Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2020
  • Online publication date: September 2020

5 - What Are Journalists for Today?

from Part II - Journalism in Times of Change

Summary

This chapter considers the question of journalists’ purposes. Matthew Powers and Sandra Vera–Zambrano argue that transformations in media and public life (e.g., distrust in news media, distressed business models) make revisiting the question especially urgent. Where scholars typically answer the question normatively, the authors suggest the question can also be analyzed empirically. Drawing on research in France and the United States, they argue that journalists reproduce and legitimate existing social hierarchies, with individuals from lower middle–class backgrounds producing practical information for popular audiences, while those from upper middle–class backgrounds tending to orient themselves toward civic aims for audiences with higher volumes of economic and cultural capital. They suggest that both the question and this answer can link scholarship on media and public life to a rich array of theoretical debates often ignored in contemporary debates that emphasize chaos, fluidity, and disorder in journalism – long focused on the establishment and maintenance of social order, the hierarchies that these orders legitimate, and the inequalities they help reproduce.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Benson, Rodney and Neveu, Erik (eds.) (2005). Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1990). In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1996). The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power. New York, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hanitzsch, Thomas, Hanusch, Folker, Ramaprasad, Jyotika, and de Beer, Arnold S. (eds.) (2019). The Worlds of Journalism: Journalistic Cultures around the Globe. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lafarge, Gérauld and Marchetti, Dominique (2017). “Les Hiérarchies de l’information. Les Légitimités Professionnelles des Étudiants en Journalisme.” Sociétés Contemporaines, 106(2), 2144.
Lippmann, Walter (1922). Public Opinion. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Londres, Albert (1929). Terre d’Ébène. Paris: Albin Michel.
Muhlmann, Géraldine (2010). Journalism for Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.
Powers, Matthew, Vera-Zambrano, Sandra, and Baisnée, Olivier (2015). “The News Crisis Compared: The Impact of the Journalism Crisis in Toulouse, France and Seattle, Washington.” In Nielson, R. K. (ed.) Local Journalism: The Decline of Newspapers and the Rise of Digital Media (pp. 3150). London: I.B. Tauris.
Powers, Matthew and Vera-Zambrano, Sandra (2016). “Explaining the Formation of Online News Startups in France and the United States: A Field Analysis.” Journal of Communication, 66(5), 857877.
Powers, Matthew and Vera-Zambrano, Sandra (2018). “How Journalists Use Social Media in France and the United States: Analyzing Technology Use Across Journalistic Fields.” New Media & Society, 20(8), 27282744.
Rosen, Jay (1999). What Are Journalists For? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Russell, Adrienne (2016). Journalism as Activism: Recoding Media Power. Cambridge: Polity.
Schudson, Michael (2008). Why Democracies Need an Unlovable Press. Cambridge: Polity.
Siebert, Fred, Peterson, Theodore, and Schramm, Wilbur, (1956). Four Theories of the Press: The Authoritarian, Libertarian, Social Responsibility, and Soviet Concepts of What the Press Should Be and Do. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Stroud, Natalie (2011). Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford.
Usher, Nikki (2014). Making News at the New York Times. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Van Aelst, Peter, Strömbäck, Jesper, Aalberg, Toril, Esser, Frank, de Vreese, Claes et al. (2017). Political Communication in a High-Choice Media Environment: A Challenge for Democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 327.
Waisbord, Silvio (2019). Communication: A Post-Discipline. Cambridge: Polity.