The risk of reliance on perceived risk. Risk – Issues in Health and Safety, 3: 59–70Google Scholar
1998. Facts and values in risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 59: 27–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977. Emerging problems of citizen participation. Public Administraion Review, 37: 478–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, R. A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
1994. A democratic dilemma: System effectiveness versus citizen participation. Political Science Quarterly, 109 (1): 23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1991. Orienting dispositions in the perceptions of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22: 61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daneke, G. A., Garcia, M. W., and Delli Priscoli, J., eds. 1983. Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
, and 1996. Collaborative learning: Improving public deliberation in ecosystem-based management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16: 71–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1986. Public involvement in hazardous waste siting decisions. Polity, 19 (2): 296–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1989. Public involvement, conflict management: Means to EQ and social objectives. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 115 (1): 31–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1999. Risk management and governance: A post-normal science approach. Futures, 31: 743–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSario, J., and Langton, S. 1987. Toward a metapolicy for social planning. In J. DeSario and S. Langton, eds., Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making, pp. 205–21. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT
Dienel, P. C. 1978. Die Planungszelle. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
Dienel, P. C. 1989. Contributing to social decision methodology: Citizen reports on technological projects. In C. Vlek and G. Cvetkovich eds., Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects, pp. 133–51. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Dienel, P. C., and Garbe, D. 1975. Zukünftige Energiepolitik. Ein Bürgergutachten, HTV Edition. Technik und Sozialer Wandel, Munich
Dienel, P. C., and Renn, O. 1995. Planning cells: A gate to “fractal” mediation. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 117–40. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
1987. Theory and method in social impact assessment. Social Inquiry, 57: 54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietz, T. 1988. Social impact assessment as applied to human ecology: Integrating theory and method. In R. J. Bordent and J. Jacobs, eds., Human Ecology: Research and Application, Society for Human Ecology, University of Maryland Press, College Park
Dietz, T., and Rycroft, R. W. 1987. The Risk Professionals. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
, , and 1989. Definitions of conflict and the legitimation of resources: The case of environmental risk. Sociological Forum, 4: 47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. Negotiated rulemaking at the EPA: Examples of wood stove emissions and truck engine emissions. Environmental Law Reporter, 17 (July): 10251–4Google Scholar
Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. 1982. Risk and Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper Collins, London
Drottz-Sj öberg, B.-M. 1991. Perception of Risk. Studies of Risk Attitudes, Perceptions, and Definitions. Center for Risk Research, Stockholm
Dryzek, J. S. 1994. Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science. 2nd ed. cambridge: Cambridge University Press
1980. Paradigmatic change in social science: From human exemptionalism to an ecological paradigm. American Behavioral Scientist, 24: 5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, J., and Joss, S. 1995. Public Participation in Science. Science Museum. London
, , and 1999. Integrated assessment focus groups: Bridging the gap between science and policy?Science and Public Policy, 26 (5): 341–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, T. C., and Cvetkovich, G. T. 1995. Social Trust. Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Greenwood, Westport, CT
Earle, T. C., and Cvetkovich, G. T. 1999. Social trust and culture in risk management. In G. T. Cvetkovich and R. Löfstedt, eds., Social Trust and the Management of Risk, pp. 9–21. Earthscan, London
Easton, D. 1965. A Framework for Political Analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Eder, K. 1992. Politics and culture: On the sociocultural analysis of political participation. In A. Honneth, T. McCarthy, C. Offe, and A. Wellmer, eds., Cultural-Political Interventions in the Unfinished Project of Enlightenment, pp. 95–120. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
1986. Alternative dispute resolution: Panacea or anathema?Harvard Law Review, 99: 668–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1954. The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51: 380–414CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1984. Improving community acceptance of hazardous waste facilities through alternative systems for mitigating and managing risk. Hazardous Waste, 1: 397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elster, J. 1989. Solomonic Judgments. Studies in the Limitation of Rationality. cambridge: Cambridge University Press
English, M. R., Gibson, A. K., Feldman, D. L., and Tonn, B. E. 1993. Stakeholder Involvement: Open Processes for Reaching Decisions about the Future Uses of Contaminated Sites. University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Ethridge, M. 1987. Procedures for citizen involvement in environmental policy: An assessment of policy effects. In J. DeSario and S. Langton, eds., Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making, pp. 115–32. Greenwood Press, Westport, CT
Etzioni, A. 1968. The Active Society: A Theory of Societal and Political Processes. The Free Press, New York
Evers, A., and Nowotny, H. 1987. Über den Umgang mit Unsicherheit. Die Entdeckung der Gestaltbarkeit von Gesellschaft.Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main
Fahrni, D. 1992. An Outline History of Switzerland: From the Origins to the Present Day. Pro Helvetia Arts Council, Zürich
1989a. Environmental risk and democratic process: A critical review. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 14 (2): 501–47Google Scholar
