Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Durkheim and the Social Character of the Categories
- 2 Historical Background: Aristotle and Kant
- 3 The Categories in Early-Nineteenth-Century French Philosophy
- 4 The Later Eclectic Spiritualism of Paul Janet
- 5 The Early Development of Durkheim's Thought
- 6 Durkheim's Sociological Theory of the Categories
- 7 Prospects for the Sociological Theory of the Categories
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
1 - Durkheim and the Social Character of the Categories
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface and Acknowledgments
- 1 Durkheim and the Social Character of the Categories
- 2 Historical Background: Aristotle and Kant
- 3 The Categories in Early-Nineteenth-Century French Philosophy
- 4 The Later Eclectic Spiritualism of Paul Janet
- 5 The Early Development of Durkheim's Thought
- 6 Durkheim's Sociological Theory of the Categories
- 7 Prospects for the Sociological Theory of the Categories
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Around the turn of the twentieth century, Émile Durkheim (1858–1917) and Marcel Mauss (1872–1950) proposed that the most basic categories of thought, including space, time, class, and causality, are social in character. Their thesis — that language and experience are structured by categories that are social in character — had a profound impact on twentieth-century thought, especially in the social sciences. Among sociologists and anthropologists in particular, it was a major source of inspiration for the popular and heady doctrine that people construct culturally specific perceptual realities through the use of culturally variable sets of categories. For these social scientists, the term “category” took on a very different signification than the original meanings we find in either Aristotle or Immanuel Kant (1724–1804). They treated the categories as belonging to some sort of conceptual scheme or framework through which we perceive the world, rather than as Aristotle's highest predicables or Kant's concepts that are logically presupposed by experience. To understand how this change in the conception of a category came about, we have to consider how Kant was interpreted in the nineteenth-century philosophical tradition from which Durkheim's sociological theory of the categories emerged. That is the purpose of this book.
In arguing for the social causes and origins of the categories, Durkheim was responding to the way in which Kant's philosophy was understood in the Third Republic.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rethinking Durkheim and his Tradition , pp. 1 - 26Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004