1989b. Technical and democratic values in risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 9 (3): 293–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15 (2): 226–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorino, D. J. 1995. Regulatory negotiation as a form of public participation. In O. Renn, Th.Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 223–38. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
1981. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26: 165–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischhoff, B. 1996. Public values in risk research. In Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Special Issue, H. Kunreuther and P. Slovic, eds., Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, pp. 75–84. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Fisher, R., and Ury, W. 1981. Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books, New York
Folberg, J., and Taylor, A. 1984. Mediation. A Comprehensive Guide to Resolving Conflicts without litigation. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco
, and 1989. Beyond neutrality: The possibilities of activist mediation in public sector conflicts. Negotiation Journal, 5 (July): 251–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, W. R. 1983. The promise and the peril of public participation in social impact assessment. In G. A. Daneke, M. W. Garcia, and J. Delli Priscoli, eds., Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment, pp. 227–34.Westview, Boulder, CO
, and 1992. Public responses to technological risk: Toward a sociological perspective. Sociological Quarterly, 33 (3): 389–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1996. Fair siting procedures: An empirical analysis of their importance and characteristics. Policy Analysis and Management, 15: 353– 763.0.CO;2-H>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, J., ed. 1995. The Rational Choice Controversy. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT
Funtowicz, S. O., and Ravetz, J. R. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht
, and 1981. Making waves: Public participation in state water planning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 17: 597–614Google Scholar
Graham, J. D., and Wiener, J. B. 1995. Risk vs. Risk: Tradeoffs in Protecting Health and the Environment. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Granovetter, M. 1992. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. In M. Granovetter and R. Swedberg, eds., The Sociology of Economic Life, pp. 53–81.Westview Press, Boulder, CO, and Oxford
, , and 1993. Valuing environmental resources: A constructive approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7: 177–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grima, A. P. 1983. Analyzing public inputs to environmental planning. In G. A. Daneke, M. W. Garcia, and J. Delli Priscoli, eds., Public Involvement and Social Impact Assessment, pp. 111–19.Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Guild, N. K. 1979. Technology on Trial: Public Participation in Decision-Making Related to Science and Technology. OECD, Paris
1983. Selecting participants for a regulatory negotiation. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 4: 195–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1968. Technik und Wissenschaft als ‘Ideologie.’ Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
Habermas, J. 1971. Knowledge and Human Interests. Beacon Press, Boston
Habermas, J. 1984. Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. ⅰ. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, Boston
Habermas, J. 1987a. Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. ⅱ. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press, Boston
Habermas, J. 1987b. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Polity Press, Cambridge
Habermas, J. 1989. The public sphere: An encyclopedia article, translated by S. Lennox and F. Lennox. In S. E. Bronner and D. M. Kellner, eds., Critical Theory and Society: A Reader, pp. 136–42. Routledge, London
Habermas, J. 1991. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, translated by C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholson, 2nd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Hadden, S. 1989. A Citizen's Right-to-Know: Risk Communication and Public Policy. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Hadden, S. 1995. Regulatory negotiation as citizen participation: A critique. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 239–52. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
Hajer, M. 1995. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hampel, J., and Renn, O., eds. 2000. Gentechnik in der Öffentlichkeit. Wahrnehmung und Bewertung einer umstrittenen Technologie, 2nd edition. Campus, Frankfurt/ Main
Harrison, K., and Hoberg, G. 1994. Risk, Science and Politics. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal
Harter, P., Orenstein, S., and Dalton, D. 1998. Better Decisions through Consultation and Collaboration. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC
Hartmann, C. 1983. The voter initiative as a form of citizen participation in Swiss transportation policy. In L. Susskind, M. Elliot, and Associates, Paternalism, Conflict, and Coproduction. Learning from Citizen Action and Citizen Participation in Western Europe, pp. S157–76. Plenum, New York and London
Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge
Helten, E. 1998. Umwelt, Verkehr, Technik – Welchen Preis hat der Fortschritt? In Gesamtverband der Deutschen Versicherungswirtschaft, ed., Risiko. Wieviel Risiko braucht die Gesellschaft?, pp. 192–207. Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft, Karlsruhe
1999. The changing role of science in environmental regulatory decision-making in the European Union. Law and European Affairs, 9 (3–4): 426–43Google Scholar
Hirst, P. 1994. Associative Democracy: New Forms of Economic and Social Governance. Polity Press, Cambridge
Hillgartner, S. 1992. The social construction of risk objects: Or, how to pry open networks of risk. In J. F. Short and L. Clarke, eds., Organizations, Uncertainties, and Risk, pp. 39–53.Westview, Boulder, CO, 1992
, and 1988. The rise and fall of social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 53–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Meaning and contextualization in risk assessment. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 59: 79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, E. L., and Stiftel, B. 1988. Combining Facts and Values in Environmental Impact Assessment. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
Jaeger, C., Renn, O., Rosa, E., and Webler, Th. 2001. Risk, Uncertainty and Rational Action. Earthscan, London
Japp, K. 1996. Soziologische Risikotheorie. Juventa, Weinheim and Munich
1982. Science and the limits of administrative rule-making: Lessons from the OSHA cancer policy. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 20: 536–61Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 1986. Risk Management and Political Culture. Russell Sage Foundation, New York
Jasanoff, S. 1991. Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society. In D. G. Mayo and R. D. Hollander, eds., Acceptable Evidence, pp. 29–47. Oxford University Press, Oxford
1993. Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis. Risk Analysis, 13 (2): 123–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The political science of risk perception. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 59: 91–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999. Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust. Risk Research, 2 (4): 325–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joss, S. 1997. Experiences with Consensus Conferences. Paper at the International Conference on Technology and Democracy. Center for Technology and Culture. University of Oslo, Norway. January 17–19, 1997. Science Museum, London
Kasperson, R. E. 1974. Participating in public affairs: Theories and issues. In R. Kasperson and M. Breitbart, eds., Participation, Decentralization, and Advocacy Planning. Resource Paper 25, pp. 1–16. Association of American Geographers, Washington, DC
1986. Six propositions for public participation and their relevance for risk communication. Risk Analysis, 6 (3): 275–81CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kasperson, R. E., and Kasperson, J. X. 1983. Determining the acceptability of risk: Ethical and policy issues. In J. T. Rogers and D. V. Bates, eds., Assessment and Perception of Risk to Human Health, Conference Proceedings, pp. 135–55. Royal Society of Canada, Ottawa
Kates, R. W., and Kasperson, J. X. 1983. Comparative risk analysis of technological hazards. A review. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 80: 7027
, and 1991. Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives, and policy formation. Policy Analysis and Management, 10 (1): 46–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeney, R. L. 1992. Value Focused Thinking. A Path to Creative Decision Making. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Keeney, R. L. 1996. The role of values in risk management. In Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Special Issue, H. Kunreuther and P. Slovic, eds., Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, pp. 126–24. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
, , and 1987. Structuring West Germany's energy objectives. Energy Policy, 15 (4): 352–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R. 1985. Planning, political hearings, and the politics of discourse. In J. Forester, ed., Critical Theory and Public Life, pp. 177–201. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Kitschelt, H. 1980. Kernenergiepolitik. Arena eines gesellschaftlichen Konflikts. Campus, Frankfurt and New York
1986. New social movements in West Germany and the United States. Political Power and Social Theory, 5: 286–324Google Scholar
Klinke, A., and Renn, O. 1999. Prometheus Unbound. Challenges of Risk Evaluation, Risk Classification, and Risk Management. Working Paper No. 153 of the Center of Technology Assessment. Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart
, and 2001. Precautionary principle and discursive strategies: classifying and managing risks. Journal of Risk Research, 4 (2): 159–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 2002. Anew approach to risk evaluation and management: Risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based management. Risk Analysis, 22 (6): 71–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The bases of cooperation. Social norms and the rule of law. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 154 (4): 754–63Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. D. 1981. The Manufacture of Knowledge:AnEssay on the Constructivist and Contextual Nature of Science. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Kraft, M. 1988. Evaluating technology through public participation: The nuclear waste disposal controversy. In M. E. Kraft and N. J. Vig, eds., Technology and Politics, pp. 253–77. Duke University Press, Durham, NC
Krimsky, S. 1979. Citizen participation in scientific and technological decision making. In S. Langton, ed., Citizen Participation Perspectives. Proceedings of the National Conference on Citizen Participation, Washington, DC, Sept. 28–Oct. 1, 1978. Tufts University Lincoln Filene Center for Citizenship and Public Affairs, Medford
Kunreuther, H. 1995. Voluntary siting of noxious facilities: The role of compensation. In O. Renn, Th.Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 283– 95. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
Kunreuther, H., and Slovic, P. 1996. Science, values, and risk. In Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Special Issue, H. Kunreuther and P. Slovic, eds., Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, pp. 116–25. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Kweit, M. G., and Kweit, R. W. 1981. Implementing Citizen Participation in a Bureaucratic Society. Praeger, New York
Kweit, M. G., and Kweit, R. W. 1987. The politics of policy analysis: The role of citizen participation in analytic decision making. In J. DeSario and S. Langton, eds., Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making, pp. 19–38. Greenwood Press, Westport
1992. The Enlightenment redefined: The formation of modern civil society. Social Research, 59: 475–95Google Scholar
1993. Participatory analysis: Democracy and technological decision making. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 18 (3): 341–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. An empirical argument for nontechnical public members on advisory committees: FDA as a model. Risk – Issues in Health and Safety, 1: 61–74Google Scholar
Langton, S. 1978. Citizen participation in America: Current reflections on the state of the art. In S. Langton, ed., Citizen Participation in America, pp. 1–12. Lexington Books, Lexington
1981. Evolution of a federal citizen involvement policy. Policy Studies Review, 1: 369–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. 1979. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Sage, London
Leminsky, G. 1977. Bürgerbeteiligung, Mitbestimmung und Gewerkschaften – Eine vorläufige Übersicht. In H. Matthöfer, ed., Bürgerbeteiligung und Bürgerinitiativen, Argumente in der Energiediskussion, Vol. 3, pp. 282–93. Neckar Verlag, Villingen
1997. Unequal participation: Democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91 (1): 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1959. The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review, 19: 79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindbloom, C. 1965. The Intelligence of Democracy. Decision Making Through Mutual Adjustment. Basic Books, New York
Linder, W., and Vatter, A. 1996. Kriterien zur Evaluation von Partizipationsverfahren. In K. Selle, ed., Planung und Kommunikation, pp. 181–8. Bauverlag, Wiesbaden and Berlin
Lindner, C. 1990. Kritik der partizipatorischen Demokratie. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
Linnerooth-Bayer, J. 1995. The Varresbecker Bach participatory process: An evaluation. In O. Renn, Th.Webler and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 203– 21. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
, and 1996. Conflicting views on fair siting processes: Evidence from Austria and the U.S. Risk – Health, Safety&Environment, 7 (2): 119–34Google Scholar
1997. Evaluation of two siting strategies: The case of two UK waste tire incincerators. Risk – Health, Safety and Environment, 8 (1): 63–77Google Scholar
Löfstedt, R. 2001. Trust and Risk Management. Manuscript. Kings College, London
1964. Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32: 298–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowi, T. 1979. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. Norton, New York
1982. The world society as a social system. International Journal of General Systems, 8: 131–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1983. Legitimation durch Verfahren. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
Luhmann, N. 1984. Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt
Luhmann, N. 1986. The autopoiesis of social systems. In R. F. Geyer and J. van der Zouven, eds., Sociocybernetic Paradoxes: Observation, Control and Evolution of Self-Steering Systems, pp. 172–92. Sage, London
Luhmann, N. 1989. Ecological Communication. Polity Press, Cambridge
1990. Technology, environment, and social risk: A systems perspective. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 4: 223–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1993. Risk: A Sociological Theory. Aldine de Gruyter, New York
1986. The interplay of science and values in assessing and regulating environmental risks. Science, Technology and Human Values, 11 (2): 40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1987. Citizen involvement in hazardous waste sites: Two North Carolina success stories. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 7: 347–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1990. Public participation in risk management decisions: The right to define, the right to know, and the right to act. Risk – Issues in Health and Safety, 1: 95–101Google Scholar
Lynn, F. M., and Kartez, J. D. 1995. The redemption of citizen advisory committees: A perspective from critical theory. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 87–102. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
MacLean, D. 1986. Social values and the distribution of risk. In D. MacLean, ed., Values at Risk, pp. 75–93. Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa
, and 1994. Resolving environmental disputes:Aframework for incorporating decision analysis and dispute resolution techniques. Journal of Environmental Management, 42: 31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1979. Process and outcome in regulatory decision-making. American Behavioral Scientist, 22 (5): 561–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majone, G. 1989. Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT, and London
1978. Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the rationality of choice. Bell Journal of Economics, 9: 587–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margolis, H. 1996. Dealing with Risk. Why the Public and the Experts Disagree on Environmental Issues. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
1990. Kommunikation über Risiken – Eine Theorie-Skizze. Schweizerische Zeitschrift f ür Soziologie, 3: 385–420Google Scholar
, and 1999. Between consensus and citizens: Public participation in technology assessment in France. Science Studies, 12 (2): 3–32Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. 1987. Politische Steuerung und gesellschaftliche Steuerungsprobleme. Anmerkungen zu einem theoretischen Paradigma. In T. Ellwein, J. J. Hesse, R. Mayntz, and F. W. Scharpf, eds., Jahrbuch zur Staats- und Verwaltungswissenschaft, Vol. 1, pp. 89–100. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Mazmanian, D. 1976. Participatory democracy in a federal agency. In J. Pierce and H. Doerksen, eds., Water Politics and Public Involvement, pp. 127–36. Science Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI
McCarthy, T. 1975. Translator's introduction. In J. Habermas, Legitimation Crisis. Beacon Press, Boston
1996. The structured value referendum: Eliciting preferences for environmental policy alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 15 (2): 227–513.0.CO;2-L>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. Ten propositions for untangling descriptive and prescriptive lessons in risk perception findings. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 59: 129–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkhofer, L. W. 1986. Comparative analysis of formal decision making approaches. In: V. T. Covello, J. Menkes, and J. Mumpower, eds., Risk Evaluation and Management, pp. 183–220. Plenum, New York
Mernitz, S. 1980. Mediation of Environmental Disputes: A Source-Book. Praeger, New York
1998. Risk and decision-making:Atheoretical approach to public participation in techno-scientific conflict situations. Technology in Society, 20: 87–98Google Scholar
1981. Citizen surveys as citizen participation. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 17 (4): 478–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1873. Considerations on Representative Government. Henry Holt and Company, New York
Moore, C. 1986. The Mediation Process. Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
1996. Defining “successful” environmental dispute resolution: Case studies from public land planning in the United States and Australia. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 16: 151–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morell, D., and Magorian, C. 1982. Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities: Local Opposition and the Myth of Preemption. Ballinger, Cambrige
Münch, R. 1982. Basale Soziologie: Soziologie der Politik. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
National Research Council. 1988. Complex Mixtures. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Nelkin, D. 1977. Technological Decisions and Democracy. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
, and 1979. Public participation in technological decisions: Reality or grand illusion?Technology Review, 6 (August/September): 55–64Google Scholar
Nelkin, D., and Pollak, M. 1980. Problems and procedures in the regulation of technological risk. In C. H. Weiss and A. F. Burton, eds., Making Bureaucracies Work, pp. 233–53. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
Nicholson, M. 1991. Negotiation, agreement and conflict resolution: The role of rational approaches and their criticism. In R. Väyrynen, ed., New Directions in Conflict Theory. Conflict Resolution and Conflict Transformation. Sage, Newbury Park
1978. Environmental mediation: The state-of-the-art?Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2 (October): 9–17Google Scholar
O'Hare, M. 1990. The importance of compensation and joint gains in environmental disputes. In W. Hoffmann-Riem and E. Schmidt-ßmann, eds., Konfliktbewältigung durch Verhandlungen, pp. 191–204. Nomos, Baden-Baden
O'Hare, M., Bacow, L., and Sanderson, D. 1983. Facility Siting and Public Opposition. Van Nostrand Reinholt, New York
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Olson, M. 1984. Participatory Pluralism: Political Participation and Influence in the United States and Sweden. Nelson-Hall, Chicago
Okrent, D. 1996. Risk perception research program and applications: Have they received enough peer review? In C. Cacciabue and I. A. Papazoglou eds., Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, PSAM3, Vol. ⅱ, pp. 1255–60. Springer, Berlin
1998. Risk perception and risk management: On knowledge, resource allocation and equity. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety, 59: 17–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Riordan, T., and Wynne, B. 1987. Regulating environmental risks: A comparative perspective. In P. R. Kleindorfer and H. C. Kunreuther, eds., Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond, pp. 389–410. Springer, Berlin
Parson, T. E. 1951. The Social System. Free Press, Glencoe, IL
1963. On the concept of political power. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 17: 352–403Google Scholar
Parsons, T. E. 1967. Sociological Theory and Modern Society. Free Press, New York
Parsons, T. E. 1971. The System of Modern Societies. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Parsons, T. E., and Shils, E. A., eds. 1951. Toward a General Theory of Action. cambridge: Cambridge University Press
1986. Negotiated rulemaking in practice. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5 (Spring): 482–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perrow, C. 1984. Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, Basic Books, New York
6. 2000. The morality of managing risk: Paternalism, prevention and precaution, and the limits of proceduralism. Risk Research, 3 (2), 135–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, R. G. 1995. A study of factors determining perceptions of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication. Ph.D. Thesis. Columbia University School of Public Health, New York
1979. The public-expert interface in local waste management decisions: Expertise, credibility, and process. Public Understanding of Science, 6 (4): 359–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, L. D. 1979. Introduction to Decision Analysis, Tutorial Paper 79-1. London School of Economics and Political Science, London
1997. The limits to safety? Calture, politics, learning and manmade disasters. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 5 (1), 1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkau, K., and Renn, O., eds., 1998. Environmental Standard Setting. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
Pollak, M. 1985. Public participation. In H. Otway and M. Peltu, eds., Regulating Industrial Risk, pp. 76–94. Butterworths, London
President's Council on Sustainable Development. 1997. Lessons Learned from Collaborative Approaches. President's Council on Sustainable Development, Washington, DC
Priddat, B. P. 1996. Risiko, Ungewißheit und Neues: Epistemiologische Probleme ökonomischer Entscheidungsbildung. In G. Banse, ed., Risikoforschung zwischen Disziplinarität und Interdisziplinarität. Von der Illusion der Sicherheit zum Umgang mit Unsicherheit, pp. 105–24. Edition Sigma, Berlin
Primack, J., and von Hippel, F. 1974. Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena. Basic Books, New York
1986. Trends in the scientific study of negotiation and mediation. Negotiation Journal, 2 (July): 237–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and 1981. A competing values approach to organizational analysis. Public Productivity Review, 5: 141–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, R. E., and Rohrbaugh, J. W. 1983. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29: 369
Raiffa, H. 1994. The Art and Science of Negotiation. 12th edition. cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rayner, S. 1987. Risk and relativism in science for policy. In V. T. Covello and B. B. Johnson, eds., The Social and Cultural Construction of Risk, pp. 5–23. Reidel, Dordrecht
Rayner, S. 1990. Risk in Cultural Perspective: Acting under Uncertainty. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Norwell
, and 1987. How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Analysis, 7: 3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reagan, M., and Fedor-Thurman, V. 1987. Public participation: Reflections on the California energy policy experience. In J. DeSario and S. Langton, eds., Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making, pp. 89–113. Greenwood, Westport, CT
1986. Decision analytic tools for resolving uncertainty in the energy debate. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 93 (2 and 3): 167–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, O. 1992. The social arena concept of risk debates. In S. Krimsky and D. Golding, eds., Social Theories of Risk, pp. 169–97. Praeger, Westport, CT
1995. Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22 (June): 147–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1998. The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management. Risk Decision and Policy 3 (1): 5–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999a. A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environmental Science and Technology, 33 (18): 3049–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1999b. Participative technology assessment: Meeting the challenges of uncertainty and ambivalence. Futures Research Quarterly, 15 (3): 81–97Google Scholar
Renn, O. 1999c. Diskursive Verfahren der Technikfolgenabschätzung. In Th. Petermann and R. Coenen, eds., Technikfolgenabschätzung in Deutschland. Bilanz und Perspektiven, pp. 115–30. Campus, Frankfurt am Main
Renn, O., and Levine, D. 1990. Credibility and trust in risk communication. In R. Kasperson and P. J. Stallen, eds., Communicating Risk to the Public, pp. 175–218. Kluwer, Dordrecht
, and 1992. Anticipating conflicts: Public participation in managing the solid waste crisis. GAIA Ecological Perspectives in Science, Humanities, and Economics, 1 (2): 84–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renn, O., and Webler, Th. 1998. Der kooperative Diskurs – Theoretische Grundlagen, Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten. In O. Renn, H. Kastenholz, P. Schild, and U. Wilhelm, eds., Abfallpolitik im kooperativen Diskurs. Bürgerbeteiligung bei der Standortsuche f ür eine Deponie im Kanton Aargau, pp. 3–103. Hochschulverlag AG, Zürich
Renn, O., Albrecht, G., Kotte, U., Peters, H. P., and Stegelmann, H. U. 1985. Sozialverträgliche Energiepolitik. Ein Gutachten f ür die Bundesregierung, HTV Edition. Technik und Sozialer Wandel, Munich
Renn, O., Goble, R., Levine, D., Rakel, H., and Webler, Th. 1989. Citizen Participation for Sludge Management, Final Report to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. CENTED, Clark University, Worcester
Renn, O., Schrimpf, M., Büttner, Th., Carius, R., Köberle, S., Oppermann, B., Schneider, E., and Zöller, K. 1999. Abfallwirtschaft 2005. Bürger planen ein regionales Abfallkonzept. Nomos, Baden-Baden
Renn, O., Webler, Th., and Wiedemann, P. 1995. The pursuit of fair and competent citizen participation. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 339–68. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
, , , , and 1985. Public participation in decision making: A three-step-procedure. Policy Sciences, 26: 189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rip, A. 1985. Experts in public arenas. In H. Otway and M. Peltu, eds., Regulating Industrial Risks, pp. 94–110. Butterworth, London
Rip, A. 1992. The development of restrictedness in the sciences. In N. Elias, H. Martins, and R. Whitley, eds., Scientific Establishments and Hierarchies, pp. 219–38. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
, and 1999. Democracy and environmental decision-making. Environmental Values, 8: 75–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roch, I. 1997. Evaluation der 3. Phase des Bürgerbeteiligungsverfahrens in der Region Nordschwarzwald, Research Report Nr. 71. Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart
1992. The evaluation of risk communication effectiveness. Acta Psychologica, 81: 169–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohrmann, B. 1999. Risk perception research: Review and documentation. Studies in Risk Communication, No. 68. Research Center J ülich, J ülich
Rohrmann, B., and Renn, O. 2000. Introduction. In O. Renn and B. Rohrmann, eds., Cross-Cultural Risk Perception, pp. 5–32. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
1995. Scientific expertise among political powers, administrators and public opinion. Science and Public Policy, 22 (3): 175–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1988. NAMBY PAMBY and NIMBY PIMBY: Public issues in the siting of hazardous waste facilities. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 3: 114–23Google Scholar
1997. Metatheoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1 (1): 15–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, N. 1976. Citizen Involvement in Land Use Governance. The Urban Institute, Washington, DC
Rosenbaum, N. 1978. Citizen participation and democratic theory. In S. Langton, ed., Citizen Participation in America, pp. 43–54. Lexington Books, Lexington
Rosenbaum, W. 1979. Elitism and citizen participation. In S. Langton, ed., Citizen Participation Perspectives. Proceedings of the National Conference on Citizen Participation (Sept. 28–Oct. 1, 1978), Washington, DC. Tufts University Lincoln Filene Center for Citizenship and Public Affairs, Medford
1982. Making bureaucracy responsive: A study of the impacts of citizen participation and staff recommendations on regulatory decision making. Public Administration Review, 42: 339–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1997. Participation run amok: The costs of mass participation for deliberative agency decisionmaking. Northwestern University Law Review, 92: 173–249Google Scholar
, and 2000. Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 225 (1): 3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushefsky, M. 1984. Institutional mechanisms for resolving risk controversies, In: S. G. Hadden, ed., Risk Analysis, Institutions, and Public Policy, pp. 133–148, Associated Faculty Press, Port Washington, NY
Rymann, C. 1993. Demokratische Evaluation eines Deponiestandortes im östlichen Kantonsteil des Kantons Aaregau.Kantonsschule Wohlen, Aarau
Sager, T. 1994. Communicative Planning Theory. Aldershot, Avebury
1991. Die Handlungsfähigkeit des Staates am Ende des zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 32 (4): 621–34Google Scholar
1999. “Earth system” analysis and the second copernican revolution. Nature, 402 (December): C19–C23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheuch, E. K. 1980. Kontroverse um Energie – ein echter oder ein Stellvertreterstreit. In H. Michaelis, ed., Existenzfrage Energie, 279–293. Econ, Düsseldorf
Schmidt, M. 2000. Demokratietheorien, 3rd edition. Leske + Budrich, Opladen
, , and 1998. Implementing structured participation for regional level waste management planning. Risk – Health, Safety & Environment, 9 (Fall): 379–95Google Scholar
1983. Limits and dangers of environmental mediation: A review essay. New York University Law Review, 58 (December): 1453–76Google Scholar
Sclove, R. 1995. Democracy and Technology. Guilford Press, New York
Scott, W., and Meyer, W. 1991. The organization of societal sectors: Proposition and early evidence. In W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, pp. 108–40. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Seligman, A. B. 1993. The Idea of Civil Society. Free Press, New York
Shrader-Frechette, K. 1985. Risk Analysis and Scientific Method: Methodological and Ethical Problems with Evaluating Societal Risks. Reidel, Dordrecht
1990. Scientific method, anti-foundationalism, and public policy. Risk – Issues in Health and Safety, 1: 23–41Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. 1991. Risk and Rationality. Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. University of California Press, Berkeley
1997. Politics and the struggle to define: A discourse analysis of the framing strategies of competing actors in a “new” participatory forum. British Journal of Sociology, 48 (3): 493–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slovic, P. 1992. Perception of risk: Reflections on the psychometric paradigm. In D. Golding and S. Krimsky, eds., Theories of Risk, pp. 117–52. Praeger, London
, , and 1981. Perceived risk: Psychological factors and social implications. Proceedings of the Royal Society, A376: 17–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starr, Ch., and Whipple, C. 1980. Risks of risk decisions. Science, 208 (4403): 1116CrossRef
1991. Learning through conflict: A realistic strategy for risk communication. Policy Sciences, 24: 99–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, P. C., and Fineberg, V. 1996. Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. National Research Council, Committee on Risk Characterization, National Academy Press, Washington, DC
Stewart, J., Kendall, E., and Coote, A. 1994. Citizen Juries. Institute for Public Research, London
Stirling, A. 1999. On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risks.Final report of a project for the EC Forward Studies Unit under auspices of the ESTO Network. Report EUR 19056 EN. European Commission, Brussels
Stolwijk, J. A. J., and Canny, P. F. 1991. Determinants of public participation in the management of technological risk. In M. Shubik, ed., Risk, Organizations, and Society, pp. 33–48. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
Susskind, L. E., and Cruishank, J. 1987. Breaking the Impasse: Consensual Approaches to Resolving Public Disputes. Basic Books, New York
Susskind, L. E., and Fields, P. 1996. Dealing with an Angry Public: The Mutual Gains Approach to Resolving Disputes. The Free Press, New York
, and 1985. Mediating public disputes: Obstacles and possibilities. Journal of Social Issues, 41: 145–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Susskind, L. E., Bacow, L., and Wheeler, M. 1083. Resolving Environmental Regulatory Disputes. Schenkman, Cambridge
Talbot, A. 1983. Settling Things: Six Case Studies in Environmental Mediation. Conservation Foundation/Ford Foundation:Washington, DC
1990. Public involvement in public management: Adapting and testing a borrowed theory. Public Administration Review, 50: 435–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, M., Ellis, W., and Wildavsky, A. 1990. Cultural Theory.Westview Press, Boulder, CO
1988. Agriculture, biotechnology, and the political evaluation of risk. Policy Studies Journal, 17 (1): 97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuler, S. 1996. Meanings, Understandings, and Interpersonal Relationships in Environmental Policy Discourse. Doctoral Dissertation. Clark University, Worcester
, and 1995. Process evaluation for discoursive decision making in environmental and risk policy. Human Ecological Review, 2: 62–74Google Scholar
and 1999. Designing an analytic deliberative process for environmental health policy making in the U. S. nuclear weapons complex. Risk – Health, Safety & Environment, 10 (1): 65–87Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1983. Community Relations in Superfund: A Handbook. EPA: Washington, DC
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1987. Unfinished Business: A Comparative Assessment of Environmental Problems. EPA: Washington, DC
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2000. Policy on alternative dispute resolution. Federal Register, 65 (249), December 27: 81858–60
van Asselt, M. B. A. 2000. Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
van den Daele, W. 1992. Scientific evidence and the regulation of technical risks: Twenty years of demythologizing the experts. In N. Stehr and R. V. Ericson, eds., The Culture and Power of Knowledge. Inquiries into Contemporary Societies, pp. 323–40. de Gruyter, Berlin
van den Daele, W. 2000. Interpreting the precautionary principle – Political versus legal perspectives. In M. P. Cottam, D. W. Harvey, R. P. Paper, and J. Tait eds., Foresight and Precaution, Vol. 1, pp. 213–21. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam and Brookfield
van Valey, T. L., and Petersen, J. C. 1987. Public service science centers: The Michigan experience. In J. DeSario and S. Langton, eds., Citizen Participation in Public Decision Making, pp. 39–63. Greenwood Press, Westport
Vari, A. 1989. Approaches towards conflict resolution in decision processes. In C. Vlek and G. Cvetkowich, eds., Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects, pp. 74–94. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Vari, A. 1995. Citizens' advisory committee as a model for public participation: A multiple-criteria evaluation. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 103–16. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
Viscusi, W. K. 1998. Rational Risk Policy. The 1996 Arne Ryde Memorial Lectures. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York
1996. A multi-level, multi-stage and multi-attribute perspective on risk assessment, decision-making, and risk control. Risk, Decision, and Policy, 1 (1): 9–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlek, C. A., and Cvetkovich, G. 1989. Social decision making on technological projects: Review of key issues and a recommended procedure. In C. Vlek and G. Cvetkovich, eds., Social Decision Methodology for Technological Projects, pp. 297–322. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Vogel, D. 1986. National Styles of Regulation: Environmental Policy in Great Britain and the United States. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
von Schomberg, R. 1992. Argumentation im Kontext wissenschaftlicher Kontroversen. In K.-O. Apel and M. Kettener, eds., Zur Anwendung der Diskursethik in Politik, Recht, Wissenschaft, pp. 260–77. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main
von Schomberg, R. 1995. The erosion of the valuespheres. The ways in which society copes with scientific, moral and ethical uncertainty. In R. von Schomberg, ed., Contested Technology. Ethics, Risk and Public Debate, pp. 13–28. International Centre for Human and Public Affairs, Tilburg
von Winterfeldt, D. 1987. Value tree analysis: An introduction and an application to offshore oil drilling. In P. R. Kleindorfer and H. C. Kunreuther, eds., Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and Beyond, pp. 349–76. Springer, Berlin
von Winterfeldt, D., and Edwards, W. 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Vorwerk, V., and Kämper, E. 1997. Evaluation der 3. Phase des Bürgerbeteiligungsverfahrens in der Region Nordschwarzwald. Working Report No. 70. Center of Technology Assessment, Stuttgart
Wachlin, K. D., and Renn, O. 1999. Diskurse an der Akademie für TA in Baden-Württemberg: Verständigung, Abwägung, Gestaltung, Vermittlung. In S. Bröchler, G. Simonis, and K. Sundermann, eds., Handbuch Technikfolgenabsch ätzung, Vol. 2, pp. 713–22. Sigma, Berlin
Waldo, J. 1987.Win/win does work. Timber-Fish-Wildlife. A Report from the Northwest Renewable Resouirces Center, 1 (1): 7
1995. Knowledge, power and environmental policy: Expertise, the lay public and water management in the western United States. The Environmental Professional, 7: 153–66Google Scholar
1993. Can participatory democracy produce better selves? Psychological dimensions of Habermas discursive model of democracy. Political Psychology, 14: 209–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, N. S. J. 1987. Mobilisierungspotential und gesellschaftliche Bedeutung der neuen sozialen Bewegungen. In R. Roth and D. Rucht, eds., Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, pp. 47–67. Campus, Franfurt/Main
WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change). 2000. World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks. Springer, Berlin
Webler, Th. 1994. Experimenting with a New Democratic Instrument in Switzerland: Siting a Landfill in the Eastern Part of Canton Aargau. Working Paper. Polyproject: Safety of Technological Systems. Swiss Institute of Technology, Zürich
Webler, Th. 1995. “Right” discourse in citizen participation. An evaluative yardstick. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 35–86. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
1999. The craft and theory of public participation:Adialectical process. Risk Research, 2 (1): 55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webler, Th., and Renn, O. 1995. A brief primer on participation: Philosophy and practice. In O. Renn, Th. Webler, and P. Wiedemann, eds., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Evaluating New Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 17–34. Kluwer, Dordrecht and Boston
, and 1999. Integrating technical analysis with deliberation in regional watershed management planning: Applying the National Research Council approach. Policy Studies Journal, 27 (3): 530–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1995b. Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15: 443–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 1991. The Group Delphi: A novel attempt at reducing uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 39 (3): 253–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , , and 1995a. Eliciting and classifying concerns: A methodological critique. Risk Analysis, 15 (3): 421–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehrli-Schindler, B. 1987. Demokratische Mitwirkung in der Raumplanung. SVPW, Bern
Weidner, H. 1993. Mediation as a Policy for Resolving Environmental Disputes with Special References to Germany. Manuscript of the Series “Mediationsverfahren im Umweltschutz.” Science Center, Berlin
Weingart, P. 1979. Das ‘Harrisburg-Syndrom’ oder die De-Professionalisierung der Experten. Preface to H. Nowotny, Kernenergie: Gefahr oder Notwendigkeit, pp. 9–17. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main
1983. Verwissenschaftlichung der Gesellschaft – Politisierung der Wissenschaft. Zeitschrift f ür Soziologie, 12: 225–41Google Scholar
Wiesendahl, E. 1987. Neue soziale Bewegungen und moderne Demokratietheorie. In R. Roth and D. Rucht, eds., Neue Soziale Bewegungen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, pp. 364–84. Campus, Franfurt/Main
Willke, H. 1985. Systemtheorie ⅲ. Steuerungstheorie. UTB Fischer, Stuttgart and Jena
1985. The importance of process in resolving environmental disputes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 5 (December): 341–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and 1996. Teetering at the Top of the ladder: The experience of citizen group participants in alternative dispute resolution processes. Sociological Perspectives, 39 (2): 249–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. 1984. Public perceptions of risk. In J. Aurrey, ed., The Urban Transportation of Irradiated Fuel, pp. 246–59. Macmillan, London
1992a. Uncertainty and environmental learning. Reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2 (June): 111–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynne, B. 1992b. Risk and social learning: Reification to engagement. In S. Krimsky and D. Golding, eds., Social Theories of Risk, pp. 275–97. Praeger, Westport, CT
Yankelovich, D. 1991. Coming to Public Judgment. Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY
, and 1998. Managing and communicating stakeholderbased decision making. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 4: 643–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeckhauser, R., and Viscusi, K. W. 1996. The risk management dilemma. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Special Issue, H. Kunreuther and P. Slovic, eds., Challenges in Risk Assessment and Risk Management, pp. 144–55. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Zillßen, H. 1993. Die Modernisierung der Demokratie im Zeichen der Umweltpolitik. In H. Zilleβen, P. C. Dienel, and W. Strubelt, eds., Die Modernisierung der Demokratie, pp. 17–39.Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen
- 16
- Cited by